ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07760402Updated Aug 12, 2026

Effects Of Propofol And Sevoflurane On Plasma Mirna Levels İn Living Kidney Donors

An interventional study of Sevoflurane and propofol in Kidney Transplant, sponsored by University of Gaziantep. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by University of Gaziantep · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Surgical interventions and associated tissue trauma induce a complex systemic inflammatory stress response characterized by the activation of neuroendocrine, metabolic, and immunological systems. Donor nephrectomy operations performed in living kidney donors are among the unique clinical models where these inflammatory cascades and cellular stress pathways are most intensely observed, due to major surgical trauma and unavoidable ischemia-reperfusion injury during organ clamping. Recent studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs), which epigenetically regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, serve as key determinants in perioperative medicine regarding immune response, resolution of inflammation, and cellular adaptation processes . Among our target molecules, miR-146a acts as a dominant, negative regulator (brake mechanism) of the innate immune response , while miR-155 plays an important role in the inflammatory response by triggering pro-inflammatory macrophage activation . Conversely, miR-21 displays an anti-apoptotic adaptation mechanism against tissue damage by directly targeting programmed cell death pathways . Propofol, an intravenous agent, and sevoflurane, a volatile anesthetic, are known to differentially impact microRNAs in circulating extracellular vesicles during major surgical interventions .

The original value of this study lies in being the first randomized clinical trial in the literature to comprehensively examine the acute comparative effects of these two anesthesia techniques on perioperative inflammatory miRNA expression profiles in completely healthy living kidney donors. The objective is to comparatively evaluate the dynamic changes in plasma miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-21 levels under general anesthesia maintained with propofol or sevoflurane.

Regarding the methodology, the research will be conducted on 34 voluntary living kidney donors aged 18-65 in the ASA I-II risk group, scheduled for elective donor nephrectomy at Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine Şahinbey Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Donors will be allocated into two equal groups (Group P: Propofol, n=17 and Group S: Sevoflurane, n=17) using a computer-assisted block randomization method, with anesthesia maintenance titrated to a Bispectral Index (BIS) of 40-60. Peripheral venous blood samples will be collected into K3-EDTA tubes at three different time points: before anesthesia induction (T0: basal), at the end of surgery (T1), and at the postoperative 24th hour (T2). In accordance with project management and data privacy principles, personal identity information will be masked, and each participant will be recorded in the system with a unique "File Number" (Dosya No). In the molecular phase conducted in coordination with the Department of Medical Genetics laboratory, total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis will be performed from plasma samples separated under cold chain rules. Expression levels of target genes and the U6 snRNA internal control will be quantitatively analyzed in duplicate using Real-Time Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Fold change ratios will be calculated using the method and analyzed with biostatistical methods including Shapiro-Wilk, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

As for the widespread impact, the molecular findings to be obtained will elucidate the epigenetic reflections of general anesthesia applications on systemic inflammation and organ protection capacities for the first time. These results will lead to the development of the safest, evidence-based anesthesia protocols that will minimize the inflammatory load caused by surgical trauma at the cellular level in living kidney donors, increase donor comfort and postoperative recovery quality, and protect kidney graft quality against ischemic injury, providing a strong scientific foundation for international transplantation guidelines.

Read the detailed description

Following the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB), this prospective, comparative study will be conducted at the University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. The study will be concluded once the target number of eligible donors is reached. Written informed consent will be obtained from donors aged 18-65, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, with a body mass index (BMI) below 35 kg/m², and scheduled for elective donor nephrectomy in the preoperative holding area before being transferred to the operating room. Informed consent forms will be obtained face-to-face by the investigators during the preoperative preparation process, prior to any clinical intervention, premedication, or randomization procedure.

Allocation of donors to the groups (Group S and Group P) will be performed in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated random numbers table via block randomization. To ensure strict allocation concealment, the assignments will be enclosed in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. The preparation of these envelopes will be handled by an independent researcher who is not involved in either the clinical phase of the study or the data analysis. Upon obtaining informed consent, the anesthesia team will open the corresponding sealed envelope in sequence and execute the assigned protocol, thereby preventing selection bias.

The Sevoflurane and Propofol methods utilized for anesthetic maintenance are part of the standard institutional routine application protocols of the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Donors will not receive any non-routine drug or dosage within the scope of this study. The randomization process is employed solely to determine which of the two standard and routine anesthetic regimens already available to the donor will be administered. Consequently, all anesthetic agents, intravenous administration sets, endotracheal tubes, and monitoring materials utilized intraoperatively are covered under the routine operational expenses of the hospital; no additional consumable materials will be introduced for research purposes.

A total of 34 donors enrolled in the study will be allocated into two groups via block randomization and the sealed envelope method to determine the maintenance regime of general anesthesia:

  • Group S (Sevoflurane Group): General anesthesia maintenance will be provided using Sevoflurane at a concentration of 1.5-2% combined with a 50% Air / 50% Oxygen mixture.
  • Group P (Propofol Group): General anesthesia maintenance will be provided using Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) via Propofol infusion at a dose of 4-10 mg/kg/hour combined with a 50% Air / 50% Oxygen mixture.

Sevoflurane and Propofol were selected as the comparative interventions due to their proven safety profiles and high preference rates in routine clinical practice, driven by their well-documented properties in preserving organ perfusion and ensuring rapid recovery. Both anesthetic agents are consistently and continuously stocked for routine clinical use in the hospital pharmacy. Potential adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, shivering, or rare malignant hyperthermia associated with Sevoflurane, and injection pain, hypotension, or bradycardia associated with Propofol, will be monitored by the anesthesia team under standard monitoring and managed promptly according to institutional routine treatment protocols.

Upon arrival in the operating suite, standard monitoring-including Electrocardiography (ECG), Non-Invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Peripheral Oxygen Saturation (SpO2), and End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (EtCO2)-will be established for all participating donors. To ensure pharmacological uniformity at the baseline phase between the groups, anesthesia induction will be performed using a standardized protocol in both groups as follows:

- Induction Protocol: All donors will routinely receive 0.03-0.05 mg/kg Midazolam, 2-2.5 mg/kg Propofol, 1-2 mcg/kg Fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg Rocuronium bromide for neuromuscular blockade, followed by endotracheal intubation.

Blood samples of 5 mL will be collected from the donors at three distinct clinical time points: prior to anesthesia induction (baseline value), at the end of surgery (post-extubation), and at the 24th postoperative hour. The blood sampling procedures will be performed during routine intravenous cannulation or through the existing intravenous line. Necessary medical precautions have been instituted to manage potential minor complications such as localized pain, hematoma, ecchymosis, or rare vasovagal syncope. The collected blood samples will be preserved by Dr. Tarik Oztuzcu at the Department of Medical Genetics, and plasma microRNA (miRNA) levels will be analyzed after the sample collection for all 34 donors is finalized.

MicroRNA Expression Methodology:

Within the scope of the project, expression levels of miR-146a, miR-155, miR-21, and the U6 gene will be analyzed in serum samples obtained by centrifuging the blood samples of the 34 donors.

  • RNA Isolation: Serum samples will be used for miRNA gene expression analysis. RNA isolation will be performed in accordance with the commercial miRNeasy (Qiagen, Germany) kit protocol. Serum samples separated from blood will be lysed within QIAzol Lysis Reagent. Following the addition of chloroform, the lysate mixture will be centrifuged to separate the aqueous and organic phases. RNA will partition into the upper aqueous phase, while DNA and proteins will remain in the organic phase. The aqueous phase will be carefully transferred, and extraction steps will proceed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • Determination of miRNA Expression: Only mature miRNAs from the isolated total RNAs will be reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA). The miScript II Reverse Transcriptase RT kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) will be used for the conversion of mature miRNAs in total RNA samples to cDNA. The reaction components and experimental steps in the cDNA synthesis phase will be carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol. Following the generation of cDNA templates from mature miRNAs, the RT-PCR array phase will be initiated. SYBR Green dye will be used along with specific primers for miR-146a, miR-155, miR-21, and U6 as an internal control to evaluate changes in the miRNA expression profile. After preparing the PCR mixture, the RT-PCR reaction will be initiated using a Corbett RT-PCR system (Qiagen, Germany). The 2\^-ΔΔCt method will be utilized for relative quantification and data analysis.
02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplant

Keywords

  • Living donor
  • microRNAs
  • sevoflurane
  • propofol
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Gaziantep is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Living kidney donors aged between 18 and 65 years.
  • Scheduled for an elective donor nephrectomy operation under general anesthesia.
  • (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • (BMI) strictly less than 35 kg/m².
  • Provided written informed voluntary consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history or clinical diagnosis of or Diabetes Mellitus (DM).
  • Active or history of chronic systemic inflammatory or diseases.
  • Chronic use of analgesics or documented history of substance abuse.
  • Known or allergic reaction to any of the anesthetic agents used in the study (Sevoflurane or Propofol).
  • Diagnosed with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, or any significant psychiatric disorder.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    GROUP S

    General anesthesia maintenance will be provided using Sevoflurane at a concentration of 1.5-2% combined with a 50% Air / 50% Oxygen mixture. Standard monitoring and routine anesthesia induction protocols will be implemented.

    Drug: Sevoflurane

  • Active comparator
    GROUP P

    General anesthesia maintenance will be provided using Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) via Propofol infusion at a dose of 4-10 mg/kg/hour combined with a 50% Air / 50% Oxygen mixture. Standard monitoring and routine anesthesia induction protocols will be implemented.

    Drug: propofol

Interventions

  • Inhalation anesthetic agent administered at a concentration of 1.5-2% with a 50% Air / 50% Oxygen mixture for the maintenance of general anesthesia.

  • Intravenous anesthetic agent administered via continuous TIVA infusion at a dose of 4-10 mg/kg/hour with a 50% Air / 50% Oxygen mixture for the maintenance of general anesthesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Relative expression levels of plasma microRNAs (miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-21)

    The relative changes in the expression levels of plasma miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-21 will be evaluated using blood samples. Total RNA will be isolated from serum samples using commercial kits, followed by complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR) array analysis. The 2\^-ΔΔCt method will be utilized to calculate relative gene expression folds, using U6 as an internal control reference gene.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-induction), immediately at the end of surgery (post-extubation), and at the 24th postoperative hour.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 5 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 30, 2026
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
StartActual
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07760402
Responsible party
Prof Dr Rauf GÜL (PROFESSOR DOCTOR, University of Gaziantep) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Elife SEVİLİR, Medical Doctor
Contact
esev1234@gmail.com
+905423794800
Rauf Gul, Professor Doctor
study chair · Gaziantep University Sahinbey Research and Application Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Sevoflurane · Propofol

Start the discussion