CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07487649Updated Sep 9, 2026

Treatment Response in Patients With Medication-Overuse Headache

An observational study in Medication-overuse Headache, Treatment and Headache, sponsored by Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
70
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study to evaluate pre-injection patient-related factors that may influence treatment response in patients with medication-overuse headache who underwent ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block.

02

Conditions studied

  • Medication-overuse Headache
  • Treatment
  • Headache
  • Greater Occipital Nerve Block
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who underwent ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve block with a diagnosis of medication-overuse headache at Edirne Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Diagnosis of medication-overuse headache according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3)
  • Diagnosis of medication-overuse headache associated with the use of triptans or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Previous diagnosis of chronic migraine or chronic tension-type headache according to the ICHD-3 criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe head or neck trauma or previous neurosurgical intervention
  • Presence of a severe psychiatric disorder (e.g., severe depression, schizophrenia)
  • History of infectious disease, chronic inflammatory disease, or malignancy
  • Previous diagnosis of secondary headache
  • History of substance abuse
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • History of an additional neurological disorder (e.g., cerebrovascular disease, multiple sclerosis)
  • Difficulty with cooperation
  • Presence of a concomitant systemic disease that may affect quality of life (e.g., congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, pulmonary disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or peripheral vascular disease)
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Treatment success group

    Patients who demonstrated a ≥50% reduction in the number of days of analgesic use for headache at the end of the second-month evaluation

    Other: Treatment outcome

  • Treatment failure group

    Patients who demonstrated a \<50% reduction in the number of days of analgesic use for headache at the end of the second-month evaluation

    Other: Treatment outcome

Interventions

  • OtherTreatment outcome

    Before the injection, patients will be evaluated for the number of headache days, headache severity, the number of days of analgesic use for headache, headache-related disability, pressure pain threshold over the bilateral greater occipital nerve, anxiety and depression scores, and sleep quality. At 1 and 2 months after the injection, they will be reassessed for the number of headache days, headache severity, and the number of days of analgesic use for headache. In addition, at 1 hour after the injection, the pain experienced during the injection procedure will be assessed.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the number of days of analgesic use for headache

    Patients will be questioned the total number of days on which they used analgesics for headache during the past month.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Headache severity

    Patients will be questioned about headache severity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A 10-cm-long horizontal straight line will be used for VAS assessment. 0 is considered no pain, and 10 is considered the most severe pain.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Post-injection pain severity

    Patients will be questioned about post-injection pain severity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A 10-cm-long horizontal straight line will be used for VAS assessment. 0 is considered no pain, and 10 is considered the most severe pain.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Headache-related disability

    Patients will be questioned about headache-related disability using the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6). The HIT-6 consists of six items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score is calculated by summing the scores of all six items, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of headache on daily life.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Pressure pain threshold

    The pressure pain threshold over the bilateral greater occipital nerve will be assessed using a manual pressure algometer (Baseline Dolorimeter®). Pressure pain threshold measurement will be performed over the medial one-third of an imaginary line drawn between the external occipital protuberance and the mastoid process. During the measurement, the 1.52 cm² flat circular probe of the algometer will be placed on the relevant area, and pressure will be increased at a rate of 1 kg per second. Patients will be asked to indicate the moment they first perceived pain. The value for the reference area will be calculated as the arithmetic mean of the right and left measurements.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Anxiety and depression levels

    Patients' anxiety and depression symptoms will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS is a 14-item scale consisting of two subscales: anxiety and depression. For each subscale, the minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Sleep quality

    Patients will be evaluated in terms of sleep quality using a 4-point Likert-type scale. They wii be asked to describe their sleep quality by selecting one of the following options: "good," "mildly impaired," "moderately impaired," or "severely impaired."

    Time frame: Baseline

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital
    Edirne, 22030, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — If requested, the data of the study will be shared by the researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07487649
Lead sponsor
Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital
Responsible party
Alper Mengi (Associate Professor, Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Mar 17, 2026
Primary completion
May 30, 2026
Completion
May 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion