ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07888491ELECTRO-LCUpdated Oct 22, 2026

Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

An observational study in Cholelithiasis, sponsored by University Hospital of Split. Recruiting at 1 site in Croatia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Split · Observational

Updated Oct 22, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
165
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study will examine how electrosurgical activation patterns during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy are associated with surgeon experience and intraoperative difficulty. Adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at University Hospital of Split will receive standard clinical care; the study does not assign an intervention or change the surgical technique. A fixed camera will record only the laparoscopic monitor, and a directional microphone will record the audible signals of the electrosurgical generator. The study includes a cross-sectional comparison among surgeons with different cumulative experience and a longitudinal assessment of developing surgeons as they gain additional experience. Activation patterns will be analyzed separately during dissection of the hepatocystic triangle and separation of the gallbladder from the liver bed. Intraoperative difficulty will be graded from the initial operative video using the Parkland Grading Scale by two independent assessors, with adjudication when needed.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, two-stage prospective observational cohort study conducted during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eligible cases will be included consecutively within predefined surgeon cohorts. Clinical care, case allocation, supervision, operative technique, and decisions regarding conversion or surgeon takeover will not be altered by the study.

Stage 1 is a cross-sectional comparison of 48 evaluable operations, with six operations performed by each of eight surgeons who have different levels of cumulative laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience. Stage 2 is a longitudinal assessment comprising 100 operations performed by four developing surgeons followed through 25 consecutive evaluable operations each, 12 operations performed by two new beginner surgeons, and six operations performed by an experienced reference surgeon. The first six operations of each longitudinally followed surgeon are also included in Stage 1. The umbrella study therefore targets at least 142 unique evaluable operations and anticipates enrollment of 165 patients to allow for technical losses and exclusions.

A Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G camera will be fixed outside the sterile field and directed only at the laparoscopic monitor. A BOYA BY-MM1 AI USB-C directional microphone will be positioned toward the loudspeaker of the Valleylab Force FX-C electrosurgical generator. Standard generator settings are Fulgurate coagulation at 65 W, Pure Cut at 35 W, and audible volume at 75%. Any deviation from the standardized equipment or settings will be recorded.

After surgery, investigators will identify two predefined operative segments from the video. Segment A begins with the first electrosurgical activation on tissue in the hepatocystic triangle after exposure has been achieved and ends with the first clip application to a cystic structure. Segment B begins with the first electrosurgical activation used to separate the gallbladder from the liver and ends with complete gallbladder separation or the beginning of final liver-bed hemostasis. WAV audio will be exported for each segment. A locked local Python/Streamlit application will identify individual electrosurgical activations and derive activation counts, durations, intervals, rates, and total activation time.

The initial appearance of the gallbladder will be graded on the Parkland Grading Scale (grades 1 to 5) before substantial dissection. Two assessors who are blinded to the audio-analysis results will grade each case independently. Disagreement will be adjudicated by an additional qualified investigator who did not perform that operation.

The main analyses will use mixed-effects models to assess associations of cumulative operative experience, Parkland grade, operative segment, and the experience-by-Parkland interaction with electrosurgical activation patterns. Longitudinal models will account for repeated operations nested within surgeon. Effect estimates will be reported with 95% confidence intervals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholelithiasis

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Electrosurgery
  • Surgical learning curve
  • Parkland Grading Scale
  • Audio analysis
03

In context

Cholelithiasis

291 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholelithiasis; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 165 is below the median of 200 across 84 observational studies indexed under Cholelithiasis.

Browse Cholelithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Split is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the regular operating program at the Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital of Split. Consecutive eligible cases will be sampled within predefined surgeon cohorts. Male sex, age over 65 years, and thickened gallbladder wall are not exclusion criteria and will be recorded as potential covariates. An unexpectedly pronounced inflammatory or acute-like intraoperative finding does not itself exclude an otherwise elective case; difficulty will be captured using the Parkland grade.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the regular operating program
  • Written informed consent
  • The designated study surgeon performs the entire analyzed operative segment
  • Technically usable synchronized audio-video recording with known electrosurgical generator settings and instrument

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery or clinical acute cholecystitis as the indication for surgery
  • Previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
  • Previous upper abdominal surgery
  • Open cholecystectomy from the outset or a major combined operation that materially alters the operative course
  • Predominant use of another energy device that is not comparable with the standardized generator
  • Change or takeover of the operating surgeon within the analyzed segment without the possibility of clear separation
  • Technically unusable audio or video recording or missing initial image required for Parkland grading
  • Withdrawal of informed consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
165 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Cohort

    Adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under standard clinical care. Consecutive eligible cases will be enrolled within predefined surgeon cohorts. The exposures of interest are the operating surgeon's cumulative laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience and the Parkland grade of intraoperative difficulty. Electrosurgical activation patterns will be derived from synchronized recordings of the laparoscopic monitor and generator audio.

    Procedure: Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureElective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Standard-of-care elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study does not assign or modify the surgical procedure, operative technique, supervision, or clinical decisions. Investigators will observe electrosurgical activation patterns during two predefined operative segments using synchronized recording of the laparoscopic monitor and electrosurgical generator audio.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Duration of Coagulation-Mode Electrosurgical Activations During Segment A

    For each operation, the median duration in seconds of individual, clearly separated coagulation-mode activations detected by the locked audio-analysis algorithm during hepatocystic triangle dissection (Segment A). Segment A must contain at least three coagulation-mode activations. The operation is the unit of analysis.

    Time frame: During Segment A of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  2. Longitudinal Change in Median Coagulation Activation Duration During Segment A

    Change in the operation-level median duration of individual coagulation-mode activations during Segment A for the four longitudinally followed developing surgeons, estimated per 10 additional evaluable laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The effect will be reported as absolute and percentage change with a 95% confidence interval, adjusted for Parkland grade.

    Time frame: From the first through the 25th evaluable operation for each longitudinally followed surgeon, up to 31 December 2028

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Coagulation-Mode Activations per Minute by Operative Segment

    For each operation, the number of detected coagulation-mode activations divided by segment duration in minutes, calculated separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  2. Total Coagulation Activation Time per Minute by Operative Segment

    For each operation, the summed duration in seconds of all coagulation-mode activations divided by segment duration in minutes, calculated separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  3. Variability of Coagulation Activation Duration by Operative Segment

    For each operation, variability in the duration of individual coagulation-mode activations will be summarized using the interquartile range and median absolute deviation, separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  4. Proportion of Coagulation Activations Longer Than 2 Seconds by Operative Segment

    For each operation, the number of coagulation-mode activations lasting more than 2 seconds divided by the total number of coagulation-mode activations, expressed as a percentage and calculated separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  5. Median Inter-Activation Interval by Operative Segment

    For each operation, the median time in seconds from the end of one coagulation-mode activation to the start of the next coagulation-mode activation, calculated separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  6. Duration of Each Operative Segment

    Elapsed time in seconds from the predefined start to the predefined end of Segment A and Segment B, calculated separately for each segment.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  7. Number of Cutting-Mode Electrosurgical Activations by Operative Segment

    For each operation, the number of detected cutting-mode electrosurgical activations, reported descriptively and calculated separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  8. Median Duration of Cutting-Mode Electrosurgical Activations by Operative Segment

    For each operation, the median duration in seconds of individual cutting-mode electrosurgical activations, reported descriptively and calculated separately for Segment A and Segment B.

    Time frame: During Segments A and B of the index laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  9. Longitudinal Change in Coagulation Activation Rate

    Change in the number of coagulation-mode activations per minute among the four longitudinally followed developing surgeons, estimated per 10 additional evaluable laparoscopic cholecystectomies and evaluated by operative segment.

    Time frame: From the first through the 25th evaluable operation for each longitudinally followed surgeon, up to 31 December 2028

  10. Longitudinal Change in Total Coagulation Activation Time per Minute

    Change in the total coagulation-mode activation time in seconds per minute among the four longitudinally followed developing surgeons, estimated per 10 additional evaluable laparoscopic cholecystectomies and evaluated by operative segment.

    Time frame: From the first through the 25th evaluable operation for each longitudinally followed surgeon, up to 31 December 2028

  11. Longitudinal Change in Variability of Coagulation Activation Duration

    Change in the interquartile range and median absolute deviation of coagulation-mode activation duration among the four longitudinally followed developing surgeons, estimated across the sequence of evaluable operations and evaluated by operative segment.

    Time frame: From the first through the 25th evaluable operation for each longitudinally followed surgeon, up to 31 December 2028

  12. Longitudinal Change in the Proportion of Coagulation Activations Longer Than 2 Seconds

    Change in the percentage of coagulation-mode activations lasting more than 2 seconds among the four longitudinally followed developing surgeons, estimated across the sequence of evaluable operations and evaluated by operative segment.

    Time frame: From the first through the 25th evaluable operation for each longitudinally followed surgeon, up to 31 December 2028

  13. Longitudinal Change in Operative Segment Duration

    Change in the duration in seconds of Segment A and Segment B among the four longitudinally followed developing surgeons, estimated across the sequence of evaluable laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

    Time frame: From the first through the 25th evaluable operation for each longitudinally followed surgeon, up to 31 December 2028

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital of Split
    Split, Split-Dalmatia County 21000, Croatia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lombardi PM, Mazzola M, Veronesi V, Granieri S, Cioffi SPB, Baia M, Del Prete L, Bernasconi DP, Danelli P, Ferrari G. Learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a risk-adjusted cumulative summation (RA-CUSUM) analysis of six general surgery residents. Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):8133-8143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10345-x. Epub 2023 Sep 8. PubMed 37684403 ↗
  • Madni TD, Nakonezny PA, Barrios E, Imran JB, Clark AT, Taveras L, Cunningham HB, Christie A, Eastman AL, Minshall CT, Luk S, Minei JP, Phelan HA, Cripps MW. Prospective validation of the Parkland Grading Scale for Cholecystitis. Am J Surg. 2019 Jan;217(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 21. PubMed 30190078 ↗
  • Meeuwsen FC, Guedon ACP, Arkenbout EA, van der Elst M, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ. The Art of Electrosurgery: Trainees and Experts. Surg Innov. 2017 Aug;24(4):373-378. doi: 10.1177/1553350617705207. Epub 2017 Apr 24. PubMed 28438057 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07888491
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Split
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 22, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Study contacts

Ognjen Barcot, MD, PhD
Contact
ognjen.barcot@kbsplit.hr
+385 21 556 691
Ognjen Barcot, MD, PhD
study director · University Hospital of Split

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion