ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07929402ESPBUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Magnesium-Enhanced ESPB for Respiratory Recovery and Analgesia in Unilateral Rib Fractures

An interventional study of Bupivacaine 0.25% and Magnesium sulfate 500 mg in Unilateral Rib Fracture, ESPB and MgSO4, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chest wall trauma is a major cause of morbidity among trauma patients. Rib fractures are associated with severe pain, impaired ventilation, reduced cough efficiency, secretion retention, prolonged hospital stay, and increased mortality. Rib fractures are also associated with concomitant thoracic injuries, head, extremity, abdominal, and blunt cardiac injuries.

These patients have poor overall clinical outcomes and are at increased risk for multiple complications.

Thoracic complications of rib fractures are common, including pneumonia, pulmonary effusion, aspiration, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary emboli, and atelectasis or lobar collapse.

these complications are important as targeted interventions may enable risk reductions. Effective analgesia is therefore a cornerstone in the management of chest trauma.

Systemic opioids have traditionally been used for pain management; however, their use is associated with respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and impaired pulmonary rehabilitation. Regional anesthesia techniques have emerged as valuable alternatives that provide effective analgesia while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects.

The ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), first described by Forero, is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetic is deposited deep to the erector spinae muscle adjacent to the transverse process. ESPB has demonstrated efficacy in thoracic surgery, breast surgery, and rib fracture analgesia, improving pain scores and respiratory mechanics.

Magnesium sulfate (MgSO₄) possesses antinociceptive properties through antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and modulation of calcium influx. As an adjuvant to local anesthetics, magnesium sulfate has been shown to prolong analgesia and reduce opioid requirements in various regional anesthesia techniques. Recent ESPB studies and systematic reviews have suggested improved analgesic efficacy when magnesium sulfate is added to local anesthetics.

However, there is currently limited evidence regarding the role of magnesium sulfate as an adjuvant to ESPB specifically in patients with unilateral rib fractures. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether adding magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in ESPB improves analgesic outcomes and respiratory recovery in this patient population.

Read the detailed description

Aim of the Study To evaluate the effect of adding magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on analgesic efficacy and respiratory recovery in patients with unilateral rib fractures.

Research Methods and Techniques Study Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blind controlled clinical trial.

Operative Suite: This study will be conducted in the Trauma Unit located in Trauma Hospital - Assiut University.

Study duration: From September 2026 until completion of patient recruitment. All participants will sign an informed consent before inclusion in the study after being individually informed.

Patient Enrollment and sample size:

Sample Size calculation Sample size was calculated using G*power, version 3.1.9.2. Based on earlier studies, we expected to find significant difference in total postoperative morphine consumption (mg) in control group and Magnesium sulphate group (effect size = 0.80) (El Sherif et al., 2022). With a power of 80% (using independent t-test and α*= 0.05) the sample needed for the study was estimated to be 42 patients (21 per each group). Considering an anticipated drop-out rate of 15%, a final sample size of 25 patients per group (50 patients in total) will be enrolled

.

Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation concealment will be achieved using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The study solution will be prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in:

Block performance. Data collection. Statistical analysis.

Patients, outcome assessors, and treating physicians will remain blinded to group allocation.

Group C (Control Group) Patients in Group C will receive: Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 mL Plus 5 mL normal saline total volume = 25 mL Group M (Magnesium sulfate Group) Patients in Group M will receive: Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 mL Plus Magnesium sulfate 500 mg (5 mL) Total volume adjusted to 25 mL.

Justification of Dose The magnesium sulfate dose of 500 mg was selected based on randomized ESPB studies and recent systematic reviews demonstrating improved analgesia with acceptable safety profiles using doses between 250 and 500 mg7.

Study Protocol

The ESPB protocol will be standardized.

Pre-Block Assessment

All patients will undergo:

Detailed history. Clinical examination. Chest imaging review. Baseline VAS score. Baseline respiratory assessment. Baseline vital signs. Monitoring Standard monitoring: ECG, non-invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), pulse oximetry, and respiratory rate 2.

Intravenous access will be secured. Technical Procedure (Intervention)

ESPB Technique: The block will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist under strict aseptic precautions.

Positioning: Sitting, lateral decubitus, or prone position based on patient tolerance.

Target Level: Mid-thoracic level corresponding to the center of the fractured ribs (typically T4-T5).

Ultrasound Technique:

A high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a longitudinal paramedian orientation approximately 3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process on the affected side.

The following structures will be identified:

Trapezius muscle. Rhomboid major muscle. Erector spinae muscle. T5 transverse process Local Anesthesia: the needle insertion site will be infiltrated with 1-2 mL of 1% lidocaine in both groups to facilitate needle insertion and minimize procedural discomfort. The same volume and concentration will be used for all patients.

Needle Insertion: A 22-gauge 80-100 mm block needle will be inserted using an in-plane approach, cranio-caudal or caudo-cranial direction. Advance until the needle tip hits the transverse process .

After negative aspiration:

2 mL saline hydrodissection will confirm correct needle placement. The study solution will then be injected deep into the erector spinae muscle. Adequate linear spread beneath the erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by US.

Thirty minutes after the procedure, a pinprick assessment will be performed to confirm the sensory distribution of the block.

Ultrasonographic assessment of diaphragmatic excursion Patients will undergo ultrasonographic assessment of ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion before performing the block and at predetermined postoperative intervals.

A low-frequency curved-array ultrasound transducer (approximately 2-5 MHz) will be placed in the subcostal region at the mid-clavicular line with the ultrasound beam directed perpendicular to the posterior third of the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm.

M-mode ultrasonography will be used to record diaphragmatic displacement during deep inspiration.

Patients will be instructed to perform maximal deep inspiration following normal expiration.

Three consecutive respiratory cycles will be recorded, and the mean of three measurements will be used as the diaphragmatic excursion value at each assessment point.

Incentive spirometry Volumetric incentive spirometry (VIS) is a simple, non-invasive respiratory device.

It provides a direct measurement of inspired volume, allowing objective assessment of inspiratory capacity.

IT is used to encourage slow, deep inspiration and promote lung expansion

Analgesic Regimen Patients will receive rescue analgesia if VAS ≥ 4: IV Morphine 0.05 mg/kg (time of first dose).

Total morphine consumption will be recorded during the first 24 hours.

Data collection Demographic Data Age, Sex, Weight, Height, and BMI ASA status.

Trauma Characteristics Number of fractured ribs Type and timing of the trauma Side of injury Presence of pulmonary contusion.

Hemodynamic Variables Recorded at:

Time: Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia.

Including:

Heart rate Mean arterial pressure Respiratory rate SpO₂ Pain Assessment

VAS score:

Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia.

At:

Rest. Coughing. Visual Analog Scale [VAS] scores 8 Pain Level Score No pain 0 Mild pain 1-3 Moderate pain 4-6 Severe pain 7-10

Respiratory Assessment Respiratory rate Ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion will be recorded at Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia, assessed in the same position and by blinded assessor.

ΔDE=DEt -DE at baseline AUCΔDE,0-24h Incentive spirometry volume will be recorded at Baseline, 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and at the time of rescue analgesia, assessed in the same position and by blinded assessor.

Effective cough score. Pulmonary complications.

Semiquantitative Cough Strength Score (SCSS)9 Cough Strength Score No cough on command 0 Audible movement of air but no audible cough 1 Weakly (barely) audible cough 2 Clearly audible cough 3 Strong cough 4 Multiple sequential strong coughs 5

Analgesic Assessment VAS pain scores at rest and during exertion at predefined intervals over the first 24 hours post-block.

Time to first request for rescue analgesia (administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds).

Total cumulative dose of rescue analgesia consumed during the study period. Patient satisfaction score. Number of morphine boluses. Patient Satisfaction Score10 Description Score Very dissatisfied

1 Dissatisfied 2 Neutral 3 Satisfied 4 Very satisfied 5

Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Serial measurements (VAS score, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, and SpO₂) were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by appropriate post hoc testing when indicated. Categorical variables were presented as frequency (n) and percentage (%) and compared using the Chi-square test. A two-sided P value \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Unilateral Rib Fracture
  • ESPB
  • MgSO4
  • Respiratory Recovery
  • Analgesic Efficacy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • MgSO4
  • ESPB
  • Rib fracture
  • Respiratory recovery
  • Analgesic efficacy
  • Morphia
  • Diaphragmatic
  • Excursion
  • Ultrasound
  • Pain acore
03

In context

Rib Fractures

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Rib Fractures; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Rib Fractures.

Browse Rib Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-65 years. I-II. Patients with 2-5 unilateral rib fractures confirmed radiologically. Stable hemodynamics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient refusal. Bilateral rib fractures or flail chest. Severe head, abdominal, or spinal injury to regional anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection). Known allergies to amide local anesthetics or magnesium sulfate. Severe traumatic brain injury. Heart block or severe hepatic or renal impairment.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control Group - Bupivacaine Alone

    Participants will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% combined with 5 mL of normal saline, giving a total injection volume of 25 mL.

    Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25%

  • Experimental
    Magnesium Sulfate Group - Bupivacaine Plus Magnesium

    Participants will receive ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% combined with magnesium sulfate 500 mg in 5 mL, giving a total injection volume of 25 mL.

    Drug: Bupivacaine 0.25% · Drug: Magnesium sulfate 500 mg

Interventions

  • 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be combined with 5 mL of normal saline (total volume 25 mL) and administered through ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.

  • DrugMagnesium sulfate 500 mg

    Magnesium sulfate 500 mg (5 mL) will be combined with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% (total volume 25 mL) and administered through ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diaphragmatic excursion

    To compare the area under the curve of the change in ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion from baseline over the first 24 hours after ultrasound-guided ESPB. Diaphragmatic excursion will be measured in centimeters .

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incentive spirometry

    volume will be assessed in the same position and by blinded assessor in milliliters

    Time frame: 24 hour

  2. Semiquantitative Cough Strength Score (SCSS)

    No cough on command 0 Audible movement of air but no audible cough 1 Weakly (barely) audible cough 2 Clearly audible cough 3 Strong cough 4 Multiple sequential strong coughs 5 Higher means better

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Visual Analog Scale [VAS] scores

    at rest and during exertion No pain 0 Mild pain 1-3 Moderate pain 4-6 Severe pain 7-10 Higher means worse

    Time frame: 24hours

  4. Time to first request for rescue analgesia

    administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds will be measured in hours after the block

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Total cumulative dose of rescue analgesia

    administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds will be measured in milligrams.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Number of rescue analgesia boluses

    administered according to institutional pain management protocols if pain scores exceed specific thresholds will be measured in milligrams.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Patient satisfaction score

    Very dissatisfied 1 Dissatisfied 2 Neutral 3 Satisfied 4 Very satisfied 5 Higher means better

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Duan J, Zhou L, Xiao M, Liu J, Yang X. Semiquantitative cough strength score for predicting reintubation after planned extubation. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Nov;24(6):e86-90. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015172. PubMed 26523016 ↗
  • Belay Bizuneh Y, Fitiwi Lema G, Yilkal Fentie D, Woldegerima Berhe Y, Enyew Ashagrie H. Assessment of Patient's Satisfaction and Associated Factors regarding Postoperative Pain Management at the University of Gondar Compressive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Pain Res Manag. 2020 Nov 12;2020:8834807. doi: 10.1155/2020/8834807. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33273994 ↗
  • Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90884-8. No abstract available. PubMed 4139420 ↗
  • Gaetano D, Brunetti S, Lomonaco V, Piccialli F, Buglione A, Colella U, Coppolino F, Pota V, Passavanti MB, Sansone P. Magnesium Sulfate as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetic in Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Life (Basel). 2026 Apr 25;16(5):726. doi: 10.3390/life16050726. PubMed 42195282 ↗
  • El Sherif FA, Youssef HA, Fares KM, Mohamed SA, Ali AR, Thabet AM. Efficacy of Ketamine versus Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound Bilevel Erector Spinae Block in Breast Cancer Surgery (a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study). Local Reg Anesth. 2022 Sep 23;15:87-96. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S379194. eCollection 2022. PubMed 36177362 ↗
  • Palachick BJ, Carver RA, Byars DV, Martyak MT, Collins JN. Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Prospective, Interventional Study. Am Surg. 2022 Sep;88(9):2124-2126. doi: 10.1177/00031348221091956. Epub 2022 May 5. PubMed 35512648 ↗
  • De Oliveira GS Jr, Castro-Alves LJ, Khan JH, McCarthy RJ. Perioperative systemic magnesium to minimize postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jul;119(1):178-90. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318297630d. PubMed 23669270 ↗
  • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. PubMed 27501016 ↗
  • May L, Hillermann C, Patil S. Rib fracture management. BJA Educ. 2016;16(1):26-32.
  • Witt CE, Bulger EM. Comprehensive approach to the management of the patient with multiple rib fractures: a review and introduction of a bundled rib fracture management protocol. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jan 5;2(1):e000064. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000064. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29766081 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. Study data will be maintained confidentially and accessed only by the primary research team.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07929402
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mohammed Nageh (Resident, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

mohammed N Fouly, MBBCh
Contact
Mohamed.foly@med.aun.edu.eg
+201555982840

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion