CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01763853IROCAUpdated Jul 29, 2016

Impact of Fluid Resuscitation Therapy on Pulmonary Edema as Measured by Alveolar Fluid Clearance in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

A Phase 4 interventional study of 4% albumin in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Hypovolemia and Pulmonary Edema, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-29.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The need for fluid resuscitation (FR) in ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common. Indeed, relative or absolute hypovolemia is a common phenomenon that the intensivist must recognize early and treat promptly. Fluid challenge may have adverse side effects associated with fluid administration. The diffusion within the interstitial space may favor edema formation and cause cardiac dysfunction by volume overload. Edema formation is global and may specifically alter pulmonary alveolar epithelial integrity, leading to enhanced alveolar edema and impaired gas exchange.

Currently, two types of fluids are frequently used, crystalloids and colloids. Among colloids and compared to crystalloids, albumin has the theoretical advantage of causing greater volume expansion.

We hypothesized that a fluid resuscitation therapy with albumin generates less pulmonary edema than a fluid resuscitation therapy with crystalloids.

The aim of our study is to compare alveolar fluid clearance, as a marker of alveolar edema fluid resorption, in 2 groups of patients: those treated with albumin and those treated with crystalloid.

Read the detailed description

The main objective of our prospective double blind, randomized, controlled trial is to compare the rate of alveolar fluid clearance, a marker of alveolar edema fluid resorption, in 2 groups of patients with ARDS and suffering from hypovolemia: those treated with albumin and those treated with crystalloid (fluid challenge of 7 mL/kg over 15 minutes, that can be repeated 3 times if hypovolemia persists).

The evolution of respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, as measured by transpulmonary thermodilution (extra-vascular lung water, pulmonary vascular permeability index, cardiac output, global enddiastolic volume), plasma osmolality, plasma oncotic pressure and plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptid (BNP) will be studied one hour and 3 hours after after fluid resuscitation in the two groups. In order to evaluate alveolar epithelial dysfunction in patients receiving either albumin or crystalloid, plasma and alveolar levels of sRAGE (the soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts) will be measured by ELISA. Lung aeration and fluid-induced derecruitment will be evaluated with an electrical impedance tomograph (PulmoVista®500, Dräger).

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
  • Hypovolemia
  • Pulmonary Edema

Keywords

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
  • Pulmonary edema
  • Alveolar fluid clearance
  • Alveolar epithelial dysfunction
  • Receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE)
  • Fluid resuscitation therapy
  • Hypovolemia
  • Crystalloid
  • Hydroxyethyl Starch
  • Intensive care unit
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 841 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ICU patients under mechanical ventilation
  • Patients within the first 24 hours after onset of moderate or severe ARDS, as defined by the Berlin definition (JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-2533)
  • Hypovolemia requiring fluid resuscitation therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Age under 18
  • Refusal of the protocol
  • Contraindications for the use of Voluven© or Ringer Lactate©
  • Contraindications for femoral artery catheterization or subclavian venous catheterization
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    albumin

    The main objective of our prospective double blind, randomized, controlled trial is to compare the rate of alveolar fluid clearance, a marker of alveolar edema fluid resorption, in 2 groups of patients with ARDS and suffering from hypovolemia: those treated with albumin and those treated with crystalloid (fluid challenge of 7 mL/kg over 15 minutes, that can be repeated 3 times if hypovolemia persists).

    Drug: 4% albumin

  • Other
    crystalloid

    The main objective of our prospective double blind, randomized, controlled trial is to compare the rate of alveolar fluid clearance, a marker of alveolar edema fluid resorption, in 2 groups of patients with ARDS and suffering from hypovolemia: those treated with albumin and those treated with crystalloid (fluid challenge of 7 mL/kg over 15 minutes, that can be repeated 3 times if hypovolemia persists).

    Drug: 4% albumin

Interventions

  • Drug4% albumin
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of alveolar fluid clearance

    Time frame: one hour after administration of fluid resuscitation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Extra-vascular lung water

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  2. Pulmonary vascular permeability index

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  3. Global enddiastolic volume index

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  4. mean arterial pressure

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  5. cardiac output

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  6. pulse pressure variation

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  7. stroke volume variation

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  8. central venous venous oxygenation

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  9. central venous pressure

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  10. PaO2

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  11. lung compliance

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  12. airways resistance

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  13. lung injury score

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  14. Plasma levels of sRAGE

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  15. Alveolar levels of sRAGE

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  16. Brain natriuretic peptide levels

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  17. Plasma osmolarity

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  18. Oncotic pressure

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  19. Electrical impedance tomography

    Time frame: one hour and three hours after administration of fluid resuscitation

  20. Mortality

    Time frame: Day 20, Day 90

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01763853
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Collaborators
R2D2 Retinoids, Reproduction Developmental Diseases, Université d'Auvergne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2013
Start date
Dec 2012
Primary completion
Apr 2017 (estimated)
Completion
May 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 29, 2016

Study contacts

Patrick LACARIN
Contact
placarin@chu-clermontferrand.fr
04 73 75 11 95
Matthieu JABAUDON
principal investigator · University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion