ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01898208Updated Mar 15, 2016Results posted

Rapid Identification and Susceptibility Testing of Pathogens From Blood Cultures

An interventional study of FilmArray testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship in Bacteremia, Fungemia and Bloodstream Infection, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-15.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
743
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Would rapid identification of bacteria and rapid detection of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (using an FDA-cleared assay) in positive blood culture bottles improve patient care at Mayo Clinic Rochester (or just lead to increased cost)?

Read the detailed description

We hypothesize that the FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panel will reduce the duration of empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy typically administered in patients who have positive blood cultures, improving clinical outcome and reducing cost. To test this hypothesis we propose a prospective, randomized controlled study comparing outcomes among patients with positive blood cultures who receive either: Standard culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of positive blood culture bottles as is done today (control), standard culture and AST of positive blood culture bottles plus the FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panel (intervention group 1), or standard culture and AST of positive blood culture bottles plus the FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panel testing along with expert infectious diseases phone consultation (intervention group 2). In both intervention groups, results of the FilmArray test will be communicated by phone to the primary service, along with templated comments about optimal antimicrobial therapy, based on the result. (Templated comments will also be used in the control group). In intervention group 2, an infectious diseases pharmacist or physician will provide patient-specific recommendations to modify antimicrobial therapy, if appropriate, based on microbiology results and clinical information obtained through medical record review and discussion with the primary service.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacteremia
  • Fungemia
  • Bloodstream Infection

Keywords

  • Bacteremia
  • Fungemia
  • Bloodstream infection
  • susceptibility
  • MRSA
  • VRE
03

In context

Bacteremia

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 743 is above the median of 156 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Bacteremia.

Browse Bacteremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,269 studies on the registry; 672 are open to participants now.

Of its 452 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 321 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Positive blood culture during the study period.
  • No positive blood cultures in prior 7 days
  • Minnesota state research authorization provided

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • No Minnesota state research authorization
  • Deceased or transitioned to comfort care within 24 hours of enrollment
  • Positive blood culture in prior 7 days
  • Previously enrolled in this study
  • Negative Gram stain
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
743 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control

    Standard Mayo practices (bacterial culture and susceptibility testing) will be used. FilmArray testing will not be performed.

    Other: Bacterial culture · Other: Susceptibility testing

  • Experimental
    FilmArray test

    Standard Mayo practices will be used AND FilmArray testing will be performed. Results of the FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panel test will be communicated to the service by phone in real-time, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

    Device: FilmArray testing · Other: Bacterial culture · Other: Susceptibility testing

  • Experimental
    FilmArray plus antimicrobial stewardship

    Standard Mayo practices will be used. FilmArray testing will be performed and reported as above, for intervention group 1. IN ADDITION, an expert will review the subject's FilmArray Blood Culture ID Panel result and medical record and contact the primary service if a modification of antimicrobial therapy may be appropriate.

    Device: FilmArray testing · Behavioral: Antimicrobial Stewardship · Other: Bacterial culture · Other: Susceptibility testing

Interventions

  • DeviceFilmArray testing

    FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel is a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel that identifies 19 types of bacteria, 5 types of fungi, and select antimicrobial-resistance genes.

    Also known as: FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel

  • BehavioralAntimicrobial Stewardship

    Real time antimicrobial stewardship: an infectious diseases pharmacist or physician will provide patient-specific recommendations to modify antimicrobial therapy.

  • OtherBacterial culture

    This test identifies the pathogen responsible for an infection.

  • OtherSusceptibility testing

    Antibiotic susceptibility testing determines the susceptibility of a bacterial strain to a specific antibiotic or a panel of antibiotics. Antibiotic susceptibility testing determines the susceptibility of a bacterial strain to a specific antibiotic or a panel of antibiotics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy (Hours)

    Difference between the date and time of the antibiotic start order (or Gram stain-positive blood culture, if antibiotics were started prior to the positive culture result) and the date and time of the antibiotic stop order. Shorter duration of broad spectrum antibiotics and longer duration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics were considered favorable outcomes.

    Time frame: Approximately 4 days after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time From Positive Gram Stain to First Active Antibiotic

    From positive Gram stain to start of active antibiotic among patients not on active therapy at enrollment; excludes subjects with contaminated blood cultures.

    Time frame: Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture

  2. Time to First Appropriate De-escalation or First Appropriate Escalation of Antibiotics

    De-escalation included discontinuation of 1 or more antibiotics and/or switching from a broad- to a narrow spectrum antibiotic. Escalation included initiation of 1 or more antibiotics and/or switching from a narrow- to a broad-spectrum antibiotic.

    Time frame: Positive Gram stain, 96 hours after enrollment

  3. Percent of Contaminated Blood Cultures Not Treated or Treated for Less Than 24 Hours

    Contaminated blood cultures were defined as growth of organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single blood culture set when greater than or equal to 2 blood culture sets were collected, except among subjects suspected to have true bacteremia associated with central venous catheters or devices.

    Time frame: Within 14 days after positive blood culture

  4. Time to Pathogen Identification

    Time frame: Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture

  5. Number of Subjects Who Had Negative Blood Cultures Within 3 Days After Enrollment

    Time frame: 3 Days after enrollment

  6. Length of Entire Hospitalization (Days)

    Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, approximately 15 days

  7. All-cause and Attributable Mortality

    If records of death were incomplete, mortality was determined using Accurint (LexisNexis, Philadelphia, PA), an internet research and location service.

    Time frame: 30 days after positive blood culture

  8. Number of Subjects With Antibiotic-Associated Toxicities/Adverse Events

    This included all adverse events that occurred within 2 weeks following enrollment and were documented in the medical record.

    Time frame: Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture

  9. Percentage of Subjects With Infectious Disease Consultation Within 72 Hours of Enrollment

    Time frame: Approximately within 72 hours of positive blood culture

  10. Mean Total Hospitalization, Laboratory Test, and Antimicrobials Costs Per Subject

    Costs were calculated using a standardized inflation-adjusted estimate of costs for each service or procedure performed in constant dollars. This approach adjusts for hospital-billed charges with Medicare Cost Report department-level cost-to-charge ratios. Physician services were proxied with Medicare reimbursement rates based on Current Procedure Terminology (CPT)-4 codes using the Medicare Fee Schedule. We did not include the cost of the stewardship program in the cost analysis, as it is not a billed service. As there was no Medicare reimbursement rate for the rmPCR test at the time of the study, test cost was proxied using the FilmArray respiratory panel. These costs were varied in sensitivity analysis with rmPCR test cost ranging from a 50% decrease to a 300% increase.

    Time frame: Approximately 7 days after positive blood culture and for duration of entire hospitalization

Other outcomes

  1. Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay

    Time frame: within 14 days of positive blood culture until ICU discharge

  2. Percentage of Patients Who Acquired Clostridium Difficile or Multidrug-resistant Organisms Within 30 Days After Enrollment

    Multidrug-resistant organisms included vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species resistant to greater than or equal to 3 antibiotic classes.

    Time frame: Approximately 30 days after positive blood culture

07

Results

Posted Mar 15, 2016

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from August 2013 to March 2014.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Started247247249
Completed207198212
Not completed404937
Withdrew: Positive blood culture172315
Withdrew: Death/comfort care within 24 hours1098
Withdrew: Negative gram stain696
Withdrew: Non-blood specimens in bottles354
Withdrew: System/technical error123
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up311

Outcome measures

PrimaryDuration of Antimicrobial Therapy (Hours)

Difference between the date and time of the antibiotic start order (or Gram stain-positive blood culture, if antibiotics were started prior to the positive culture result) and the date and time of the antibiotic stop order. Shorter duration of broad spectrum antibiotics and longer duration of narrow-spectrum antibiotics were considered favorable outcomes.

Time frame:
Approximately 4 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Median · hours
Duration of Antimicrobial Therapy (Hours)
hoursControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Vancomycin (van), all subjects (n=132, 101, 124)44 (22 to 72)42 (21 to 93)42 (19 to 90)
Van, organisms not requiring van (n=56, 56,57)8.2 (0 to 26)0 (0 to 16)0 (0 to 3)
Van-susceptible enterococci (n=8, 8, 16)20 (1 to 59)70 (48 to 88)82 (40 to 96)
Van, Methicillin-susceptible S.aureus(n=13,13,16)23 (20 to 53)11 (0 to 26)8 (0 to 44)
Nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin (n=20, 16, 14)42 (24 to 57)71 (51 to 79)85 (42 to 92)
Piperacillin-tazobactam (n=77, 65, 72)56 (39 to 82)44 (27 to 74)45 (19 to 78)
Cefepime (n=62, 52, 6755 (28 to 96)71 (43 to 96)58 (32 to 96)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.92
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.032
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.037
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.2
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.035
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.012
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.56
SecondaryTime From Positive Gram Stain to First Active Antibiotic

From positive Gram stain to start of active antibiotic among patients not on active therapy at enrollment; excludes subjects with contaminated blood cultures.

Time frame:
Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time From Positive Gram Stain to First Active Antibiotic
hoursControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Time From Positive Gram Stain to First Active Antibiotic11 (2 to 51)6 (2 to 31)4 (2 to 20)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.55
SecondaryTime to First Appropriate De-escalation or First Appropriate Escalation of Antibiotics

De-escalation included discontinuation of 1 or more antibiotics and/or switching from a broad- to a narrow spectrum antibiotic. Escalation included initiation of 1 or more antibiotics and/or switching from a narrow- to a broad-spectrum antibiotic.

Time frame:
Positive Gram stain, 96 hours after enrollment
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to First Appropriate De-escalation or First Appropriate Escalation of Antibiotics
hoursControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Time to first approp. de-escalation(n=121,112,111)34 (21 to 55)38 (22 to 66)21 (7 to 37)
Time to first appropriate escalation (40,38,44)24 (3 to 67)6 (2 to 36)5 (2 to 22)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = <0.0001
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.04
SecondaryPercent of Contaminated Blood Cultures Not Treated or Treated for Less Than 24 Hours

Contaminated blood cultures were defined as growth of organisms such as coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single blood culture set when greater than or equal to 2 blood culture sets were collected, except among subjects suspected to have true bacteremia associated with central venous catheters or devices.

Time frame:
Within 14 days after positive blood culture
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of blood cultures
Percent of Contaminated Blood Cultures Not Treated or Treated for Less Than 24 Hours
Percentage of blood culturesControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Percent of Contaminated Blood Cultures Not Treated or Treated for Less Than 24 Hours758992
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Chi-squared · p = 0.015
SecondaryTime to Pathogen Identification
Time frame:
Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time to Pathogen Identification
hoursControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Time to Pathogen Identification22.3 (17 to 28)1.3 (0.9 to 1.6)1.3 (0.9 to 1.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test · Kruskal-Wallis · p = <0.0001
  • Control vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = <0.0001
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Who Had Negative Blood Cultures Within 3 Days After Enrollment
Time frame:
3 Days after enrollment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Who Had Negative Blood Cultures Within 3 Days After Enrollment
participantsControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Number of Subjects Who Had Negative Blood Cultures Within 3 Days After Enrollment147131146
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.79
Other pre-specifiedLength of Intensive Care Unit Stay
Time frame:
within 14 days of positive blood culture until ICU discharge
Reported as:
Median · days
Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay
daysControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay3 (2 to 4)2 (1 to 5)3 (2 to 4)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.90
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Patients Who Acquired Clostridium Difficile or Multidrug-resistant Organisms Within 30 Days After Enrollment

Multidrug-resistant organisms included vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species resistant to greater than or equal to 3 antibiotic classes.

Time frame:
Approximately 30 days after positive blood culture
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Who Acquired Clostridium Difficile or Multidrug-resistant Organisms Within 30 Days After Enrollment
percentage of participantsControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Percentage of Patients Who Acquired Clostridium Difficile or Multidrug-resistant Organisms Within 30 Days After Enrollment7.28.19.9
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Chi-squared · p = 0.62
SecondaryLength of Entire Hospitalization (Days)
Time frame:
Participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, approximately 15 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Length of Entire Hospitalization (Days)
daysControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Length of Entire Hospitalization (Days)8 (5 to 15)8 (5 to 15)8 (5 to 16)
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.60
SecondaryAll-cause and Attributable Mortality

If records of death were incomplete, mortality was determined using Accurint (LexisNexis, Philadelphia, PA), an internet research and location service.

Time frame:
30 days after positive blood culture
Reported as:
Number · participants
All-cause and Attributable Mortality
participantsControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
All-cause mortality222018
Attributable mortality772
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Fisher Exact · p = 0.74
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Fisher Exact · p = 0.42
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Antibiotic-Associated Toxicities/Adverse Events

This included all adverse events that occurred within 2 weeks following enrollment and were documented in the medical record.

Time frame:
Approximately 14 days after positive blood culture
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects With Antibiotic-Associated Toxicities/Adverse Events
participantsControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Number of Subjects With Antibiotic-Associated Toxicities/Adverse Events332
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Fisher Exact · p = 0.82
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Infectious Disease Consultation Within 72 Hours of Enrollment
Time frame:
Approximately within 72 hours of positive blood culture
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With Infectious Disease Consultation Within 72 Hours of Enrollment
percentage of participantsControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Percentage of Subjects With Infectious Disease Consultation Within 72 Hours of Enrollment49.84945.3
SecondaryMean Total Hospitalization, Laboratory Test, and Antimicrobials Costs Per Subject

Costs were calculated using a standardized inflation-adjusted estimate of costs for each service or procedure performed in constant dollars. This approach adjusts for hospital-billed charges with Medicare Cost Report department-level cost-to-charge ratios. Physician services were proxied with Medicare reimbursement rates based on Current Procedure Terminology (CPT)-4 codes using the Medicare Fee Schedule. We did not include the cost of the stewardship program in the cost analysis, as it is not a billed service. As there was no Medicare reimbursement rate for the rmPCR test at the time of the study, test cost was proxied using the FilmArray respiratory panel. These costs were varied in sensitivity analysis with rmPCR test cost ranging from a 50% decrease to a 300% increase.

Time frame:
Approximately 7 days after positive blood culture and for duration of entire hospitalization
Reported as:
Mean · dollars
Mean Total Hospitalization, Laboratory Test, and Antimicrobials Costs Per Subject
dollarsControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
Overall Hospitalization Costs65,450 ± 128,68666,887 ± 117,83268,729 ± 134,215
Laboratory Test Cost5,377 ± 10,1155,680 ± 8,8725,743 ± 9,809
Antimicrobials Costs2,194 ± 4,1751,932 ± 3,1751,741 ± 2,748
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.7789
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.0006
  • Control vs FilmArray Test vs FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship · Kruskal-Wallis · p = 0.6540

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control—0/207 (0%)3/207 (1.4%)
FilmArray Test—0/198 (0%)3/198 (1.5%)
FilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship—0/212 (0%)2/212 (0.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial Stewardship
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/2072/1980/212
SeizuresNervous system disorders0/2071/1980/212
HepatitisHepatobiliary disorders1/2070/1980/212
Renal insufficiencyRenal and urinary disorders1/2070/1980/212
Prolonged QTc intervalCardiac disorders0/2070/1981/212
MyelosuppressionImmune system disorders0/2070/1981/212

Baseline characteristics

Randomized subjects were excluded if they had a positive blood culture in the prior week, had not provided the state research authorization, previously enrolled in the study, died or transitioned to comfort care within 24 hours of enrollment, or had a negative Gram stain. Only non-excluded subjects were included in the baseline characteristics.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial StewardshipTotal
Mean61.5 ± 19.3261.4 ± 21.2261.2 ± 20.0861.4 ± 20.17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial StewardshipTotal
Female658285232
Male142116127385
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlFilmArray TestFilmArray Plus Antimicrobial StewardshipTotal
United States207198212617
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Banerjee R, Teng CB, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, Steckelberg JM, Moriarty JP, Shah ND, Mandrekar JN, Patel R. Randomized Trial of Rapid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Blood Culture Identification and Susceptibility Testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1071-80. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ447. Epub 2015 Jul 20. PubMed 26197846 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2013, a primary completion of Aug 2014 and a completion of Aug 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Mar 2016, 1 year 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 8, 2013
First posted
Jul 12, 2013
Start
Aug 2013
Primary completionActual
Aug 2014
CompletionActual
Aug 2014
Results first posted
Mar 15, 2016
Last update
Mar 15, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01898208
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Ritu Banerjee, M.D., Ph.D. (MD, Ph.D, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 12, 2013
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
Aug 2014
Completion
Aug 2014
Results posted
Mar 15, 2016
Last update
Mar 15, 2016

Study contacts

Robin Patel, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic
Ritu Banerjee, MD, Ph.D
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion