ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06831981ARO 2024-13Updated Oct 13, 2026

Hyperthermia With Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

An interventional study of Hyperthermia and Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen. Recruiting at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Updated Oct 13, 20262 sites added2 sites removedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
264
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of deep regional hyperthermia in the context of radiochemotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can surgery be avoided if the tumor completely regresses?
  • How high is the Local re-growth rate
  • Is the treatment safe?
  • Assessment of the Quality of life
  • Rate of sphincter-sparing surgery
  • Pathological staging, tumor downstaging
  • Assessment of continence during the course of therapy

Participants will:

Undergo radiochemotherapy with or without addition of hyperthermia (50:50 randomisation) followed by standard consolidation chemotherapy. After treatment response evaluation surgery or non-operative management takes place.

Read the detailed description

In this prospective, randomized phase III trial "Radiochemotherapy with concomitant deep regional hyperthermia in locally advanced rectal cancer" trial it is hypothesized that with the addition of hyperthermia complete response rates can be further increased resulting in a higher number of patients who can omit surgery in favor of organ preservation and a surveillance protocol. Patients receive radiochemotherapy with 5-FU or capecitabine followed by standard consolidation chemotherapy with 5-FU/folinic acid/oxaliplatin or CAPOX. Hyperthermia will take place based on a 1:1 randomisation. After evaluation of treatment response in week 22 patients will either undergo surgical resection in case of residual tumor or non-operative management when a clinical complete response is seen or repeat evaluation after another 3 months in case of a near clinical complete response. In selected cases endoscopic procedures can be considered as an alternative to radical surgery.The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of deep regional hyperthermia in the context of radiochemotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. As the primary endpoint TME-free survival will be used (TMEFS).

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Hyperthermia
  • TME
  • high risk rectal tumors
  • locally advanced retal cancer
  • total neoadjuvant therapy
  • organ preservation
03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

2,400 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 587 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 264 is above the median of 65 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Tuebingen is the lead sponsor of 490 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female patients with confirmed diagnosis of rectal cancer localized 0-12 cm from the anocutaneous line (i.e. lower and middle third of the rectum)
  • Indication for total therapy irrespective of participation in the current study.
  • Any MRI staged rectal cancer with one of the following high-risk features:

    • cT4
    • cN2 (see Appendix)
    • Distance to mesorectal fascia 1mm or less.
    • Involved Lateral pelvic lymph nodes
    • EMVI (extramural venous invasion) positivity
  • Staging requirements: High-resolution, thin-sliced (i.e. 3mm) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis is the mandatory local staging procedure.
  • Cross-sectional imaging of the abdomen and chest to exclude distant .
  • Aged at least 18 years. No upper age limit.
  • Performance Status ≤ 1
  • Adequate hematological, hepatic, renal and metabolic function parameters
  • of the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower border of the tumor localised more than 12 cm from the anocutaneous line as measured by rigid rectoscopy
  • Tumors with microsatellite instability ("MSI-High Tumors") and the possibility for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition.
  • for hyperthermia such as metal implants or pacemakers
  • Distant (to be excluded by CT scan of the thorax and abdomen)
  • Preexisting fecal incontinence for solid stool
  • Prior antineoplastic therapy for rectal cancer
  • Prior radiotherapy of the pelvic region
  • Major surgery within the last 4 weeks prior to inclusion
  • Subject pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant within 6 months after the end of treatment
  • Subject (male or female) is not willing to use highly effective methods of (per institutional standard) during treatment and for 6 months (male or female) after the end of treatment (adequate: oral contraceptives, intrauterine device or barrier method in conjunction with spermicidal jelly)
  • Other concomitant antineoplastic therapy
  • Serious concurrent diseases, including neurologic or psychiatric disorders (incl. dementia and uncontrolled seizures), active, uncontrolled infections, active, disseminated coagulation disorder
  • cardiovascular disease (incl. myocardial infarction, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia) ≤ 6 months before enrolment
  • Prior or concurrent ≤ 3 years prior to enrolment in study (Exception: non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical carcinoma FIGO stage 0-1), if the patient is continuously disease-free
  • Known allergic reactions on study medication
  • Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency
  • Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical conditions potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule (these conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
264 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiochemotherapy with hyperthermia followed by consolidation chemotherapy

    Radiochemotherapy with hyperthermia followed by consolidation chemotherapy. After restaging decision to watch and wait in case of complete or near complete response or surgery

    Other: Hyperthermia · Radiation: Radiotherapy · Drug: Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil · Drug: Consolidation chemotherapy with FOLFOX

  • Active comparator
    Radiochemotherapy without hyperthermia followed by consolidation chemotherapy

    Radiochemotherapy without hyperthermia followed by consolidation chemotherapy. After restaging decision to watch and wait in case of complete response or surgery

    Radiation: Radiotherapy · Drug: Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil · Drug: Consolidation chemotherapy with FOLFOX

Interventions

  • OtherHyperthermia

    Additional hyperthermia to radiochemotherapy regime in Arm 1 and radiochemotherapy without additional hyperthermia in Arm 2.

  • RadiationRadiotherapy

    Radiotherapy of the pelvis

  • DrugChemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil

    Drug page: Fluorouracil

    Chemotherapy with 5-flurouracil is given in parallel to radiotherapy

  • DrugConsolidation chemotherapy with FOLFOX

    Drug page: Folfox protocol

    Consolidation chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Two-year TME-free survival (TMEFS)

    The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of deep regional hyperthermia in the context of radiochemotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. As the primary endpoint two-year TME-free survival will be used (TMEFS).

    Time frame: From September 2024 until September 2036

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2036, 140 months after the start.

Of 329 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Rectal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 51 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78. This study's planned 140 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 336 studies reached it within 51 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 78.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 3, 2024
First posted
Feb 18, 2025
StartActual
Sep 11, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2036
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2037
Last update
Oct 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
2 sites added, 2 sites removed
Show 2 added (2 Germany)
  • University Hospital · Tübingen, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · Tübingen, Germany
Show 2 removed
  • University Hospital · Tuebingen, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · Tübingen, Germany
Oct 13, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 13, 2026
    2 sites added, 2 sites removed
    Show 2 added (2 Germany)
    • University Hospital · Tübingen, Germany
    • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · Tübingen, Germany
    Show 2 removed
    • University Hospital · Tuebingen, Germany
    • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · Tübingen, Germany
    + 4 other changes: index terms, identifiers, verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06831981
Collaborators
University Hospital Erlangen, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2025
Start date
Sep 11, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2036 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2037 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 13, 2026

Study contacts

Cihan Gani, MD, Prof. Dr.
Contact
cihan.gani@med.uni-tuebingen.de
+49 7071 29-82165
Barbara Gehler, MD, Dr.
Contact
barbara.gehler@med.uni-tuebingen.de
+49 7071 29-82165
Cihan Gani, MD, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · University Hospital Tuebingen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion