ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06529029LAP-ST vs ECTUpdated Nov 2, 2026

Low Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy Versus Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Sigma-Stim and RUL LAP-ST (Low-Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy - Right Unilateral) in Suicidal Ideation, Major Depressive Disorder and Schizo Affective Disorder, sponsored by Michigan State University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by Michigan State University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 2, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 349 studies in Suicidal Ideation with a site in United States — 109 open to participants now, 122 under way, 4 of them phase 3. Suicidal Ideation · United States.

Planned enrollment
237th of 320
30 · median 66
Started
2024
with 31 others
Phase 2/3
8 of 349
1 open now
Primary completion
2026-10
later than 23 of 121 live
Registered
271st of 349
by date

Among the 349 studies in Suicidal Ideation with a site in United States, this one is the 237th largest by planned enrollment of the 320 interventional ones, is one of 32 that started in 2024, is one of 8 in phase 2/3, reaches primary completion later than 23 of the 121 other live ones, and was the 271st registered.

By phase

349 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase254 · 93 open
Observational29 · 5 open
Phase 216 · 4 open
Phase 416 · 1 open
Phase 113 · 5 open
Phase 310 · 0 open
Phase 2/3this study8 · 1 open
Phase 1/23 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 32 started in 2024.

Size and results

Median enrollment 66 across the 320 interventional studies, 133 across the 29 observational. Of the 198 that completed or were terminated, 82 (41%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 349 studies in Suicidal Ideation with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This protocol proposes an initial randomized clinical trial that includes all patients with suicidal ideation (SI) at baseline, and with SI as the primary outcome measure to examine whether Right Unilateral Low-Amplitude Pulse - Seizure Therapy (RUL LAP-ST) treatment has more magnitude and rate of remission of SI as conventional pulse amplitude Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy (RUL ECT) (based on our prior secondary analysis). Our central hypothesis is that RUL LAP-ST has significantly less cognitive/memory side effects (no memory side effects were noted in our prior studies for 500mA and 600mA) and thus is more favorable in terms of side effects compared to RUL conventional pulse amplitude ECT, while maintaining better anti-suicidal effect.

Read the detailed description

Suicide is one of the leading causes of mortality. Suicidal Ideation (SI) is a precursor to suicide. SI is especially hard to treat/remit in those with treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders (TRPD). This includes treatment-resistant mood disorders and psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders). The above TRPD and the SI can remit with Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). That is to say, a transdiagnostic, evidence-based treatment for those patients, in addition to pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, is ECT. ECT has both research support (mainly secondary analysis) and clinical evidence of a beneficial effect in remission of suicidality, as well as unsurpassed effect in treating primary mood and psychotic disorders including those who are treatment-resistant to other therapeutics. However, there are undeniable barriers to treatment with ECT. The most important barrier is memory side effects. ECT can help SI. ECT has also been shown to improve quality of life in a randomized trial by our group, which studied elderly patients with depression. Treating SI, along with the underlying disorder, especially in patients with TRPD is crucial in real-world patients who are clinically referred for ECT. These real-world referrals to ECT (by the patients' primary psychiatrist) will constitute the recruitment pool for this study.

Current amplitude drives electric fields to the deeper structures that are concerned with memory (Peterchev et al., 2010). Previously, the investigators performed the first in human proof of concept one arm open label clinical trial of LAP-ST, (N=22); followed by another small (N=7) pilot randomized, double-blinded clinical trial for the feasibility, safely and initial efficacy of LAP-ST, and another group later confirmed the more favorable cognitive side effects of LAP-ST compared to higher current amplitude (800mA).

However, efficacy of LAP-ST against suicidality has not been well established as primary outcome previously.

Thus, this protocol proposes an initial randomized clinical trial that includes all patients with SI at baseline, and with SI as the primary outcome measure to examine whether RUL LAP-ST treatment has more magnitude and rate of remission of SI as conventional pulse amplitude RUL ECT (based on our prior secondary analysis). Our central hypothesis is that RUL LAP-ST has significantly less cognitive/memory side effects (no memory side effects were noted in our prior studies for 500mA or 600mA) and thus is more favorable in terms of side effects compared to RUL conventional pulse amplitude ECT, while maintaining better anti-suicidal effect.

03

Conditions studied

  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Schizo Affective Disorder
  • Bipolar Disorder

Keywords

  • Suicidal Ideation
  • Suicide
  • Depression
  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Schizo Affective Disorder
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy
  • Neuromodulation
  • Brain Stimulation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients in whom ECT is clinically indicated: The referrals to ECT by the primary psychiatrist (before a consult by the ECT consultant) will serve to both increase the feasibility of the study and address any ethical concerns that the patient would not undergo ECT without having a valid full indication for the procedure as well as increase the external validity and generalizability of the study.
  2. Male or female patients 18 to 90 years of age
  3. Current criteria for MDE with any SI of major depressive, bipolar, or schizoaffective disorders
  4. Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) with 2 or more on SI item
  5. Use of effective method of for women of child-bearing capacity
  6. Patient is medically stable
  7. No anticipated need to alter psychotropic medications for the duration of the study (except for urgent/emergent situations)
  8. Ability of patient to fully participate in the process

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable or serious medical condition that substantially increases risks of ECT or cognitive impairment
  2. Female patients who are pregnant or plan to be pregnant during the study or are breast-feeding
  3. History of neurological disorder if deemed by the treating ECT physician or PI to pose a significant risk with ECT, or if there is any metal in the head or history of known structural brain lesion or skull defect that is deemed to affect cognition or safe ECT treatment
  4. Implanted devices that make ECT unsafe
  5. Clinical presentation of delirium or dementia
  6. Active substance use disorders within 1 week of randomization
  7. ECT in the past 1 month or prior failure to respond to an adequate course of ECT as deemed by the ECT physician treating the patient or the PI
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RUL LAP-ST (Low-Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy - Right Unilateral)

    Low Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy RUL ECT at 600mA (or 700mA)

    Device: Sigma-Stim · Procedure: RUL LAP-ST (Low-Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy - Right Unilateral)

  • Active comparator
    RUL ECT (Electroconvulsive Therapy)

    RUL Conventional pulse amplitude Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)

    Device: Sigma-Stim

Interventions

  • DeviceSigma-Stim

    Right Ultra-Brief Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy at 600mA or 700mA vs Right Unilateral Ultra-Brief Standard ECT at 800mA.

    Also known as: Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST)

  • ProcedureRUL LAP-ST (Low-Amplitude Pulse Seizure Therapy - Right Unilateral)

    Please see description above

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suicide Ideation - Self Report

    Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (SSI-Worst and SSI-Current) - self reported. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 42. Lower score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  2. Suicide Ideation - Clinician Rated

    Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) - clinician administered. Intensity of suicidal ideation: minimum score of 0, maximum score of 5. Lower score indicates a better outcome. Suicidal behavior not rated on a scale.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depression - Clinician Rated

    Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) - clinician administered. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 60. Lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  2. Depression - Self Report

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) - self reported. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 27. Lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  3. Depression - Self Report

    Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) - self reported. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 27. Lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Anxiety

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD7) - self reported. Minimum score 0, maximum score 21. Lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  2. Psychosis

    Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - clinician administered. Full scale minimum score of 31. Maximum score of 217. Lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  3. Global Clinical Assessment

    Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) - clinician administered. Severity: minimum score of 0, maximum score of 7, lower score indicates better outcome. Improvement: minimum score of 0, maximum score of 7, lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  4. Time to Reorientation after ECT sessions

    Time to Reorientation scale (TRO) - study staff administered. Minimum score 3 minutes, maximum score more than 20 minutes. Lower score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of four weeks

  5. Cognitive function and cognitive side effects

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLTR) - clinician administered. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 12. Higher score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: At baseline and completion of the acute ECT/LAP-ST course, an average of four weeks

  6. Cognitive Executive functions

    Delis Kaplan Executive Function Scale (DKEFS) - verbal fluency and color/word interference modules - clinician administered. Verbal fluency: minimum score of 1, maximum score of 60. Higher scores indicate better outcome for the total score. Color-word interference: minimum score of 1, maximum score of 19. In general, higher score indicate better outcome.

    Time frame: At baseline and completion of the acute ECT/LAP-ST course, an average of four weeks

  7. Autobiographic Memory side effects

    Autobiographic Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF) - clinician administered. Minimum score of 0, maximum score of 30. Higher score indicates better outcome.

    Time frame: At baseline and completion of the acute ECT/LAP-ST course, an average of four weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49548, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kochanek KD, Murphy S, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Dec;(293):1-8. PubMed 29319473 ↗
  • Curtin S, Warner M, Hedegaard H: Increase in suicide in the United States, 1999-2014. NCHS data brief no. 241. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db241.pdf. 2016
  • Kellner CH, Fink M, Knapp R, Petrides G, Husain M, Rummans T, Mueller M, Bernstein H, Rasmussen K, O'connor K, Smith G, Rush AJ, Biggs M, McClintock S, Bailine S, Malur C. Relief of expressed suicidal intent by ECT: a consortium for research in ECT study. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 May;162(5):977-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.977. PubMed 15863801 ↗
  • Fink M, Kellner CH, McCall WV. The role of ECT in suicide prevention. J ECT. 2014 Mar;30(1):5-9. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182a6ad0d. PubMed 24091903 ↗
  • Sienaert P. Based on a True Story? The Portrayal of ECT in International Movies and Television Programs. Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):882-891. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PubMed 27522170 ↗
  • McCall WV, Lisanby SH, Rosenquist PB, Dooley M, Husain MM, Knapp RG, Petrides G, Rudorfer MV, Young RC, McClintock SM, Mueller M, Prudic J, Greenberg RM, Weiner RD, Bailine SH, Youssef NA, McCloud L, Kellner CH; CORE/PRIDE Work Group. Effects of continuation electroconvulsive therapy on quality of life in elderly depressed patients: A randomized clinical trial. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Feb;97:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 16. PubMed 29195125 ↗
  • Kulak-Bejda A, Bejda G, Waszkiewicz N. Mental Disorders, Cognitive Impairment and the Risk of Suicide in Older Adults. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 25;12:695286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.695286. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34512415 ↗
  • Lara E, Olaya B, Garin N, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M, Moneta V, Haro JM. Is cognitive impairment associated with suicidality? A population-based study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;25(2):203-13. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Aug 21. PubMed 25190638 ↗
  • Fernandez-Sevillano J, Alberich S, Zorrilla I, Gonzalez-Ortega I, Lopez MP, Perez V, Vieta E, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Saiz P. Cognition in Recent Suicide Attempts: Altered Executive Function. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 22;12:701140. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.701140. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34366931 ↗
  • Rutter SB, Cipriani N, Smith EC, Ramjas E, Vaccaro DH, Martin Lopez M, Calabrese WR, Torres D, Campos-Abraham P, Llaguno M, Soto E, Ghavami M, Perez-Rodriguez MM. Neurocognition and the Suicidal Process. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2020;46:117-153. doi: 10.1007/7854_2020_162. PubMed 32860213 ↗
  • Szanto K, Galfalvy H, Vanyukov PM, Keilp JG, Dombrovski AY. Pathways to Late-Life Suicidal Behavior: Cluster Analysis and Predictive Validation of Suicidal Behavior in a Sample of Older Adults With Major Depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Mar/Apr;79(2):17m11611. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11611. PubMed 29489076 ↗
  • Deng ZD, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. Electric field strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a finite element simulation study. J Neural Eng. 2011 Feb;8(1):016007. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/016007. Epub 2011 Jan 19. PubMed 21248385 ↗
  • Peterchev AV, Rosa MA, Deng ZD, Prudic J, Lisanby SH. Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage. J ECT. 2010 Sep;26(3):159-74. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181e48165. PubMed 20805726 ↗
  • Youssef N, Sidhom E: Examination of Cognitive Profile and Variability in the Current Amplitude Domain of Low Current Amplitude ECT in Society of Biological Psychiatry 69th Annual Meeting (Published in Biological Psychiatry 2014 supplement) New York, New York2014
  • Youssef NA, Sidhom E. Feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST): A proof of concept clinical trial in man. J Affect Disord. 2017 Nov;222:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 16. PubMed 28667887 ↗
  • Youssef NA, McCall WV, Ravilla D, McCloud L, Rosenquist PB. Double-Blinded Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial Comparing Cognitive Side Effects of Standard Ultra-Brief Right Unilateral ECT to 0.5 A Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST). Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 13;10(12):979. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120979. PubMed 33322138 ↗
  • Youssef NA, Ravilla D, Patel C, Yassa M, Sadek R, Zhang LF, McCloud L, McCall WV, Rosenquist PB. Magnitude of Reduction and Speed of Remission of Suicidality for Low Amplitude Seizure Therapy (LAP-ST) Compared to Standard Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Pilot Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. Brain Sci. 2019 Apr 29;9(5):99. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050099. PubMed 31035665 ↗
  • Abbott CC, Quinn D, Miller J, Ye E, Iqbal S, Lloyd M, Jones TR, Upston J, Deng Z, Erhardt E, McClintock SM. Electroconvulsive Therapy Pulse Amplitude and Clinical Outcomes. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;29(2):166-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 17. PubMed 32651051 ↗
  • Beck AT, Brown GK, Steer RA. Psychometric characteristics of the Scale for Suicide Ideation with psychiatric outpatients. Behav Res Ther. 1997 Nov;35(11):1039-46. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00073-9. PubMed 9431735 ↗
  • Beck AT, Kovacs M, Weissman A. Assessment of suicidal intention: the Scale for Suicide Ideation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1979 Apr;47(2):343-52. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.47.2.343. No abstract available. PubMed 469082 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Ran from Jul 2024 to primary completion in Oct 2026, 27 months.

Completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Dec 2026 → Apr 2027, on Nov 2, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 19, 2024
First posted
Jul 31, 2024
StartActual
Jul 3, 2024
Primary completionActual
Oct 8, 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 2027was Dec 2026
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Nov 2, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026→Oct 8, 2026 (actual)
Nov 2, 2026
Study completion
Dec 1, 2026→Apr 2027
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Oct 1, 2026→Oct 8, 2026 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 1, 2026→Apr 2027
    + 4 other changes: verification date, responsible party, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06529029
Collaborators
Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services
Responsible party
Nagy Youssef, MD, PhD (Vice President for Research; Director of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine Division - Grand Rapids, Michigan State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2024
Start date
Jul 3, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 8, 2026
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Nagy A Youssef, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services & Michigan State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion