ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06349915SWEEPUpdated Oct 5, 2026

A Pilot Evaluation of a Digital Peer Support Intervention for Suicidal Adolescents

An interventional study of Supporting Wellbeing with Everyday Experiences of Peers (SWEEP) in Suicide, sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Albert Einstein College of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 5, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Suicide risk has increased among youth in underserved communities, where access to mental healthcare is limited. To address this need, the investigator team plans to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of a brief, low-cost, culturally responsive digital intervention for ethnically diverse youth at risk for suicide in The Bronx, New York. In collaboration with community stakeholders, suicide recovery narratives, featuring adolescents' experiences related to recovery from suicidal thoughts will be developed. A smartphone ecological momentary assessment (EMA) app will be used to evaluate whether a curriculum of these narratives provides anti-suicidal benefits to at-risk adolescents.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-arm investigation of a novel suicide prevention intervention, called "Supporting Wellbeing with Everyday Experiences of Peers" (SWEEP). In a preliminary phase (Phase 1) of the study, suicide recovery narratives: short first-person stories about lived experience with and recovery from Bronx Adolescents will be collected. The investigator team will then evaluate evaluate the anti-suicidal benefits of this intervention in a single-arm trial. In a subsequent phase (Phase 2), adolescent participants (n=46) will be provided with the SWEEP intervention, which involves reading or listening to one suicide recovery narrative each day during the 14-day trial. Six of the 46 participants will be adolescents, with recent suicidal thoughts or depression, who are currently receiving mental healthcare in Montefiore's Outpatient Psychiatry Department, rather than those on the waitlist to receive these services. All six participants will then complete a post-intervention qualitative interview to inform potential changes to intervention procedures. During this second phase, suicide recovery narratives will be provided, in audio and text formats, via a smartphone app. That same smartphone app will also collect real-time (ecological momentary) assessments of suicidal thoughts, as well as secondary and additional outcomes, five times per day. The investigator team will evaluate whether participants experience reductions in the intensity of suicidal thoughts over the course of the 14-day trial. During Phase 3, participants will be recruited to a control condition (n=15) and a treatment condition (n=30). Those in the Phase 3 treatment condition will receive the same intervention (1 SWEEP narrative per day for 14 days + 3x/day EMA) as those in Phase 2. Those in the Control condition will receive 3x/day EMA only.

A recent amendment approved by the IRB decreased the maximum response time for follow-up after participants report an adverse event from 24 hours to 12 hours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Suicide

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • digital intervention
  • community participation
  • ecological momentary assessment
03

In context

Suicide

607 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicide; 162 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 46 is below the median of 104 across 490 interventional studies indexed under Suicide.

Browse Suicide studies →

Lead sponsor

Albert Einstein College of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 201 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Of its 46 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 37 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • past-month history of suicidal thoughts
  • past-month history of Major depressive disorder
  • possession of apple or android smartphone with data plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to read/write in English
  • Active mania
  • Active psychosis
  • Autism spectrum disorder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    This is a single-arm study. All participants will be allocated to the intervention arm, in which they will receive the digital narrative therapy.

    Behavioral: Supporting Wellbeing with Everyday Experiences of Peers (SWEEP)

Interventions

  • BehavioralSupporting Wellbeing with Everyday Experiences of Peers (SWEEP)

    Each day during a 14-day trial period, participants will receive one narrative featuring lived experience with and recovery from suicidal thoughts and behaviors. These narratives will be presented in audio and text format via a smartphone app. Participants will also complete self-report surveys assessing study outcomes using the same smartphone app five times per day.

    Also known as: SWEEP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suicidal Thoughts

    Participants will self-report their current subjective intensity of suicidal thoughts using an 11-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating more intense suicidal thoughts.

    Time frame: 5 times per day during 14-day trial

Secondary outcomes

  1. Suicidal Urge Resistance

    Participants will self-report the strength of their current ability to resist suicidal urges using an 11-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater ability to resist suicidal urges.

    Time frame: 5 times per day during 14-day trial

  2. Social Connectedness

    Participants will self-report their current feelings of being connected to other people using an 11-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating feeling more being connected to other people.

    Time frame: 5 times per day during 14-day trial

  3. Optimism

    Participants will self-report their current of feelings of optimism about the future using an 11-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater optimism.

    Time frame: 5 times per day during 14-day trial

  4. Social Support

    Participants will self-report their current perception of the availability of emotional support from others using an 11-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating the perception greater availability of emotional support from others.

    Time frame: 5 times per day during 14-day trial

  5. Intervention Acceptability

    Participants will self-report their current perception of acceptability of the SWEEP intervention across three items. Participants will rate the usefulness of receiving the narratives using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating that the narratives were more useful. Participants will rate the difficulty of reading or listening to the narratives each day using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating that the narratives were more difficult to read or listen to. This item will be reverse coded. Participants will rate how willing they are to recommend the narratives to their peers using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater willingness to recommend the narratives. Each of these items will be evaluated in isolation, as well as in aggregate using both summation and an arithmetic mean score.

    Time frame: Study conclusion (at the end of the 14-day trial)

Other outcomes

  1. Emotions

    Participants will self-report the current intensity of 10 emotions: excited, guilty, scared, proud, irritated, ashamed, inspired, nervous, determined, angry. Each emotion will be rated on an 11-point Likert-type scale with higher scores indicating more intense emotion. Each of these items will be evaluated in isolation, as well as in aggregate using arithmetic mean. For aggregating an overall emotion score, the positive emotions excited, proud, inspired, and determined will be reverse-scored to provide an aggregate rating of negative emotion.

    Time frame: 5 times per day during 14-day trial

  2. Treatment Readiness

    Participants will self-report their current readiness for mental health treatment across 4 items. Participants will rate their motivation for beginning regular mental health services using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater readiness to begin regular services. Participants will rate their anxiety about discussing personal difficulties with a mental health professional using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. This item will be reverse coded. Participants will rate how confident they feel that regular mental health services will be helpful using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater confidence. Participants will rate how necessary they feel that regular mental health services are for them using a 7-point Likert-type scale, with higher scores indicating greater feelings of necessity. Each item will be evaluated in isolation and in aggregate using both summation and arithmetic mean score.

    Time frame: Baseline (prior to starting the 14-day trail) and study conclusion (at the end of the 14-day trial)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Franz PJ, Mou D, Kessler DT, Stubbing J, Jaroszewski AC, Ray S, Cao-Silveira VB, Bachman S, Schuster S, Graupensperger D, Alpert JE, Porath M, Nock MK. Digital bibliotherapy as a scalable intervention for suicidal thoughts: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Aug;90(8):626-637. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000752. PubMed 36066864 ↗
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 10 leading causes of death, United States. WISQARS Fatal Injury Data Visualization Tool.
  • Fox KR, Huang X, Guzman EM, Funsch KM, Cha CB, Ribeiro JD, Franklin JC. Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. 2020 Dec;146(12):1117-1145. doi: 10.1037/bul0000305. Epub 2020 Oct 29. PubMed 33119344 ↗
  • Alvarez K, Polanco-Roman L, Samuel Breslow A, Molock S. Structural Racism and Suicide Prevention for Ethnoracially Minoritized Youth: A Conceptual Framework and Illustration Across Systems. Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;179(6):422-433. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21101001. PubMed 35599542 ↗
  • Bray MJC, Daneshvari NO, Radhakrishnan I, Cubbage J, Eagle M, Southall P, Nestadt PS. Racial Differences in Statewide Suicide Mortality Trends in Maryland During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):444-447. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3938. PubMed 33325985 ↗
  • Weimerskirch PJ. Benjamin Rush and John Minson Galt, II. Pioneers of bibliotherapy in America. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1965 Oct;53(4):510-26. PubMed 5319266 ↗
  • Stip E, Ostlundh L, Abdel Aziz K. Bibliotherapy: Reading OVID During COVID. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 7;11:567539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567539. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33364987 ↗
  • Evans K, Tyrer P, Catalan J, Schmidt U, Davidson K, Dent J, Tata P, Thornton S, Barber J, Thompson S. Manual-assisted cognitive-behaviour therapy (MACT): a randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention with bibliotherapy in the treatment of recurrent deliberate self-harm. Psychol Med. 1999 Jan;29(1):19-25. doi: 10.1017/s003329179800765x. PubMed 10077290 ↗
  • Gualano MR, Bert F, Martorana M, Voglino G, Andriolo V, Thomas R, Gramaglia C, Zeppegno P, Siliquini R. The long-term effects of bibliotherapy in depression treatment: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 29. PubMed 28993103 ↗
  • Bietti LM, Tilston O, Bangerter A. Storytelling as Adaptive Collective Sensemaking. Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;11(4):710-732. doi: 10.1111/tops.12358. Epub 2018 Jun 28. PubMed 29954043 ↗
  • Rennick-Egglestone S, Morgan K, Llewellyn-Beardsley J, Ramsay A, McGranahan R, Gillard S, Hui A, Ng F, Schneider J, Booth S, Pinfold V, Davidson L, Franklin D, Bradstreet S, Arbour S, Slade M. Mental Health Recovery Narratives and Their Impact on Recipients: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis. Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;64(10):669-679. doi: 10.1177/0706743719846108. Epub 2019 May 2. PubMed 31046432 ↗
  • Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, Braithwaite SR, Selby EA, Joiner TE Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):575-600. doi: 10.1037/a0018697. PubMed 20438238 ↗
  • Joiner T. Why People Die by Suicide. Harvard University Press; 2005.
  • Nock MK, Green JG, Hwang I, McLaughlin KA, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC. Prevalence, correlates, and treatment of lifetime suicidal behavior among adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;70(3):300-10. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.55. PubMed 23303463 ↗
  • Millner AJ, Lee MD, Nock MK. Describing and Measuring the Pathway to Suicide Attempts: A Preliminary Study. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2017 Jun;47(3):353-369. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12284. Epub 2016 Aug 1. PubMed 27477787 ↗
  • Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Huang X, Musacchio KM, Jaroszewski AC, Chang BP, Nock MK. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. 2017 Feb;143(2):187-232. doi: 10.1037/bul0000084. Epub 2016 Nov 14. PubMed 27841450 ↗
  • Roswarski T, Dunn J. The Role of Help and Hope in Prevention and Early Intervention with Suicidal Adolescents: Implications for Mental Health Counselors. J Ment Health Couns. 2009;31(1):34-46. doi:10.17744/mehc.31.1.u150745762627518
  • Franz PJ, Nook EC, Mair P, Nock MK. Using Topic Modeling to Detect and Describe Self-Injurious and Related Content on a Large-Scale Digital Platform. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12569. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PubMed 31264733 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The research team will consider requests to share specific data with qualified research teams upon request

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026→Oct 2026
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2028→Apr 2028
Oct 5, 2026
Study completion
Feb 2028→Apr 2028
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Start date Aug 2026→Oct 2026
    Primary completion Feb 2028→Apr 2028
    Study completion Feb 2028→Apr 2028
    + 3 other changes: identifiers, verification date and description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06349915
Collaborators
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Yeshiva University, Ilumivu
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 5, 2024
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Peter J Franz, Ph.D.
Contact
peter.franz@einsteinmed.edu
6077278620
Peter J Franz, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion