ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07923266Oral_SwitchUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Oral Switch in Bloodstream Infections in Immunocompromised Children

A Phase 4 interventional study of Oral antibiotic therapy and Standard IV antibiotic therapy in Bloodstream Infection, Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter and Immunocompromised Patients, sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Recruiting at 4 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 4 Weeks to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Primary conditionBacteremiaRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Bacteremia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Bacteremia, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Weeks to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This nationwide, multicenter, randomized non-inferiority trial aims to determine whether an switch to oral antibiotic therapy (experimental arm) is non-inferior to standard intravenous antibiotic therapy (control arm) with respect to recurrence in children and adolescents with uncomplicated bloodstream infections, who are immunocompromised or have a central venous catheter.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Bloodstream infections are among the leading causes of hospital admission and prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in children and adolescents. Current international guidelines recommend IV-only therapy or prolonged IV treatment before switching to oral antibiotics. However, these recommendations are primarily based on historical convention and low-quality evidence rather than randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies in both adults and children with serious infections other than bloodstream infections suggest that shorter IV courses followed by oral step-down therapy may be safe and effective. However, no RCT has specifically investigated an early switch to oral antibiotic therapy in immunocompromised children and/or those with a central venous catheter (CVC). Although these children may be at increased risk of infectious complications, they also experience a substantial proportion of pediatric bloodstream infections and prolonged IV antibiotic courses. Consequently, the potential impact of a safe early oral-switch strategy may be particularly important in this population.

Objective:

The trial objective is to determine whether early IV-to-oral antibiotic switch is non-inferior to continued standard IV therapy with respect to recurrence of bloodstream infection in clinically stable children and adolescents aged 4 weeks to 17 years with immunosuppression and/or have a CVC and have a bloodstream infection.

Study design:

This is an investigator-initiated, nationwide, open-label, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), controlled, non-inferiority trial, with randomization stratified by 1) Bacteria type (Gram positive vs. Gram negative), and 2) planned CVC removal (removal versus retention or no CVC, as determined before randomization).

Patients:

Children and adolescents aged 4 weeks to 17 years with underlying medical condition associated with immunosuppression and/or the presence of a CVC, and have a bloodstream infections will be recruited from all 18 pediatric departments in Denmark.

Procedure:

Eligible children will be randomized 1:1 to an early oral switch strategy or standard IV therapy. The choice of oral and IV antibiotics will not be determined by randomization but will be made by the treating clinician according to the isolated pathogen, antimicrobial susceptibility, and current treatment guidelines. The total antibiotic treatment duration will be the same in both treatment groups, according to Danish guidelines.

Participants will be randomized to the early oral switch arm (experimental arm) or the standard IV arm (control arm).

Participants allocated to the early oral switch arm will receive effective IV antibiotic therapy for at least 3 days and switch to oral therapy as soon as possible after clinical stability, but no later than day 6, to complete a total treatment duration of 10-14 days according to clinical treatment guidelines. Participants allocated to the standard IV arm (control arm) will receive IV antibiotic therapy for the full treatment course.

Sample size calculation:

The study aims to enroll a minimum of 114 participants. The sample size calculation is based on an expected treatment failure risk of 1.5% in both treatment arms, a non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points, a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%, and the use of an appropriate statistical method that accounts for the expected low number of events. Assuming a dropout rate of up to 5%, enrollment of 114 participants will provide approximately 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority.

Recruitment is planned for approximately 36 months and may be extended if required and feasible to achieve the target sample size. If 114 participants are enrolled within the initial 36-month recruitment period, enrollment will continue until the end of the 36-month recruitment period or until a maximum of 150 participants have been enrolled, whichever occurs first, to increase statistical power to approximately 90%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bloodstream Infection
  • Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter
  • Immunocompromised Patients
  • Bacteremia Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • oral antibiotics
  • bacteremia
  • oral step-down
  • children
  • pediatrics
  • CHILD
  • blood stream infection
  • CLABSI
  • immunocompromised
03

In context

Bacteremia Reclassified

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 114 is below the median of 156 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Bacteremia.

Browse Bacteremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Compared within Bacteremia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Weeks to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 4 weeks to 17 years
  2. Underlying medical condition associated with and/or presence of a central venous catheter
  3. Positive blood culture with a high-pathogenic bacterium. Eligible pathogens include Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, β-haemolytic streptococci, and Enterococcus spp., for which standard treatment is at least 7 days of intravenous antibiotics.
  4. Clinical stability, defined as: (a) respiratory and hemodynamically stable, without need for oxygen, IV fluid therapy or inotropic support; and (b) well-appearing with signs of clinical improvement (e.g., improved physical activity), as judged by the investigator
  5. Afebrile for 24 hours.
  6. Tolerating oral fluids and diet and considered to have adequate gastrointestinal absorption for age, as judged by the investigator
  7. Within the randomization window: i) As soon as possible after eligibility is confirmed and ii) within 3-6 days of effective IV antibiotics (72-144 hours) including the duration of the last IV dose.
  8. obtained from a parent or guardian, and from the patient if of appropriate age.

Polymicrobial episodes are allowed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Complicated infections

    1. Tunnel infection associated with a CVC, unless the CVC is removed
    2. Suspected CNS infection
    3. Other focal infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy beyond the treatment of bacteremia, e.g., deep-seated abscess or other deep-seated infections, bone or joint infections, and endocarditis
  2. Blood culture with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Neisseria meningitidis, or low-pathogenic possible contaminants of uncertain clinical relevance, including coagulase-negative staphylococci, Micrococcus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Cutibacterium acnes, and Bacillus spp.
  3. mucositis (e.g. stomatitis (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) grade ≥3, defined as severe pain interfering with oral intake)
  4. No suitable oral antibiotic available (e.g., due to antimicrobial resistance or )
  5. Within the follow-up period (≤6 weeks) of a previous randomization for another pathogen covered by the antibiotic indicated for the index episode.
  6. Planned to receive prophylactic antibiotic therapy covering the pathogen after completion of treatment for the index infection
  7. A decision to discontinue life-prolonging treatment has been made, with a of less than 6 weeks, as assessed by the treating physician.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
114 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early Oral Switch

    Early Oral Switch

    Drug: Oral antibiotic therapy

  • Active comparator
    Standard Intravenous Therapy

    Standard Intravenous Therapy

    Drug: Standard IV antibiotic therapy

Interventions

  • DrugOral antibiotic therapy

    Participants randomized to the experimental arm will switch from IV to oral antibiotic therapy after effective IV antibiotic therapy for at least 3 days, followed by oral therapy as soon as possible after clinical stability, but no later than day 6, and continue oral therapy to complete the recommended total treatment duration.

  • DrugStandard IV antibiotic therapy

    Participants randomised to the control arm will receive IV antibiotic therapy throughout the recommended total treatment duration.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of blood stream infection

    Number of patients who experience growth of the same bacteria as in the index blood stream infection in a subsequent blood culture during the follow-up period.

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. IV antibiotic treatment duration

    Duration of IV antibiotic treatment from randomization until completion of IV antibiotic treatment for the index bloodstream infection, measured in hours.

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization

Other outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of Hospital Stay for index infection

    Time frame: From randomization until discharge for the index bloodstream infection, assessed up to 42 days after randomization

  2. Escalation of antibiotics

    Proportion of participants with at least one escalation of antibiotic treatment for the index bloodstream infection, defined as a switch from oral to intravenous antibiotics or from intravenous antibiotics to a broader-spectrum intravenous regimen.

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of treatment for the index bloodstream infection, assessed up to 42 days after randomization

  3. Re-initiation of antibiotics

    Re-initiation of antibiotics after completion of antibiotic treatment for the index infection (regardless of the indication)

    Time frame: From randomization until completion of treatment for the index bloodstream infection, assessed up to 42 days after randomization

  4. Treatment failure, other than blood stream infection

    Treatment failure, other than blood stream infection, defined as clinically and/or microbiologically confirmed disease progression or relapse, adjudicated by an independent, blinded adjudication committe

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization

  5. Long term treatment failure

    Long term treatment failure, including blood stream infection, defined as clinically and/or microbiologically confirmed disease progression or relapse, adjudicated by an independent, blinded adjudication committee

    Time frame: Within 3 months after randomization

  6. Number of Participants with Safety Outcomes

    Safety outcomes are admission to an intensive care unit and death

    Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 10, 2026
Sites
4 sites changed recruiting status (4 now recruiting)
Show 4 sites
  • Department of Pediatrics, Aalborg University Hospital · Aalborg, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
  • Aarhus University Hospital · Aarhus, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
  • Copenhagen University Hospital · Copenhagen, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
  • Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital · Odense, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026→Nov 9, 2026 (actual)
Nov 10, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2029→Nov 8, 2029
Nov 10, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    4 sites changed recruiting status (4 now recruiting)
    Show 4 sites
    • Department of Pediatrics, Aalborg University Hospital · Aalborg, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
    • Aarhus University Hospital · Aarhus, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
    • Copenhagen University Hospital · Copenhagen, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
    • Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital · Odense, Denmarkno status→Recruiting
    Start date Nov 1, 2026→Nov 9, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Nov 1, 2029→Nov 8, 2029
  2. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07923266
Lead sponsor
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Responsible party
Ulrikka Nygaard (Professor, senior consultant, MD, PhD, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Nov 9, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 8, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Ulrikka Nygaard, MD, PhD, DrMedSci
Contact
ulrikka.nygaard@regionh.dk
+4540794656
Nadja H Vissing, MD PhD
Contact
nadja.hawwa.vissing@regionh.dk
+4521790640

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion