ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07906366BRAVE-PICUUpdated Oct 30, 2026

Building Resilience Through Anxiety Virtual Education in PICU Survivors

An interventional study of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Critical Illness Recovery and Mental Health, sponsored by University of Rochester. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Primary conditionPsychological Well-Being(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?Psychological Well-Being is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by University of Rochester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Survivors of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admissions often experience adverse mental health consequences, either as a result of, or associated with, their intensive care stay. Evidence-based digital cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) tools exist for both children and parents to learn cognitive behavioral strategies. In this feasibility study, we aim to measure the adoption and acceptability of a dCBT tool among PICU survivors and their parents. We hypothesize that >50% of subjects will meet completion criteria for these programs, and that we will observe a trend toward improved anxiety scores.

Read the detailed description

Childhood critical illness is common and impacts nearly 1 in 6 hospitalized children. Although overall pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) mortality is decreasing, survivors are experiencing longer stays, greater symptom severity, and greater morbidity. Outcomes reflected in the post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-p) framework are expressed across several domains, including cognitive, physical, and emotional health. Survivor emotional health is often negatively impacted in both the short and long term, with rates of acute posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic stress disorder among survivors reaching more than 88%. Critically, small studies suggest these trajectories are malleable with 40-70% of survivors demonstrating post-traumatic growth if they are supported. If left untreated, mental health (MH) symptoms increase risk for PICU readmission and adverse physical health outcomes. Despite increasing evidence that MH follow-up post-ICU discharge results in improved survivor outcomes, we and others have shown MH follow-up rates are \<12%, much lower than rates of new MH pathology. Critically, referral remains the primary intervention available to PICU survivors and availability of MH care remains a significant barrier to accessing adequate care. There is an urgent need to identify alternative pathways to mental health care.

Digital cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) tools show promise in filling the gaps between service availability and need. Such tools do not replace the need for skilled providers; however, they show considerable promise in improving access to mental health tools that promote resilience, such as emotion identification, coping skills, and an approach mindset. Despite successful implementation of these tools in schools, community clinics, and outpatient medical settings, they have never before been used in critical care settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness Recovery
  • Mental Health

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
03

In context

Psychological Well-Being Unverified

2,193 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 728 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 110 across 1,796 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.

Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 729 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.

Compared within Psychological Well-Being, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 7 and ≤ 13 (the dCBT program is only validated for patients within this age range)
  • Admitted to the GCH PICU and have an anticipated discharge date in the subsequent 1 - 3 days
  • Be able to interact with an iPad or computer device, as assessed by caregivers
  • English speaking subjects due to the lack of translated versions of the dCBT tool

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No specific exclusion criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Subjects in this arm will be randomized to an online, commercially available, digital cognitive behavioral therapy tool for use following discharge from the hospital.

    Other: Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

  • No intervention
    Control

    Subjects in this arm will not receive access to the digital cognitive behavioral therapy tool. They will experience usual post-hospital care.

Interventions

  • OtherDigital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Subjects in the intervention arm will receive access to a commercially available, digital cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) tool. This dCBT tool is specifically designed for children and their caregivers, and has been validated in other care settings.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED)

    Subjects in both arms will receive Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED) instrument upon enrollment (baseline) and at study completion (12 weeks). This instrument is scored from 0 to 82 (2 points per question) and provides a measure of anxiety, avoidance, and panic disorders. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety and related disorders. It was developed by Boris Birmaher, MD, Suneeta Khetarpal, MD, Marlane Cully, MEd, David Brent, MD, and Sandra McKenzie, PhD, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. System Usage

    Usage data of the dCBT product will be provided for subjects in the intervention arm. We will receive information about the number of logins and the active time spent in the system.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. System Usability Scales

    Subjects in the intervention arm will receive the System Usability Scales instrument at study completion. This scale measures the usability of the Camp Cope-a-lot system and was adapted from the SUS developed by John Brooke in 1986. It is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores meaning greater usability.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS)

    Subjects in both arms will receive the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen (CATS) at baseline. This instrument asks about stressful or scary events that happened to the subject. It is scored from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more trauma history. It was developed by Prof. Lutz Goldbeck (Ph.D.) \& Prof. Lucy Berliner (Ph.D.).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale (BTPS)

    Subjects in both arms will receive the Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale (BTPS) at Baseline. It asks questions about specific barriers to seeking psychological help, counseling, or advice for the subject. It is scored from 1 to 38 with higher scores indicating greater barriers to treatment participation.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Digital Competence Scale

    Subjects in both arms will receive the Digital Competence Scale at Baseline. It is a short self-assessment instrument for measuring digital competencies. It is scored from 0 to 12 with higher scores indicating greater digital competence. It was developed by Schwarz (2024).

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07906366
Responsible party
Adam C Dziorny (Associate Professor - Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care (SMD), University of Rochester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Adam Dziorny, MD, PhD
Contact
adam_dziorny@urmc.rochester.edu
585-276-3014
Adam Dziorny, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Rochester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion