CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06386315Updated Apr 22, 2026

Reduced Dose Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Procedure in Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Recurrent Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 7 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
112
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase II trial compares the safety, side effects and effectiveness of reduced dose radiation therapy to standard of care dose radiation in treating patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Standard of care radiation treatment for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma is usually delivered in 12 treatments. Studies have shown indolent lymphoma to be sensitive to radiation treatment, however, larger doses have higher rates of toxicities. A reduced radiation dose may be safe, tolerable and/or effective compared to standard of care radiation dose in treating patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To show that the experimental arm [9 gray (Gy) in 3 fractions, 8 Gy in 2 fractions, or 10 Gy in 5 fractions] has significantly reduced acute toxicity (grade ≥ 2 adverse events at least possibly related to radiation treatment within 14 days after the end of radiation treatment [according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5.0] compared to 24 Gy in 12 fractions.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate patient reported quality of life. II. To evaluate response rate. III. To evaluate local control rate. IV. To evaluate relapse-free survival.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Financial toxicity will be assessed at the end of radiation treatment. II. Financial health care expenditure will be assessed at the end of radiation treatment III. Late toxicity.

CORRELATIVE RESEARCH OBJECTIVES:

I. Biopsies of enrolled patients will be evaluated for pathological assessment of cellular and genetic mutations to correlate them with disease local relapse and radiation resistance.

II. Patients will have their baseline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan undergo auto-segmentation to calculate the functional imaging 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesions glycolysis (TLG) and maximum standardized uptake volume (SUVmax) of the sites to be treated with involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) using MIMvista platform to correlate it with disease local relapse and treatment response.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo reduced dose ISRT once daily (QD) over 3, 2, or 5 treatment fractions. Patients also undergo CT or PET/CT throughout the study. Patients may additionally undergo endoscopy during screening and during follow up.

ARM II: Patients undergo standard of care (SOC) radiation therapy QD over 12 treatment fractions. Patients also undergo CT or PET/CT throughout the study. Patients may additionally undergo endoscopy during screening and during follow up.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at days 7 and 14, months 3 and 6, and then every 6 months for up to 2 years post-radiation therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Recurrent Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Recurrent Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Histological confirmation of indolent B-cell lymphoma that can include any of the following:

    • Follicular lymphoma (grade 1 or 2 or 3A)
    • Marginal zone lymphoma (nodal or extranodal)
    • Follicle center lymphoma
  • Any stage disease
  • Initial, refractory, or relapsed disease. If relapse involves the site to be treated there must be evidence of disease progression
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤ 3
  • Negative pregnancy test done ≤ 7 days prior to registration, for persons of childbearing potential only
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
  • Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up visits (during the active monitoring phase of the study). Virtual visits can also be considered as an option for applicable items
  • Confirmation from radiation oncologist of suitability to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following:

    • Pregnant women
    • Nursing women
    • Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception
  • T-cell lymphoma
  • Receiving treatment for small and chronic lymphocytic lymphoma
  • Grade 3B follicular lymphoma
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
112 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ARM 1 (reduced dose ISRT)

    Patients undergo reduced dose ISRT once daily (excluding weekends): 9 Gy delivered in 3 treatment fractions or 8 Gy in 2 fractions. At physician discretion, patients may receive 10 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients also undergo CT or PET/CT throughout the study. Patients may additionally undergo endoscopy during screening and during follow up.

    Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Endoscopic Procedure · Radiation: Involved-site Radiation Therapy (3 Fractions) · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Other: Questionnaire Administration

  • Active comparator
    ARM 2 (SOC ISRT)

    Patients undergo standard of care (SOC) radiation therapy once daily (excluding weekends): 24 Gy in 12 treatment fractions. Patients also undergo CT or PET/CT throughout the study. Patients may additionally undergo endoscopy during screening and during follow up.

    Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Endoscopic Procedure · Radiation: Involved-site Radiation Therapy (12 Fractions) · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Other: Questionnaire Administration

Interventions

  • ProcedureComputed Tomography

    Undergo CT or PET/CT

    Also known as: CAT, CAT Scan, Computed Axial Tomography, Computerized Axial Tomography, Computerized axial tomography (procedure), Computerized Tomography, Computerized Tomography (CT) scan, CT, CT Scan, tomography

  • ProcedureEndoscopic Procedure

    Undergo endoscopy

    Also known as: Endoscopic Examination, Endoscopy, ES

  • RadiationInvolved-site Radiation Therapy (3 Fractions)

    Undergo ISRT in 3 fractions

    Also known as: ISRT

  • RadiationInvolved-site Radiation Therapy (12 Fractions)

    Undergo ISRT in 12 fractions

    Also known as: ISRT

  • ProcedurePositron Emission Tomography

    Undergo PET/CT

    Also known as: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET, PET Scan, Positron emission tomography (procedure), Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, PT

  • OtherQuestionnaire Administration

    Ancillary studies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of grade 2 or higher acute adverse events (AEs)

    AEs will be graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Acute toxicity will be reported as a proportion calculated as the number of patients with acute toxicity divided by the total number of treatment patients. Treatment cycles are 5 days ±2 days (Arm 1) and 16 days ±2 days (Arm 2).

    Time frame: Up to 14 days after radiation treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response rate

    Response rate will be defined as the proportion of patients displaying response (complete response or partial response) at 3 months post treatment. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all signs of cancer in response to treatment. Partial response is defined decrease in the size of target lesions by ≥ 50%, with no increase in the size of any lesion and no appearance of new lesions. Treated patients who do not have a 3-month evaluation will be classified as a non-response. Treatment cycles are 5 days ±2 days (Arm 1) and 16 days ±2 days (Arm 2).

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after radiation treatment

  2. Time to progression rate

    Local control will be defined as the number of days from end of radiation treatment until first local recurrence within 24 months post radiation treatment. Treatment cycles are 5 days ±2 days (Arm 1) and 16 days ±2 days (Arm 2).

    Time frame: Up to 24 months after radiation treatment

  3. Patient reported quality of life

    Patient reported quality of life will be measured using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale, a 13-item questionnaire answered on a scale of 1-5 where 1=Not at all and 5=Very much. Treatment cycles are 5 days ±2 days (Arm 1) and 16 days ±2 days (Arm 2).

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after radiation treatment

07

Study locations

7 of 7 sites recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida
    Jacksonville, Florida 32224-9980, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea
    Albert Lea, Minnesota 56007, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic Health System - Mankato
    Mankato, Minnesota 56001, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic Health System-Eau Claire Clinic
    Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701, United States
    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare
    La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06386315
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 26, 2024
Start date
May 15, 2024
Primary completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Trials Referral Office
Contact
mayocliniccancerstudies@mayo.edu
855-776-0015
Brad S. Hoppe, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion