ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07794319Updated Aug 31, 2026

Osteopathic Care Combined With Physiotherapy and Pain Education for Cervicogenic Headache

An interventional study of Osteopathic Care and Physiotherapy in Cervicogenic Headache, sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-31.

Sponsored by Centro Universitário Augusto Motta · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Introduction: Cervicogenic headache (CH) is a secondary headache associated with non-traumatic dysfunctions of the cervical region. Osteopathic Care (OC) has shown promising results in reducing pain and disability in patients with migraine, tension-type headaches and CH, but the effectiveness of OC remains scarce, and the studies has low certainty of evidence. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the OC in the management of headache-related disability in patients with CH 6 weeks and 24 weeks after the intervention compared with sham and control group. Methods: This is a three-arm, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 adult participants with chronic CH will be recruited. Participants must report episodic headache for at least 3 months, occurring at least once per week, present cervical mobility less than 44° on the cervical flexion-rotation test, and exhibit headache during provocative tests at C0, C1, C2, and/or C3. After randomization, the experimental group will receive OC plus Physiotherapy (specific exercises for the cervical spine and Mulligan´s manual therapy) and a pain education booklet. The control group will receive the same Physiotherapy and pain education intervention. The sham group will receive the OC sham combined with Physiotherapy and pain education. Primary outcome will be headache-related disability, assessed by Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Secondary outcomes will be pain intensity (VAS) and the Perceived Changes Questionnaire (PCQ). Outcome assessment will be carried out at baseline, 6 weeks after the intervention and 24 weeks follow up with an intention-to-treat framework. Expected Results: OC combined with Physiotherapy and pain education would be effectiveness in reducing headache-related disability compared to the sham and control groups, 6 weeks after the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervicogenic Headache

Keywords

  • Cervicogenic Headache
  • Secondary Headache Disorders
  • Musculoskeletal Manipulations
  • Osteopathic Manipulation
  • Osteopathic Medicine
03

In context

Post-Traumatic Headache

192 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Traumatic Headache; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 44 across 169 interventional studies indexed under Post-Traumatic Headache.

Browse Post-Traumatic Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • males and females from Rio de Janeiro - RJ - BR
  • over 18 years old
  • diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache established by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-III)
  • must report episodic headache for at least 3 months, occurring at least once per week
  • present cervical mobility less than 44° on the cervical flexion-rotation test (CFRT)
  • exhibit headache during provocative tests at C0, C1, C2, and/or C3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing other physiotherapy, osteopathic, orthodontic, or medical treatment
  • present neurological disorders
  • have signs of trauma or fracture
  • report symptoms of vertigo or tinnitus
  • have another condition that may be the origin of the headache
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Osteopathic Care

    The participants in the Experimental Group will receive Osteopathic Care (OC) targeting segments affected by somatic dysfunctions to restore function. All individual treatments will be documented in a table detailing the osteopathic technique applied for each identified somatic dysfunction, including musculoskeletal, visceral, and cranial approaches. Each intervention session will last between 30 and 45 minutes. In addition to OC, participants will also receive the same physiotherapy program and pain education booklet as the control group. In the present study, we will not use drugs or devices.

    Other: Osteopathic Care

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Osteopathic Care

    The participants in the Sham Osteopathic Care (OC) Group will receive sham OC, consisting of light touch, movement arc maneuvers, and simulated osteopathic manipulation, in which the patient is positioned but the final manipulative thrust is not performed. In addition to sham OC, participants will also receive the same physiotherapy program and pain education booklet as the control group. In the present study, we will not use drugs or devices.

    Other: Sham (No Treatment)

  • Active comparator
    Physiotherapy

    The participants in the Control Group will be managed by a licensed physiotherapist with over 10 years of experience. They will undergo a physiotherapy program and receive a pain education booklet. The physiotherapy program consists of specific motor control exercises for the neck and Mulligan Concept manual therapy techniques. In the present study, we will not use drugs or devices.

    Other: Physiotherapy

Interventions

  • OtherOsteopathic Care

    Participants will receive OC targeting segments affected by somatic dysfunctions to restore function. All individual treatments will be documented in a table detailing the osteopathic technique applied for each identified somatic dysfunction, including musculoskeletal, visceral, and cranial approaches. Each intervention session will last between 30 and 45 minutes. In addition to OC, participants will also receive the same physiotherapy program and pain education booklet as the control group. In the present study, we will not use drugs or devices.

  • OtherPhysiotherapy

    Participants will be managed by a licensed physiotherapist with over 10 years of experience. They will undergo a physiotherapy program and receive a pain education booklet. The physiotherapy program consists of specific motor control exercises for the neck and Mulligan Concept manual therapy techniques. In the present study, we will not use drugs or devices.

  • OtherSham (No Treatment)

    Participants will receive sham OC, consisting of light touch, movement arc maneuvers, and simulated osteopathic manipulation, in which the patient is positioned but the final manipulative thrust is not performed. In addition to sham OC, participants will also receive the same physiotherapy program and pain education booklet as the control group. In the present study, we will not use drugs or devices.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Headache-related Disability

    The primary outcome will be headache-related disability, measured by Headache Impact Test (HIT-6; score range: 36-78). The HIT-6 consists of six questions assessing the impact of headache on daily, physical, social, and work-related activities. Higher scores represent a greater impact. Scores above 60 indicate a very severe impact; scores between 56 and 59 indicate substantial impact; scores between 50 and 55 indicate some impact; and scores below 49 indicate little to no impact.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 6 weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    The Pain Intensity will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent a greater Pain Intensity. Scores between 0-2 indicates mild pain, 3-7 moderate pain, and 8-10 severe pain. Participants will be asked to mark a point on the scale corresponding to their Pain Intensity.

    Time frame: at baseline, at 6 weeks post-intervention and 24 weeks post-intervention.

  2. Perceived Change

    Secondary outcomes will include Scores on the Perceived Change Scale. The Perceived Change Scale consists of 19 items assessing the patient's qualitative perception of changes in their life because of the treatment received. Each item has three response options: 1: worse than before; 2: no change; and 3: better than before. Higher scores indicate a better and more positive perception of improvement from the intervention.

    Time frame: at 6 weeks post-intervention and 24 weeks post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Olesen J. International Classification of Headache Disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018 May;17(5):396-397. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30085-1. Epub 2018 Mar 14. No abstract available. PubMed 29550365 ↗
  • Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4. PubMed 6226917 ↗
  • Reis F, Palermo TM, Acalantis L, Nogueira LC, Meziat-Filho N, Louw A, Ickmans K. "A journey to learn about pain": the development and validation of a comic book about pain neuroscience education for children. Braz J Phys Ther. 2022 Jan-Feb;26(1):100348. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 May 2. PubMed 34001422 ↗
  • Hage R, Demoulin C, J Puentedura E, Brismee JM. Sham treatment? Should it be redefined for its use in manual therapy clinical studies? J Man Manip Ther. 2025 Feb;33(1):1-3. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2025.2448921. Epub 2025 Jan 9. No abstract available. PubMed 39785123 ↗
  • Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Draper-Rodi J, Vase L, Scott W, McGregor A, Soliman N, MacMillan A, Olivier A, Cherian CA, Corcoran D, Abbey H, Freigang S, Chan J, Phalip J, Norgaard Sorensen L, Delafin M, Baptista M, Medforth NR, Ruffini N, Skott Andresen S, Ytier S, Ali D, Hobday H, Santosa AANAA, Vollert J, Rice ASC. Blinding and sham control methods in trials of physical, psychological, and self-management interventions for pain (article I): a systematic review and description of methods. Pain. 2023 Mar 1;164(3):469-484. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002723. Epub 2022 Jul 11. PubMed 36265391 ↗
  • Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Vase L, Draper-Rodi J. From placebos and shams to high-quality control interventions in manual therapy trials to study efficacy and mechanisms. J Man Manip Ther. 2025 Oct;33(5):376-377. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2025.2471477. Epub 2025 Feb 22. No abstract available. PubMed 39986688 ↗
  • Pradela J, Bevilaqua-Grossi D, Chaves TC, Dach F, Ferreira Carvalho G. Brazilian Portuguese version of the Headache Disability Inventory: Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability. Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):156-165. doi: 10.1177/0333102420949860. Epub 2020 Aug 20. PubMed 32819150 ↗
  • de Lira MR, Meziat-Filho N, Zuelli Martins Silva G, Castro J, Fernandez J, Guirro RRJ, Berg R, Chaves TC. Efficacy of cognitive functional therapy for pain intensity and disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomised sham-controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 18;59(13):912-920. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-109012. PubMed 40049758 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Researchers involved in the study will have access to the final clinical trial dataset and may share it for verification and publication purposes upon reasonable request. The principal investigator will be responsible for data management and will ensure that all study data are stored in both physical and digital formats for 5 years after study completion. The data entry spreadsheet will be updated by the investigator based on collected assessment forms. Study data will be entered into a password-protected database, with access restricted to authorized study personnel. Data quality will be ensured through double-checking of entries and periodic audits. All participant data will be de-identified prior to analysis to ensure confidentiality.

Time frame: for 5 years after study completion.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 24 months later.

Of 89 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Post-Traumatic Headache, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 90 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2026
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2028
Last update
Aug 31, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 31, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07794319
Lead sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Collaborators
Instituto Brasileiro de Osteopatia
Responsible party
Paula Oliveira Esteves (Principal Investigator, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 31, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 31, 2026

Study contacts

PAULA O ESTEVES, MSc
Contact
paulaesteves@souunisuam.com.br
+5521992255928
ARTHUR S FERREIRA, DSc
Contact
arthurde@souunisuam.com.br
+5521999151800

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion