ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07487610Updated Sep 9, 2026

Relationship Between Neuropathic Pain and Geriatric Assessment Parameters in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older

An observational study in Neuropathic Pain, Old Age; Debility and Pain, sponsored by Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 80 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
450
Ages
80 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to determine the frequency of neuropathic pain in individuals aged 80 years and older and to evaluate the relationship between neuropathic pain and comprehensive geriatric assessment parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Old Age; Debility
  • Pain
03

In context

Neuralgia

1,100 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuralgia; 241 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 450 is above the median of 102 across 231 observational studies indexed under Neuralgia.

Browse Neuralgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
80 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients aged 80 and over who are followed up from the healthy aging outpatient clinic of Edirne Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital geriatric clinic will be included in the study

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 80 years or older
  • Full cooperation
  • Complete comprehensive geriatric assessment parameters

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with dementia classified as CDR-2 or CDR-3 according to the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale
  • Patients who have experienced an acute illness within the last 1 month (e.g., infection, fracture, or cerebrovascular disease)
  • Patients with a psychotic disorder
  • Patients with severe hearing loss
  • Patients with a history of
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
450 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • patients without neuropathic pain

    Patients with a total score of 4 or higher according to the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4)

    Other: Detailed geriatric assessment

  • Patients without neuropathic pain

    Patients with a total DN4 score below 4

    Other: Detailed geriatric assessment

Interventions

  • OtherDetailed geriatric assessment

    The patients' demographic characteristics, comorbid diseases, and laboratory parameters routinely requested from each patient within the last 3 months, including TSH, vitamin D, vitamin B12, HbA1c, hemoglobin, folic acid, and GFR levels, will be recorded. During the outpatient clinic visit, the presence of neuropathic pain will be assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN4) questionnaire. Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the average pain severity over the last week will be recorded. The use of medications that may affect pain severity and that have been used regularly by the patients for the last 3 months will also be assessed (antiepileptics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol, and antidepressants). The patients will undergo mood assessment, evaluation of basic and instrumental activities of daily living, neurocognitive assessment, frailty assessment, and nutritional assessment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of neuropathic pain

    The presence of neuropathic pain will be assessed using the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN4) questionnaire. The DN4 consists of 10 items. The first 7 items evaluate the characteristics and sensory quality of pain, whereas the remaining 3 items are based on physical examination findings. A total score of 4 or higher is defined as the presence of neuropathic pain, while a score below 4 is defined as the absence of neuropathic pain.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Patients' pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In the VAS assessment, a 10-cm horizontal straight line will be used, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates unbearable pain. Using the VAS, the average pain intensity during the last week will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Mood status

    Mood status will be assessed using the short form of the Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale. The short form consists of 15 questions to which patients respond with "yes" or "no." Scoring is based on the number of depressive responses, and the total score is used to determine the level of depression. Scores of 0-9 are considered "normal," scores of 10-19 indicate "mild depression," and scores of 20-30 indicate "severe depression.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Daily living activities

    The assessment of daily living activities will be assessed with the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADLS). IADLS consists of 8 questions that include information on using the telephone, preparing meals, shopping, doing daily housework, doing laundry, being able to get on a vehicle, being able to use medications, and managing money. 0-8 points are evaluated as "dependent," 9-16 points as "semi-dependent," and 17-24 points as "independent."

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Activities of daily living

    The assessment of daily living activities will be assessed with the the Barthel Index (BI) scale. BI consists of 10 questions that evaluate feeding, washing, self-care, dressing, defecation control, urinary control, going to the toilet, the ability to get from bed to a wheelchair, mobility status such as walking or being wheelchair dependent, and climbing stairs. 0-20 points are considered as completely dependent, 21-61 points as severely dependent, 62-90 points as moderately dependent, 91-99 points as slightly dependent, and 100 points as completely independent.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. Neurocognitive assessment

    Neurocognitive assessment will be done with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). MMSE test is a short screening test with 11 questions and 30 points. MMSE is completed in approximately 10 minutes and evaluates orientation, memory, attention, calculation, recall, language, motor function and perception, visual-spatial abilities. 24-30 points is normal, 18-23 points is mild dementia, 17 and below is compatible with severe dementia.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Frailty

    Frailty will be assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). CFS is graded from 1 to 9. The higher the score, the greater the frailty.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Nutritional assessment

    Nutritional assessment will be evaluated with the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire-short form (MNA-SF). MNA-SF consists of 5 subheadings; those with 12-14 points are considered "no risk of malnutrition", those with 8-11 points are considered "at risk of malnutrition" and those with 0-7 points are considered "malnourished".

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital
    Edirne, 22030, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — If requested, the data of the study will be shared by the researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07487610
Lead sponsor
Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital
Responsible party
Alper Mengi (Associate Professor, Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Mar 17, 2026
Primary completion
May 30, 2026
Completion
Jun 30, 2026
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Kübra Altunkalem Seydi, MD
principal investigator · Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion