An observational study in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 26 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Assiut University — 15 open to participants now, 15 under way, none of them phase 3. Multiple Sclerosis · Assiut University.
Among the 26 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Assiut University, this one is the 2nd largest by planned enrollment of the 24 observational ones that give a count, is one of 6 that started in 2026, is one of 24 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 11 of the 14 other live ones, and was the 22nd registered.
3,269 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 663 are open to participants now.
Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →15 of the 26 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Assiut University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:
Assiut University
Ages 18–49 · Women only
Assiut University
Ages 20–50 · Healthy volunteers
Assiut University
Ages 18+
Assiut University
Ages 18–55
Assiut University
Ages 18–55
By country, each count listing its studies:
Of the 431 Multiple Sclerosis studies recruiting now, 163 (38%) set no upper age limit and 212 (49%) stop at 75 or younger; 40 take children under 18; 96 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years to 55 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
26 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2018; this study’s year is marked. 6 started in 2026.
This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 100 across 971 observational studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.
Median enrollment 48 across the 2 interventional studies, 100 across the 24 observational. Of the 2 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,081 studies on the registry; 2,179 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
5 of the studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Assiut University that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 0 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT06770959Assiut UniversityFrequency of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Manifestations Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, a Clinical Hospital Based Study | 2026-12 |
| NCT06017726Assiut UniversityInsulin Resistance in Egyptian Patients With Multiple Sclerosis | 2026-12 |
| NCT07847086Assiut UniversityGait Pattern and Its Relation to Cognition and VEP in Multiple Sclerosis | 2027-09-26 |
| NCT07846943Assiut UniversityEpstein-Barr Virus Antibodies in Egyptian Patients With Multiple Sclerosis | 2027-10 |
| NCT07826221Assiut UniversityPrevalence of Primary Headache in Multiple Sclerosis Patients | 2027-10 |
Add all 5 to your calendar (.ics) → With an account.
Among the 26 studies in Multiple Sclerosis by Assiut University, from their registry updates:
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to determine the frequency of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and identify its clinical, radiological, neuroaxonal, and functional predictors in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The study aims to facilitate early identification of patients at increased risk of disability progression independent of relapses and to support individualized therapeutic decision-making.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
What is the frequency of PIRA in patients with early RRMS? Which demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with the development of PIRA? Which MRI biomarkers, including lesion burden, brain atrophy, spinal cord involvement, and paramagnetic rim lesions (where available), are associated with PIRA? Can optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements, including peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness, predict PIRA? Are serum biomarkers, including neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), associated with an increased risk of PIRA? Which baseline factors independently predict disability progression?
Participants will undergo comprehensive baseline and follow-up assessments, including collection of demographic and clinical data, neurological examination with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scoring, brain and spinal cord MRI, OCT assessment, laboratory evaluation of serum biomarkers (where available), and validated functional and patient-reported outcome measures. Participants will be followed longitudinally to identify confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) and classify disability progression as PIRA or relapse-associated worsening (RAW).
The primary outcome is the occurrence of PIRA, defined as confirmed disability accumulation independent of clinical relapses during follow-up. Secondary outcomes include identification of independent clinical, imaging, OCT, and laboratory predictors of PIRA and evaluation of their association with long-term disability progression. The findings may improve early risk stratification and support timely initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in patients with early RRMS.
The goal of this prospective observational cohort study is to determine the frequency of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and identify its clinical, radiological, neuroaxonal, and functional predictors in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) attending the Multiple Sclerosis Unit at Assiut University Hospital. Although relapses have traditionally been considered the primary driver of disability accumulation in RRMS, growing evidence indicates that disability may also progress independently of clinical relapses. This phenomenon, known as PIRA, has emerged as a major contributor to long-term disability and an early manifestation of the progressive disease process. Early identification of patients at risk for PIRA may facilitate timely initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), improve individualized treatment strategies, and reduce long-term neurological disability.
PIRA is defined as confirmed disability accumulation (CDA) occurring during a relapse-free period and is increasingly recognized as a reflection of chronic neurodegenerative processes and compartmentalized inflammation within the central nervous system. Recent studies suggest that PIRA may occur even during the earliest stages of RRMS and is associated with accelerated brain atrophy, greater gray matter loss, increased risk of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), and poorer long-term functional outcomes. Despite its clinical importance, reliable predictors of PIRA remain insufficiently established, particularly in patients with early RRMS. This study seeks to address this knowledge gap by integrating clinical assessments with advanced imaging, laboratory biomarkers, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and validated functional outcome measures.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
What is the frequency of PIRA among patients with early RRMS during the study follow-up period? Which demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with the development of PIRA? Which MRI characteristics, including lesion burden, lesion location, spinal cord involvement, brain atrophy, and chronic inflammatory imaging biomarkers, are associated with subsequent PIRA? Can retinal neuroaxonal measurements obtained by OCT, including peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness, predict future disability progression independent of relapses? Are circulating biomarkers of neuroaxonal injury and astroglial activation, including serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), associated with the occurrence of PIRA? Which baseline variables independently predict disability progression after adjustment for potential confounding factors? Does combining clinical, radiological, OCT, and laboratory biomarkers improve prediction of PIRA compared with individual markers alone?
Participants diagnosed with early RRMS according to the 2024 McDonald diagnostic criteria and meeting the study eligibility criteria will be prospectively enrolled and followed according to the study protocol.
Each participant will undergo standardized baseline and follow-up evaluations including:
Collection of demographic data, disease duration, clinical presentation, relapse history, disease-modifying therapy exposure, vascular risk factors, and other relevant medical history.
Comprehensive neurological examination with disability assessment using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) to determine baseline disability and detect confirmed disability accumulation during follow-up.
Brain and spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using standardized imaging protocols to evaluate T2 lesion burden, gadolinium-enhancing lesions (when clinically indicated), lesion distribution, brain atrophy measures, spinal cord lesions, and, where available, advanced imaging biomarkers such as chronic active lesions or paramagnetic rim lesions.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of retinal neuroaxonal integrity through measurement of pRNFL and mGCIPL thickness.
Laboratory assessment of serum biomarkers including neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), where available, to evaluate neuroaxonal injury and chronic astroglial activation.
Administration of validated functional and patient-reported outcome measures evaluating cognition, fatigue, depression, quality of life, and physical function, according to the study protocol.
Prospective follow-up to identify confirmed disability accumulation, classify disability progression as PIRA or relapse-associated worsening (RAW), and evaluate disability persistence throughout the observation period.
The primary outcome is the frequency of PIRA, defined as confirmed disability accumulation occurring independently of clinical relapses according to established international criteria.
Secondary outcomes include identification of independent clinical, MRI, OCT, laboratory, and functional predictors of PIRA; determination of factors associated with persistent disability progression; evaluation of the relationship between imaging biomarkers and disability accumulation; and development of a predictive model for early identification of patients at increased risk of PIRA.
The findings of this study are expected to improve understanding of the mechanisms underlying disability progression in early RRMS and provide evidence for integrating multimodal biomarkers into routine clinical practice. Early identification of patients at increased risk of PIRA may facilitate individualized treatment decisions, support earlier use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies, and ultimately improve long-term neurological outcomes.
Patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) will be recruited consecutively from the Neurology Department, Assiut University Hospital, and followed prospectively for 24 months.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Alternative diagnosis confirmed (e.g., NMOSD, vasculitis)
Glaucoma. Diabetic retinopathy. Retinal vascular disease. High myopia (>6 diopters). Previous ocular trauma or intraocular surgery (except uncomplicated cataract surgery >6 months).
Media opacity preventing reliable OCT acquisition.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis enrolled in the study and followed prospectively to determine the occurrence of progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). Participants will subsequently be classified into PIRA and non-PIRA groups according to the study outcome.
Proportion of participants who develop progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) during the 2-year follow-up
Percentage of participants who meet the predefined study criteria for confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), based on Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) criteria in the absence of clinical relapse.
Time frame: Baseline assessment with follow-up evaluations every 6 months for 24 months
Adjusted odds ratio for development of PIRA according to baseline MRI biomarkers
Baseline \& follow up after 1 year MRI biomarkers, including T2 lesion number, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, whole-brain volume (cm³), cortical volume (cm³), thalamic volume (cm³), black holes, paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs), and slowly expanding lesions (SELs), will be evaluated as predictors of development of PIRA using multivariable logistic regression. Results will be reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals
Time frame: Baseline assessment with follow-up evaluations every 12 months for 24 months
Adjusted odds ratio for development of PIRA according to baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers
Baseline spectral-domain OCT measurements \& follow up after 1 year , including peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness (µm) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness (µm), will be evaluated as predictors of development of PIRA using multivariable logistic regression. Results will be reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals
Time frame: Baseline assessment with follow-up evaluations every 12 months for 24 months
Adjusted odds ratio for development of PIRA according to baseline visual evoked potential (VEP) P100 latency.
Baseline visual evoked potential P100 latency (milliseconds) will be evaluated as a predictor of development of PIRA using multivariable logistic regression. Results will be reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: Baseline assessment with follow-up evaluations every 6 months for 24 months
Plan to share: No — data is available with the corresponding author on reasonable request
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Sep 2028, 24 months later.
Of 335 non-industry observational studies under Multiple Sclerosis, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 81. This study's planned 24 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 426 studies reached it within 41 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 75.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.