An interventional study of Positive Psychology Program in Elderly, Nursing Homes and Positive Psychology, sponsored by University of Gaziantep. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-26.
Sponsored by University of Gaziantep · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effects of an eight-week, group-based positive psychology program on hope, gratitude, and mental well-being among adults aged 65 years and older living in nursing homes in Gaziantep, Türkiye. Approximately 60 participants will be assigned to an intervention group or a control group, with 30 participants planned for each group.
The intervention group will receive eight weekly positive psychology sessions, each lasting 40-45 minutes, based on the PERMA model and adapted to older adults. The program will address positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning in life, accomplishment, hope, gratitude, and psychological well-being. The control group will receive no intervention during the study period and will be provided with an educational guide about the program after study completion.
Hope, gratitude, and mental well-being will be assessed using the Herth Hope Scale, Gratitude Scale, and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, respectively. Assessments will be conducted before the intervention, immediately after the eight-week program, and at a two-month follow-up. The study aims to determine whether the positive psychology program improves these outcomes among older adults living in nursing homes.
According to United Nations population estimates, the proportion of older adults worldwide was 10.2% in 2024. Türkiye also has an aging population, with older adults accounting for approximately 10.2% of the total population (Turkish Statistical Institute [TurkStat], 2024). The growing proportion of older adults highlights the increasing importance of developing interventions that support their psychological well-being and quality of life.
Aging is a multidimensional process involving physical, cognitive, social, economic, and psychological changes. It may lead individuals to reflect on the later stages of life and the meaning of their experiences (Tanrıverdi, 2021). However, aging is experienced differently by each individual, and its meaning depends largely on personal perceptions and attitudes (Kalkan, 2008). Older adults are often associated with dependency, social isolation, loneliness, unhappiness, and reduced social relationships. Such perceptions may overshadow their needs for affection, social support, respect, and meaningful engagement (Yıldırım \& Abukan, 2015; Aktaş Polat \& Hira, 2017).
Changes in traditional family structures and the increasing demands of urban life have contributed to the growing use of institutional care services for older adults (Taş et al., 2023). Although nursing homes may be chosen voluntarily or because of necessity, negative perceptions, concerns about institutional care, and difficulties adapting to a new living environment may adversely affect older adults' psychological well-being. Previous studies have reported that some nursing home residents experience boredom, social exclusion, feelings of worthlessness, longing for family life, and low morale and life satisfaction (Büker et al., 2010; Şenol \& Erdem, 2017; Taş et al., 2023). These findings suggest that psychosocial interventions aimed at strengthening positive psychological resources may be beneficial for older adults living in nursing homes.
Positive psychology focuses on positive emotions, satisfaction, happiness, engagement, relationships, and meaning in life. It emphasizes the identification and development of individual strengths and psychological resources rather than focusing exclusively on psychological distress (Özkan, 2021). Seligman's PERMA model conceptualizes well-being through five components: positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. Positive emotions may broaden awareness and facilitate coping with stress; engagement involves using personal strengths in meaningful activities; positive relationships promote connectedness, support, and a sense of belonging; meaning involves experiencing purpose and value in life; and accomplishment concerns setting and pursuing personally meaningful goals. Together, these components provide a framework for interventions designed to enhance well-being (Carr, 2016; Özkan, 2021).
Previous studies have suggested that positive psychology interventions may reduce psychological distress, hopelessness, anxiety, and depressive symptoms while improving life satisfaction, quality of life, and psychological well-being (Seung Joo et al., 2015; Safari \& Akbari, 2018; Gümüş Demir et al., 2022). Interventions informed by positive psychotherapy have also been associated with improvements in vitality, life satisfaction, happiness, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and perceived pain among older adults (Kashaniyan \& Koolaee, 2015; Tavakoli \& Dehnavi, 2020; Bartley et al., 2024; Pourdavarani et al., 2024). Yao et al. (2023) reported beneficial effects of a nurse-delivered positive psychotherapy intervention among older adults with mild cognitive impairment and depression. A group-based intervention conducted in a nursing home also indicated improvements in emotional distress, positive outlook, empathy, interpersonal relationships, friendship, helping behaviors, and self-expression (Yanardağ \& Özkan, 2023).
Hope and gratitude are additional psychological resources that may contribute to well-being in later life. Studies have indicated that hope-based interventions may improve life satisfaction, vitality, happiness, optimism, self-compassion, and hope among older adults (Cheavens \& Whitted, 2023; Azdanloo et al., 2025). Gratitude-based interventions have also been associated with reduced depressive symptoms and increased happiness and gratitude among adults aged 60 years and older (Ramírez et al., 2014). Furthermore, higher levels of gratitude have been associated with lower mortality risk among older adults (Chen et al., 2024). These findings support the importance of interventions that cultivate hope, gratitude, and psychological well-being in older populations.
Despite growing interest in positive psychology, research evaluating structured positive psychology interventions specifically among older adults, particularly those living in nursing homes, remains limited. Previous studies have examined various positive psychotherapy approaches, while a systematic review concerning dementia, cognitive decline, and positive psychology identified a relative lack of research beyond mindfulness-based approaches (Vasileiou et al., 2025). Further research is therefore needed to evaluate structured, theory-informed interventions that target positive psychological resources in older adults living in institutional care settings.
Study Rationale and Objective
In response to this gap, the present study will evaluate the effects of an eight-week, group-based positive psychology program structured around the PERMA model and adapted for older adults living in nursing homes. The study will examine whether participation in the program improves hope, gratitude, and mental well-being compared with the control condition.
By evaluating these outcomes, the study aims to contribute to the evidence base for psychosocial interventions in geriatric care. The findings may inform the development of nursing interventions that promote psychological well-being and support more positive, meaningful, and socially connected experiences of aging. In addition, the study may provide a basis for future research on positive psychology interventions delivered by mental health and psychiatric nursing professionals in institutional care settings.
1,049 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 509 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 113 across 888 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.
Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →University of Gaziantep is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Arm Label: Positive Psychology Program Group Arm Description: Participants in this group will receive an eight-session positive psychology program based on the PERMA model, with one session per week over eight weeks. The Herth Hope Scale (HUÖ), Gratitude Scale (ŞÖ), and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMİOÖ) will be administered before the intervention, immediately after the program, and at a two-month follow-up.
Behavioral: Positive Psychology Program
Participants in this group will not receive the positive psychology program during the study period. The Herth Hope Scale (HUÖ), Gratitude Scale (ŞÖ), and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMİOÖ) will be administered at baseline, two months after baseline, and two months after the second assessment. At the end of the study, participants will be provided with an educational handbook about the positive psychology program.
An eight-week, group-based positive psychology program based on the PERMA model, consisting of weekly 40-45-minute sessions.
Change in Hope Level
Hope will be assessed using the Herth Hope Scale (HUÖ).
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the eight-week intervention, and two-month follow-up.
Change in Gratitude Level
Gratitude will be assessed using the Gratitude Scale
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the eight-week intervention, and two-month follow-up.
Change in Mental Well-Being
Mental well-being will be assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS).
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the eight-week intervention, and two-month follow-up.
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided — The data sharing plan has not yet been finalized, and the decision will depend on participant confidentiality and applicable data protection requirements.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.