ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07408193Updated Jul 7, 2026

The Role of Coadministration of Lidocaine and Ketamine in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain.

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion and Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain, sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial examining the effect of a series of two weekly intravenous infusions of lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg in patients with moderate to severe opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the lidocaine - ketamine (LK) regimen provides better analgesia that an active placebo of midazolam 0.02 mg/kg, in this population.

Read the detailed description

Background

Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for chronic cancer-related pain, but their use is associated with multiple adverse effects, tolerance requiring progressively higher doses, and, in rare cases, opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Standard adjuvant analgesics (antiepileptics and antidepressants) may provide modest benefit. However, despite maximally tolerated therapy, many patients continue to experience refractory pain.

Lidocaine and low-dose ketamine may be beneficial in these difficult-to-treat pain scenarios due to their favorable safety profile and mechanisms of action. The main limitation of these drugs is their short duration of action; however, mechanisms involving central plasticity and reversal of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia may explain the longer analgesic effects observed in some studies.

Study Design

This is a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of two weekly lidocaine-ketamine (LK) infusions compared to active placebo in patients with opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain.

The investigators will assess:

Pain intensity and physical functioning using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Emotional functioning using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Patient-reported overall improvement using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale Total opioid consumption expressed as oral morphine equivalents (MME) Neuropathic pain effects in patients with confirmed neuropathic components using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

Adult patients presenting to the pain clinic of Attikon University General Hospital with a diagnosis of chronic cancer-related pain according to the International Association for the Study of Pain definition will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be adult patients with chronic cancer-related pain who continue to experience moderate to severe pain despite stable, optimized analgesic therapy. Eligible patients will be on a stable opioid regimen of at least 60 mg oral morphine equivalents per day for at least one week, with stable adjuvant analgesics in those with a neuropathic pain component. A minimum life expectancy of three months and the ability to provide informed consent will be required. Patients with significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, uncontrolled psychiatric or neurological illness, pregnancy, or contraindications to lidocaine, ketamine, or midazolam will be excluded. The presence of a neuropathic pain component will be assessed clinically and with validated instruments to allow exploratory subgroup analyses of treatment effects on neuropathic pain.

Randomization and Blinding Patients will be randomized using a computer-generated sequence in blocks of four.

Allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Infusions will be prepared by anesthesiology staff not involved in the trial, using identical, unmarked transparent syringes to maintain blinding.

Both patients and assessors (including companions or clinic staff assisting with questionnaires) will be blinded to treatment.

Intervention

Active intervention (LK infusion):

Lidocaine 4 mg/kg + ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, administered over 45 minutes using an electronic infusion pump Dosing based on actual body weight; for BMI >30, ideal body weight will be used

Active placebo: Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg IV over 45 minutes, selected to mimic sedative effects without analgesic activity

Procedure:

Pre-infusion: patients complete questionnaires and undergo brief clinical assessment IV cannula insertion and standard monitoring (pulse oximeter, ECG, non-invasive BP) Infusion over 45 minutes, followed by 1-hour post-infusion observation Two infusions will be administered 7 days apart After a 14-day washout, patients cross over to the alternate intervention

Rescue Analgesia

All patients will have access to rescue analgesics (e.g., oral oxycodone), converted to oral morphine equivalents for measurement and comparison.

Safety Monitoring Hepatic function: SGOT/SGPT monitored during the study Renal function: Creatinine and GFR monitored

Protocol adjustments:

If SGOT/SGPT above ULN => Extend infusion to 60 min; If SGOT/SGPT >3x ULN => Reduce lidocaine dose to 2 mg/kg; If. SGOT/SGPT >5x ULN, Child B/C liver disease, or GFR \<30ml/min => Discontinue participation

Common side effects:

Lidocaine: lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste Ketamine: nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome:

Change in BPI question 3 (pain intensity) from baseline to end of treatment.

Secondary Outcomes:

Physical functioning (BPI) Emotional functioning (BDI) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Opioid consumption (MME) Neuropathic pain (NPSI)

Statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS software package (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA) and R Project. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to assess the normality of data distribution, and the level of statistical significance will be set at 5% (p \< 0.05). Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD), whereas those not following the normal distribution will be presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies (percentages).

Comparisons between the two treatment conditions in the crossover design will be performed using the paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, depending on the normality of the data distribution. To explore potential correlations among study parameters, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) or other appropriate correlation coefficients will be calculated. If required by the study findings, additional analyses-such as multivariable logistic regression to identify independent determinants of observed changes, or mixed-effects model analyses-will be conducted.

Sample size calculation was performed using the Hedwig tool provided online by Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center. A sample of 20 patients has 80% statistical power for a level of significance of a=0.05 to detect a clinically significant change of 2 points in question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form from baseline to end of treatment assessment, given an SD of 3 based on data from studies assessing this particular outcome. Based on that, at least 20 patients need to be enrolled. We aim to enroll 24 patients.

Common side effects associated with lidocaine infusion include lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste. Common side effects associated with ketamine infusion include nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation. No serious adverse events have been reported with these drugs at the dosages used in this RCT. Any adverse events will be reported, along with any action taken.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain

Keywords

  • Cancer Pain
  • Treatment-Resistant Chronic Pain
  • Lidocaine
  • Ketamine
  • Analgesics, Adjuvant
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Neoplasms
03

In context

Cancer Pain

310 studies on the registry are indexed under Cancer Pain; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 62 across 235 interventional studies indexed under Cancer Pain.

Browse Cancer Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or more
  • Capacity to provide , ability to complete study assessments and comply with the study procedures
  • Meets the IASP definition for chronic cancer-related pain
  • Moderate or severe pain, defined as average pain of 4 or greater on an 11-point (0-10) NRS in the past 24h
  • Adequate trial of opioid medication, defined as a dose of at least 60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent or maximum tolerated dose, in the past 24h
  • For patients with neuropathic component to pain: adequate trial of at least one adjuvant analgesic, defined as a daily dose of at least Amitriptyline 37.5mg, Duloxetine 30mg, Gabapentin 900mg, Pregabalin 150mg, Venlafaxine 60mg or equivalent (26), or maximum tolerated dose in the past 24h

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous adverse reaction to ketamine, lidocaine or other amide-type local anesthetics, midazolam
  • Severe liver disease (Child Class B or C)
  • or SGOT >5 times the
  • End stage kidney disease
  • Serious cardiac comorbidity (e.g. unstable angina, poorly controlled hypertension or tachycardia, high-risk coronary vascular disease, symptomatic heart failure with class III-IV, history of heart block, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, Adams-Stokes syndrome)
  • Elevated intracranial or intraocular pressure
  • Pheochromocytoma or poorly controlled hyperthyroidism
  • History of psychosis, schizophrenia or substance abuse
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Porphyria
  • shorter than the duration of the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion

    Drug: Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion

  • Placebo comparator
    Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion

    Drug: Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine and Ketamine Infusion

    Drug pages: Lidocaine · Ketamine

    Participants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI \>30). The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting.

  • DrugActive Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion

    Participants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing midazolam 0.02mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI \>30). The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the Worst Pain During the Last 24 Hours on an 11-Point, 0 to 10, Numerical Rating Scale

    Question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form, where 0 is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in the Score of Pain Intensity of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form

    Assesses changes in patient-reported pain severity, including worst, least, average pain over the past 24 hours, and current pain ("pain right now").

    Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).

  2. Change in the Proportion of Patients Achieving 2-Point Reduction on Worst and Least Pain of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form

    Evaluates the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant improvement, defined as a ≥2-point reduction in worst and least pain on the Brief Pain Inventory.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).

  3. Change in the Score of the Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form

    Measures changes in the degree to which pain interferes with daily functioning, mood, sleep, work, and social activities.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).

  4. Change in total Oral Morphine Equivalents Consumption of the Previous Week

    Assesses changes in total opioid use by calculating the weekly oral morphine equivalent dose consumed by each participant.

    Time frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).

  5. Immediate Analgesic Effect of the Infusion (LK or placebo)

    Evaluated using question 6 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (pain right now)

    Time frame: Before the infusion and one hour after infusion termination.

  6. Change in the Score of the Beck Depression Inventory

    Measures changes in depressive symptom severity associated with treatment over the course of the study. Beck Depression inventory is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression. Scores range from 0 to 63, where higher score indicates more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.

  7. Rating of Overall Improvement Using Patient Global Impression of Change Scale

    Assesses the patient's overall perceived improvement in pain and function following the treatment. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."

    Time frame: one week after the second (LK or placebo) infusion

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University General Hospital of Athens "Attikon" - National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School
    Athens, Attica 12461, Greece
    Recruiting
    • Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology · Contactkkalimeris@med.uoa.gr · +302105831997
    • Erond Zeneli, MD · Contact+306982094129
    • Erond Zeneli, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bennett MI, Kaasa S, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic cancer-related pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001363. PubMed 30586069 ↗
  • van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1437-49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm056. Epub 2007 Mar 12. PubMed 17355955 ↗
  • WHO Guidelines for the Pharmacological and Radiotherapeutic Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537492/ PubMed 30776210 ↗
  • Bennett MI. Effectiveness of antiepileptic or antidepressant drugs when added to opioids for cancer pain: systematic review. Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):553-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216310378546. Epub 2010 Jul 29. PubMed 20671006 ↗
  • Lee JT, Sanderson CR, Xuan W, Agar M. Lidocaine for Cancer Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):326-334. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0257. Epub 2019 Jan 7. PubMed 30614748 ↗
  • Mestdagh F, Steyaert A, Lavand'homme P. Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques. Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 18;30(7):6838-6858. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500. PubMed 37504360 ↗
  • Zhu B, Zhou X, Zhou Q, Wang H, Wang S, Luo K. Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 18;10:954. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00954. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31620064 ↗
  • Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Bhatia A, Cohen SP. Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):241-254. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185. PubMed 31082965 ↗
  • Jonkman K, van de Donk T, Dahan A. Ketamine for cancer pain: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;11(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000262. PubMed 28306568 ↗
  • Kandil E, Melikman E, Adinoff B. Lidocaine Infusion: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Chronic Pain. J Anesth Clin Res. 2017 Jan;8(1):697. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000697. Epub 2017 Jan 11. PubMed 28239510 ↗
  • Iacob E, Hagn EE, Sindt J, Brogan S, Tadler SC, Kennington KS, Hare BD, Bokat CE, Donaldson GW, Okifuji A, Junkins SR. Tertiary Care Clinical Experience with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1245-1253. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx167. PubMed 29016948 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808. PubMed 29870458 ↗
  • Striebel J, Ruppen W, Schneider T. Simultaneous application of lidocaine and ketamine during ambulatory infusion therapy: a retrospective analysis. Pain Manag. 2023 Sep;13(9):539-553. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0037. Epub 2023 Oct 18. PubMed 37850330 ↗
  • Sugimoto M, Uchida I, Mashimo T. Local anaesthetics have different mechanisms and sites of action at the recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;138(5):876-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705107. PubMed 12642389 ↗
  • Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38. PubMed 8080219 ↗
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11. PubMed 18055266 ↗
  • Mystakidou K, Mendoza T, Tsilika E, Befon S, Parpa E, Bellos G, Vlahos L, Cleeland C. Greek brief pain inventory: validation and utility in cancer pain. Oncology. 2001;60(1):35-42. doi: 10.1159/000055294. PubMed 11150906 ↗
  • Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, Rostaing S, Lanteri-Minet M, Collin E, Grisart J, Boureau F. Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain. 2004 Apr;108(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.024. PubMed 15030944 ↗
  • Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00482-6. PubMed 11323136 ↗
  • Lee J, Currow D, Lovell M, Phillips JL, McLachlan A, Ritchie M, Brown L, Fazekas B, Aggarwal R, Seah D, Sheehan C, Chye R, Noble B, McCaffrey N, Aggarwal G, George R, Kow M, Ayoub C, Linton A, Sanderson C, Mittal D, Rao A, Prael G, Urban K, Vandersman P, Agar M. Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain): study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e066125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066125. PubMed 36810169 ↗
  • Olkkola KT, Ahonen J. Midazolam and other benzodiazepines. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;(182):335-60. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74806-9_16. PubMed 18175099 ↗
  • Gewandter JS, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Baron R, Gastonguay MR, Gilron I, Katz NP, Mehta C, Raja SN, Senn S, Taylor C, Cowan P, Desjardins P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Farrar JT, Hewitt DJ, Iyengar S, Jay GW, Kalso E, Kerns RD, Leff R, Leong M, Petersen KL, Ravina BM, Rauschkolb C, Rice ASC, Rowbotham MC, Sampaio C, Sindrup SH, Stauffer JW, Steigerwald I, Stewart J, Tobias J, Treede RD, Wallace M, White RE. Research designs for proof-of-concept chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1683-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 May 24. PubMed 24865794 ↗
  • Chu R, Umukoro N, Greer T, Roberts J, Adekoya P, Odonkor CA, Hagedorn JM, Olatoye D, Urits I, Orhurhu MS, Umukoro P, Viswanath O, Hasoon J, Kaye AD, Orhurhu V. Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for the Management of Early Postoperative Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Controlled Trials. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2020 Oct 15;50(4 Suppl 1):216-259. doi: 10.64719/pb.4391. PubMed 33633427 ↗
  • Mathias SD, Crosby RD, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Chung K. Estimating minimally important differences for the worst pain rating of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. J Support Oncol. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suponc.2010.12.004. PubMed 21542414 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: They will be available from the end of the recording of the response of the last patient and for 5 years thereafter.

Access criteria: Researchers that would have come in contact with our team firstly and that shall be able to prove that they will use the data solely for research purposes and not for commercial use.

Data sharing details ↗ · attikonhospital.gov.gr

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 17 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2026
First posted
Feb 13, 2026
StartActual
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07408193
Collaborators
Attikon Hospital
Responsible party
Konstantinos Kalimeris (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2026
Start date
Mar 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Associate Professor
Contact
kkalimeris@med.uoa.gr
+302105831997
Erond Zeneli MD, PhD candidate
Contact
erond.zeneli@gmail.com
+306982094129
Konstantinos Kalimeris, Assoc Prof of Anesthesiology
study chair · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Maria Riga, Assis Prof of Anesthesiology
study chair · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Ioannis Kotsantis, Assis Prof of Oncology
study chair · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Lidocaine · Ketamine

Start the discussion