ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07923643Updated Nov 6, 2026

Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain

An interventional study of Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone in Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain and Chronic Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial will evaluate whether adding magnesium sulfate to dexamethasone-augmented ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block improves postoperative recovery and analgesia in female patients undergoing elective modified radical mastectomy under general anesthesia. Fifty-four participants will be allocated to two groups. Both groups will receive bupivacaine and dexamethasone for PECS block; the intervention group will additionally receive magnesium sulfate. The primary outcome will be the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, block-related complications, intraoperative fentanyl requirements, hemodynamic parameters, and chronic post-mastectomy pain assessed through six months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Chronic Postoperative Pain
  • Quality of Recovery

Keywords

  • Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS)
  • Magnesium sulfate
  • dexamethasone
  • Quality of recovery
  • chronic pain
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients aged 18-70 years.
  • I-III.
  • Scheduled for elective modified radical mastectomy.
  • Able to understand the study protocol and complete the QoR-15 questionnaire.
  • Provided written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics, dexamethasone, magnesium sulfate, or study medications.
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy.
  • Local infection at the injection site.
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment.
  • Neuromuscular disorders.
  • Chronic opioid use or chronic pain syndromes.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • >35 kg/m².
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to communicate effectively.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group D

    Patients will receive an ultrasound-guided PECS block (10 mL in PECS I and 20 mL in PECS II; total volume 30 mL) using 15ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine 75 mg mixed with 8mg dexamethasone (2ml) and diluted to 30ml with normal saline (13ml)

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Experimental
    Group DM

    Patients will receive an ultrasound-guided PECS block (10 mL in PECS I and 20 mL in PECS II; total volume 30 mL) using 15ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine 75mg mixed with 8mg dexamethasone (2ml),250mg magnesium sulfate (2.5ml) and diluted to 30ml with normal saline (10.5ml),

    Drug: Bupivacaine · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Magnesium sulfate

Interventions

  • Patients will receive an ultrasound-guided PECS block (10 mL in PECS I and 20 mL in PECS II; total volume 30 mL) using 15ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine 75 mg in both groups

  • Dexamethasone 8 mg will be administered as an adjunct to the PECS block in both groups

  • Magnesium sulfate 250 mg will be administered as an adjunct to the PECS block in DM group only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery-15 score at 24 hours after surgery

    Total score of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire, ranging from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain

    Assessing the presence or absence of chronic postoperative pain and its intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)minimum value of 0, maximum value of 10, where higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: Through 6 months postoperatively

  2. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Evaluating postoperative pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: At arrival to Post- Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (0 hour), 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.

  3. Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    Measuring the total morphine consumption required by the patient as rescue analgesia.

    Time frame: During the first 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Time to First Request for Rescue Analgesia

    Recording the duration from the end of surgery until the patient first requests rescue analgesia (when Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)is 4 or more).

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours postoperatively

  5. Patient Satisfaction

    Evaluating patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied)(minimum value of 1, maximum value of 5, where higher scores mean a better outcome).

    Time frame: At 24 hours postoperatively.

  6. Block-Related Complications and Adverse Effects

    Evaluating the overall incidence of any block-related complications or adverse events (including block failure, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, hematoma, infection, pneumothorax, nerve injury, or magnesium-related side effects), reported as the percentage of affected patients out of the total study population

    Time frame: Intraoperatively and throughout the 24-hour postoperative period.

  7. Incidence and Severity of Postoperative Nausea

    The incidence and severity of postoperative nausea will be assessed during the first 24 hours after surgery. Nausea severity will be measured using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst imaginable nausea). Assessments will be performed at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. The incidence of nausea (NRS \> 0) and the severity scores at each assessment time will be recorded.

    Time frame: During the first 24 hours postoperatively (Assessments will be performed at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively).

  8. Incidence and Frequency of Postoperative Vomiting

    The incidence and frequency of postoperative vomiting will be assessed during the first 24 hours after surgery. The occurrence of vomiting and the total number of vomiting episodes will be recorded at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. The need for rescue antiemetic medication will also be documented.

    Time frame: During the first 24 hours postoperatively (Assessments will be performed at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively).

  9. Intraoperative Fentanyl Requirements

    Measuring the total intraoperative consumption of fentanyl.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively (during the surgical procedure).

  10. Heart rate

    Assessing heart rate values.

    Time frame: At baseline, after block, every 15 minutes intraoperatively, and at the end of surgery (extubation period).

  11. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

    Assessing Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) values

    Time frame: At baseline, after block, every 15 minutes intraoperatively, and at the end of surgery (extubation period).

  12. Oxygen Saturation (SpO2)

    Assessing peripheral oxygen saturation levels.

    Time frame: At baseline, after block, every 15 minutes intraoperatively, and at the end of surgery (extubation period).

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • He SQ, Liu GY, Yu YH, Wang L, Zhang GY, Peng DS, Bei WX, Chen CL, Lv SH, Zhao ZY, Huang Y, Xiang YQ. Establishing M1 subdivision for de novo nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving immuno-chemotherapy: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Oral Oncol. 2024 Dec;159:107074. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107074. Epub 2024 Oct 10. PubMed 39393309 ↗
  • Sun Y, Jacobson KB, Golovlev V. A multienzyme bioluminescent time-resolved pyrophosphate assay. Anal Biochem. 2007 Aug 15;367(2):201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.04.023. Epub 2007 Apr 25. PubMed 17540325 ↗
  • Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):625-32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y. Epub 2010 Feb 10. PubMed 20146096 ↗
  • Guo L, Zhao J, She Z, Lu M, Zong Y. Statistical key factors optimization of conditions for hydrogen production from S-TE (solubilization by thermophilic enzyme) waste sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2013 Jun;137:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.102. Epub 2013 Mar 22. PubMed 23584408 ↗
  • Szalontai G, Besenyei G, Parkanyi L. Homonuclear SQ-DQ correlations in solids: applications of the broadband BaBa scheme to reveal 31P-31P spatial correlations in two-, three-, four-, and five-spin systems. Magn Reson Chem. 2011 Dec;49(12):801-11. doi: 10.1002/mrc.2842. Epub 2011 Nov 18. PubMed 22102509 ↗
  • Dinice J, Mainwaring RD. Pentalogy of Cantrell: a rare congenital abnormality. JAAPA. 2007 Nov;20(11):26-7. doi: 10.1097/01720610-200711000-00016. No abstract available. PubMed 18035760 ↗
  • Skjelbred P, Lokken P. Post-operative pain and inflammatory reaction reduced by injection of a corticosteroid. A controlled trial in bilateral oral surgery. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;21(5):391-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00542325. PubMed 7042372 ↗
  • Nowhere to hide. Nature. 2009 Jul 16;460(7253):307. doi: 10.1038/460307b. No abstract available. PubMed 19606096 ↗
  • Latham JA, Ji T, Matthews K, Mariano PS, Allen KN, Dunaway-Mariano D. Catalytic Mechanism of the Hotdog-Fold Thioesterase PA1618 Revealed by X-ray Structure Determination of a Substrate-Bound Oxygen Ester Analogue Complex. Chembiochem. 2017 Oct 5;18(19):1935-1943. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201700322. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PubMed 28741300 ↗
  • Houben JM, Giltay EJ, Rius-Ottenheim N, Hageman GJ, Kromhout D. Telomere length and mortality in elderly men: the Zutphen Elderly Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Jan;66(1):38-44. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq164. Epub 2010 Oct 1. PubMed 20889650 ↗
  • Richebe P, Pouquet O, Jelacic S, Mehta S, Calderon J, Picard W, Rivat C, Cahana A, Janvier G. Target-controlled dosing of remifentanil during cardiac surgery reduces postoperative hyperalgesia. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):917-25. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.03.185. Epub 2011 Jun 8. PubMed 21641819 ↗
  • McGreevy K, Bottros MM, Raja SN. Preventing Chronic Pain following Acute Pain: Risk Factors, Preventive Strategies, and their Efficacy. Eur J Pain Suppl. 2011 Nov 11;5(2):365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.eujps.2011.08.013. PubMed 22102847 ↗
  • Pawlas N, Broberg K, Skerfving S, Pawlas K. Disturbance of posture in children with very low lead exposure, and modification by VDR FokI genotype. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):739-44. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1129926. PubMed 25528913 ↗
  • Perl T, Carstens E, Hirn A, Quintel M, Vautz W, Nolte J, Junger M. Determination of serum propofol concentrations by breath analysis using ion mobility spectrometry. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):822-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep312. Epub 2009 Nov 3. PubMed 19887534 ↗
  • Riechel C, Alegiani AC, Kopke S, Kasper J, Rosenkranz M, Thomalla G, Heesen C. Subjective and objective knowledge and decisional role preferences in cerebrovascular patients compared to controls. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 2;10:1453-60. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S98342. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27536077 ↗
  • Rojic-Becker D, Portero-Tresserra M, Marti-Nicolovius M, Vale-Martinez A, Guillazo-Blanch G. Effects of caloric restriction on monoaminergic neurotransmission, peripheral hormones, and olfactory memory in aged rats. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Jul 9;409:113328. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113328. Epub 2021 Apr 27. PubMed 33930470 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 24 months later.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2026
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2028
CompletionEst.
Nov 2028
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07923643
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Madona M.NOMAN (Lecturer of Anesthesia, ICU and pain management, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Madona M Noman, MD
Contact
madonamisheal90@yahoo.com
201006265867
Romany G Gendy, MD
Contact
madonamisheal@gmail.com
201229869146
Madona M Noman, MD
principal investigator · Assiut University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Magnesium Sulfate

Start the discussion