ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07101978HYPPRI-1Updated Sep 30, 2026

Hyperthermia in Patients With Chronic Primary Pain - Effects on Thermoregulation, Somatosensory System and Movement Evoked Pain

An interventional study of serial whole body hyperthermia in Hyperthermia, Chronic Primary Pain and Widespread Pain, sponsored by Bern University of Applied Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.

Sponsored by Bern University of Applied Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 30, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study, in a quasi-experimental matched two-group pre-post design, investigates the effect of serial water-filtered whole-body hyperthermia on circadian core body temperature, the somatosensory system (nociception) and the movement evoked pain in healthy and patients with chronic primary pain (e.g., fibromyalgia). The intervention lasts 3 weeks with two treatment sessions per week.

Read the detailed description

A total of 30 healthy participants and 30 participants with chronic primary pain between the ages of 18 and 70 are being sought. All participants will receive the same amount of water-filtered whole-body hyperthermia in outpatient or semi-inpatient treatment. All abnormalities and side effects will be documented by the responsible therapists and doctors. Changes in circadian core body temperature, sensory or nociceptive sensitivities of the somatosensory system, and movement-evoked pain will be recorded, and blood parameters for nociceptive plasticity will be collected. For secondary efficacy, specific questionnaires on pain experience, fatigue, depression, and fear avoidance behavior will be collected 7 and 25 weeks after therapy.

For women of childbearing potential, four measurements of circadian core body temperature are also taken during the pre-trial phase to monitor menstrual cycle variability and to correct for it in the main trial. To correctly determine menstrual cycle phases, blood samples to assess the levels of sex hormones, LH urine tests, and basal body temperature are collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperthermia
  • Chronic Primary Pain
  • Widespread Pain
  • Muscular Disease
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases
  • Neuromuscular Disease
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Circadian Rhythm
  • Body Temperature Changes
  • Somatosensory Function
  • Quantitative Sensory Testing
  • Healthy

Keywords

  • hyperthermia
  • widespread pain
  • chronic primary pain
  • circadian body temperature
  • quantitative sensory testing
  • healthy
03

In context

Hyperthermia

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperthermia; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 40 across 232 interventional studies indexed under Hyperthermia.

Browse Hyperthermia studies →

Lead sponsor

Bern University of Applied Sciences is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

patients:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of widespread pain (ICD-11 MG30.01)
  • Widespread Pain Index (WPI) ≥ 7 and Symptom Severity (SS) scale ≥ 5 or WPI) ≥ 3 and SS ≥ 9,
  • Pain >= 3 month and VAS >= 4,0
  • Body - infrared-A-Bulb Distance \< 38cm (overweight participants)
  • Signed declaration of consent

healthy:

  • No chronic illnesses
  • No acute infections
  • No regular medication: To avoid interactions
  • ≤ 40kg/cm2
  • Mental health: No psychiatric diagnoses or psychotropic medication in your medical history

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in other clinical studies
  • for hyperthermia (severe cardiovascular diseases, tumour diseases, acute infections, pregnant and breastfeeding women)
  • Acute and / or feverish microbial infections
  • Participants with severe somatic, rheumatic concomitant endocrine or neurological diseases, in particular neurological diseases associated with cognitive disorders, severe liver or kidney and cardiac diseases
  • participants who are permanently treated with opioids, cannabis, drugs (e.g. corticoids, immunosuppressants) or alpha/beta-A(nta)gonists due to a disease from the group described above
  • participants with pain due to a serious psychiatric illness (bipolar disorder, psychosis, personality disorder, severe depression, substance abuse) and serious systemic or neurological disorders
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding (for women)
  • Intake of medication within 6 weeks that inhibits the reuptake of the neurotransmitter serotonin or binds to receptors of this neurotransmitter group
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    serial whole body hyperthermia

    For the study, the method of water-filtered whole-body hyperthermia is used. The HT 3000 system (by heckel medizintechnik GmbH, Olgastrasse 25, 73728 Esslingen, Garmany) is used, in which the entire body is heated to a core body temperature above the physiological 37°C. The aim is to achieve a core body temperature of 38.5°C within the framework of mild whole-body hyperthermia. After this warm-up phase, a temperature plateau phase of about 15 minutes follows, in which an attempt is made to maintain the core body temperature of 38.5°C. In the temperature plateau phase, a slight increase in the body core temperature is usually observed. The total time required for a session is given as 2.5 to 3 hours, but this depends on the individual constitution and daily condition of the patient and can be subject to fluctuations.

    Behavioral: serial whole body hyperthermia

Interventions

  • Behavioralserial whole body hyperthermia

    The hyperthermia treatment is carried out in a cycle of two treatments per week, with at least one day in between, over a period of three weeks, according to the manufacturer's instructions. According to the guidelines, the rectal (possibly vaginal) temperature (as body core temperature), heart rate and oxygen saturation (Sp02) are continuously determined during the hyperthermiatreatment. During the treatment, continuous supervision by trained personnel is guaranteed, and a doctor is on call.

    Also known as: passive whole body hyperthermia, water filtered whole body hyperthermia, moderate whole body infrared-A hyperthermia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Circadian core body temperature

    A BodyCap HF (high-frequency) measurement capsule is used for circadian monitoring of core body temperature over a 24-hour period. The single-use capsule is swallowed and excreted naturally after the measurement.

    Time frame: Week 0

  2. Circadian core body temperature

    A BodyCap HF (high-frequency) measurement capsule is used for circadian monitoring of core body temperature over a 24-hour period. The single-use capsule is swallowed and excreted naturally after the measurement.

    Time frame: Week 5

  3. Cold detection threshold (CDT); °C

    CDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: Week 0

  4. Cold detection threshold (CDT); °C

    CDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: week 5

  5. Warm detection threshold (WDT); °C

    WDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: Week 0

  6. Warm detection threshold (WDT); °C

    WDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: week 5

  7. Thermal sensory limen (TSL) ; °C

    TSL is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm and cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) alternately 6x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate and count number of cold stimuli that are perceived as hot.

    Time frame: week 0

  8. Thermal sensory limen (TSL) ; °C

    TSL is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated warm and cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) alternately 6x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate and count number of cold stimuli that are perceived as hot.

    Time frame: week 5

  9. Cold pain threshold (CPT); °C

    CPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: week 0

  10. Cold pain threshold (CPT); °C

    CPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive cold temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: week 5

  11. Heat pain threshold (HPT); °C

    HPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive heat temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: week 0

  12. Heat pain threshold (HPT); °C

    HPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated nociceptive heat temperature stimuli (Thermode) 3x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculate.

    Time frame: week 5

  13. Mechanical detection threshold (MDT) ; mN

    MDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (different strengths Frey filaments) 10x applied to the skin Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  14. Mechanical detection threshold (MDT) ; mN

    MDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (different strengths Frey filaments) 10x applied to the skin Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  15. Mechanical pain threshold (MPT), count of sharp and blunt stimuli

    MPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 10x applied to the skin. Mechanical pain threshold (MPT). Count number of sharp and blunt stimuli. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  16. Mechanical pain threshold (MPT), count of sharp and blunt stimuli

    MPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 10x applied to the skin. Mechanical pain threshold (MPT). Count number of sharp and blunt stimuli. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  17. Mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) ; NRS

    MPS is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 35x applied to the skin. The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) is queried. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  18. Mechanical pain sensitivity (MPS) ; NRS

    MPS is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) 35x applied to the skin. The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) is queried. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  19. Summative pain amplification (WUR); NRS

    WUR (wind-up ratio) is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) single and seriell 10x applied to the skin. The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) for single and seriell stimuli are compared into relation. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  20. Summative pain amplification (WUR); NRS

    WUR (wind-up ratio) is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (PinPrick with different weights) single and seriell 10x applied to the skin. The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) for single and seriell stimuli are compared into relation. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  21. Vibration detection threshold (VDT) ; x/8

    VDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (64Hz tuning fork) 3x applied to the skin. The x/8 vibration is measure (0/8 no perception and 8/8 strengthest perception). Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  22. Vibration detection threshold (VDT) ; x/8

    VDT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (64Hz tuning fork) 3x applied to the skin. The x/8 vibration is measure (0/8 no perception and 8/8 strengthest perception). Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  23. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), kgf/1cm2

    PPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (pain pressure algometer) 5x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  24. Pressure pain threshold (PPT), kgf/1cm2

    PPT is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (pain pressure algometer) 5x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  25. Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), NRS

    DMA is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (brush, cotton wool and Q-Tip) 5x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculated. The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) ist queried. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 0

  26. Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA), NRS

    DMA is a part of quantitative sensory testing. A psychophysical testing method in which calibrated mechanical stimuli (brush, cotton wool and Q-Tip) 5x applied to the skin. Z-values are calculated. The Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain to 100 = worst pain imaginable) ist queried. Z-values are calculated.

    Time frame: week 5

  27. 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Walking back and forth as far as possible along a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes, taking breaks as needed ( total distance covered is recorded in meters, pain is measured before and after the test, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Week 0

  28. 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Walking back and forth as far as possible along a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes, taking breaks as needed ( total distance covered is recorded in meters, pain is measured before and after the test, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Week 5

Secondary outcomes

  1. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)

    The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Week 0

  2. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)

    The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Week 5

  3. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)

    The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)

    The instrument assesses subjective pain experience and evaluates both the quality and numerical intensity of pain (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable)

    Time frame: Week 30

  5. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

    Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain. It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain). The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").

    Time frame: Week 0

  6. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

    Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain. It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain). The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").

    Time frame: Week 5

  7. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

    Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain. It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain). The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").

    Time frame: Week 12

  8. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

    Is a psychological questionnaire designed to assess a person's beliefs about how physical activity and work may influence their pain. It focuses on fear-avoidance behaviours, particularly in individuals with musculoskeletal pain (e.g., low back pain). The questionnaire consists of 16 items divided into two subscales: physical activity (FABQ-PA) and work (FABQ-W). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from "completely disagree" to "completely agree").

    Time frame: Week 30

  9. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)

    An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)

    Time frame: Week 0

  10. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)

    An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)

    Time frame: Week 5

  11. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)

    An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)

    Time frame: Week 12

  12. Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20)

    An inventory including 20 questions about fatigue-symptoms (each from 1 ("Yes, that is true") to 5 ("No, that is not true")) covering 5 dimensions (general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity, mental fatigue)

    Time frame: Week 30

  13. General Depression Scale (ADS-L)

    is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D. (20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)

    Time frame: Week 0

  14. General Depression Scale (ADS-L)

    is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D. (20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)

    Time frame: Week 5

  15. General Depression Scale (ADS-L)

    is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D. (20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)

    Time frame: Week 12

  16. General Depression Scale (ADS-L)

    is a german self-report questionnaire designed to assess depressive symptoms in the general population adapted from the CES-D. (20 items, 4-point Likert scale (0 = rarely or none of the time, 3 = most or all of the time)

    Time frame: Week 30

  17. Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)

    Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain.

    Time frame: week 0

  18. Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)

    Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain.

    Time frame: week 5

  19. Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)

    Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain.

    Time frame: week 12

  20. Avoidance-Endurance Fast-Screen (AEFS)

    Description: Is a short screening questionnaire designed to identify maladaptive pain coping patterns, specifically avoidance and endurance behaviours in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. It differentiates between fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related coping styles (e.g., persistence despite pain). The AEFS includes a 7-point scale (0=never to 6=always) for Pain Persistence (PPS) from the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ), as well as two dichotomous (0=yes, 1=no) mood items from the Beck-Depressions-Inventar. The PPS scale is administered using two response scales for coping with mild and severe pain.

    Time frame: week 30

Other outcomes

  1. BDNF

    Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in blood to measure nociplasticity

    Time frame: Week 0

  2. BDNF

    Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in blood to measure nociplasticity

    Time frame: Week 5

  3. PRISE (Patient-Rated Inventory of Side Effects)

    A tool used to assess the presence and severity of side effects (0=no severity, 3= greater severity) across nine organ/function domains, including gastrointestinal, nervous system, heart, eyes/ears, skin, genital/urinary, sleep, sexual function, and other areas

    Time frame: 30min post treatment

  4. PSST

    The Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool (PSST) is used to assess the presence and severity of premenstrual symptoms and their impact on daily functioning. The tool translates categorical criteria into a rating scale. It consists of 19 items: 14 items regarding premenstrual symptoms and 5 items measuring functional impairment. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The total score is used to screen for Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) and moderate-to-severe Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS), with higher ratings reflecting a higher symptom severity.

    Time frame: During the pre-trial phase, specifically on day 2 after ovulation (luteal phase)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bern University of Applied Science
    Bern, Canton of Bern 3012, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026
Sep 30, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2028→Dec 30, 2028
Sep 30, 2026
Study completion
Dec 31, 2028→Mar 31, 2029
Sep 30, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • Addedother outcomePSSTTime frame: During the pre-trial phase, specifically on day 2 after ovulation (luteal phase)
Sep 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 30, 2026
    Start date Aug 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026
    Primary completion Aug 30, 2028→Dec 30, 2028
    Study completion Dec 31, 2028→Mar 31, 2029
    Secondary outcomes 1 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Addedother outcomePSSTTime frame: During the pre-trial phase, specifically on day 2 after ovulation (luteal phase)
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07101978
Lead sponsor
Bern University of Applied Sciences
Collaborators
Dr. med. h.c Erwin Braun Stiftung
Responsible party
Kay-Uwe Hanusch (Principal Investigator,, Bern University of Applied Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 30, 2026

Study contacts

Kay-Uwe Hanusch, Dr.scient.med
Contact
kay.hanusch@bfh.ch
+41 31 848 5005
Kay-Uwe Hanusch, Dr.scient.med
study director · Bern University of Applied Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion