CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01522599ELPUpdated Jun 17, 2014

Flow-flow ECCO2-R and 4 ml/kg Tidal Volume vs. 6 ml/kg Tidal Volume to Enhance Protection From VILI in Acute Lung Injury

A Phase 3 interventional study of ARDS-Net Strategy and ECCO2-R in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by University of Turin, Italy. Terminated at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-17.

Sponsored by University of Turin, Italy · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Financial hardship
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
230
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that further reduction of VT to 4mL/kg may enhance lung protection in patients with ARDS as compared to the conventional "ARDS-Net" ventilation. Control of PaCO2 in the \~4 ml/kg arm would be accomplished by LFPPV- ECCO2-R.

Read the detailed description

The trial will test the hypothesis that a VT of 4 ml/kg PBW combined with low flow CO2 removal improves outcome in patients with severe ARDS (PFs ≤ 200 and PEEP ≥ 10) compared to ventilation with a VT of 6 ml/kg PBW. The study will accrue a maximum of 230 patients over approximately 12-18 months.

PRIMARY END-POINT: Number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) during the 28 days immediately after randomization

SECONDARY END-POINTS: 28 and 90-day all-cause mortality; number of ICU-free days during the 28 days immediately after randomization; cumulative incidence of: first episode of refractory hypoxemia (during 28 days after randomization), use of rescue therapies, first day that meet criteria for weaning, SOFA-free and severe adverse events.

Patients in CONTROL will be treated according to a modified, simplified version of The ARDS-Network lung protective lower tidal volume. Patients in TREATMENT group will be treated according to the ARDS-Net protocol modified (VT reduced by 1 ml/kg PBW at intervals ≤ 2 hours until VT = 4ml/kg PBW and the use of low-flow CO2 removal with a Plateau Pressure Goal: ≤ 25 cm H2O).

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

  • ARDS: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • LOW FLOW ECCO2-R: EXTRA-CORPOREAL CO2 REMOVAL
  • VILI: Ventilator Induced Lung Injury
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 230 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age > 18 years
  • are on invasive assisted breathing less then 48 hours
  • less than 24 hours since diagnosis for ARDS: with PF\<=200 and PEEP>=10, bilateral infiltrate on chest X-Ray and no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension
  • have a commitment to full support

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intubation and mechanical ventilation (any form) for > 48 hours
  • risk of systemic bleeding with anticoagulation
  • acute brain injury
  • body mass index > 40
  • neuromuscular disease that impairs ability to ventilate without assistance
  • severe chronic respiratory disease
  • burns > 40% total body surface area
  • malignancy or other irreversible disease or condition for which 6- month mortality is estimated to be greater than 50%
  • allogeneic bone marrow transplant within the last 5 years
  • chronic respiratory condition making patient respirator dependent
  • patient, surrogate, or physician not committed to full support
  • acute myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome within 30 days
  • moribund patient: not expected to survive 24 hours
  • no consent/inability to obtain consent
  • patients receiving high frequency ventilation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
230 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ARDS-Net strategy (Control)

    Other: ARDS-Net Strategy

  • Experimental
    ECCO2-R with 4 mL/Kg Vt (Treatment)

    Other: ECCO2-R

Interventions

  • OtherARDS-Net Strategy

    Treatment according to the ARDS-Net protocol (The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1301-1308May 4, 2000)

    Also known as: Protective ventilation

  • OtherECCO2-R

    Ventilation with Tidal Volume of 4 ml/kg PBW and low flow CO2 removal

    Also known as: Further protective ventilation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of ventilator-free days during the 28 days immediately after randomization

    VFDs is a composite endpoint. VFD to day 28 is defined as the number of days after initiating unassisted breathing to day 28 after randomization, assuming a patient survives for at least two consecutive calendar days after initiating nassisted breathing and remains free of assisted breathing. If a patient dies prior to day 28 or is still receiving assisted breathing at day 27, his/her VFDs will be zero.

    Time frame: 28 DAYS

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day all-cause mortality

    All patients will be classified as either "alive at Study Day 28" or, if dead, "dead at Study Day 28." For example, day zero is the day of randomization and day 1 is the next day and encompasses all events that occur midnight-to-midnight, etc.

    Time frame: 28 days

  2. 90-day all-cause mortality.

    All patients will be classified as either "alive at Study Day 90" or, if dead, "dead at Study Day 90. Patients alive in hospital or in any health care facility at day 90 will be considered to have survived.

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Number of ICU-free days during the 28 days immediately after randomization (ICU-FD).

    ICU-FDs are defined as the number of days from the time of ICU discharge to day 28 after randomization, assuming survival for at least two consecutive calendar days after ICU discharge and continued stay outside the ICU setting to day 28. If a patient returns to the ICU and subsequently needs ICU admission to day 28, ICU-FDs will be counted from the end of the last period of ICU discharge to day 28.

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. Cumulative incidence of first episode of refractory hypoxemia (during 28 days after randomization).

    Refractory hypoxemia is defined as PaO2 \< 60 mm Hg for at least 1 hour while receiving an FIO2 of 1.0

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Cumulative incidence of the use of rescue therapies.

    The first day inhaled nitric oxide or prone position or high-frequency oscillation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or any combinations of these therapies will be tabulated.

    Time frame: 28 days

  6. Cumulative incidence of first day that meet criteria for weaning readiness during 28 days after randomization.

    Weaning readiness will be defined if the following 4 criteria are met for the last 30 minutes during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). 1. SpO2 ≥ 90% and / or PaO2 ≥ 60 mm Hg; PaO2 to take precedence if both available 2. Respiratory Rate ≤ 35 / min 3. pH ≥ 7.30 4. No respiratory distress

    Time frame: 28 days

  7. Cumulative SOFA-free score between randomization and day 28.

    The SOFA-free score is calculated as the maximum daily score, minus the observed SOFA score. To monitor the degree of variation of the patient's SOFA score (as improvement or worsening) the daily difference between the maximum score and the observed score will be summed up for each day between randomization and day 28. Patients dying before the 28th day cannot continue to increase their cumulative SOFA-free score. In this way, the larger the cumulative score reached, the higher is the improvement of the patient and the probability of being alive at day 28.

    Time frame: 28 days

  8. Cumulative incidence of severe adverse events during 28 days after randomization.

    Adverse events that are considered to be related to ECCO2-R and that follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the ECCO2-R and that could readily have been produced by ECCO2-R will be classified as: "DEVICE RELATED" or "PATIENT RELATED"

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Turin - Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine
    Turin, 10126, Italy
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01522599
Lead sponsor
University of Turin, Italy
Responsible party
Marco Ranieri (Principal Investigator, University of Turin, Italy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 31, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2014
Completion
Jan 2014
Last update
Jun 17, 2014

Study contacts

Vito Marco VM Ranieri, MD
principal investigator · Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Turin, Italy
Antonio A Pesenti, MD
study chair · Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion