ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07682766MARINAUpdated Jul 6, 2026

BioMArkeRs of INflammation, Infection, and Immunity in the Critical Area (MARINA): the Use of Inflammatory and Immunity Biomarkers as Early Predictors of Clinical Severity, Organ Damage, Response to Treatment, and Infectious Complications in Patients Admitted to the Critical Care Area.

An observational study in Septic Shock and Immunocompromised Patients, sponsored by University of Turin, Italy. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-06.

Sponsored by University of Turin, Italy · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The MARINA study (bioMARkers of INflammation, infection, and immunity in critical cAre) is a multicenter, prospective and retrospective observational cohort study designed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of inflammatory and immune biomarkers in critically ill patients.

The study enrolls adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to intensive care or step-down units who present with signs or symptoms of active infection, including sepsis and septic shock. Three main patient populations are targeted: (1) patients with suspected or confirmed infection (community- or hospital-acquired); (2) patients undergoing high-risk major surgery (cardiac, thoracic, or abdominal) under general anesthesia; and (3) immunocompromised patients (solid organ transplant, HSCT, bone marrow transplant, CAR-T cell therapy, or other severe immunosuppression).

Serial measurements of established and emerging biomarkers - including procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, MR-proadrenomedullina, copeptin, ferritin, interleukin-6, troponin, D-dimer, lactate, lymphocyte subpopulations, and immunoglobulins - are collected at predefined time points (T1: within 24 hours; T2: within 72 hours; T7: at day 7 of ICU admission) and integrated with clinical data on a dedicated electronic platform.

The primary endpoint is 28-day mortality. Secondary endpoints include assessment of organ damage, clinical severity, response to treatment, infectious complications (including VAP and bacteremia), superinfections (bacterial, viral, fungal), ICU and hospital length of stay, and the ability of biomarkers to guide antimicrobial de-escalation. Long-term survival at 90 and 180 days is also assessed.

A minimum sample size of 200 patients (prospective phase) is planned across participating centers in Italy and Spain. The study duration is four years from ethical approval.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock
  • Immunocompromised Patients

Browse trials for

03

In context

Shock, Septic

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 108 across 406 observational studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy is the lead sponsor of 214 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study enrolls adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to intensive care units (ICU) or step-down units at participating centers. Three partially overlapping patient populations are included:

  • Infection group: patients with suspected or confirmed infection, including sepsis and septic shock, either community- or hospital-acquired.
  • Surgical group: patients who have undergone high-risk major surgery under general anesthesia (cardiac, thoracic, or abdominal surgery) within the 24 hours preceding ICU admission, either as elective or emergency procedures.
  • Immunocompromised group: patients with severely impaired immune status, including recipients of solid organ transplant (SOT), hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), bone marrow transplant, or CAR-T cell therapy, as well as patients under any other form of severe immunosuppression, presenting with signs or symptoms of active infection.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written to participate in the study (or deferred consent, obtained as soon as clinically feasible, in patients unable to provide consent at the time of enrollment)
  • Surgical group: patients who have undergone a high-risk elective or emergency surgical procedure under general anesthesia within the previous 24 hours (cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery)
  • Infection group: suspected or confirmed infection (including sepsis and septic shock), either community- or hospital-acquired
  • group (subset of the infection group): patients with impaired immune status, including solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, hematopoietic stem cell transplant () recipients, bone marrow transplant recipients, CAR-T cell therapy recipients, or any other form of severe immunosuppression

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to provide
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Therapeutic limitations or clinical decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment at the time of enrollment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Septic shock

    patients with probable or documented septic shock

  • major surgery

    patients admitted to ICU after major surgical procedures (cardiac surgery, major abdominal surgery, major thoracic surgery)

  • immunocompromised

    patients with \>= organ failure due to probable or documented immune alteration (hematologic patients, oncologic patients, autoimmune diseases)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 28-day all-cause mortalityTime Frame: 28 days from ICU admission

    To evaluate whether serial measurements of prognostic biomarkers (including procalcitonin, MR-proadrenomedullin, copeptin, ferritin, interleukin-6, lymphocyte subpopulations, and immunoglobulins) can predict 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with active infection, including those undergoing major surgery or with impaired immune status.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days from ICU admission

Secondary outcomes

  1. clinical severity

    Assessment of whether biomarker levels correlate with clinical severity scores in patients with active infection admitted to intensive or step-down care units.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days from ICU admission

  2. Organ damage

    Evaluation of the correlation between biomarker levels and the degree of organ dysfunction/damage during ICU stay.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days from ICU admission

  3. Response to treatment

    Assessment of the ability of serial biomarker measurements to reflect and predict response to antimicrobial and supportive treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days from ICU admission

  4. Infectious complications

    Evaluation of the ability of biomarkers to predict the occurrence of infectious complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bacteremia.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days from ICU admission

  5. ICU and hospital length of stay

    Evaluation of whether biomarker levels at admission and during follow-up correlate with duration of ICU stay and total hospital stay.

    Time frame: Up to 180 days from ICU admission

  6. Long-term survival

    Evaluation of the correlation between biomarker levels and long-term survival at 90 and 180 days.

    Time frame: 90 and 180 days from ICU admission

  7. Early risk stratification in severely immunocompromised patients

    Evaluation of the role of biomarkers in early prediction of mortality risk, infectious complications, and superinfections in patients with severe immune deficiency.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days from ICU admission

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 35 months after the start.

Of 189 non-industry observational studies under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 202 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 26, 2026
First posted
Jul 6, 2026
StartActual
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Jul 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07682766
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 6, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 6, 2026

Study contacts

Giorgia Montrucchio, Professor
Contact
giorgiagiuseppina.montrucchio@unito.it
00390116331633

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion