ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07512297ESWL-PAINUpdated Aug 12, 2026

Pain Control During ESWL Using Non-Opioid Analgesics

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ibuprofen (Brufen®) and Paracetamol (drug) in Urolithiasis, Kidney Stones and Ureteral Stones, sponsored by University of Gaziantep. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Primary conditionKidney CalculiRegistry: UrolithiasisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Urolithiasis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Kidney Calculi
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Kidney Calculi, a narrower term within Urolithiasis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Gaziantep · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of three non-opioid analgesics (ibuprofen, paracetamol, and tenoxicam) during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). All patients undergoing ESWL will be randomly assigned into four groups including a placebo group.

Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th minutes during the procedure. In addition to comparing analgesic efficacy, the study will evaluate patient-related and stone-related factors affecting pain perception, including body mass index, subcutaneous fat thickness, and stone density measured by Hounsfield Units.

The study also aims to assess the relationship between analgesic efficacy, energy levels applied during ESWL, and treatment outcomes such as stone-free rates. The findings may contribute to optimizing individualized pain management strategies and improving treatment efficiency in ESWL procedures.

Read the detailed description

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a widely used non-invasive treatment modality for urinary stone disease. Despite its minimally invasive nature, ESWL can cause significant pain due to the transmission of shock waves through skin, soft tissues, and renal structures. Inadequate pain control may lead to patient movement, reduced tolerance, and suboptimal targeting of the stone, ultimately affecting treatment success.

This prospective randomized controlled study is designed to compare the analgesic efficacy of three commonly used non-opioid analgesics-ibuprofen, paracetamol, and tenoxicam-against placebo during ESWL. All patients will be included and randomly assigned into four equal groups using a computer-generated randomization method.

Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at predefined time points (5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th minutes) during the ESWL procedure. The primary objective is to determine differences in pain control among the analgesic groups.

Secondary objectives include evaluating the association between pain intensity and procedural parameters such as energy levels applied during ESWL, as well as patient-related and stone-related factors. These include body mass index (BMI), subcutaneous fat thickness, and stone density measured in Hounsfield Units (HU).

In addition, treatment success will be assessed by stone-free rates, and the relationship between effective analgesia and the ability to apply higher energy levels will be analyzed.

The study hypothesizes that improved analgesia may enhance patient tolerance, allow the application of higher energy levels, and consequently improve stone fragmentation and treatment outcomes.

The results of this study may provide clinically relevant insights for optimizing analgesic protocols and individualizing patient management during ESWL procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urolithiasis
  • Kidney Stones
  • Ureteral Stones

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ESWL
  • pain
  • Analgesia
03

In context

Kidney Calculi Reclassified

509 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Calculi; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 86 across 391 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Calculi.

Browse Kidney Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Gaziantep is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Compared within Kidney Calculi, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Urolithiasis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing ESWL for urinary stone disease
  • Patients with kidney or ureteral stones indicated for ESWL
  • Ability to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or to ibuprofen, paracetamol, or tenoxicam

    • Chronic pain conditions or regular use of analgesics
    • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
    • Severe renal or hepatic impairment
    • Patients unable to complete pain assessment using VAS
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ibuprofen

    Participants receive ibuprofen prior to ESWL for pain control.

    Drug: Ibuprofen (Brufen®)

  • Experimental
    Paracetamol

    Participants receive paracetamol prior to ESWL for pain control.

    Drug: Paracetamol (drug)

  • Experimental
    Tenoxicam

    Participants receive tenoxicam prior to ESWL for pain control.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants receive placebo prior to ESWL.

    Drug: Tenoxicam

Interventions

  • Ibuprofen administered prior to ESWL for pain control.

  • Paracetamol administered prior to ESWL for pain control.

  • DrugTenoxicam

    Tenoxicam administered prior to ESWL for pain control.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo administered prior to ESWL.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Pain scores will be recorded at the 5th, 10th, 15th, and 20th minutes during the ESWL procedure. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome. VAS scores will be compared between treatment groups.

    Time frame: During ESWL procedure (up to 20 minutes)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stone-Free Rate After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL)

    Stone-free status will be defined as the absence of residual stone fragments on imaging performed 2 to 4 weeks after ESWL. The proportion of participants who are stone-free will be compared between treatment groups.

    Time frame: Within 2-4 weeks after ESWL

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Waqas M, Butt A, Ayaz Khan M, Khan I, Saqib IU, Hussain T, Akhter S. Comparison of Different Analgesia Drug Regimens for Pain Control During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Study. Cureus. 2017 Apr 26;9(4):e1195. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1195. PubMed 28560121 ↗
  • Hu W, Yang K, Zhang L, Lu X. Effect of media distraction (audio-visual and music) for pain and anxiety control in patients undergoing shock-wave lithotripsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jun;21(6):623. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10055. Epub 2021 Apr 14. PubMed 33936280 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data (IPD) sharing is currently undecided. Data may be shared upon reasonable request after publication, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical considerations.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07512297
Responsible party
Mehmet Öztürk (Asst. Prof. Dr., University of Gaziantep) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 6, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Mehmet Öztürk
Contact
mehmetozturk000@gmail.com
+905393328554

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ibuprofen · Acetaminophen

Start the discussion