A Phase 4 interventional study of Oral antibiotic therapy and Standard IV antibiotic therapy in Bloodstream Infection, Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter and Immunocompromised Patients, sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet. Recruiting at 4 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 4 Weeks to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.
Sponsored by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This nationwide, multicenter, randomized non-inferiority trial aims to determine whether an switch to oral antibiotic therapy (experimental arm) is non-inferior to standard intravenous antibiotic therapy (control arm) with respect to recurrence in children and adolescents with uncomplicated bloodstream infections, who are immunocompromised or have a central venous catheter.
Background:
Bloodstream infections are among the leading causes of hospital admission and prolonged intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in children and adolescents. Current international guidelines recommend IV-only therapy or prolonged IV treatment before switching to oral antibiotics. However, these recommendations are primarily based on historical convention and low-quality evidence rather than randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies in both adults and children with serious infections other than bloodstream infections suggest that shorter IV courses followed by oral step-down therapy may be safe and effective. However, no RCT has specifically investigated an early switch to oral antibiotic therapy in immunocompromised children and/or those with a central venous catheter (CVC). Although these children may be at increased risk of infectious complications, they also experience a substantial proportion of pediatric bloodstream infections and prolonged IV antibiotic courses. Consequently, the potential impact of a safe early oral-switch strategy may be particularly important in this population.
Objective:
The trial objective is to determine whether early IV-to-oral antibiotic switch is non-inferior to continued standard IV therapy with respect to recurrence of bloodstream infection in clinically stable children and adolescents aged 4 weeks to 17 years with immunosuppression and/or have a CVC and have a bloodstream infection.
Study design:
This is an investigator-initiated, nationwide, open-label, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), controlled, non-inferiority trial, with randomization stratified by 1) Bacteria type (Gram positive vs. Gram negative), and 2) planned CVC removal (removal versus retention or no CVC, as determined before randomization).
Patients:
Children and adolescents aged 4 weeks to 17 years with underlying medical condition associated with immunosuppression and/or the presence of a CVC, and have a bloodstream infections will be recruited from all 18 pediatric departments in Denmark.
Procedure:
Eligible children will be randomized 1:1 to an early oral switch strategy or standard IV therapy. The choice of oral and IV antibiotics will not be determined by randomization but will be made by the treating clinician according to the isolated pathogen, antimicrobial susceptibility, and current treatment guidelines. The total antibiotic treatment duration will be the same in both treatment groups, according to Danish guidelines.
Participants will be randomized to the early oral switch arm (experimental arm) or the standard IV arm (control arm).
Participants allocated to the early oral switch arm will receive effective IV antibiotic therapy for at least 3 days and switch to oral therapy as soon as possible after clinical stability, but no later than day 6, to complete a total treatment duration of 10-14 days according to clinical treatment guidelines. Participants allocated to the standard IV arm (control arm) will receive IV antibiotic therapy for the full treatment course.
Sample size calculation:
The study aims to enroll a minimum of 114 participants. The sample size calculation is based on an expected treatment failure risk of 1.5% in both treatment arms, a non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points, a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%, and the use of an appropriate statistical method that accounts for the expected low number of events. Assuming a dropout rate of up to 5%, enrollment of 114 participants will provide approximately 80% power to demonstrate non-inferiority.
Recruitment is planned for approximately 36 months and may be extended if required and feasible to achieve the target sample size. If 114 participants are enrolled within the initial 36-month recruitment period, enrollment will continue until the end of the 36-month recruitment period or until a maximum of 150 participants have been enrolled, whichever occurs first, to increase statistical power to approximately 90%.
297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 114 is below the median of 156 across 156 interventional studies indexed under Bacteremia.
Browse Bacteremia studies →Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.
Compared within Bacteremia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Polymicrobial episodes are allowed
Exclusion Criteria:
Complicated infections
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.
“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Immunosuppression
A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.
Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
CTCAE grade
The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.
“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Early Oral Switch
Drug: Oral antibiotic therapy
Standard Intravenous Therapy
Drug: Standard IV antibiotic therapy
Participants randomized to the experimental arm will switch from IV to oral antibiotic therapy after effective IV antibiotic therapy for at least 3 days, followed by oral therapy as soon as possible after clinical stability, but no later than day 6, and continue oral therapy to complete the recommended total treatment duration.
Participants randomised to the control arm will receive IV antibiotic therapy throughout the recommended total treatment duration.
Recurrence of blood stream infection
Number of patients who experience growth of the same bacteria as in the index blood stream infection in a subsequent blood culture during the follow-up period.
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization
IV antibiotic treatment duration
Duration of IV antibiotic treatment from randomization until completion of IV antibiotic treatment for the index bloodstream infection, measured in hours.
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization
Length of Hospital Stay
Length of Hospital Stay for index infection
Time frame: From randomization until discharge for the index bloodstream infection, assessed up to 42 days after randomization
Escalation of antibiotics
Proportion of participants with at least one escalation of antibiotic treatment for the index bloodstream infection, defined as a switch from oral to intravenous antibiotics or from intravenous antibiotics to a broader-spectrum intravenous regimen.
Time frame: From randomization until completion of treatment for the index bloodstream infection, assessed up to 42 days after randomization
Re-initiation of antibiotics
Re-initiation of antibiotics after completion of antibiotic treatment for the index infection (regardless of the indication)
Time frame: From randomization until completion of treatment for the index bloodstream infection, assessed up to 42 days after randomization
Treatment failure, other than blood stream infection
Treatment failure, other than blood stream infection, defined as clinically and/or microbiologically confirmed disease progression or relapse, adjudicated by an independent, blinded adjudication committe
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization
Long term treatment failure
Long term treatment failure, including blood stream infection, defined as clinically and/or microbiologically confirmed disease progression or relapse, adjudicated by an independent, blinded adjudication committee
Time frame: Within 3 months after randomization
Number of Participants with Safety Outcomes
Safety outcomes are admission to an intensive care unit and death
Time frame: Within 6 weeks after randomization
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet