ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07837076NormFMDUpdated Oct 9, 2026

Endothelial Function in Healthy Volunteers

An interventional study of Measurement of endothelial function using FMD in Healthy Women, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 50 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-09.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Oct 9, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in France+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to measure FMD (flow-mediated dilation) in healthy volunteers aged over 50 in order to establish reference values for women aged over 50.

Read the detailed description

The measurement of endothelial function using FMD (flow-mediated dilation) is a widely validated, non-invasive technique used in clinical research. FMD is considered a potential early marker of atherosclerosis. The investigators have been working for several years in collaboration with INRAE in Theix, where a number of observational and interventional studies have been carried out. Indeed, more than 400 patients, particularly women over the age of 50, have been included to investigate various clinical conditions such as nutritional disorders, cardiovascular disorders and rheumatological conditions. These studies have been the subject of several publications which have highlighted low FMD values in the presence of these comorbidities compared with European standards. However, these studies were retrospective and employed different methodologies, populations, techniques, equipment and investigators.

The investigators currently lack reference values to propose guidelines for more effective prevention of endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, in several studies the investigators have highlighted correlations between FMD and muscle impairment and quality of life, using no reference standards other than those found in the literature - which also contains methodological biases - and they would also like to establish their own reference values in this context.

This study therefore aims to assess endothelial and muscle function, as well as quality of life, in healthy female volunteers with the aim of establishing reference values, under the same conditions and using the same methodology as in previous clinical trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Women

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • endothelial function
  • healthy women
  • arteriosclerosis
03

In context

Arteriosclerosis

157 studies on the registry are indexed under Arteriosclerosis; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 109 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Arteriosclerosis.

Browse Arteriosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 859 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 50 or over.
  • Able to give to take part in the research.
  • Enrolled in a social security system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, arterial disease) deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the trial.
  • Medical and/or surgical history deemed by the investigator to be incompatible with the trial.
  • Treatment with lipid-lowering drugs, for high blood pressure or osteoporosis.
  • Women under legal guardianship or deprived of their liberty.
  • Refusal to participate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Healthy adult women

    All the participants will be included in the only arm of this study designed to establish FMD values of reference.

    Other: Measurement of endothelial function using FMD

Interventions

  • OtherMeasurement of endothelial function using FMD

    FMD refers to the increase in the diameter of the brachial artery caused by hyperaemia resulting from the rapid deflation of a cuff inflated to a suprasystolic pressure. This measurement of endothelial function is carried out at the level of the microcirculation (peripheral vessels) using the non-invasive technique of measuring flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery, which is currently the gold standard for assessing vascular endothelial function in humans (Holder et al., 2021).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of endothelial function using the FMD technique

    The diameter of the brachial artery is measured by ultrasound before and after the increase in shear stress induced by the release of the occlusion after 5 minutes. The FMD of the left brachial artery is measured in the longitudinal plane above the antecubital fossa using a high-resolution CE-marked ultrasound scanner with a 190 linear array probe operating at 7 to 12 MHz. A mechanical arm (Vascular Imaging, Amsterdam, Netherlands), fitted with micrometric screws to allow precise movement in all three dimensions, is used to ensure correct, stereotactic positioning of the probe. Once the probe is optimally positioned, images are initially recorded for 60 s and then continuously for 3 min following the resolution of forearm ischaemia, caused by inflating a blood pressure cuff to 220 mmHg for 5 min (occlusion). The images are encoded and recorded on a dedicated computer, then digitised for subsequent blinded analysis using automatic edge-detection software 197.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. SARC-F questionnaire

    Muscle function will be assessed using the SARC-F questionnaire, where a score of 4 out of 5 or higher suggests the presence of sarcopenia.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. SPPB test

    Muscle function will be assessed using the SPPB test, which assesses an individual's physical performance (balance, walking speed, standing up from a chair).

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Muscle strenght

    Assessment of muscle strength in Kg using a dynamometer.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Body composition: body fat

    Body fat percentage will be measured using a bioimpedance analyser

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Body composition: lean body mass

    Lean body mass percentage will be assessed using a bioimpedance analyser

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Body composition: body water

    Body water percentage will be assessed using a bioimpedance analyser

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. PSQI questionnaire

    Quality of life will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which measures sleep quality during the month preceding the interview with the participant. The overall score (0 to 21) is calculated by adding together the sub-scores for the seven components, each of which ranges from 0 to 3 points. The higher the overall score, the greater the impairment to sleep quality. An overall score of more than 5 is an indicator of sleep disorders.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. HAD scale

    Quality of life will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale, which screens for anxiety and/or depressive disorders. It comprises 14 items scored from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety and seven others to the depressive dimension, thus yielding two scores (maximum score for each: 21). A score of 7 or below indicates an absence of symptoms. A score between 8 and 10 indicates possible symptoms. A score of 11 or above indicates confirmed symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. SF-36 questionnaire

    Quality of life will be assessed using 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), which assesses an individual's physical and mental health based on 36 questions relating to eight aspects of health. An index is calculated for both physical and mental health (0-100); the higher the score, the better the quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Cognitive function assessment

    The cognitive assessment will be carried out using the MoCA test, which is a screening tool for cognitive decline that provides a comprehensive assessment of cognitive functions by examining: memory, visuospatial ability, executive functions, concentration and attention, language and spatial orientation.

    Time frame: Baseline

  11. Biological analyses

    A blood sample (28 mL in total) will be taken after fasting to analyse the lipid profile, certain bone markers (FGF23, vitamin D) and genetic/epigenetic markers.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 29 interventional studies with no phase under Arteriosclerosis, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 9, 2026: start Sep 2026 → Oct 2026, primary completion Sep 2027 → Oct 2027 and completion Sep 2027 → Oct 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2026
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
StartActual
Oct 5, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027was Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 2027was Sep 2027
Last update
Oct 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 9, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in France
Show site
  • Clinical Investigation Platform/Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm CIC 1405 · Clermont-Ferrand, France
Oct 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026→Oct 5, 2026 (actual)
Oct 9, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2027→Oct 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Study completion
Sep 2027→Oct 2027
Oct 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 9, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in France
    Show site
    • Clinical Investigation Platform/Clinical Investigation Center, Inserm CIC 1405 · Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Start date Sep 2026→Oct 5, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Sep 2027→Oct 2027
    Study completion Sep 2027→Oct 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07837076
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 9, 2026

Study contacts

Lise Laclautre
Contact
promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
+334754963
Gisèle Pickering
principal investigator · University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion