ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06527040Updated Sep 21, 2026

Clinical Decision Support for Safety of Opioid Transitions

An observational study in Medication Abuse and Harm Reduction, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200,000
Ages
12 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a clinical decision support (CDS) alert designed to notify providers when an opioid prescription will result in a patient transitioning into a new phase of opioid therapy. The 2022 CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain recommends that providers reassess patient pain, treatment goals, and the risks and benefits of opioid therapy before patients transition from acute to subacute treatment (1 month of opioid analgesics) and from subacute to chronic opioid treatment (3 months). This study will evaluate a CDS tool that identifies patients who will be transitioning between phases of opioid therapy as a result of a prescribed opioid medication and prompts providers to review patient needs and goals of care. A pre-post study design will be used to compare provider prescribing practices and patient outcomes before and after implementation of the CDS alert. During the pre-implementation period, providers will continue routine care and will have access to existing patient pain assessments and clinical information, but no transition alert will be displayed. During the post-implementation period, providers will receive a notification when an opioid prescription results in a transition to a new phase of therapy and will be encouraged to review patient needs, reassess pain and treatment goals, and document their clinical decision-making. Opioid transition orders, provider documentation, and patient outcomes will be evaluated using medical record data collected during routine clinical care and compared between the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Medication Abuse
  • Harm Reduction
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,238 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 409 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200,000 is above the median of 251 across 299 observational studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,543 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Of its 147 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Residents and visitors to the state of Colorado who seek healthcare within the University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) primary care system and receive an opioid prescription.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Any primary care encounter where an opioid is prescribed that transitions the patient to a different stage of opioid therapy (acute to subacute after 1 month of opioids; subacute to chronic after 3 months of an opioid)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients \<12 and >89
  • Patients with active cancer diagnosis in last 1 year
  • Patients with hospice care/palliative care order
  • Patients with sickle cell disease diagnosis
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • pre-implementation period

    Encounters with a high risk opioid prescription prior to intervention implementation. Providers will not see any alert. Usual care.

  • Clinical Decision Support (CDS): Opioid transition alert

    Encounters where the opioid transition clinical decision support (CDS) alert fired. CDS logic is programmed to fire the alert when a provider places an order for an opioid that will transition the patient from acute to subacute opioid therapy (at 30 days) or from subacute to chronic opioid therapy (at 90 days).

    Other: Opioid Transitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS)

Interventions

  • OtherOpioid Transitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS)

    Clinical decision support in the form of an electronic health record (EHR) integrated, provider-facing alert suggesting (a) the patient is transitioning to a new phase of opioid therapy and (b) the provider should review patient pain data and pain management goals as suggested by Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of encounters with an opioid transitioning prescription

    The number of primary care encounters where an opioid prescription transitions a patient to a different phase of care (by phase) divided by the total number of opioid prescriptions

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical decision support (CDS) acceptance rate

    The number of times providers accepted the Clinical decision support (CDS) tool and documented a review of patient pain and goals

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Subsequent opioid overdose/poisoning rates

    The number of patients who reached the threshold of chronic opioid use, had a diagnosis of opioid overdose/poisoning or a new diagnosis of opioid use disorder

    Time frame: Six months after an encounter where the opioid use disorder is identified

  3. Opioid prescription abandonment

    The proportion of opioid prescriptions initiated (triggering the CDS) and an opioid was not signed by the provider, indicating a change in clinical decision to prescribe an opioid

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Number of patients with long term opioid use

    Count of patients receiving \>90 day supply of opioids

    Time frame: Six months after an encounter where the opioid use disorder is identified

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified quantitative EHR data utilized in this project will be housed on the National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program (NAHDAP) website.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Data will be provided to NAHDAP after study results are published in peer-reviewed journals.

Access criteria: Prior to downloading study data, the individual will have to register with the site and agree to a standard data use agreement.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.icpsr.umich.edu

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Apr 2027, 4 months later.

Of 122 non-industry observational studies under Substance-Related Disorders, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 133 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2024
First posted
Jul 30, 2024
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06527040
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2024
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Heather Tolle, PhD
Contact
heather.tolle@cuanschutz.edu
303-724-9924
Jason Hoppe, DO
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion