An interventional study of Bupivacaine 0.25% and Magnesium sulfate 500 mg in Unilateral Rib Fracture, ESPB and MgSO4, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Chest wall trauma is a major cause of morbidity among trauma patients. Rib fractures are associated with severe pain, impaired ventilation, reduced cough efficiency, secretion retention, prolonged hospital stay, and increased mortality. Rib fractures are also associated with concomitant thoracic injuries, head, extremity, abdominal, and blunt cardiac injuries.
These patients have poor overall clinical outcomes and are at increased risk for multiple complications.
Thoracic complications of rib fractures are common, including pneumonia, pulmonary effusion, aspiration, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary emboli, and atelectasis or lobar collapse.
these complications are important as targeted interventions may enable risk reductions. Effective analgesia is therefore a cornerstone in the management of chest trauma.
Systemic opioids have traditionally been used for pain management; however, their use is associated with respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and impaired pulmonary rehabilitation. Regional anesthesia techniques have emerged as valuable alternatives that provide effective analgesia while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects.
The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), first described by Forero, is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle adjacent to the transverse process. ESPB has demonstrated efficacy in thoracic surgery, breast surgery, and rib fracture analgesia, improving pain scores and respiratory mechanics.
Magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) possesses antinociceptive properties through antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and modulation of calcium influx. As an adjuvant to local anesthetics, magnesium sulfate has been shown to prolong analgesia and reduce opioid requirements in various regional anesthesia techniques. Recent ESPB studies and systematic reviews have suggested improved analgesic efficacy when magnesium sulfate is added to local anesthetics.
However, there is currently limited evidence regarding the role of magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to ESPB specifically in patients with unilateral rib fractures. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether adding magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in ESPB improves analgesic outcomes and respiratory recovery in this patient population.
Aim of the Study To evaluate the effect of adding magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on analgesic efficacy and respiratory recovery in patients with unilateral rib fractures.
Research Methods and Techniques Study Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blind controlled clinical trial.
Operative Suite: This study will be conducted in the Trauma Unit located in Trauma Hospital - Assiut University.
Study duration: From September 2026 until completion of patient recruitment. All participants will sign an informed consent before inclusion in the study after being individually informed.
Patient Enrollment and sample size:
Sample Size calculation Sample size was calculated using G*power, version 3.1.9.2. Based on earlier studies, we expected to find significant difference in total postoperative morphine consumption (mg) in control group and Magnesium sulphate group (effect size = 0.80) (El Sherif et al., 2022). With a power of 80% (using independent t-test and α*= 0.05) the sample needed for the study was estimated to be 42 patients (21 per each group). Considering an anticipated drop-out rate of 15%, a final sample size of 25 patients per group (50 patients in total) will be enrolled
.
Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation concealment will be achieved using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The study solution will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in:
Block performance. Data collection. Statistical analysis.
Patients, outcome assessors, and treating physicians will remain blinded to group allocation.
Group C (Control Group) Patients in Group C will receive: Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 mL Plus 5 mL normal saline total volume = 25 mL Group M (Magnesium sulfate Group) Patients in Group M will receive: Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 mL Plus Magnesium sulfate 500 mg (5 mL) Total volume adjusted to 25 mL.
Justification of Dose The magnesium sulfate dose of 500 mg was selected based on randomized ESPB studies and recent systematic reviews demonstrating improved analgesia with acceptable safety profiles using doses between 250 and 500 mg7.
Study Protocol
The ESPB protocol will be standardized.
Pre-Block Assessment
All patients will undergo:
Detailed history. Clinical examination. Chest imaging review. Baseline VAS score. Baseline respiratory assessment. Baseline vital signs. Monitoring Standard monitoring: ECG, non-invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), pulse oximetry, and respiratory rate 2.
Intravenous access will be secured. Technical Procedure (Intervention)
ESPB Technique: The block will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist under strict aseptic precautions.
Positioning: Sitting, lateral decubitus, or prone position based on patient tolerance.
Target Level: Mid-thoracic level corresponding to the center of the fractured ribs (typically T4-T5).
Ultrasound Technique:
A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal paramedian orientation approximately 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process on the affected side.
The following structures will be identified:
Trapezius muscle. Rhomboid major muscle. Erector spinae muscle. T5 transverse process Local Anesthesia: the needle insertion site will be infiltrated with 1-2 mL of 1% lidocaine in both groups to facilitate needle insertion and minimize procedural discomfort. The same volume and concentration will be used for all patients.
Needle Insertion: A 22-gauge 80-100 mm block needle will be inserted using an in-plane approach, cranio-caudal or caudo-cranial direction. Advance until the needle tip hits the transverse process .
After negative aspiration:
2 mL saline hydrodissection will confirm correct needle placement. The study solution will then be injected deep into the erector spinae muscle. Adequate linear spread beneath the erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by US.
Thirty minutes after the procedure, a pinprick assessment will be performed to confirm the sensory distribution of the block.
Ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic excursion Patients will undergo ultrasonographic assessment of ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion before performing the block and at predetermined postoperative intervals.
A low-frequency curved-array ultrasound transducer (approximately 2-5 MHz) will be placed in the subcostal region at the mid-clavicular line with the ultrasound beam directed perpendicular to the posterior third of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm.
M-mode ultrasonography will be used to record diaphragmatic displacement during deep inspiration.
Patients will be instructed to perform maximal deep inspiration following normal expiration.
Three consecutive respiratory cycles will be recorded, and the mean of three measurements will be used as the diaphragmatic excursion value at each assessment point.
Incentive spirometry Volumetric incentive spirometry (VIS) is a simple, non-invasive respiratory device.
It provides a direct measurement of inspired volume, allowing objective assessment of inspiratory capacity.
IT is used to encourage slow, deep inspiration and promote lung expansion
Analgesic Regimen Patients will receive rescue analgesia if VAS ≥ 4: IV Morphine 0.05 mg/kg (time of first dose).
Total morphine consumption will be recorded during the first 24 hours.
Data collection Demographic Data Age, Sex, Weight, Height, and BMI ASA status.
Trauma Characteristics Number of fractured ribs Type and timing of the trauma Side of injury Presence of pulmonary contusion.
Hemodynamic Variables Recorded at:
Time: Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia.
Including:
Heart rate Mean arterial pressure Respiratory rate SpO₂ Pain Assessment
VAS score:
Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia.
At:
Rest. Coughing. Visual Analog Scale [VAS] scores 8 Pain Level Score No pain 0 Mild pain 1-3 Moderate pain 4-6 Severe pain 7-10
Respiratory Assessment Respiratory rate Ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion will be recorded at Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia, assessed in the same position and by blinded assessor.
ΔDE=DEt -DE at baseline AUCΔDE,0-24h Incentive spirometry volume will be recorded at Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia, assessed in the same position and by blinded assessor.
Effective cough score. Pulmonary complications.
Semiquantitative Cough Strength Score (SCSS)9 Cough Strength Score No cough on command 0 Audible movement of air but no audible cough 1 Weakly (barely) audible cough 2 Clearly audible cough 3 Strong cough 4 Multiple sequential strong coughs 5
Analgesic Assessment VAS pain scores at rest and during exertion at predefined intervals over the first 24 hours post-block.
Time to first request for rescue analgesia (administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds).
Total cumulative dose of rescue analgesia consumed during the study period. Patient satisfaction score. Number of morphine boluses. Patient Satisfaction Score10 Description Score Very dissatisfied
1 Dissatisfied 2 Neutral 3 Satisfied 4 Very satisfied 5
Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Serial measurements (VAS score, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and SpO₂) were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by appropriate post hoc testing when indicated. Categorical variables were presented as frequency (n) and percentage (%) and compared using the Chi-square test. A two-sided P value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
126 studies on the registry are indexed under Rib Fractures; 28 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Rib Fractures.
Browse Rib Fractures studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Age 18-65 years. I-II. Patients with 2-5 unilateral rib fractures confirmed radiologically. Stable hemodynamics
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient refusal. Bilateral rib fractures or flail chest. Severe head, abdominal, or spinal injury to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection). Known allergies to amide local anesthetics or magnesium sulfate. Severe traumatic brain injury. Heart block or severe hepatic or renal impairment.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
ASA physical status
The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% combined with 5 mL of normal saline, giving a total injection volume of 25 mL.
Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25%
Participants will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% combined with magnesium sulfate 500 mg in 5 mL, giving a total injection volume of 25 mL.
Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% · Drug: Magnesium sulfate 500 mg
20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be combined with 5 mL of normal saline (total volume 25 mL) and administered through ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.
Magnesium sulfate 500 mg (5 mL) will be combined with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% (total volume 25 mL) and administered through ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.
Diaphragmatic excursion
To compare the area under the curve of the change in ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion from baseline over the first 24 hours after ultrasound-guided ESPB. Diaphragmatic excursion will be measured in centimeters .
Time frame: 24 hours
Incentive spirometry
volume will be assessed in the same position and by blinded assessor in milliliters
Time frame: 24 hour
Semiquantitative Cough Strength Score (SCSS)
No cough on command 0 Audible movement of air but no audible cough 1 Weakly (barely) audible cough 2 Clearly audible cough 3 Strong cough 4 Multiple sequential strong coughs 5 Higher means better
Time frame: 24 hours
Visual Analog Scale [VAS] scores
at rest and during exertion No pain 0 Mild pain 1-3 Moderate pain 4-6 Severe pain 7-10 Higher means worse
Time frame: 24hours
Time to first request for rescue analgesia
administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds will be measured in hours after the block
Time frame: 24 hours
Total cumulative dose of rescue analgesia
administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds will be measured in milligrams.
Time frame: 24 hours
Number of rescue analgesia boluses
administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds will be measured in milligrams.
Time frame: 24 hours
Patient satisfaction score
Very dissatisfied 1 Dissatisfied 2 Neutral 3 Satisfied 4 Very satisfied 5 Higher means better
Time frame: 24 hours
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. Study data will be maintained confidentially and accessed only by the primary research team.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.