CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT03308773STOPDISEASEUpdated Apr 3, 2024

Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice Base on Patient Specific Physiology

An observational study in PreDiabetes, Insulin Resistance and Type2 Diabetes, sponsored by Pacific Coast Family Medical Group. Enrolling by invitation. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-03.

Sponsored by Pacific Coast Family Medical Group · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
5,000
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is well known that the Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease are preceded by over ten years by metabolic dysfunction and anatomic changes that can be quantified. In order to develop effective preventive strategies and reduce the cost burden to the health care system, recognition of the earliest pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease is clinically relevant. The interval retrospective evaluation of data from patient records, reflect the effectiveness of the various treatments implemented in clinical practice.

Prevalence of "prediabetes" among American adults is estimated to be \~84 million, or one out of three Americans. Over a 5-7 year period approximately one third of these prediabetic individuals will progress to type 2 diabetes. Prediabetes is a heterogenous group comprised of individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and increased A1c (5.7-6.4%). Although different pathophysiologies are present in individuals with IFG and IGT, their conversion rate to overt type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is similar.

Insulin resistance is a common causal feature of many of the pathophysiologic mechanisms linking macrovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Because hyperglycemia is the major factor responsible for the development of microvascular complications, it logically follows that prevention of progression of prediabetes to overt diabetes should retard/prevent the development of the microvascular complications. From the measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, and c-peptide levels during the oral glucose tolerance test, one can derive measures of the two core defects responsible for the development of T2DM, i.e. insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction as well as the degree of dysglycemia.

By combining a standard medical evaluation with the evaluation of cardiovascular biomarkers, patients at intermediate risk of vascular disease can be identified. In these patients, carotid intima media thickness (IMT) and carotid plaque evaluation is offered to attempt to clarify risk.

The hypothesis of this observational study is that the characterization of the physiology and anatomy of patients at risk of developing type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease can stratify risk of developing disease and direct treatment strategies tailored to the identified physiologic defect, leading to improvements in the delay or prevention of disease.

Read the detailed description

It is well known that the Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease are preceded by over ten years by metabolic dysfunction and anatomic changes that can be quantified. In order to develop effective preventive strategies and reduce the cost burden to the health care system, recognition of the earliest pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease is clinically relevant. In patients with risk factors for type 2 diabetes and/or vascular disease, we have quantified this dysmetabolic state using glucose tolerance testing to quantify insulin resistance and beta cell function while measuring vascular biomarkers as well as Intima-media thickness and carotid plaque to characterize cardiovascular risk. The interval retrospective evaluation of data from patient records, reflect the effectiveness of the various treatments implemented in clinical practice.

Prevalence of "prediabetes" among American adults is estimated to be \~84 million, or one out of three Americans. Over a 5-7 year period approximately one third of these prediabetic individuals will progress to type 2 diabetes. Prediabetes is a heterogenous group comprised of individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and increased A1c (5.7-6.4%). Although different pathophysiologies are present in individuals with IFG and IGT, their conversion rate to overt type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is similar.

Prospective epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that \~40% of subjects who progress to T2DM over 5 years had Normal glucose tolerance (NGT) at baseline, suggesting that a large group of NGT subjects also are at increased T2DM risk. It has previously been demonstrated that a 1-hour plasma glucose concentration >155 mg/dl identifies a subgroup of NGT subjects with high future T2DM risk.

Further, multiple studies have demonstrated that background retinopathy, microalbuminuria, and peripheral neuropathy are present in 10-20% of prediabetic individuals. Compared with normoglycemic patients, those with prediabetes were associated with a 13-30% higher risk for composite cardiovascular disease.

Insulin resistance is a common causal feature of many of the pathophysiologic mechanisms linking macrovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Because hyperglycemia is the major factor responsible for the development of microvascular complications, it logically follows that prevention of progression of prediabetes to overt diabetes should retard/prevent the development of the microvascular complications. From the measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, and c-peptide levels during the oral glucose tolerance test, one can derive measures of the two core defects responsible for the development of T2DM, i.e. insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction as well as the degree of dysglycemia.

The need for improvement in the identification of asymptomatic atherosclerosis is exemplified by the observation that nearly 50% of patients suffering a first myocardial infarction have either, none or only one of the standard risk factors; smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and family history of heart disease. By combining a standard medical evaluation with the evaluation of cardiovascular biomarkers, patients at intermediate risk of vascular disease can be identified. In these patients, carotid intima media thickness and carotid plaque evaluation is offered to attempt to clarify risk.

Further associations exist between insulin resistance and other medical conditions including; fatty liver, epicardial fat, diastolic dysfunction, arrhythmia, dementia and cancer. Quantifying insulin resistance may allow advances in preventive strategies.

Following these evaluations, a discussion of the scientific literature as well as the risk, benefits and alternatives available, a personalized treatment plan is generated. Interval reassessment is carried out as part of the routine medical care of the patients in the practice.

The hypothesis of this observational study is that the characterization of the physiology and anatomy of patients at risk of developing type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease can stratify risk of developing disease and direct treatment strategies tailored to the identified physiologic defect, leading to improvements in the delay or prevention of disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • PreDiabetes
  • Insulin Resistance
  • Type2 Diabetes
  • NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
  • Diastolic Dysfunction
  • Dementia
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Cancer
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Carotid Plaque

Keywords

  • Prediabetes
  • insulin resistance
  • T2DM
  • Carotid IMT/Plaque
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Internal Medicine/Endocrinology private practice in Southern California

Inclusion criteria

  • American Diabetic Association (ADA)/American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) criteria for patients at risk for developing type 2 diabetes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prior treatment with medications for type 2 diabetes
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherLifestyle modification in routine care of patients

    Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle recommendations and non-investigational pharmacotherapy in routine care of patients

    Also known as: non-investigational drug in routine care of patients

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants who develop type 2 diabetes based on response to oral glucose tolerance test

    Patients will be monitored for up to 20 years (10 year retrospective plus 10 year prospective). The outcome measure will reflect the number of patients who develop of type 2 diabetes as evidenced by the response to oral glucose tolerance testing.

    Time frame: 6 months and an average of every 2 years through the study completion, approximately 20 years

  2. Time to development of type 2 diabetes

    Patients will be monitored for up to 20 years (10 year retrospective plus 10 year prospective). The outcome measure will reflect the time to the development of type 2 diabetes as evidenced by the response to oral glucose tolerance testing.

    Time frame: 6 months and an average of every 2 years through the study completion, approximately 20 years

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029. PubMed 26348752 ↗
  • Abdul-Ghani MA, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Contributions of beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006 May;29(5):1130-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.2951130. PubMed 16644654 ↗
  • Abdul-Ghani MA, Jenkinson CP, Richardson DK, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Insulin secretion and action in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: results from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study. Diabetes. 2006 May;55(5):1430-5. doi: 10.2337/db05-1200. PubMed 16644701 ↗
  • Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabet Med. 2007 Feb;24(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02043.x. PubMed 17257275 ↗
  • DREAM Trial Investigators; Dagenais GR, Gerstein HC, Holman R, Budaj A, Escalante A, Hedner T, Keltai M, Lonn E, McFarlane S, McQueen M, Teo K, Sheridan P, Bosch J, Pogue J, Yusuf S. Effects of ramipril and rosiglitazone on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in people with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: results of the Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial. Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):1007-14. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1868. Epub 2008 Feb 11. PubMed 18268075 ↗
  • Asghar O, Petropoulos IN, Alam U, Jones W, Jeziorska M, Marshall A, Ponirakis G, Fadavi H, Boulton AJ, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy detects neuropathy in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2643-6. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0279. Epub 2014 Jun 26. PubMed 24969581 ↗
  • Gibbons CH, Goebel-Fabbri A. Microvascular Complications Associated With Rapid Improvements in Glycemic Control in Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Jul;17(7):48. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0880-5. PubMed 28526993 ↗
  • Defronzo RA. Banting Lecture. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009 Apr;58(4):773-95. doi: 10.2337/db09-9028. No abstract available. PubMed 19336687 ↗
  • Armato J, DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M, Ruby R. Successful treatment of prediabetes in clinical practice: targeting insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. Endocr Pract. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):342-50. doi: 10.4158/EP11194.OR. PubMed 22068250 ↗
  • Huang Y, Cai X, Mai W, Li M, Hu Y. Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016 Nov 23;355:i5953. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5953. PubMed 27881363 ↗
  • Armato JP, DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M, Ruby RJ. Successful treatment of prediabetes in clinical practice using physiological assessment (STOP DIABETES). Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;6(10):781-789. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30234-1. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PubMed 30224284 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03308773
Lead sponsor
Pacific Coast Family Medical Group
Responsible party
John Armato (Physician, Principle investigator, Pacific Coast Family Medical Group) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 13, 2017
Start date
Jan 5, 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2024

Study contacts

John P Armato, MD
principal investigator · Providence St Josephs Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion