ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07874412ORCHESTRAUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Operating-Room Distractions, Surgeon Workload, Anxiety, Teamwork and Intraoperative Adverse Events (ORCHESTRA)

An observational study in Colorectal Diseases and Anal Diseases, sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Updated Oct 14, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

During surgery, telephone calls, conversations, equipment problems and other events may distract the operating team. Some events interrupt the progress of the operation. The surgeon's workload and anxiety, together with how well the team works together, may also be related to events that occur during surgery.

ORCHESTRA is an observational study of patients undergoing colorectal or anal surgery in a single hospital. Trained observers record distractions during routine operations. After each operation, the surgeon reports workload and anxiety, and an observer assesses teamwork. Intraoperative adverse events are graded using a standard severity classification. The study examines how these measurements are related. It does not assign treatments, introduce distractions or change routine surgical care.

Read the detailed description

ORCHESTRA is a prospective, single-centre observational cohort study conducted in an academic colorectal surgery unit. Consecutive eligible patients undergoing colorectal or anal procedures performed by one designated surgeon are observed during routine surgical care. The operating surgeon and participating theatre staff gave consent to observation and questionnaire assessment at the start of the study.

Two independent observers record naturally occurring distractions in real time, including their type, operative phase and observable impact. Distractions are classified as A, potentially distracting; B, visibly distracting the team; or C, interrupting operative flow. The principal exposure is the number of C-class events per operation. Additional summaries include category-specific counts, total distraction count and a weighted score calculated as A + 2B + 3C.

Intraoperative adverse events are assessed using ClassIntra, with the maximum grade per operation serving as the primary outcome. Immediately after surgery, the operating surgeon completes the study's SURG-TLX implementation and STAI-State. Team collaboration is assessed by the observers using the study's OTAS implementation. Recorded patient and procedure characteristics include age, ASA physical status, obesity, procedure category and operative duration.

Ordinal regression examines associations with increasing ClassIntra severity. Related models consider workload and anxiety together and separately because these measures may be strongly correlated. Additional analyses describe distraction patterns, teamwork, workload and anxiety, and assess more clinically consequential events using a ClassIntra grade II or higher threshold. The study is observational and does not establish causal effects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Diseases
  • Anal Diseases

Keywords

  • operating room
  • distractions
  • surgical flow interruptions
  • surgeon workload
  • situational anxiety
  • teamwork
  • human factors
  • colorectal surgery
  • anal surgery
  • ClassIntra
  • SURG-TLX
  • STAI
  • OTAS
  • intraoperative complications
03

In context

Intraoperative Complications

81 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraoperative Complications; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 167 across 36 observational studies indexed under Intraoperative Complications.

Browse Intraoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens is the lead sponsor of 172 studies on the registry; 52 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive eligible adult patients undergoing colorectal or anal surgery in the participating unit, performed by the designated surgeon during the study period.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Undergoing a colorectal or anal operation in the participating unit, performed by the designated surgeon, during recruitment.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- None.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Colorectal and anal surgery cohort

    Consecutive eligible patients undergoing colorectal or anal surgery performed by the designated surgeon in the participating unit. Naturally occurring distractions, surgeon workload and anxiety, team collaboration and intraoperative adverse events are assessed during the index operation.

    Other: Naturally occurring operating-room distractions and human factors

Interventions

  • OtherNaturally occurring operating-room distractions and human factors

    Observational recording of naturally occurring distractions and assessment of surgeon workload, situational anxiety and team collaboration during routine surgical care. No experimental exposure is assigned and no change to treatment is prescribed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraoperative adverse-event severity assessed by ClassIntra

    The highest ClassIntra grade recorded during the index operation. Grade 0 indicates no intraoperative adverse event; grades I through V indicate increasing severity, with grade V indicating intraoperative death. The case-level ordinal score is analysed in relation to distraction burden and other recorded patient, procedural and human-factor measurements.

    Time frame: During the index operation, from anaesthetic induction to extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. ClassIntra grade II or higher intraoperative adverse event

    Occurrence (yes or no) of at least one intraoperative adverse event of ClassIntra grade II or higher, representing a more clinically consequential event. Reported as the number and proportion of operations with such an event.

    Time frame: During the index operation, from anaesthetic induction to extubation

  2. Surgeon state-anxiety score

    STAI-State total score based on 20 items, with reverse scoring of positively worded items according to the authorised scoring key. The surgeon reports feelings during the surgical case just completed. Scores range from 20 to 80; higher scores indicate greater situational anxiety. Only complete questionnaires are scored.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the index operation

  3. Surgeon task-load score

    Study implementation of SURG-TLX using six domains rated from 1 to 5: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, task complexity, situational stress and distractions. The overall score is the unweighted mean of the six ratings, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater workload.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the index operation

  4. Observer-rated team collaboration score

    Overall teamwork score from the study's OTAS implementation, rated by the observers on a scale from 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates severely hindered behaviour and 6 indicates highly effective behaviour. Higher scores indicate better team collaboration.

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the index operation

  5. C-class distraction count

    Number of C-class events per operation, recorded in real time. C-class events are distractions that interrupt operative flow. This is the principal exposure for the primary analysis. A higher count indicates greater observed interruption burden. The minimum is 0 and there is no fixed upper limit.

    Time frame: During the index operation, from anaesthetic induction to extubation

  6. Total and category-specific distraction counts

    Number of A-class (potentially distracting), B-class (visibly distracting the team) and C-class (interrupting operative flow) events per operation, and their total, recorded in real time by the observers. The minimum is 0 and there is no fixed upper limit; higher counts indicate greater distraction burden.

    Time frame: During the index operation, from anaesthetic induction to extubation

  7. Weighted distraction index

    Study-defined score calculated as the number of A-class events plus twice the number of B-class events plus three times the number of C-class events. The minimum is 0, there is no fixed maximum, and higher values indicate greater weighted distraction burden.

    Time frame: During the index operation, from anaesthetic induction to extubation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dell-Kuster S, Gomes NV, Gawria L, Aghlmandi S, Aduse-Poku M, Bissett I, Blanc C, Brandt C, Ten Broek RB, Bruppacher HR, Clancy C, Delrio P, Espin E, Galanos-Demiris K, Gecim IE, Ghaffari S, Gie O, Goebel B, Hahnloser D, Herbst F, Ioannidis O, Joller S, Kang S, Martin R, Mayr J, Meier S, Murugesan J, Nally D, Ozcelik M, Pace U, Passeri M, Rabanser S, Ranter B, Rega D, Ridgway PF, Rosman C, Schmid R, Schumacher P, Solis-Pena A, Villarino L, Vrochides D, Engel A, O'Grady G, Loveday B, Steiner LA, Van Goor H, Bucher HC, Clavien PA, Kirchhoff P, Rosenthal R. Prospective validation of classification of intraoperative adverse events (ClassIntra): international, multicentre cohort study. BMJ. 2020 Aug 25;370:m2917. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2917. PubMed 32843333 ↗
  • Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4. PubMed 21597890 ↗
  • Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery (OTAS): refinement and application in urological surgery. World J Surg. 2007 Jul;31(7):1373-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9053-z. PubMed 17487527 ↗
  • Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E, Kneebone R, Sevdalis N. Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Feb;212(2):234-243.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.001. PubMed 21276535 ↗
  • Wheelock A, Suliman A, Wharton R, Babu ED, Hull L, Vincent C, Sevdalis N, Arora S. The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork. Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051. PubMed 26291954 ↗
  • Keogh S, Laski D. A Concern for Intraoperative Distractions and Interference: An Observational Study Identifying, Measuring, and Quantifying Both within the Operating Theatre. Surg Res Pract. 2021 Dec 11;2021:9910290. doi: 10.1155/2021/9910290. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34931175 ↗
  • Ntanos N, Dimakakou K, Pantermaraki M, Filis K, Sigala F, Theodorou D, Chamzin A, Galyfos G. Evaluating Intraoperative Distractions During Surgical Procedures in a University Surgical Department-A Quantitative Analysis. World J Surg. 2025 Dec;49(12):3444-3447. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70174. Epub 2025 Nov 20. PubMed 41265892 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: conditions
  2. Oct 14, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07874412
Responsible party
George Theodoropoulos (Professor, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 14, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Nikolaos Ntanos
Contact
ntanos.nikos00@outlook.com
+30 213 208 8000
Nikolaos Ntanos
principal investigator · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
George Theodoropoulos
study chair · National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion