ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07783035Updated Aug 24, 2026

ABCDEF Bundle Compliance and ICU Outcomes in Latin America

An observational study in Icu Delirium, Post Intensive Care Syndrome and Critical Illness, sponsored by Hospital H+ Queretaro. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by Hospital H+ Queretaro · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
580
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the degree of compliance with the ABCDEF bundle and its relationship with clinical outcomes in adult patients (aged 18 and older) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in Latin America for at least 48 hours.

The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the prevalence, cumulative incidence, and duration of delirium in adult ICU patients in Latin America? Is higher compliance with the ABCDEF bundle (low [\<33%], moderate [33%-66%], high [>66%]) independently associated with a lower prevalence, cumulative incidence, and duration of delirium? Does higher ABCDEF bundle compliance improve functional mobility at hospital discharge and long-term cognitive, psychological, and quality-of-life outcomes at 3 and 6 months post-discharge? Researchers will compare three groups based on their level of ABCDEF bundle compliance (low [\<33%], moderate [33%-66%], and high [>66%]) to see if higher bundle adherence improves delirium and long-term post-ICU functional outcomes.

Participants will:

Receive standard ICU care without experimental intervention. Undergo daily assessments for delirium (using CAM-ICU) and physical mobility (using ICU Mobility Scale) during their ICU stay.

Complete telephone follow-up evaluations at 3 months post-discharge to assess cognitive function (BCAT-ICU/MoCA) and psychological symptoms (HADS, DSPS).

Complete follow-up evaluations at 6 months post-discharge to assess cognitive function (full MoCA), psychological symptoms (HADS, DSPS), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L).

02

Conditions studied

  • Icu Delirium
  • Post Intensive Care Syndrome
  • Critical Illness

Keywords

  • ABCDEF Bundle
  • Delirium
  • Intensive Care
  • Post Intensive Care Syndrome
03

In context

postintensive care syndrome

105 studies on the registry are indexed under postintensive care syndrome; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 580 is above the median of 135 across 56 observational studies indexed under postintensive care syndrome.

Browse postintensive care syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital H+ Queretaro is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult critically ill patients admitted to six multipurpose intensive care units across four Latin American countries (Colombia, Mexico, Chile, and Argentina) with an expected ICU stay of at least 48 hours

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years Admission to the ICU during the 3-month recruitment period
  • Expected ICU length of stay ≥48 hours
  • Written provided by the patient or legal representative (or eligibility for deferred consent according to local regulations)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of moderate to severe dementia
  • Severe chronic brain disease (e.g., previous disabling stroke, Parkinson's disease, advanced multiple sclerosis)
  • Severe prior intellectual disability or prior functional cognitive dependence
  • Palliative sedation scheduled from ICU admission
  • Deep irreversible coma or diagnosed brain death
  • Uncorrected bilateral deafness
  • Non-Spanish speakers
  • Refusal or explicit request by the family not to participate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
580 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Low ABCDEF Bundle Compliance

    Adult ICU patients who receive less than 33% of the ABCDEF bundle components (0 to 1 out of 6 components implemented) during their ICU stay.

    Other: ABCDEF Bundle Compliance Assessment

  • Moderate ABCDEF Bundle Compliance

    Adult ICU patients who receive between 33% and 66% of the ABCDEF bundle components (2 to 4 out of 6 components implemented) during their ICU stay.

    Other: ABCDEF Bundle Compliance Assessment

  • High ABCDEF Bundle Compliance

    Adult ICU patients who receive more than 66% of the ABCDEF bundle components (5 to 6 out of 6 components implemented) during their ICU stay.

    Other: ABCDEF Bundle Compliance Assessment

Interventions

  • OtherABCDEF Bundle Compliance Assessment

    Observational assessment of routine ICU clinical care practices implementing the ABCDEF bundle components (A: Sedation Assessment, B: Spontaneous Breathing Trials, C: Choice of Anesthesia/Sedation, D: Delirium Assessment and Management, E: Early Mobility, F: Family Engagement). No experimental intervention is assigned by the study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ICU Delirium Prevalence

    Percentage of adult patients experiencing delirium at any point during their ICU stay, evaluated daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU).

    Time frame: Daily during the ICU stay (up to hospital discharge or a maximum of 30 days)

  2. ICU Delirium Cumulative Incidence

    Percentage of patients without delirium at ICU admission who subsequently develop delirium during their ICU stay, assessed daily using the CAM-ICU.

    Time frame: Daily during the ICU stay (up to hospital discharge or a maximum of 30 days).

  3. ICU Delirium Duration

    Total number of days with delirium during the ICU stay, calculated from daily CAM-ICU assessments.

    Time frame: Daily during the ICU stay (up to hospital discharge or a maximum of 30 days).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Mobility at ICU Discharge

    Physical mobility evaluated using the ICU Mobility Scale (ICUMS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (nothing/lying in bed) to 10 (walking independently without a walking aid). Higher scores represent better physical mobility and functional status.

    Time frame: Assessed every 48 hours during the ICU stay until ICU discharge (up to 30 days)

  2. Achievement of Standing or Walking at ICU Discharge

    Percentage of patients reaching a functional mobility level of at least standing at bedside or walking (defined as an ICU Mobility Scale score ≥ 4) before ICU discharge.

    Time frame: Assessed every 48 hours during the ICU stay until ICU discharge (up to 30 days).

  3. In-Hospital Mortality

    Proportion of patients who died prior to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From ICU admission up to hospital discharge (approximately 30 days).

  4. Post-ICU Cognitive Function at 3 Months

    Global cognitive performance assessed using either the BCAT-ICU or the T-MoCA. Scores range from 0 to 30 for BCAT-ICU (and 0 to 22 for T-MoCA), where higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: 3 months post-hospital discharge

  5. Post-ICU Cognitive Function at 6 Months

    Global cognitive performance assessed using the full Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Scores range from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent better cognitive function (a score of 26 or above is considered normal).

    Time frame: 6 months post-hospital discharge.

  6. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms at 3 Months

    Psychological post-traumatic stress symptoms assessed using the 17-item Davidson Trauma Scale (DSPS). Total scores range from 0 to 136, where higher scores indicate greater frequency and severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 3 months post-hospital discharge.

  7. Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms at 6 Months

    Psychological post-traumatic stress symptoms assessed using the 17-item Davidson Trauma Scale (DSPS). Total scores range from 0 to 136, where higher scores indicate greater frequency and severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 6 months post-hospital discharge.

  8. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale at 3 Months

    Psychological distress regarding anxiety symptoms assessed using the Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). Scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms (worse outcome; scores ≥ 8 suggest clinical anxiety).

    Time frame: 3 months post-hospital discharge.

  9. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Subscale at 3 Months

    Psychological distress regarding depression symptoms assessed using the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome; scores ≥ 8 suggest clinical depression).

    Time frame: 3 months post-hospital discharge.

  10. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale at 6 Months

    Psychological distress regarding anxiety symptoms assessed using the Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). Scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 6 months post-hospital discharge.

  11. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression Subscale at 6 Months

    Psychological distress regarding depression symptoms assessed using the Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms (worse outcome).

    Time frame: 6 months post-hospital discharge.

  12. EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 6 Months

    Self-reported health status and quality of life evaluated across 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). The index utility score ranges approximately from -0.6 to 1.0 (depending on national value sets), where higher scores represent better health-related quality of life (1.0 = perfect health).

    Time frame: 6 months post-hospital discharge.

  13. EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) Score at 6 Months

    Self-rated overall health status assessed using the EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS). Scores range from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represents the worst health you can imagine and 100 represents the best health you can imagine (higher scores represent better outcome).

    Time frame: 6 months post-hospital discharge.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07783035
Lead sponsor
Hospital H+ Queretaro
Responsible party
Jose J Zaragoza, MD MSc (Principal Investigator, Hospital H+ Queretaro) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Aug 24, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 24, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Study contacts

Job Heriberto Rodriguez Guillen
Contact
job.rodriguez@hospitalesmac.com
5549636548 ext. 52

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion