ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05854563CC1Updated Jan 13, 2026

Cough Capture as a Portal Into the Lung

An observational study in Lung Diseases, Lung Cancer and Lung Diseases, Obstructive, sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-13.

Sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The lung is a privileged organ; blood does not reflect most lung processes well, if at all. Therefore, for population scale diagnostics, the investigator team is developing non-invasive portals to the lung, for eventual early detection/risk assessment and diagnostic purposes. However, large macromolecules are not likely suspended nor readily detected in the breath. In particular, genomic DNA in the breath condensate (EBC) is very sparse, and where present, generally highly fragmented, not readily amenable to sequencing based assessments of DNA somatic mutation burden or distribution. Because gDNA (and protein) is challenging to obtain non-invasively from EBC, the study team considered alternative surrogate lower airway specimens. Cough capture is rarely done, and the investigator team is in the process of optimizing its collection. Importantly, the team will be evaluating how much of coughed material is from saliva contamination. Additionally, analyzing material that is target captured by capturing deep lung extracellular vesicles (EVs) using immobilized CCSP/SFTPC antibodies targeting EVs from distal bronchiole Club and alveolar type 2 cells could circumvent the mouth contamination problem, leaving a non-invasive portal to the deep lung suitable for large molecules, and in turn suitable for myriad epidemiologic and clinical applications.

The investigator team proposes (Aim 1) to pursue optimizing cough collection, and testing the efficacy and practicality of partitioning cough specimen for deep-lung specific extra-cellular vesicles (EVs). This cough specimen will be compared to that from invasively collected deep lung samples BAL/bronchial brushings, and to the potential contaminating mouth rinse, all from the same individuals. (Aim 2) The study team initially proposes to examine these cough specimens for somatic mutations by SMM bulk sequencing for single nucleotide variation, developed in the Vijg/Maslov labs. Finally, the investigator team will (Aim 3) test all airway specimens (cough, mouthwash and BAL) for lung surrogacy of cough, using proteins known to be specific for lung, as opposed to oral cavity/saliva, in the Sidoli/proteomics core.

The investigator team envisions that the translational impact of non-invasively obtained DNA or protein markers could allow for more rapid acute clinical diagnoses, and facilitate precision prevention and/or early detection of many acute and chronic respiratory disorders, including lung cancer, asthma and COPD, acute and chronic infectious diseases, and indeed systemic disorders of inflammation and metabolism.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: Cough can serve as a valid non-invasive surrogate for the lung for large molecules such as DNA and proteins, potentially for a variety of clinical and public health purposes.

Proposal in Brief: For development of an epidemiological and clinically-applicable platform for large molecules captured uniquely from deep lung, the investigator team will pursue a new approach that includes cough collection, and testing the efficacy and practicality of partitioning cough specimen for deep-lung specific extra-cellular vesicles (EVs). This cough specimen will be compared to that from invasively collected deep lung samples BAL/bronchial brushings, and to the potential contaminating mouthrinse, all from the same individuals. The study team initially proposes to examine these crude cough specimens, and then EV partitioned airway samples, for somatic mutations by SMM bulk sequencing for somatic mutations, state-of-art techniques developed in the Vijg/Maslov labs and for proteins known to be specific for lung, as opposed to oral cavity/saliva, in the Sidoli/proteomics core.

Specific Aims:

  1. Cough will be captured by aerochamber or equivalent/optimized device in 5 healthy volunteers, and in 5 current smokers, in parallel with mouthrinse and with BAL. Lung-specific EVs from these same samples via deep lung capture (Loudig lab) will be performed in parallel.
  2. Cough will undergo DNA mutation analyses using single molecule mutation sequencing (SMM-seq).
  3. Cough, mouthwash and BAL will undergo proteomic analysis using LC-MS in our Core facility.

Aims 1 and 2 will be studied in a cross-sectional manner, enrolling a convenience sample of PLWHA smokers attending the Montefiore Medical Center (MMC) Infectious Diseases (ID) Clinic. During Aim 1, group EBC DNA methylation and microRNA and metabolomics patterns will be determined by high resolution tagged bisulfite genomic sequencing of three tumor suppressor genes (DAPK, RASSF1A, PAX5B), according to smoking status (current, former, never), and lifelong dose (pack-years) in a sample of HIV-infected smokers. Aim 2 will pilot the comparison of EBC DNA methylation and microRNA and metabolomics patterns from HIV infected individuals to that from uninfected individuals, collected in other projects funded by other mechanisms. Aim 3 will employ a prospective design, collecting two specimens over time from a subset of the overall study sample to examine the stability of EBC DNA and microRNA and metabolomics patterns methylation patterns over time in HIV-infected smokers.

Approach:

Human Lung Studies protocol practices, in general: Ongoing subject enrollment is part of a longstanding IRB-approved Einstein-Montefiore clinical case-control protocol (2007-407). Individuals from pulmonary practices eligible to enroll are: Age > 21 years old, any smoking status, myriad comorbid status except contraindications to BAL, planned for clinically-indicated lung collection procedure (bronchoscopy) as part of routine care. This amounts to >100-150 bronchoscopy and related former smoker donors recruits per year. Over 150-200 such pre-existing bronchoscopic sample sets, and attendant non-invasive EBC, along with MW, buccal brush, others] are banked and potentially available for the current study. All data/specimens are collected pre-diagnosis and pre-procedure; each subject provides EBC (and other non-invasives such as Cough) samples pre- bronchoscopy. As such, this active protocol minimizes (i) recall bias; and (ii) contamination of non-invasive specimens from the disruptions and spillage of the lung tissue inherent to these lung procedures. Each subject will be followed for 3 months in the medical record to gather updated diagnostics/testing, and minimize case-control misclassification. Extensive demographic, exposure and clinical data are available: (1) demographic information; (2) smoking details: (3) markers of underlying lung disease: (4) existing imaging (5) clinical information/pathological findings. For this ICTR pilot:

Cough will be captured in aerochamber (common, disposable handheld spacer device for asthma meter dose inhalers/pumps). The investigator team has found that it is an adequate cough (forced exhalation) capture device, pending further optimization. Under a planned amendment, the patient is instructed to cough every 30 seconds into the handheld plastic chamber, during an overall period of 10 minutes. All inside surfaces of the entire chamber is then rinsed with 2-4 ml of PBS, and the rinse/wash is snap frozen. The rinse is subsequently processed according to the analyte to be studied. For DNA, there is an Isopropanol/EtOH precipitation step, followed by resuspension in smaller volume, and extraction by Qiagen/Zymo DNA isolation kit. For protein, the crude extract in PBS is handled directly in the core by precipitation, drying, resuspension in buffer, and injection in the LC-MS platform for shotgun analyses.

The EV partitioning procedure is published. EV-CATCHER™ can be customized to target unique surface membrane proteins particular to the desired cell type and thus to direct capture of cell-specific EVs. The Loudig lab has compiled extensive data demonstrating, for example, that using antibodies targeting deep lung cell unique and specific proteins (e.g., Clara Cell Specific protein (CCSP), Alveolar type 2 cell Surfactant Protein-C (SFTPC)) can specifically purify EVs from Bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) and exhaled breath condensates (EBC) and obtain similar miRNA expression profiles. Finally, by adding an enzymatically degradable uracylated double-stranded biotin-labeled DNA linker between immobilizing platform (polystyrene 96-well plate) and the activated antibody, the intact release of immunopurified EVs by incubation with uracil glycosylase (UNG) can be facilitated.

Approach: Aliquots from the 10 initial donors providing cough, mouthrinse, and BAL samples (5 current smokers, 5 never smokers) totaling 30 initial samples among all sample types for EV partitioning. Then, both whole-unpartitioned and EV-partitioned samples will be generated (totaling 60 samples) to be triaged to the two main assays, SMM for somatic mutation, and shotgun proteomics, below, both for feasibility demonstration, and pilot evaluation of surrogacy of cough for lung.

Aim 2: Cough will undergo DNA mutation analyses using SMM. Direct analysis of genome sequence integrity in normal cells. A key problem in studying genome sequence integrity in normal human tissues is the random nature of DNA mutations in the genome. While some mutations are clonally amplified, the vast majority are unique to each cell, and therefore rare and variant, which necessitates either single-cell whole genome amplification or in vitro clonal amplification assays. Both approaches have been associated with artifacts. Recently, the Maslov/Vijg lab developed reliable methods to quantitatively assess somatic mutations in single cells or in clonally amplified single cells. Using these methods it was demonstrated that base substitution mutations increase with smoking (and age) in proximal bronchial epithelial basal cells. A newer method for the quantitative analysis of somatic mutations, Single Molecule Mutation-seq (SMM-seq), is much more cost effective and can be applied to small amounts of bulk DNA. This latest SMM-seq method is significant because it allows, among other considerations, a practical means to accurately detect mutations in cytologically normal cells.

Approach: The 20 cough samples (10 unfractionated, 10 fractionated) will undergo DNA extraction, and library preparation and sequencing as described in the protocol. Somatic mutations among all the detected variants occurs by subtraction of germline polymorphisms found by analysis of regular sequencing library from DNA of the same individual. The number of somatic variants is normalized to the number of callable bases, i.e., bases with coverage more than 7X in SMM-seq libraries and with coverage more than 20X in regular libraries. Somatic mutation frequency will be expressed as a number of mutations per genome. The remaining 40 samples (20 from mouthwash and 20 from BAL) will be processed under other ongoing funding mechanisms, given budgetary constraints.

Aim 3: Cough, mouthwash, and BAL will undergo proteomic analysis using LC-MS in Einstein's Core facility. Prior proteomics attempts in cough do not exist to the investigator team's knowledge, perhaps due to technical limitations of low abundance material. The proteomics core (Sidoli, et al) will optimize a strategy to enhance sensitivity and speed for quantifying low abundance proteins/peptides. The sample preparation protocol will be modified to minimize sample loss and miniaturize nano-liquid chromatography coupled with state-of-the-art MS to quantify proteins/peptides in BAL, MW, and EBC specimens.

Approach: Sample preparation for proteomics: Cough specimen is dried to completion and then resuspended in 5 µL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH = 8) for canonical proteomics sample preparation (20 ng of trypsin). The entire sample is then analyzed using a Dionex RSLC Ultimate 300 (Thermo Scientific) nano-liquid chromatographer coupled online with an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Scientific) mass spectrometer. For separation, the lab will utilize an in-house packed analytical column with minimal internal diameter (50 µm ID, 25 cm length) so that molecules with a \~100 nL/min flow-rate can be separated. The low flow-rate provides enhanced pre-concentration of the sample eluting from the column, leading to sub-attomole sensitivity.

Data analysis, including data transformation, is then performed using a pipeline in the Sidoli lab. Briefly, proteomics MS spectra are identified and quantified using Proteome Discoverer (v2.5, Thermo Scientific) with thresholds more stringent than currently recommended by the community for false discovery rate (\<1% FDR for spectrum matches, peptides and proteins). Quantitative values are then transformed and normalized as described by the Sidoli lab. Statistical regulation is assessed using parametric statistics (p\< 0.05). Chromatograms are manually inspected, given the relatively short list of candidates.

All cough samples (10 unfractionated, 10 fractionated x 3 specimen types=60 samples) will undergo proteomic analysis as described.

Cross-compartment comparisons: Determining cough surrogacy for lung can be performed in analogous fashion to that performed for EBC surrogacy for the lung. Within a given platform, the levels (and signature) of SMM mutation will be compared. In the recent past in the exhaled microRNA environment (not proposed here), this has been performed by Spearman correlations of microRNA-seq data clustering in principal components, PCA (not shown) and Spearman correlations (not shown). For the proteomics environment, this surrogacy of cough for lung can be shown for cough similarly by clustering heatmaps, PCA, and methods such as Spearman correlation.

Outcome: This initial pilot testing of cough as a new platform biospecimen is high risk, high reward pragmatic translational work. If this pilot project shows cough to be a valid surrogate for lung, on the two platforms examined, then that will provide strong preliminary evidence for supporting further federal funding. This potential for an airway based portal to the lung could be envisioned for a wide variety of acute and chronic clinical and public health purposes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Diseases
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive
  • Lung Diseases, Interstitial
  • Lung Inflammation
03

In context

Lung Diseases

1,158 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 182 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 200 across 315 observational studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Albert Einstein College of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 201 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 46 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 37 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All consenting subjects >=21 y.o.with a clinical indication/imminent bronchoscopy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: minimum age of 21 years
  • Gender: Male and Female adults
  • Ethnicity: All ethnic groups and races
  • Subjects undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnostic purposes or therapy
  • Subjects without a known diagnosis of lung cancer who are not scheduled for lung tissue collection procedures
  • Subjects with a known or suspected diagnosis of asthma or and are scheduled for a visit at Montefiore Asthma or COPD Center and individual practices, and/or in-hospital with exacerbation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy precluding clinically indicated (e.g., >1.3, PTTr>1.3), thrombocytopenia \<50,000, uremia with serum creatinine >3.0
  • Unstable angina
  • Recent myocardial infarction (within 3 months),
  • Uncontrolled congestive heart failure or severe pulmonary hypertension (mean PAP>75 mmHg)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Bronchoscopy subjects, current or former smokers

    Bronchoscopy subjects \>=21 yo, current or former smokers

    Other: Observational only, all subjects; measure DNA mutation and proteomic survey.

  • Bronchoscopy subjects, never smokers

    Bronchoscopy subjects \>=21 yo, never smokers

    Other: Observational only, all subjects; measure DNA mutation and proteomic survey.

Interventions

  • OtherObservational only, all subjects; measure DNA mutation and proteomic survey.

    Observational only, all subjects; measure DNA mutation and proteomic survey.

    Also known as: Observational study to develop a cough diagnostic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of smoker and non-smoker participants demonstrating somatic DNA mutations as evidenced by mutation burden

    Somatic DNA analysis will be conducted using Single Molecule Mutation sequencing (SMM-seq) to identify mutations in EV-partitioned cough samples. The number will be determined by statistical testing using Fishers Exact Test to determine if there is a nonrandom association between the two variables

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes for collection of all airway samples

  2. Aggregate Median Mutation Rate in smoker and non-smoker participants

    Somatic DNA analysis will be conducted using Single Molecule Mutation sequencing (SMM-seq) to identify mutations in EV-partitioned cough samples. The aggregate median mutation rate (somatic mutation burden) in the cough from the group of smokers, as compared to that of non-smoking individuals, will be determined by statistical T-test.

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes for collection of all airway samples

  3. Number of smoker and non-smoker participants demonstrating altered protein expression

    Proteomic analysis will be conducted via LC-MS on the collected and EV-partitioned cough samples, MW samples, and BAL samples, respectively. To evaluate cough surrogacy for the deep lung (BAL) specimen, Spearman correlations of the most highly expressed 80 proteins among the three specimen types will be compared. The number of participant specimens demonstrating Spearman inter-tissue correlation values in excess of their corresponding threshold (0.3) will be tabulated.

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes for collection of all airway samples

  4. Proteomic signature comparison in smoker and non-smoker participants

    Proteomic analysis will be conducted via LC-MS on the collected and EV-partitioned cough samples, MW samples, and BAL samples, respectively. The proteomic signature of the most highly expressed 80 proteins in each of three specimen types will be compared between the current smoker and the non-smoker participants using PCA.

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes for collection of all airway samples

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mitchell MI, Ben-Dov IZ, Ye K, Liu C, Shi M, Sadoughi A, Shah C, Siddiqui T, Okorozo A, Gutierrez M, Unawane R, Biamonte L, Parikh K, Spivack S, Loudig O. Exhaled breath condensate contains extracellular vesicles (EVs) that carry miRNA cargos of lung tissue origin that can be selectively purified and analyzed. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024 Apr;13(4):e12440. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12440. PubMed 38659349 ↗
  • Shi M, Han W, Loudig O, Shah CD, Dobkin JB, Keller S, Sadoughi A, Zhu C, Siegel RE, Fernandez MK, DeLaRosa L, Patel D, Desai A, Siddiqui T, Gombar S, Suh Y, Wang T, Hosgood HD, Pradhan K, Ye K, Spivack SD. Initial development and testing of an exhaled microRNA detection strategy for lung cancer case-control discrimination. Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 24;13(1):6620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33698-8. PubMed 37095155 ↗
  • Huang Z, Sun S, Lee M, Maslov AY, Shi M, Waldman S, Marsh A, Siddiqui T, Dong X, Peter Y, Sadoughi A, Shah C, Ye K, Spivack SD, Vijg J. Single-cell analysis of somatic mutations in human bronchial epithelial cells in relation to aging and smoking. Nat Genet. 2022 Apr;54(4):492-498. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01035-w. Epub 2022 Apr 11. PubMed 35410377 ↗
  • Zefi O, Waldman S, Marsh A, Shi MK, Sonbolian Y, Khulan B, Siddiqui T, Desai A, Patel D, Okorozo A, Khader S, Dobkin J, Sadoughi A, Shah C, Spivack S, Peter Y. Distinctive field effects of smoking and lung cancer case-control status on bronchial basal cell growth and signaling. Respir Res. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02924-w. PubMed 39160511 ↗
  • Khulan B, Ye K, Shi MK, Waldman S, Marsh A, Siddiqui T, Okorozo A, Desai A, Patel D, Dobkin J, Sadoughi A, Shah C, Gera S, Peter Y, Liao W, Vijg J, Spivack SD. Normal bronchial field basal cells show persistent methylome-wide impact of tobacco smoking, including in known cancer genes. Epigenetics. 2025 Dec;20(1):2466382. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2025.2466382. Epub 2025 Feb 20. PubMed 39980243 ↗
  • S.D. Spivack, M.W. Azam, A. Okorozo, K. Batbayar, A.Y. Maslov, M. Lee, J. Vijg, and O. Loudig. Development of Cough Access to the Deep Lung for Somatic Mutagenesis Assessment [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A4800. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A4800
  • S.D. Spivack, O. Zefi, S. Waldman, M. Shi, T. Siddiqui, A. Desai, D. Patel, A. Okorozo, J.B. Dobkin, A. Sadoughi, and C. Shah. Altered Bronchialbasal Cell Morphology and Growth Phenotypes in Field Carcinogenesis Correspond With Altered Notch Signaling Patterns [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A7917. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A791
  • S.D. Spivack, K. Batbayar, A. Maslov, M. Lee, M.W. Azam, and J. Vijg. Genome-wide Tobacco Smoke Mutagenesis Modelled in Long Term HBEC Bronchial Basal Epithelial Cells In Vitro [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A4801. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.2025.211.Abstracts.A4801

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Following publication all IPD can be made available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Within 6 months of study publication/conclusion

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 51 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 30, 2023
First posted
May 11, 2023
StartActual
Mar 28, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Jan 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05854563
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2023
Start date
Mar 28, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 13, 2026

Study contacts

Aham Okorozo, MD
Contact
ahamefule.okorozo@einsteinmed.edu
718-678-1035
Khulan Batbayar, PhD
Contact
Khulan.Batbayar@einsteinmed.edu
718-678-1040
Simon D Spivack, MD
principal investigator · Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion