ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04752098Updated Apr 27, 2025

A Study to Assess Metabolic Bone Disease of Prematurity Using an Acoustic Method

An interventional study of Vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), based on ultrasound radiation force in Metabolic Bone Disease, Osteopenia and Neonatal Rickets, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Days to 8 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-27.

Primary conditionRicketsRegistry: Bone Diseases, MetabolicReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Bone Diseases, Metabolic — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Rickets
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Rickets, a narrower term within Bone Diseases, Metabolic.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2020, registered Feb 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
37
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Days to 8 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this project is to develop a new noninvasive ultrasound based technique, called vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), for evaluation of infant bone health with particular application in assessment of bone health in premature infants who are at risk for bone disease.

Read the detailed description

With increased survival of very low birth weight and premature infants over recent decades, bone assessment has become especially vital with the recognition of metabolic bone disease (MBD) of prematurity. Bone assessment became especially vital during last decades with the growing emphasis on metabolic bone disease of prematurity and low-birth-weight infants. Statistics shows that up to 50% of low birth weight and preterm newborns are likely to develop metabolic bone disease. Currently, no screening test has been shown to provide both sensitive and specific evidence of developing MBD over the first several weeks of life in the premature infants. Therefore, there is a need for a non-invasive tool for evaluation of infant bone health. This study will be conducted on premature infants at risk for MBD at multiple time points during their growth, with full term infants as controls. vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA) measurements will be done on the tibia. VAA measurements for the premature infants will be compared to those of full term infants. Performance of VAA in identifying osteopenia and its ability to monitor the response to treatment will be evaluated. The investigators will use an ultrasound system that has been used in the pilot study and employ a transducer with a smaller footprint for pediatric application.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolic Bone Disease
  • Osteopenia
  • Neonatal Rickets

Keywords

  • Bone Diseases
  • bone health
  • Fracture
  • infancy
  • Low Birth Weight Infant
  • mineralization
  • Neonatal
  • Pediatrics
  • Premature
  • ultrasound
  • Rickets
03

In context

Rickets Reclassified

36 studies on the registry are indexed under Rickets; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 37 is above the median of 23 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Rickets.

Browse Rickets studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Compared within Rickets, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Bone Diseases, Metabolic. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Days to 8 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Full term newborns, approximately equal number of male and female newborn, age \<28 days.
  • Preterm infants, approximately equal number of male and female preterm infants with gestational age at birth \<37 weeks or birth weight \<1500 grams.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants currently requiring continuous cardiovascular medication infusions, including but not limited to, dopamine, epinephrine, milrinone, and dobutamine (may have received these medications in the past.
  • Infants with major congenital anomalies that may affect bone health or structure.
  • For full term infants, infants with a history of intrauterine growth restriction or who are small for gestational age (\<10th percentile for weight) at birth.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    premature infants and full term infants

    The study visits will be at ≥3 time points at ages: within the first 28 days after birth, 2 months, 3 months, and, if still hospitalized, at 4 months and at 6 months. * The ultrasound machine to the nursery or neonatal intensive care unit at a scheduled time. * The appropriate ultrasound probe will be placed on the infant's tibia and a miniature hydrophone near the probe. A series of ultrasound measurements will be obtained and the ultrasound data will be saved for offline processing. * The Investigators will repeat the measurement in 3 locations of the infant's tibia. * Each ultrasound measurement takes a few seconds. The complete ultrasound study will take about 15 minutes at each visit. * All procedures will be conducted in the nursery or neonatal intensive care unit to ensure infant safety. * The ultrasound measurement for full-term infants can be done in ultrasound lab.

    Diagnostic Test: Vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), based on ultrasound radiation force

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testVibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), based on ultrasound radiation force

    The study will develop and validate a new ultrasonic method for assessment of infant bone by evaluating structural and mechanical characteristics of the infant tibia. This project will utilize a novel, non-invasive method, vibro-acoustic analysis (VAA), to evaluate infant bone properties in a wide frequency range while reducing the artifacts from soft tissue.

    Also known as: ultrasound

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ultrasound Transducer Compatibility

    Successful acquisition and integration of a pediatric transducer with a footprint ≤ X cm² and focal depth ≤ Y mm (to be defined based on commercial availability and anatomical feasibility).

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Hydrophone Sensitivity and Size

    Selection and validation of a miniature hydrophone (e.g., diameter ≤ Z mm) with high sensitivity, characterized by its frequency response and minimum detectable pressure level.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Bandwidth Assessment

    Measurement of hydrophone bandwidth (in MHz) as a primary indicator of sensitivity and signal capture quality.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. System Performance Metrics

    Quantitative assessment of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and resolution improvements compared to the previous setup using standard adult-sized components.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Feasibility in Preclinical Models

    Demonstration of the optimized VAA system's ability to produce high-resolution, reproducible images in a neonatal bone phantom or relevant preclinical model.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quantitative Bone Health Index (BHI)

    Derived from vibro-acoustic assessment (VAA) of the tibia in both term and preterm infants, BHI will be compared across age-adjusted groups to determine baseline differences between preterm and term infants.

    Time frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years

  2. VAA Sensitivity to Gestational Age

    Correlation of VAA-derived parameters with gestational age at birth to assess the method's sensitivity in detecting bone development differences attributable to prematurity.

    Time frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years

  3. Longitudinal Changes in VAA Measurements

    Assessment of VAA parameter changes over serial visits in preterm infants undergoing standard nutritional or medical interventions. Evaluates VAA's ability to detect improvements or deteriorations in bone status over time.

    Time frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years

  4. Comparison with Clinical Markers (if available)

    Cross-validation of VAA findings with available clinical or biochemical markers of bone health (e.g., serum calcium, phosphate, ALP levels) to evaluate concurrent validity.

    Time frame: through the study completion, up to 3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04752098
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Azra Alizad (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2021
Start date
Sep 2, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2024
Completion
Aug 31, 2024
Last update
Apr 27, 2025

Study contacts

Azra Alizad, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion