ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03313011SLD4TUpdated May 1, 2026

The Neurobiology of Two Distinct Types of Progressive Apraxia of Speech

An observational study in Apraxia of Speech, Non-fluent Aphasia and Primary Progressive Aphasia, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2017; still recruiting 9 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to identify and distinguish two different types of Progressive Apraxia of Speech through clinical imaging and testing.

Read the detailed description

Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder reflecting a problem with the programming and/or planning of speech. AOS is well recognized in the context of stroke where onset is acute and the condition improves or is stable and chronic. AOS that is insidious in onset and progresses over time because of neurodegeneration is less well recognized and understood. For the past decade the investigators have been studying patients with primary progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS). They have demonstrated that it can be the earliest manifestation of an underlying neurodegenerative disease and have recently reported that the profile of PAOS characteristics can differ among affected patients. In some instances, the speech pattern is dominated by distorted sound substitutions and additions, and other features attributable to articulatory difficulty, while in other instances the pattern is dominated by slow, prosodically segmented speech. We have designated the first profile as Phonetic PAOS (Ph-PAOS) and the second as Prosodic PAOS (Pr-PAOS; previously referred to in our studies as type 1 and 2, respectively). Importantly, it appears that the AOS pattern type may have prognostic implications. In a recent longitudinal study, the investigators observed that in some PAOS patients, the AOS remained the most salient feature over an average of seven years of the neurodegenerative disease. Other patients developed a severe extrapyramidal syndrome, resembling progressive supranuclear palsy, within five years, causing significant morbidity, including the inability to ambulate and a shortened life span; interestingly, this more aggressive course was associated with the Pr- PAOS type. At present, little is known about these types. To address the main aim to better understand the neurobiology and clinical associations of PAOS types, they will perform longitudinal speech, language, and neurocognitive testing, acoustic analyses, neuroimaging, and autopsy in a cohort of 47 new PAOS patients (for 80 PAOS patients total) and healthy controls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Apraxia of Speech
  • Non-fluent Aphasia
  • Primary Progressive Aphasia
  • Primary Progressive Nonfluent Aphasia

Keywords

  • apraxia of speech
03

In context

Apraxias

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Apraxias; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 47 is below the median of 80 across 12 observational studies indexed under Apraxias.

Browse Apraxias studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients that have been diagnosed as having Progressive Apraxia of Speech.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. All enrolled patients must be over the age of 18, speak English as their primary language, and have an informant who can provide an independent evaluation of functioning.
  2. Each new patient must present with a chief complaint of progressive impairment of speech and must have evidence of AOS documented by a speech-language pathologist during routine clinical evaluation.
  3. At study entry, all patients must have speech sufficiently intelligible for a confident diagnosis of AOS, dysarthria, and/or aphasia, and for acoustic analysis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any patient whose speech is not intelligible enough for confident speech-language diagnosis will be excluded from the study.
  2. All patients with concurrent illnesses that could account for speech deficits (e.g., traumatic brain injury, strokes, developmental syndromes), and patients meeting criteria for another neurodegenerative disease (e.g., Alzheimer's type dementia57), will be excluded.
  3. Patients with aphasia or dysarthria who do not have PAOS, or whose aphasia or dysarthria at study entry is more severe than PAOS, will be excluded.
  4. All women who are pregnant, or post-partum and breast-feeding, will be excluded as they are unable to undergo the required imaging. All women who can become pregnant must have a pregnancy test no more than 48 hours before the DaTscan.
  5. Patients will also be excluded if MRI is (e.g., metal in head, cardiac pace maker), if there is severe claustrophobia, if there are conditions that may confound brain imaging studies (e.g. structural abnormalities, including subdural hematoma or intracranial neoplasm), or if they are medically unstable or are on medications that might affect brain structure or metabolism (e.g. chemotherapy).
  6. Patients will be excluded if they do not have an informant, or do not consent to the research.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Progressive Apraxia of Speech

    Diagnostic Test: Testing protocol for the study

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testTesting protocol for the study

    All patients will see a Neurologist for a neuro exam and consult, see a Speech Pathologist for assessment of speech and language skills, see the Study Coordinator for neuropsych testing (brief tests of thinking, memory, visual spatial skills, etc), undergo an MRI of the brain and a DaTscan of the brain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Distinguish types of Progressive Apraxia of Speech

    Distinguish types of PAOS using the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS)

    Time frame: 1-2 years after baseline imaging

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 119 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 11, 2017
First posted
Oct 18, 2017
StartActual
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
May 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03313011
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Keith A. Josephs (Consultant in Neurology, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 18, 2017
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

Sarah M Boland, CCRP
Contact
boland.sarah@mayo.edu
507-284-3863
Keith Josephs, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion