ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06609278Updated Jun 30, 2026Results posted

THRIVE: Culturally AdapTed Harm Reduction Intervention

An interventional study of harm reduction intervention in Opioid Use and Stimulant Use, sponsored by Brittany Miller-Roenigk. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by Brittany Miller-Roenigk · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to develop and test a culturally adapted harm reduction intervention among Black adults who misuse opioids and/or stimulants. The questions it aims to answer include: will the culturally adapted harm reduction educational intervention increase overall knowledge of overdose and prevention/intervention techniques and increase confidence and willingness to use/teach interventions to others at-risk.

Read the detailed description

The overall study design is a mixed methods pilot developing and testing a culturally adapted intervention to enhance knowledge about and motivation to use opioid overdose harm reduction strategies, including Fentanyl Test Strips (FTS) and Narcan. Given the preliminary nature of this pilot study designed to develop an adapted intervention, subjects will not be randomized and there will be no control group or placebo.

Aim 1 is a qualitative design in which investigators will conduct two focus group sessions with a group of up to 8 Black adults who have misused opioids and stimulants in the past 30 days. Participants will be recruited to have about 50% gender and age representation across four cohorts: born 1996-2006; born 1985-1995; born 1974-1984; and born 1960-1973; with one male and one female in each cohort. A semi-structured qualitative focus group format will be utilized for each focus group session to allow for flexibility in asking additional questions based on participant responses. Individuals are excluded if they do not want to be audio-recorded, since a main component of the study is recording focus groups. Aim 1 will occur in Louisville, Kentucky (KY) and full study visits will be recorded.

Aim 2 is a cross-sectional mixed method design in which the culturally adapted intervention developed during Aim 1 will be piloted after institutional review board (IRB) modification approval of the intervention among about 48-60 Black adults residing in Louisville, Kentucky and Cincinnati, Ohio (OH). Each study site will recruit three groups of up to 8-10 participants to pilot the intervention, resulting in approximately 6 groups and 48-60 participants. Eligible participants for Aim 2 are aged 18-65 and will be recruited to have approximately 50% male and female members overall but not specific to age cohorts. Participants will complete pre-and post-intervention quantitative measures assessing their motivation and comfort using Narcan and Fentanyl Test Strips (FTS). In addition, participants will also participate in a semi-structured qualitative focus group after completing the intervention session to assess harm reduction needs in their community, additional barriers participants expect with the adapted intervention, feasibility of the intervention, and perceived knowledge of opioid overdose and prevention and intervention tools gained from prior to the intervention to afterwards. Individuals are excluded if they do not want to be audio-recorded, since a main component of the study is recording focus groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use
  • Stimulant Use

Keywords

  • Harm Reduction
  • Opioid Overdose
  • Stimulant Misuse
  • Opioid Misuse
  • Narcan
  • Fentanyl Test Strips
03

In context

Harm Reduction

115 studies on the registry are indexed under Harm Reduction; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is below the median of 139 across 92 interventional studies indexed under Harm Reduction.

Browse Harm Reduction studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Brittany Miller-Roenigk as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Identify as Black or African American
  • Currently a resident of study areas
  • Report misuse of stimulants and/or opioids in the last six months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not identify as Black or African American
  • If they participated in Aim 1 of the study
  • Do not want to be audio-recorded
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    THRIVE

    Participants will complete pre- and post-intervention quantitative measures assessing their motivation and comfort using Narcan and FTS. In addition, participants will also participate in a semi-structured qualitative focus group after completing the intervention session to assess harm reduction needs in their community, additional barriers participants expect with the adapted intervention, feasibility of the intervention, and perceived knowledge of opioid overdose and prevention and intervention tools gained from prior to the intervention to afterwards.

    Behavioral: harm reduction intervention

Interventions

  • Behavioralharm reduction intervention

    Each participant will complete a pre-test at Study Visit 1 prior to the intervention, participate in the intervention, then complete a post-test. After the intervention, participants will participate in a recorded focus group. Participants will be offered FTS, Narcan, first aid supplies at the study visit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant Confidence Using Harm Reduction Techniques at Baseline

    Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Participant Confidence Using Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention

    Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

    Time frame: Post-intervention (approximately 2 hours)

  3. Participant Willingness to Use Harm Reduction Techniques at Baseline

    Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Participant Willingness to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Post-intervention

    Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

    Time frame: Post-intervention (approximately 2 hours)

  5. Participant Comfort to Possess Harm Reduction Techniques Baseline

    Comfort will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not comfortable) to 10 (very comfortable).

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Participant Comfort to Possess Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention

    Comfort will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not comfortable) to 10 (very comfortable).

    Time frame: Post Intervention (approximately 2 hours)

  7. Participant Confidence Describing How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques to Others Baseline

    Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Participant Confidence Describing How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques to Others Post Intervention

    Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

    Time frame: Post intervention (approximately 2 hours)

  9. Participant Willingness to Teach Others How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Baseline

    Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Participant Willingness to Teach Others How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention

    Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

    Time frame: Post intervention (approximately 2 hours)

  11. Change in Knowledge of How Overdose Occurs

    1 = yes, 0 = no; score on scale ranged 0-1 with a higher score equating to more greater knowledge of how overdose occurs

    Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (approximately 2 hours)

  12. Change in Perceived Knowledge/Confidence of How to Prevent and Intervene With an Overdose

    Yes/No/Somewhat with coding 0 = No, 1= Somewhat, 2= yes; score on scale ranged 0-2 with a higher score equating to greater knowledge/confidence how to prevent and intervene with an overdose

    Time frame: Baseline and post intervention (approximately 2 hours)

07

Results

Posted May 7, 2026

Participant flow

Aim 1 consisted of the Community Advisory Board (CAB). CAB reviewed the intervention and provided feedback in a focus group capacity only; CAB was not enrolled as participants in the clinical trial.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTHRIVE
Started63
Community advisory board6
Received thrive intervention57
Completed63
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryParticipant Confidence Using Harm Reduction Techniques at Baseline

Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Confidence Using Harm Reduction Techniques at Baseline
score on a scaleTHRIVE
Fentanyl Test Strips (FTS)5.43 ± 3.70
Narcan6.61 ± 3.61
PrimaryParticipant Confidence Using Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention

Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

Time frame:
Post-intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Confidence Using Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention
score on a scaleTHRIVE
Fentanyl Test Strips (FTS)8.36 ± 2.90
Narcan8.36 ± 2.90
PrimaryParticipant Willingness to Use Harm Reduction Techniques at Baseline

Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Willingness to Use Harm Reduction Techniques at Baseline
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS6.02 ± 3.78
Narcan7.86 ± 3.39
PrimaryParticipant Willingness to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Post-intervention

Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

Time frame:
Post-intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Willingness to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Post-intervention
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS8.46 ± 2.87
Narcan8.68 ± 2.67
PrimaryParticipant Comfort to Possess Harm Reduction Techniques Baseline

Comfort will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not comfortable) to 10 (very comfortable).

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Comfort to Possess Harm Reduction Techniques Baseline
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS7.26 ± 3.53
Narcan7.70 ± 3.39
PrimaryParticipant Comfort to Possess Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention

Comfort will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not comfortable) to 10 (very comfortable).

Time frame:
Post Intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Comfort to Possess Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS8.70 ± 2.55
Narcan8.49 ± 2.92
PrimaryParticipant Confidence Describing How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques to Others Baseline

Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Confidence Describing How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques to Others Baseline
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS6.35 ± 3.81
Narcan6.88 ± 3.85
PrimaryParticipant Confidence Describing How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques to Others Post Intervention

Confidence will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not confident) to 10 (very confident).

Time frame:
Post intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Confidence Describing How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques to Others Post Intervention
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS8.33 ± 2.81
Narcan8.68 ± 2.49
PrimaryParticipant Willingness to Teach Others How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Baseline

Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Willingness to Teach Others How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Baseline
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS7.25 ± 3.66
Narcan7.54 ± 3.62
PrimaryParticipant Willingness to Teach Others How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention

Willingness will be measured by a pre - post test survey with a Likert type scale measured from 1 (not willing) to 10 (very willing).

Time frame:
Post intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Participant Willingness to Teach Others How to Use Harm Reduction Techniques Post Intervention
score on a scaleTHRIVE
FTS8.44 ± 2.73
Narcan8.67 ± 2.55
PrimaryChange in Knowledge of How Overdose Occurs

1 = yes, 0 = no; score on scale ranged 0-1 with a higher score equating to more greater knowledge of how overdose occurs

Time frame:
Baseline and post intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Knowledge of How Overdose Occurs
score on a scaleTHRIVE
Baseline.8 ± .4
Post intervention.95 ± .23
PrimaryChange in Perceived Knowledge/Confidence of How to Prevent and Intervene With an Overdose

Yes/No/Somewhat with coding 0 = No, 1= Somewhat, 2= yes; score on scale ranged 0-2 with a higher score equating to greater knowledge/confidence how to prevent and intervene with an overdose

Time frame:
Baseline and post intervention (approximately 2 hours)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Perceived Knowledge/Confidence of How to Prevent and Intervene With an Overdose
score on a scaleTHRIVE
Baseline1.33 ± .72
Post intervention1.89 ± .36

Adverse events

Collected over 2 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
THRIVE0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

This participant count include 57 participants who received the THRIVE Intervention and the 6 participants from the Community Advisory Board (CAB). The CAB was not analyzed.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)THRIVE
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years58
>=65 years5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)THRIVE
Female27
Male36
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)THRIVE
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American63
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)THRIVE
United States63
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Louisville Central Community Center
    Louisville, Kentucky 40203, United States
  • Urban Minority Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Outreach Program (UMADAOP) of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 2 months.

Results were first posted in May 2026, 10 months after primary completion.

Of 54 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Harm Reduction, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 43. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 57 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2024
First posted
Sep 24, 2024
StartActual
Apr 2, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jun 20, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 20, 2025
Results first posted
May 7, 2026
Last update
Jun 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06609278
Lead sponsor
Brittany Miller-Roenigk
Responsible party
Brittany Miller-Roenigk (Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2024
Start date
Apr 2, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2025
Completion
Jun 20, 2025
Results posted
May 7, 2026
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Study contacts

Brittany Miller-Roenigk, PhD
principal investigator · University of Kentucky

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion