ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07815249Updated Sep 11, 2026

Speech Therapy for Children With Rare Genetic Conditions and Childhood Apraxia of Speech

An interventional study of Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing in Childhood Apraxia of Speech and Genetic Condition, sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Australia. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Murdoch Childrens Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this trial is to learn if speech therapy can improve speech accuracy in children with rare genetic conditions and childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). This study will look at each child individually.

Participants will complete 4-weeks of motor speech therapy (3 times per week) and will complete speech assessments before, during and after therapy to measure change. The motor speech therapy will be either Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment (ReST) or Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC). Assignment to ReST or DTTC will be based on the participant's age and speech ability. This trial will not compare ReST and DTTC.

Read the detailed description

This study uses a single case experimental design (SCED) approach with a multiple baseline design.

Participants will be allocated to either speech movement therapy approach (Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing [DTTC] or Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment [ReST]) (based on clinical and speech characteristics). Each participant is allocated to one treatment only. Each participant will follow an A-B-F pattern as follows.

A: Baseline: Within each group, participants will be randomly allocated to baseline lengths of 3, 4 or 5 probes (i.e., providing experimental control). Baseline probes will be collected twice per week (i.e., baseline duration will run from 1.5 to 2.5 weeks)

B: Treatment: All participants will complete a 4-week treatment block (3 sessions per week) with a qualified speech pathologist.

F: Follow-up: Maintenance probes will be completed at 1 week, 4 weeks and 8 weeks post-treatment.

Speech outcomes are measured repeatedly during baseline, treatment and follow-up to examine level, trend and maintenance of change over time.

The primary objective is to examine the efficacy of currently utilised speech treatments (i.e., DTTC, ReST) on accuracy of trained speech targets in children with CAS and rare genetic conditions.

Secondary objectives:

  • To measure change in accuracy of untrained speech targets (generalisation)
  • To measure change in connected speech intelligibility
  • To measure change in functional communication (e.g., parent-reported communication and intelligibility)
  • To explore parent satisfaction with the intervention and perceived impact on participation and quality of life

This trial anticipates n=20 participants, approximately n=10 per treatment group (DTTC, ReST) each contributing to a multiple baseline SCED.

Once consented, the individual estimated duration is 4 months:

  • \< 3 weeks for multiple baseline probes
  • 4 weeks of treatment (incl. weekly probes)
  • 8 weeks for follow-up/maintenance probes

Treatment:

  • Intensive speech movement treatment delivered 3x/week for 4 weeks (12x 45-60 minute sessions).
  • Established DTTC or ReST protocols will be followed. These treatments are manualised. Fidelity will be monitored via checklists and session recordings, with oversight from the CI
  • Individualised target word sets will be based on each child's phonetic/phonotactic profile (i.e., the sounds and syllable structures they can and cannot produce)
  • Speech probe assessments collected at each baseline, weekly during treatment, and at 1-, 4- and 8- weeks post-treatment
02

Conditions studied

  • Childhood Apraxia of Speech
  • Genetic Condition

Keywords

  • Childhood apraxia of speech
  • Speech pathology
  • Speech therapy
  • Genetic
  • Genetic condition
  • Speech-language pathology
  • Motor speech
03

In context

Apraxias

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Apraxias; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 32 across 50 interventional studies indexed under Apraxias.

Browse Apraxias studies →

Lead sponsor

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 99 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged between 3 and 16 years, with a confirmed genetic condition and a diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech; English as the primary language at home; able to participate in speech therapy 3 times per week for 4 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of an acquired brain or movement condition likely to affect speech; currently receiving motor speech therapy in the community; diagnosis of a behavioural condition likely to impact engagement (i.e., unable to participate for 45 minutes, unable to focus attention at the speech therapist's face for a few minutes at a time, unable to say any sounds and/or use gesture, unable to try to copy speech therapist; intolerant to touch (if touch cues are needed for DTTC)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motor speech therapy

    DTTC or ReST

    Behavioral: Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment · Behavioral: Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing

Interventions

  • BehavioralRapid Syllable Transition Treatment

    ReST is a motor speech treatment targeting prosodic accuracy (correct stress patterns) and smooth transitions between sounds. It uses pseudo-words (also known as nonwords) to remove reliance on meaning and focus on pure motor planning and programming demands (i.e., the core deficit in CAS). Participants will complete 60 minutes of motor speech therapy (ReST), 3 times per week for 4 weeks, totalling 12 treatment sessions.

  • BehavioralDynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing

    DTTC is a motor speech treatment. It is designed to support children with CAS who require intensive modelling, cueing, and motor practice. The treatment focuses on syllables rather than isolated sounds and progresses through a hierarchy of simultaneous production (i.e., with the clinician), immediate (copying), delayed, and spontaneous productions based on performance. Cueing is highly flexible and dynamic to ensure accurate speech movement patterns before practice intensity increases. Participants will complete 60 minutes of motor speech therapy (DTTC), 3 times per week for 4 weeks, totalling 12 treatment sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in accuracy of trained speech targets following speech intervention where accuracy is measured by the percentage of words correct on an individualised probe word list

    This will be used to determine changes in accuracy of trained speech targets following speech intervention. Accuracy will be determined using an individualised probe word list (a higher percentage of correct words demonstrates higher accuracy).

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in accuracy of untrained speech targets following speech intervention where accuracy is measured by the percentage of words correct on an individualised probe word list

    This will be used to determine changes in accuracy of untrained speech targets following speech intervention. Accuracy will be determined using an individualised probe word list (a higher percentage of correct words demonstrates higher accuracy).

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

  2. Change in the percentage of subjective (listener-based) single word speech intelligibility following speech intervention measured using the Preschool/Childhood Speech Intelligibility Measure (PSIM/CSIM)

    Percent single word intelligibility calculated from Preschool/Childhood Speech Intelligibility Measure (PSIM/CSIM). Higher % is more accurate.

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

  3. Change in subjective (listener-based) sentence level (connected speech) intelligibility following speech intervention measured using the Assessment of the Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (ASSIDS)

    The percentage of words correctly understood by an unfamiliar listener will be measured from 22 sentences produced. A higher percentage demonstrates greater accuracy.

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

  4. Change in objective measures of speech timing following speech intervention measured using acoustic measures obtained from three short speech tasks (2-minute monologue, diadochokinetic rate (i.e., "pa-pa-pa") and sustained vowel.

    Acoustic measures of timing (pause length and speech rate) will be obtained from three short speech tasks (2-minute monologue, diadochokinetic rate (DDK) (i.e., "pa-pa-pa") and sustained vowel (i.e., "say ahhh for as long as you can").

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

  5. Change in objective measures of vocal control following speech intervention measured using acoustic measures obtained from three short speech tasks (2-minute monologue, diadochokinetic rate (i.e., "pa-pa-pa") and sustained vowel.

    Acoustic measures of vocal control (fundamental frequency variation) will be obtained from three short speech tasks (2-minute monologue, diadochokinetic rate (DDK) (i.e., "pa-pa-pa") and sustained vowel (i.e., "say ahhh for as long as you can").

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

  6. Change in objective measures of vocal quality following speech intervention measured using acoustic measures obtained from three short speech tasks (2-minute monologue, diadochokinetic rate (i.e., "pa-pa-pa") and sustained vowel.

    Acoustic measures of vocal quality (harmonics-to-noise ratio) will be obtained from three short speech tasks (2-minute monologue, diadochokinetic rate (DDK) (i.e., "pa-pa-pa") and sustained vowel (i.e., "say ahhh for as long as you can").

    Time frame: Baseline (3, 4 or 5 baselines depending on baseline allocation, complete twice weekly pre-treatment), Treatment week 1, Treatment week 2, Treatment week 3, Treatment week 4, 1-week post treatment, 4-weeks post treatment, 8-weeks post treatment.

  7. Tolerability for the parent/caregiver and participant measured using a 5-point Likert scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree

    Study specific parent/caregiver and participant tolerability and use survey using 5-point Likert scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree.

    Time frame: Completed at end of 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Morgan AT, Amor DJ, St John MD, Scheffer IE, Hildebrand MS. Genetic architecture of childhood speech disorder: a review. Mol Psychiatry. 2024 May;29(5):1281-1292. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02409-8. Epub 2024 Feb 16. PubMed 38366112 ↗
  • Maas E, Robin DA, Austermann Hula SN, Freedman SE, Wulf G, Ballard KJ, Schmidt RA. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Aug;17(3):277-98. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025). PubMed 18663111 ↗
  • Maas E, Gildersleeve-Neumann C, Jakielski KJ, Stoeckel R. Motor-based intervention protocols in treatment of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2014 Sep;1(3):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s40474-014-0016-4. PubMed 25313348 ↗
  • Scarcella I, Michelazzo L, McCabe P. A Pilot Single-Case Experimental Design Study of Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment for Italian Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jun 18;30(3S):1496-1510. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00133. Epub 2021 Apr 8. PubMed 33830791 ↗
  • Grigos MI, Case J, Lu Y, Lyu Z. Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing in Young Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Multiple Single-Case Design. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Apr 8;67(4):1042-1071. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00415. Epub 2024 Mar 21. PubMed 38512002 ↗
  • Thomas DC, McCabe P, Ballard KJ. Rapid Syllable Transitions (ReST) treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: the effect of lower dose-frequency. J Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;51:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 6. PubMed 25052390 ↗
  • Thomas DC, McCabe P, Ballard KJ, Lincoln M. Telehealth delivery of Rapid Syllable Transitions (ReST) treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Nov;51(6):654-671. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12238. Epub 2016 May 10. PubMed 27161038 ↗
  • Strand EA. Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing: A Treatment Strategy for Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):30-48. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0005. Epub 2019 Dec 17. PubMed 31846588 ↗
  • Kratochwill TR, Levin JR. Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue. Psychol Methods. 2010 Jun;15(2):124-44. doi: 10.1037/a0017736. PubMed 20515235 ↗
  • Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 May;61(3):164-179. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15. PubMed 29253607 ↗
  • Vogel AP, Stoll LH, Oettinger A, Rommel N, Kraus EM, Timmann D, Scott D, Atay C, Storey E, Schols L, Synofzik M. Speech treatment improves dysarthria in multisystemic ataxia: a rater-blinded, controlled pilot-study in ARSACS. J Neurol. 2019 May;266(5):1260-1266. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09258-4. Epub 2019 Mar 6. PubMed 30840144 ↗
  • Pennington L, Lombardo E, Steen N, Miller N. Acoustic changes in the speech of children with cerebral palsy following an intensive program of dysarthria therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):182-195. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12336. Epub 2017 Jul 17. PubMed 28714530 ↗
  • Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR. Communication efficiency of dysarthric speakers as measured by sentence intelligibility and speaking rate. J Speech Hear Disord. 1981 Aug;46(3):296-301. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4603.296. PubMed 7278175 ↗
  • Maas E, Gildersleeve-Neumann C, Jakielski K, Kovacs N, Stoeckel R, Vradelis H, Welsh M. Bang for Your Buck: A Single-Case Experimental Design Study of Practice Amount and Distribution in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Sep 20;62(9):3160-3182. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0212. Epub 2019 Aug 19. PubMed 31425660 ↗
  • Gomez M, Purcell A, Jakielski K, McCabe P. A single case experimental design study using an operationalised version of the Kaufman Speech to Language Protocol for children with childhood apraxia of speech. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Apr;26(2):194-211. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2211750. Epub 2023 Oct 19. PubMed 37855390 ↗
  • McKechnie J, Ahmed B, Gutierrez-Osuna R, Murray E, McCabe P, Ballard KJ. The influence of type of feedback during tablet-based delivery of intensive treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. J Commun Disord. 2020 Sep-Oct;87:106026. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106026. Epub 2020 Jul 8. PubMed 32693310 ↗
  • McCabe P, Preston JL, Evans P, Heard R. A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Motor-Based Treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and Ultrasound Biofeedback. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 9;32(2):629-644. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00144. Epub 2023 Feb 27. PubMed 36848673 ↗
  • Morgan AT, Murray E, Liegeois FJ. Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD006278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub3. PubMed 29845607 ↗
  • Murray E, McCabe P, Ballard KJ. A systematic review of treatment outcomes for children with childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Aug;23(3):486-504. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0035. PubMed 24686844 ↗
  • Murray E, McCabe P, Ballard KJ. A Randomized Controlled Trial for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech Comparing Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme-Third Edition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):669-86. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0179. PubMed 25807891 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 17 months after the start.

Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Apraxias, half reached primary completion within 53 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 6, 2026
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07815249
Lead sponsor
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Miya D St John, PhD
Contact
miya.stjohn@mcri.edu.au
+610399366586
Maddy K Hill, MSpPath
Contact
maddy.hill@mcri.edu.au
+610399366586
Miya D St John, PhD
principal investigator · Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion