ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07103694i-NEEDUpdated Jun 11, 2026

i-NEED: NEw migrainE Drugs Database

An observational study in Episodic Migraine, Chronic Migraine and Medication Overuse Headache, sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele Roma. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by IRCCS San Raffaele Roma · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,641
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) starting in 2018, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) represent the first true revolution in the preventive treatment of migraine due to their selectivity and specificity. To date, four anti-CGRP mAbs have been developed for the preventive treatment of migraine: eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.Anti-CGRP mAbs constitute not only the first specific and selective treatment for the prevention of migraine but also the most extensively studied pharmacological category in this field, considering the vast and complex populations examined. The clinical effects of the various mAbs are substantially comparable and are characterized by several fundamental aspects:

  • High efficacy in both episodic and chronic migraine, with the presence of super-responders who experience a reduction in the average monthly number of migraine days of >75% (or even 100%) compared to before treatment.
  • Efficacy that is independent of the clinical form of migraine - with or without aura - and regardless of whether there is analgesic overuse.
  • Efficacy maintained even in the presence of depressive or anxious comorbidities.
  • Rapid onset of action (even more pronounced with eptinezumab), with the therapeutic effect appearing within the first week in most cases.
  • Excellent tolerability with an absence of class-specific adverse events.
  • Outstanding treatment adherence and a very low rate of treatment discontinuation in the long term. It should also be noted that the development of anti-drug antibodies or neutralizing antibodies to anti-CGRP mAbs is rare and does not significantly impact the efficacy or tolerability of treatment. Future clinical practice will need to clarify several additional aspects, such as: 1) whether treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs can modify the course of migraine; 2) the appropriate approach regarding any traditional preventive treatment (whether to continue or discontinue it); 3) the definition of the characteristics of non-responders; 4) the definition of patients with a delayed response to treatment.

Gepants are oral antagonists of the CGRP receptor. Among the four gepants synthesized so far (atogepant, rimegepant, ubrogepant, zavegepant), atogepant and rimegepant are currently available in Italy. Atogepant has proven to be an effective and well-tolerated option for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraines. Rimegepant is effective for both acute treatment and prevention of migraines, with a favorable safety profile and flexible oral administration. Lasmiditan is the first ditan effective for migraine attack and it represents a new therapeutic option for patients with contraindications to triptans, due to the presence of vascular risk factors, or for patients who experience undesirable side effects with these, thus increasing the therapeutic possibilities for the symptomatic treatment of migraine. The combination of sumatriptan 85 mg and naproxen sodium 500 mg is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks in adult patients for whom sumatriptan monotherapy is insufficient.

Read the detailed description

The European Headache Federation has published detailed guidelines on the state of the art regarding evidence of effectiveness in reducing the frequency and intensity of headache episodes, as well as the safety and tolerability of the four monoclonal antibodies under "ideal" experimental conditions, with patients selected based on stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. This selection limits the direct transferability of the conclusions of these studies to clinical reality. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate, in a clinical practice setting, the real effectiveness in reducing the monthly frequency of migraine days and the tolerability and efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in a real-world evidence context. The study may later include all drugs that become available for this condition, subject to authorization by the competent Italian authority.

The present extension of the I-NEED study aims to integrate the collection and evaluation of real-life data on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prophylaxis with the study of efficacy, safety, and tolerability-also in a real-world evidence context-of gepants in the prophylaxis of episodic and chronic migraine, and of rimegepant, ditans, and the sumatriptan-naproxen combination in the acute treatment of migraine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Episodic Migraine
  • Chronic Migraine
  • Medication Overuse Headache

Keywords

  • migraine, anti-CGRP monoclonal antobodies, gepants, ditans, sumatriptan and naproxen combination
03

In context

Headache Disorders, Secondary

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Headache Disorders, Secondary; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,641 is above the median of 122 across 17 observational studies indexed under Headache Disorders, Secondary.

Browse Headache Disorders, Secondary studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS San Raffaele Roma is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Eligible patients include

  • adults (equal or more 18 years)
  • episodic or chronic migraine diagnosis,
  • treated with preventive or acute treatment drugs

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age more or equal 18 years;
  • Males and females;
  • Willingness to sign the ;
  • Episodic migraine for the use of drug indicated for migraine attack
  • High frequency episodic migraine, at least 8 days per month of disabling migraine in the past 3 months;
  • Chronic migraine, according to the ICHD-III criteria;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other headaches different than migraine;
  • Known intolerance to the eccipients;
  • Vascular disease or Raynaud.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,641 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • individuals affected by migraine

    episodic and chronic migraine

    Drug: anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies · Drug: gepants · Drug: combination of sumatriptan and naproxen · Drug: ditan

Interventions

  • Druganti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies

    erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab

  • atogepant, rimegepant

  • Drugcombination of sumatriptan and naproxen

    Drug pages: Sumatriptan · Naproxen

    combination of sumatriptan and naproxen

  • Drugditan

    lasmiditan

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  2. effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  3. effectiveness of innovative drug as migraine prophylaxis

    reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  4. effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  5. effectiveness of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    reduction in the number of monthly migraine days compared to the baseline average recorded in the three months preceding treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  6. 2 hour-pain freedom

    Percentage of patients reporting complete pain relief within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

    Time frame: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. safety and tolerability of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    type and number of adverse events occurring during the study period (event details, duration, severity and action taken)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  2. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on symptomatic medication use and medication overuse headache

    reduction in the average monthly consumption of analgesics in patients undergoing treatment with innovative drugs

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  3. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

    mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  4. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

    mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  5. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

    mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  6. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

    mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  7. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine symptoms

    mean change in perceived pain intensity during a migraine attack (measured using the Numerical Rating Scale, score range 0-10) compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  8. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  9. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  10. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  11. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  12. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Headache Impact Test 6-TM scores (score range 36-78) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  13. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Migraine Disability Assessment Score Questionnaire (grade I: 0-5; grade II: 6-10; grade III: 11-20; grade IV\>21) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  14. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Migraine Disability Assessment Score Questionnaire (grade I: 0-5; grade II: 6-10; grade III: 11-20; grade IV\>21) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  15. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related disability

    mean change in Migraine Disability Assessment Score Questionnaire (grade I: 0-5; grade II: 6-10; grade III: 11-20; grade IV\>21) before treatment

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  16. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on interictal disability

    Mean change in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 (score range: 0-12)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  17. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on interictal disability

    Mean change in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 (score range: 0-12)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  18. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on interictal disability

    Mean change in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 (score range: 0-12)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  19. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on interictal disability

    Mean change in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 (score range: 0-12)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  20. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on interictal disability

    mean change in Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4 score (score range: 0-12)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  21. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on work-related difficulties due to migraine

    mean change in the HEADWORK questionnaire score (two sections: the first one includes 13 items and the second one 12 items: every item requires a five point response scale ranging between 1-"no difficulty"-, 5 - "I cannot do it")

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  22. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on work-related difficulties due to migraine

    mean change in the HEADWORK questionnaire score (two sections: the first one includes 13 items and the second one 12 items: every item requires a five point response scale ranging between 1-"no difficulty"-, 5 - "I cannot do it")

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  23. impact of innovatine drugs as migraine prophylaxis on work-related difficulties due to migraine

    mean change in the HEADWORK questionnaire score (two sections: the first one includes 13 items and the second one 12 items: every item requires a five point response scale ranging between 1-"no difficulty"-, 5 - "I cannot do it")

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  24. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on economic resources in migraine

    mean change in the COSTI questionnaire score (evaluation of both direct and indirect cost directly gathered from patients)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  25. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on economic resources in migraine

    mean change in the COSTI questionnaire score (evaluation of both direct and indirect cost directly gathered from patients)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  26. impact of innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis on economic resources in migraine

    mean change in the COSTI questionnaire score (evaluation of both direct and indirect cost directly gathered from patients)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  27. patient subjective perception

    collection of subjective feedback from the patients regarding their experience with the medication, assessing patient satisfaction, ease of use of the medication perceived effectiveness with Patient Global Impression of Change (score range 1-7)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  28. patient subjective perception

    collection of subjective feedback from the patients regarding their experience with the medication, assessing patient satisfaction, ease of use of the medication perceived effectiveness with Patient Global Impression of Change (score range 1-7)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  29. patient subjective perception

    collection of subjective feedback from the patients regarding their experience with the medication, assessing patient satisfaction, ease of use of the medication perceived effectiveness with Patient Global Impression of Change (score range 1-7)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  30. patient subjective perception

    assessment of subjective perception of change through Patient Global Impression of Change (score range 1-7)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  31. patient subjective perception

    collection of subjective feedback from the patients regarding their experience with the medication, assessing patient satisfaction, ease of use of the medication perceived effectiveness with Patient Global Impression of Change (score range 1-7)

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  32. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>50% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  33. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>50% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  34. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>50% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  35. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>50% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  36. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>50% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  37. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>75% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  38. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>75% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  39. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>75% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  40. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>75% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  41. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a \>75% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  42. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a 100% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 4 weeks from treatment initiation

  43. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a 100% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 8 weeks from treatment initiation

  44. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a 100% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks from treatment initiation

  45. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a 100% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 24 weeks from treatment initiation

  46. response rates to innovative drugs as migraine prophylaxis

    percentage of patients achieving a 100% reduction in monthly migraine days compared to the pre-treatment period

    Time frame: the assessment will be conducted at 48 weeks from treatment initiation

  47. 1 hour-pain freedom

    Percentage of patients reporting complete pain relief within 1 hour after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

    Time frame: 1 hour after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  48. 2 hours-pain relief

    percentage of patients reporting a 50% reduction in pain intensity wiithin 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

    Time frame: 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  49. disappearance of Most Bothersone Symptom

    percentage of patients experiencing the disappearence of the Most Bothersone Symptom (the most disabling by the patient) within wiithin 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

    Time frame: 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  50. presence or absence of associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia)

    presence or absence of associated symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia) at predefined time intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours

    Time frame: 1-48 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  51. 24 hour-sustained pain freedom

    percentage of patients experiencing complete pain relief within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

    Time frame: 24 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  52. 24 hour-sustained pain relief

    percentage of patients experiencing a 50% reduction in pain intensity within 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

    Time frame: 24 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  53. headache recurrence

    definition of the moment of possible migraine pain recurrence (headache recurernce), as well as its intensity within 24 and 48 hours following the administration of the medication (limited to patients who experienced pain freedom within 2 hours)

    Time frame: 2 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  54. use of rescue medication

    use of rescue medication and evaluation of the time interval between the first and the second dose

    Time frame: 24 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

  55. adverse occurence

    definition of the type and number of adverse events occurring within 48 hours of taking the innovative drug for migraine attack (event details, duration, severity and action taken)

    Time frame: 0-48 hours after taking the innovative drug for migraine attack

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, Reuter U, Terwindt G, Mitsikostas DD, Martelletti P. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2019 Jan 16;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y. PubMed 30651064 ↗
  • Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F, Sapra S, Picard H, Mikol DD, Lenz RA. A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2123-2132. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848. PubMed 29171821 ↗
  • Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, Klatt J. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2280-2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0. Epub 2018 Oct 22. PubMed 30360965 ↗
  • Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: The EVOLVE-1 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):1080-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212. PubMed 29813147 ↗
  • Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, Friedman DI, Selzler KJ, Aurora SK. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018 Dec 11;91(24):e2211-e2221. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640. Epub 2018 Nov 16. PubMed 30446596 ↗
  • Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M, Yang R, Ma Y, Aycardi E. Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 May 15;319(19):1999-2008. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4853. PubMed 29800211 ↗
  • Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M, Yang R, Ma Y, Aycardi E. Fremanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2113-2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709038. PubMed 29171818 ↗
  • Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Olesen J, Ashina M, Wilks K, Kudrow D, Kroll R, Kohrman B, Bargar R, Hirman J, Smith J; ALD403 study investigators. Safety and efficacy of ALD403, an antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of frequent episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Nov;13(11):1100-1107. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70209-1. Epub 2014 Oct 5. PubMed 25297013 ↗
  • Lipton RB, Goadsby PJ, Smith J, Schaeffler BA, Biondi DM, Hirman J, Pederson S, Allan B, Cady R. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020 Mar 31;94(13):e1365-e1377. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009169. Epub 2020 Mar 24. PubMed 32209650 ↗
  • Lipton RB, Croop R, Stock EG, Stock DA, Morris BA, Frost M, Dubowchik GM, Conway CM, Coric V, Goadsby PJ. Rimegepant, an Oral Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonist, for Migraine. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):142-149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811090. PubMed 31291516 ↗
  • Goadsby PJ, Wietecha LA, Dennehy EB, Kuca B, Case MG, Aurora SK, Gaul C. Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine. Brain. 2019 Jul 1;142(7):1894-1904. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz134. PubMed 31132795 ↗
  • Brandes JL, Kudrow D, Stark SR, O'Carroll CP, Adelman JU, O'Donnell FJ, Alexander WJ, Spruill SE, Barrett PS, Lener SE. Sumatriptan-naproxen for acute treatment of migraine: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007 Apr 4;297(13):1443-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.13.1443. PubMed 17405970 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 57 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 29, 2025
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
StartActual
Mar 24, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Jun 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07103694
Lead sponsor
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
Start date
Mar 24, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Piero Barbanti, MD, PhD
Contact
piero.barbanti@sanraffaele.it
+390652254318
Cinzia Aurilia
Contact
cinzia.aurilia@sanraffaele.it
+390652254318

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion