ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07191145Updated Oct 29, 2026

Eary Infusion of Eptinezumab for TreatmEnt of ACute Post-Traumatic Headaches (ELITE-ACT)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Eptinezumab and Placebo in Post Traumatic Headache, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 29, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Most individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) experience post-traumatic headaches (PTH). Of PTH, 50% present with a migraine phenotype which is the most disabling type of PTH. Patients with migraine-PTH are at greater risk of persistent symptoms whereby the acute PTH (aPTH) becomes persistent PTH (pPTH) (ie. lasting > 3 months) with a conversion rate of 47-95%. As migraine symptoms become chronic, it becomes treatment resistant. Despite these implications, early preventive medication management of PTH is marred by lengthy trials of multiple medications (2-3 months for each) and adverse effects that aggravate mTBI symptoms (fatigue, nausea, and presyncope). There is a compelling need to establish an effective treatment to prevent this debilitating outcome. Eptinezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-blocking monoclonal antibody that reduces migraine burden in patients with migraines after a single infusion. Patients with PTH have higher serum levels of CGRP and experimental infusion of CGRP to patients with mTBI reproduces migraine PTH symptoms. Given the similarly in CGRP expression between chronic migraines and PTH, an infusion of eptinezumab within 8 weeks of PTH is hypothesized to reduce headache burden 3 months after treatment and prevent pPTH.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 500,000 Canadians aged >12 experienced a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in the preceding year based on a 2020 report. Patients with mTBIs have a cumulative incidence of headaches, termed post-traumatic headaches (PTH), of 91% over one year following injury. Post-traumatic headache (PTH), according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) by definition, is a headache caused by a traumatic injury to the head. This condition is further classified into acute PTH (aPTH) which is a headache of less than 3 months duration following injury to the head, and persistent PTH (pPTH) which refers to the transition of aPTH to longer than 3 months duration.

PTH is the most common symptom after mTBI. The impact of PTH is significant as the majority of patients with aPTH (up to 95%) transition to pPTH. In patients who experience PTH, the frequency of headache burden may vary with one study reporting a mean monthly headache frequency of 25 days. Individuals with PTH have decreased cognitive function with impaired memory tests, slower reaction, and struggle in returning to their previous physical and social functions. Therefore, PTH has a profound emotional, social, and economic impact. Treatment for PTH is currently guided by its phenotype - migraine, tension, or trigeminal autonomic cephalgias. PTH with migraine phenotype occurs in 49% of cases and tension phenotype in 40%, whereas 11% are undefined. Patients with tension-PTH are by definition headaches with mild to moderate intensity, whereas patients with migraine-PTH are categorized as severe. Patients with migraine-PTH are more likely to have near daily headaches and have a higher probability of progressing to pPTH.

The pathophysiology of migraine-PTH results from activation of the trigeminovascular system (TVS). Release of CGRP from the TVS has been identified as the primary mechanism where increased sensitivity of trigeminal nociceptors that innervate the dura mater is responsible for intracranial pain. As migraine progresses, frequent and sustained activation of the TVS and its central connections may lead to neuroplastic changes and a reduced threshold for initiating migraine attacks. Patients with PTH are known to have higher serum levels of CGRP and infusion of CGRP to patients with mTBI reproduces migraine PTH symptoms. Current evidence on treatment of PTH is limited to two placebo-controlled trials involving botulinum toxin and fremanezumab. Both trials involved patients that had established and pPTH and neither specifically selected for patients with migraine-PTH to the best of our knowledge (fremanezumab study is unpublished). The fremanezumab study also did not demonstrate a significant improvement compared to placebo in the pPTH population. A third open label study on pPTH and erenumab demonstrated a reduction of 2.8 days per month in a 12 week trial and was well-tolerated.

There is pre-clinical evidence demonstrating early administration of CGRP-blocking monoclonal antibodies (MAb) is important to prevent establishment of central sensitization after mTBI. Once central sensitization is established, additional CGRP-independent mechanisms promote or maintain central sensitization and CGRP-blocking MAbs are less effective. Therefore, there has been a focus to target aPTH prior to progression to pPTH. The American Headache Society's recent position statement endorsed the use of CGRP-targeting therapies, including MAbs, as first-line options due to their efficacy across multiple patient-important outcomes and favourable safety profile. CGRP-targeting therapies have excellent tolerability and efficacy evidenced by low drop out rates. There are currently two trials registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov assessing erenumab, a subcutaneously administered CGRP-blocking monoclonal antibody, for treatment of aPTH that are in progress. Notably, both trials have pursued all phenotypes of PTH rather than migraine-PTH to which CGRP MAb is specific for treating.

Eptinezumab is a CGRP-blocking MAb approved by Health Canada for prevention of migraines in patients with greater than 4 migraine days per month. It is unique as the only intravenously administered CGRP MAb. It has superior bioavailability (100% after 30 min infusion achieving maximum plasma concentration with the first dose) and as a single dose, versus monthly subcutaneous injection of erenumab, has higher medication compliance. The Health Canada recommended doses are 100mg or 300mg. Large scale randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing eptinezumab to placebo in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. These trials showed that monthly migraine days (MMD) were reduced 0.7 to 2.7 days at 12 weeks for the 100 mg dose and 1.0 to 3.2 days for the 300 mg dose compared to placebo. Eptinezumab has been shown to have greater proportions of reductions of 50% in MMD in the first 12 weeks compared to placebo and also a greater proportion of patients who experienced 100% reduction in MMD at 12 weeks than placebo. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to eptinezumab 100mg, the 300mg dose was associated with substantially reduced MMD with no significant differences in adverse events or serious adverse events.

The most common adverse effects reported with eptinezumab use included upper respiratory tract infections, hypersensitivity or infusion site reactions, nasopharyngitis, nausea, and sinusitis. In post-marketing surveillance, 10.4% of patients reported mild adverse effects including vertigo, constipation, rhinitis, myalgia, weight gain, hoarseness, and hypotension. Hypersensitivity reactions include angioedema, urticaria, flushing, rash, and pruritus (reported in 3-4% of patients). The only absolute contraindication to eptinezumab is hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients. Eptinezumab contains sorbitol and therefore patients with Hereditary Fructose Intolerance should not receive it.

In the PTH population where memory impairment can be an issue, eptinezumab has the added benefit of prolonged duration of therapeutic benefit (3 vs 1 month compared to other subcutaneous injectable CGRP MAbs) thereby resulting in decreased dosing frequency and increased compliance. Eptinezumab also has the added advantage of rapid onset which has been observed on day 1 post-treatment whereas other MAbs may take 1 month or more to establish benefit. The rapid onset of effect may prove to be advantageous to prevent progress from aPTH to pPTH. Given its ease of use as a rapid-acting single-administration medication, evidence in reduction in MMD, good tolerability and safety profiles, and adherence to treatment (single IV versus multiple doses), eptinezumab is an ideal candidate for study in patients with migraine-PTH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Traumatic Headache

Keywords

  • Migraine
03

In context

Post-Traumatic Headache

192 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Traumatic Headache; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 44 across 169 interventional studies indexed under Post-Traumatic Headache.

Browse Post-Traumatic Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 584 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Meet diagnostic criteria for acute post-traumatic headache as per ICHD-3 criteria
  • Meet migraine screening questionnaire criteria (MSQ score ≥ 4) during at least one of the weekly screening calls
  • Within 8 weeks after onset of PTH

    * Imaging is not required for inclusion

  • Negative human chorionic gonadotropin test before treatment, for female participants of who are not practicing medically appropriate methods of (e.g., hormonal contraceptives, implants, injectables, intrauterine devices, intrauterine systems, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe TBI
  • History of mTBI within the past 5 years
  • Pre-existing chronic migraine and its subtypes, tension-type headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, cranial neuralgias, daily headache, diagnosis of another secondary headache disorder per ICHD-3 (except medication overuse headache)
  • Concurrent use of CGRP-related treatment or botulinum toxin within the last three month for migraine
  • Substance / opioids use disorder
  • Confounding chronic pain disorder / pains
  • Concurrent major injuries (long bone, rib, and spinal fractures) or surgical intervention while in hospital on initial trauma
  • On-going litigation for current trauma
  • Pregnancy/breast-feeding
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric conditions (depression, PTSD, anxiety, functional neurological disorder)
  • Use of opioids/barbiturates for headaches (> 4 days/month)
  • Hereditary fructose intolerance
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention - Eptinezumab

    Eptinezumab 300mg IV once within 8 weeks of post-traumatic headache onset

    Drug: Eptinezumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Control - Placebo

    Placebo IV once within 8 weeks of post-traumatic headache onset

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Eptinezumab 300mg IV

  • OtherPlacebo

    Control - placebo IV

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Headache frequency

    Number of moderate to severe headache days between 9-12 weeks (inclusive) after intervention

    Time frame: 9-12 weeks (inclusive) after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Responder rate

    Percentage change from baseline in the number of moderate to severe headache days, as captured by the participant's headache diary and at weekly follow-ups. At 9-12 weeks (inclusive) after treatment, those reporting a 50% reduction from baseline are considered responders.

    Time frame: At 9-12 weeks (inclusive) after treatment, those reporting a 50% reduction from baseline are considered responders.

  2. Acute treatment utilization

    The number of days in which an acute headache treatment was used, as captured daily in the participant headache diary, at baseline, and at weekly follow-ups until week 12.

    Time frame: Daily until 12 weeks

  3. Preventive treatment utilization

    The utilization of preventive analgesics, as a categorical yes/no variable, will be recorded daily in the participant headache diary, at baseline and at weekly follow-ups until week 12

    Time frame: Daily until 12 weeks

  4. Headache disability

    Patient-reported disability due to their headache, assessed using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12/24 weeks. Minimum score 36, maximum score 78; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 24 weeks

  5. Concussion severity

    Patient-reported disability due to their headache, assessed using the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12 weeks. Minimum score 0, maximum score 52; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 12 weeks

  6. Emotional Function

    Patient-reported anxiety using General Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12 weeks. Minimum score 0, maximum score 21; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 12 weeks

  7. Emotional Function

    Patient-reported mood using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12 weeks. Minimum score 0, maximum score 27; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 12 weeks

  8. Emotional Function

    Patient-reported post-traumatic stress using the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12 weeks. Minimum score 0, maximum score 80; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 12 weeks

  9. Patient satisfaction

    Patient-reported satisfaction with their treatment, assessed using the patient global impression of change (PGIC), at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12 weeks. Minimum score 0, maximum score 10; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 12 weeks

  10. Sleep quality

    Patient-reported sleep quality, assessed using the PROMIS 6a sleep questionnaire at baseline and during follow-ups at 4/8/12 weeks. Minimum score 6, maximum score 30; higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline until 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Adverse events related to study medication

    Time frame: Baseline until 24 weeks after treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified data will be available upon request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Upon publication, no limit on time

Access criteria: Contact study investigators

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 7 months later.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Nov 2026, on Oct 23, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 5, 2025
First posted
Sep 24, 2025
StartEst.
Nov 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
Last update
Oct 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 29, 2026
Sites
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is now Recruiting
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
Sep 30, 2026→Nov 2026
Oct 23, 2026
Secondary outcomes
2 time frame changed
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameHeadache disabilityBaseline until 12 weeks → Baseline until 24 weeks
  • Time frameother outcomeAdverse eventsBaseline until until 24 weeks after treatment → Baseline until 24 weeks after treatment
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is now Recruiting
  2. Oct 23, 2026
    Start date Sep 30, 2026→Nov 2026
    Secondary outcomes 2 time frame changed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameHeadache disabilityBaseline until 12 weeks → Baseline until 24 weeks
    • Time frameother outcomeAdverse eventsBaseline until until 24 weeks after treatment → Baseline until 24 weeks after treatment
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07191145
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2025
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Howard Meng, MD
Contact
howard.meng@sunnybrook.ca
416-480-4864
Lavarnan Sivanathan, MD
Contact
lavarnan.sivanathan@sunnybrook.ca
Howard Meng, MD
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Eptinezumab

Start the discussion