ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06537609BALANCE+Updated Nov 9, 2026

A Platform Trial for Gram Negative Bloodstream Infections

An interventional study of De-escalation VS No De-escalation and Oral beta-lactams VS non beta-lactams in Gram-negative Bacteremia, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Recruiting at 41 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 130 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered Jul 2024).
  • Started Apr 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Updated Nov 9, 2026Eligibility revisedPrimary outcomes revised+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Years to 130 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

BALANCE+ is a perpetual multiple domain randomized controlled platform trial to evaluate various treatment strategies for Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN BSIs). Each domain addresses critical questions in the management of GN BSIs, aiming to refine treatment strategies, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce antimicrobial resistance.

The initial vanguard pilot RCT (NCT05893147) started on 29 August 2023 and has successfully completed the pilot phase on 24-Apr-2024. All patients enrolled in the vanguard phase are part of the main platform trial.

Read the detailed description

BALANCE+ is an adaptive platform trial evaluating multiple treatment options in patients admitted to the hospital due to Gram negative bloodstream infections (BSIs). It focuses on both cross-cutting and subgroup-specific questions, using an open-label, pragmatic design embedded in routine care.

BALANCE+ addresses the significant health concern of BSIs, which have high morbidity and mortality rates, exacerbated by the global public health threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). With rising resistance rates and limited new drug development, effective treatment strategies for BSIs remain under-researched.

BALANCE+ follows the BALANCE trial, which evaluated duration of antibiotic treatment, and aims to further investigate critical questions in managing Gram-negative BSIs. This platform trial will explore various aspects of BSI treatment, including antibiotic de-escalation, oral antibiotic choices, central line management, treatment of specific pathogens, and the necessity of follow-up blood cultures.

BALANCE+ is using Bayesian methods without a fixed sample size. Interim analyses will occur after every 1000th patient in each domain, and then for every 200th patient thereafter. The trial will stop if futility or superiority thresholds are met, or if a domain reaches its ceiling sample size (2500 patients for most domains and 4000 for the beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam domain) without meeting a stopping threshold.

A vanguard pilot trial involving over 150 patients at 9 hospitals across Canada confirmed the feasibility of the BALANCE+ trial. The main trial will include patients from the vanguard pilot phase since there has been no major change in the overall study design and domains. The adaptive design allows for interim analyses and adjustments by adding or removing domains as per the statistical analysis plan, enhancing the trial's efficiency and relevance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gram-negative Bacteremia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Bacteremia

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,500 is above the median of 156 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Bacteremia.

Browse Bacteremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 584 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Nov 9, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
0 Years to 130 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

PLATFORM INCLUSION CRITERIA

Platform Inclusion Criteria:

  • admitted to a participating hospital
  • positive blood culture with Gram negative (GN) bacterium

Platform Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient's goals of care are for palliation with no active treatment
  • moribund patient, not expected to survive > 72 hours
  • previously enrolled in the platform trial
  • not eligible for any domain at the time of screening

DOMAIN SPECIFIC INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. De-escalation versus no de-escalation domain

    Inclusion Criteria

    - included in BALANCE+ platform

    Exclusion Criteria

    • receiving an empiric antibiotic regimen at the time of blood culture finalization to which the GN pathogen(s) are not sensitive
    • arbapenem-non-susceptible
    • no de-escalation option due to any or all of:

      • antimicrobial resistance
      • allergies
      • medical
      • drug-drug interaction risk
      • other relevant reason
    • patients with a suspected or proven polymicrobial source of infection
    • > 24 hours since index blood culture susceptibility results finalization
  2. Beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam oral/enteral treatment domain

    Inclusion Criteria

    • included in BALANCE+ platform
    • initially treated with intravenous antibiotics, but clinical team transitioning patient to oral/enteral antibiotic within 7 days of starting treatment

    Exclusion Criteria

    • enrolled in an arm of another BALANCE+ platform domain which limits the use of oral/enteral therapy:
    • no-de-escalation arm (patients in the no de-escalation arm cannot be randomized into this domain unless they are ready for discharge home, in which case de-escalation is allowable to oral agents at discharge)
    • no non-beta-lactam options due to any or all of:

      • resistance
      • allergies
      • medical contraindications
      • drug-interaction risk
      • other relevant reason
    • no beta-lactam options due to any or all of:

      • resistance
      • allergies
      • medical contraindications
      • drug-interaction risk
      • other relevant reason
    • pregnancy
    • already received >24 hours of oral antibiotics after index blood culture finalization
  3. Central vascular catheter replacement domain

    Inclusion Criteria

    • included in BALANCE+ platform
    • has an indwelling central vascular catheter that was already in place within the 48-hour period before the onset of bloodstream infection (i.e. is not a new catheter placed within 48 hours of the onset of infection)

    Exclusion Criteria

    • patient has no ongoing need for a central vascular catheter
    • patient has definite indication for central vascular catheter removal
    • ongoing septic shock with definite/probable line source o concomitant S. aureus bacteremia

      • concomitant candidemia
    • local suppurative signs (severe redness, warmth, pain, swelling or fluctuance/collection) necessitating catheter removal, or other clinical evidence of infected line (e.g. imaging/echocardiographic findings)
  4. Low-risk AmpC domain

    Inclusion Criteria

    • included in BALANCE+ platform
    • positive blood culture with GN bacterium, of the following species: i. Serratia spp. ii Morganella spp. iii Providencia spp. iv Proteus spp. other than P.mirabilis
    • organism is susceptible to ceftriaxone

    Exclusion Criteria

    - severe allergy to beta-lactams (e.g., type 4 reaction or DRESS)

    • baseline phenotypic non-susceptiblity to ceftriaxone
    • more than 1 calendar day beyond availability of susceptibility results
  5. Follow up blood culture domain

    Inclusion Criteria

    - included in BALANCE+ platform

    Exclusion Criteria

    • patient died or discharged from hospital prior to day 4
    • blood culture already collected by the treating team at day 4±1
    • >5 days since index positive blood culture collection
    • definite indication for repeat blood culture testing o concomitant S. aureus bacteremia o concomitant Candidemia o clinical suspicion for infective endocarditis
  6. 4 day versus 7-day antibiotic duration

    Inclusion Criteria • improving clinical trajectory, based on meeting all of these criteria by the 4th calendar day of adequate antibiotics:

    o temperature 35.0ºC-37.9ºC

    o not on vasopressors

    o FiO2 ≤ 50%

    Exclusion Criteria

    • Has not undergone successful source control (if required) before completing 4th calendar day of adequate antibiotics
    • Neutropenia (\<0.5 × 10⁹/L)
    • solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
    • suspected or documented deep-seated infection requiring prolonged antibiotics
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    De-escalation VS No De-escalation

    Other: De-escalation VS No De-escalation

  • Active comparator
    Oral beta-lactams VS Oral Non-beta-lactams

    Other: Oral beta-lactams VS non beta-lactams

  • Active comparator
    Central vascular catheter retention VS Central vascular catheter replacement

    Other: Central vascular catheter retention VS Central vascular catheter replacement

  • Active comparator
    Cephalosporin VS Carbapenem for low risk AmpC organisms

    Other: Cephalosporin VS Carbapenem for low risk AmpC organisms

  • Active comparator
    Routine follow-up blood culture VS No routine follow-up blood culture

    Enrollment to the domain has been completed.

    Other: Routine follow-up blood culture VS No routine follow-up blood culture

  • Active comparator
    4-day versus 7-day antibiotic duration

    Other: 4-day versus 7- day antibiotic duration

Interventions

  • OtherDe-escalation VS No De-escalation

    No de-escalation group: continue to receive the same antibiotic that was started initially (as long as it is confirmed to be effective based on the blood culture sensitivity result). De-escalation is only allowed within 7 days if patient is being discharged from hospital. De-escalation group: switched to narrower spectrum antibiotic (based on spectrum scale specified in protocol).

  • OtherOral beta-lactams VS non beta-lactams

    Beta-lactam antibiotic: This can be, but not limited to, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalexin, cefadroxil, or cefixime. Non beta-lactam antibiotic: This can be ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

  • OtherCentral vascular catheter retention VS Central vascular catheter replacement

    Central vascular catheter replacement: the catheter will be changed by the treating team as soon as possible and within a maximum of 3 calendar days from blood culture finalization (removal must happen within that time; replacement can occur after that time point) Central vascular catheter retention: the catheter will not be changed and will be retained until it is non functional or no longer needed.

  • OtherCephalosporin VS Carbapenem for low risk AmpC organisms

    Cephalosporin (ceftriaxone) at standard doses Carbapenem (Meropenem or Ertapenem) at standard doses

  • OtherRoutine follow-up blood culture VS No routine follow-up blood culture

    Routine follow-up blood culture: routine repeat blood collection 4 days from the index blood collection with positive bacteria. No follow-up blood culture: no routine repeat blood collection 4 days from the index blood collection with positive bacteria

  • Other4-day versus 7- day antibiotic duration

    The shorter duration arm will receive 4 days of adequate antibiotics. The longer duration arm will receive 7 days of adequate antibiotics.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Ordinal Scale which incorporates death, reinfection, readmission, and for some domains incorporates a tie-breaker of new antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

    The primary outcome for each domain will use a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) ordinal scale in which patients are categorized into the following mutually exclusive categories, ranked from best to worst status: 1. Alive with no reinfection or readmission. 2. Alive with reinfection OR readmission. 3. Alive with reinfection AND readmission. 4. Dead For the 4 antibiotic-related domains (the de-escalation versus no de-escalation domain, the beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam domain, the low risk AmpC domain, and the 4 versus 7 day duration domain) there will be an additional tie-breaker within ordinal levels 1, 2 and 3 based on whether there was new detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. 90-day mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. 90-day re-infection

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. 90-day all cause readmission

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. 90-day AMR colonization/infection

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. 90-day Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI)

    Time frame: 90 days

  6. 30-day mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. 60-day mortality

    Time frame: 60 days

  8. Additional Secondary Outcomes for Follow up blood culture domain

    * total duration of antibiotic therapy * hospital length of stay

    Time frame: 90 days

  9. Additional Secondary Outcomes for De-escalation versus no de-escalation Domain

    * change in total microbiome diversity between the day of randomization and discharge (or day 30 if earlier) * net change in resistome AMR burden between the day of randomization and discharge (or day 30 if earlier).

    Time frame: 90 days

  10. Additional Secondary Outcomes for Beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam domain

    * antibiotic-related allergic reaction * antibiotic-related adverse event

    Time frame: 90 days

  11. Additional Secondary Outcomes for Central vascular catheter replacement versus retention domain

    * pneumothorax or thoracotomy tube insertion related to vascular catheter * clinically important bleeding * line associated thrombus * persistent bacteremia \>5d from initial index culture * secondary bloodstream infection with new bacterial or fungal organism

    Time frame: 90 days

  12. Additional Secondary Outcomes for Low-risk AmpC domain

    * isolation of ESBL producing organism or third generation cephalosporin resistant Gram negative organism * isolation of a carbapenem-resistant organism

    Time frame: 90 days

  13. Additional domain-specific secondary outcomes in 4-day versus 7-day antibiotic duration

    * antibiotic-related allergic reaction * antibiotic-related (non-allergic) adverse event (grade 4+ or 3+ with treatment change) * microbiome/resistome sub-study * change in total microbiome diversity (Shannon diversity index) between the day of randomization and day 30 * change in total microbiome diversity (Shannon diversity index) between the day of randomization and day 7 * net change in resistome AMR burden between the day of randomization and day 30 * change in total microbiome diversity (Shannon diversity index) between the day of randomization and day 7

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

41 of 41 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 36 months after the start.

Of 34 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bacteremia, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 64. This study's planned 36 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 25, 2024
First posted
Aug 5, 2024
StartActual
Apr 24, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 2028
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
2 sites added
Show 2 added (2 New Zealand)
  • North Shore Hospital · Takapuna, New Zealand
  • Wellington Hospital · Newtown, New Zealand
Nov 9, 2026
Eligibility
1 criterion edited, 11 added, 5 removed
What changed in the criteria
  • Editedongoing septic shock with definite/probable line source o concomitant S. aureus bacteremia
  • Removedconcomitant S. aureus bacteremia
  • Removeddefinite indication for repeat blood culture testing
  • Removedconcomitant S. aureus bacteremia
  • Removedconcomitant Candidemia
  • Removedclinical suspicion for infective endocarditis
  • Addeddefinite indication for repeat blood culture testing o concomitant S. aureus bacteremia o concomitant Candidemia o clinical suspicion for infective endocarditis
  • Added4 day versus 7-day antibiotic duration
  • AddedInclusion Criteria • improving clinical trajectory, based on meeting all of these criteria by the 4th calendar day of adequate antibiotics:
  • Addedo temperature 35.0ºC-37.9ºC
  • Addedo not on vasopressors
  • Addedo FiO2 ≤ 50%
  • AddedExclusion Criteria
  • AddedHas not undergone successful source control (if required) before completing 4th calendar day of adequate antibiotics
  • AddedNeutropenia (<0.5 × 10⁹/L)
  • Addedsolid organ or bone marrow transplantation
  • Addedsuspected or documented deep-seated infection requiring prolonged antibiotics
Nov 9, 2026
Interventions
Added 4-day versus 7- day antibiotic duration. Arms added: 4-day versus 7-day antibiotic duration
Nov 9, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionDesirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Ordinal Scale which incorporates death, reinfection, readmission, and for some domains incorporates a tie-breaker of new antimicrobial resistance (AMR).: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 9, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 edited, 5 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Individual DomainsFollow up blood culture domainTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for De-escalation versus no de-escalation DomainTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam domainTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Central vascular catheter replacement versus retention domainTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Low-risk AmpC domainTime frame: 90 days
  • AddedAdditional domain-specific secondary outcomes in 4-day versus 7-day antibiotic durationTime frame: 90 days
Nov 9, 2026
Sponsor
Collaborators added: Universidad de la Sabana; collaborators removed: Universidad de La Sabana, Colombia
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    2 sites added
    Show 2 added (2 New Zealand)
    • North Shore Hospital · Takapuna, New Zealand
    • Wellington Hospital · Newtown, New Zealand
    Eligibility 1 criterion edited, 11 added, 5 removed
    What changed in the criteria
    • Editedongoing septic shock with definite/probable line source o concomitant S. aureus bacteremia
    • Removedconcomitant S. aureus bacteremia
    • Removeddefinite indication for repeat blood culture testing
    • Removedconcomitant S. aureus bacteremia
    • Removedconcomitant Candidemia
    • Removedclinical suspicion for infective endocarditis
    • Addeddefinite indication for repeat blood culture testing o concomitant S. aureus bacteremia o concomitant Candidemia o clinical suspicion for infective endocarditis
    • Added4 day versus 7-day antibiotic duration
    • AddedInclusion Criteria • improving clinical trajectory, based on meeting all of these criteria by the 4th calendar day of adequate antibiotics:
    • Addedo temperature 35.0ºC-37.9ºC
    • Addedo not on vasopressors
    • Addedo FiO2 ≤ 50%
    • AddedExclusion Criteria
    • AddedHas not undergone successful source control (if required) before completing 4th calendar day of adequate antibiotics
    • AddedNeutropenia (<0.5 × 10⁹/L)
    • Addedsolid organ or bone marrow transplantation
    • Addedsuspected or documented deep-seated infection requiring prolonged antibiotics
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionDesirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Ordinal Scale which incorporates death, reinfection, readmission, and for some domains incorporates a tie-breaker of new antimicrobial resistance (AMR).: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 edited, 5 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Individual DomainsFollow up blood culture domainTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for De-escalation versus no de-escalation DomainTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Beta-lactam versus non-beta-lactam domainTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Central vascular catheter replacement versus retention domainTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedAdditional Secondary Outcomes for Low-risk AmpC domainTime frame: 90 days
    • AddedAdditional domain-specific secondary outcomes in 4-day versus 7-day antibiotic durationTime frame: 90 days
    Interventions Added 4-day versus 7- day antibiotic duration. Arms added: 4-day versus 7-day antibiotic duration
    Sponsor Collaborators added: Universidad de la Sabana; collaborators removed: Universidad de La Sabana, Colombia
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06537609
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Clínica Universidad de La Sabana, Universidad de la Sabana, Aotearoa Clinical Trials
Responsible party
Dr. Nick Daneman (Clinician Scientist, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 5, 2024
Start date
Apr 24, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Nick Daneman, MD
Contact
nick.daneman@sunnybrook.ca
4164806100 ext. 3862
Mithun Mohan George
Contact
mithun.george@sri.utoronto.ca
416-480-6100 ext. 688153
Nick Daneman, MD
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Rob Fowler, MD
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion