CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05464277INACHOSUpdated Jul 16, 2024

Intermediate Normal Versus High Normal Oxygen Levels in the Emergency Department for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

An interventional study of Oxygen in Traumatic Brain Injury, Acute Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by Evangelismos Hospital. Terminated at 2 sites in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-16.

Sponsored by Evangelismos Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Insufficient rate of recruitment
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Despite almost universal usage of supplemental oxygen therapy in patients presenting in the emergency department with traumatic brain injury (TBI), optimal oxygen levels are unclear.

The investigators propose a pilot multi-center randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that maintaining intermediate normal as opposed to high normal oxygen levels in patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI is feasible, and to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of the two approaches to oxygen therapy. The aim is that the investigators produce pilot data, which could inform the design of potential subsequent larger clinical trials.

Read the detailed description

Despite the worldwide burden of traumatic brain injury (TBI), medical research on the field as opposed to other health problems is underrepresented. Consequently, there are few data to support commonly used interventions for the management of TBI, especially in the setting of the emergency department. For example, despite almost universal usage of supplemental oxygen therapy, the effects of different oxygenation levels under normobaric conditions on outcomes of patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI are unknown.

On the one hand, liberal oxygenation may provide a margin of safety against hypoxemia and may be needed to meet the high oxygen demands of an acutely altered brain physiology. On the other hand, there are increasing concerns that excessive oxygen supplementation may have harmful effects, such as central nervous system toxicity, cerebral vasoconstriction, impaired immunity leading to predisposition to infections (including pneumonia) and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Such effects could be avoided by intermediate normal oxygen levels.

Taken together, the relative merits and risks of the abovementioned two approaches to oxygen therapy (namely, intermediate normal versus high normal oxygen levels) of patients with TBI in terms of important clinical outcomes (namely, development of nosocomial pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, disability and mortality) remain undefined. This suggests the need for randomized controlled trials. However, randomized controlled trials focusing on patient-centered outcomes should be preceded by pilot randomized controlled trials, which demonstrate a separation in treatment and protocol compliance (feasibility) associated with the studied interventions.

Therefore, the investigators propose a pilot multi-center randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that maintaining intermediate normal as opposed to high normal oxygen levels in patients presenting in the emergency department with TBI is feasible, and to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of the two approaches to oxygen therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Acute Respiratory Failure
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Acute Brain Injury

Keywords

  • emergency care
  • acute respiratory failure
  • trauma
  • oxygen
  • disability
  • acute care
  • critical care
  • mortality
  • brain injury
  • mechanical ventilation
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Evangelismos Hospital is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient ≥18 years
  • Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8
  • Non-penetrating traumatic brain injury
  • Intubated patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Lack of intention to admit to the intensive care unit
  • Moribund patient expected to die within 24 hours
  • Expected need for mechanical ventilation \< 24 hours
  • Time interval from intubation to group allocation more than 60 minutes
  • Penetrating traumatic brain injury
  • Pregnancy
  • Lack of equipoise of the treating clinician
  • Lack of informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intermediate normal oxygen

    For the "intermediate normal oxygen" group, an oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of 95-97% will be recommended in the light of the Improving Oxygen Therapy in Acute-illness (IOTA) meta-analysis. The acceptable lower limit of PaO2 will be set to 80 mmHg according to a recent consensus of experts endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The lower-limit and higher-limit monitor alarm for SpO2 will be set at 94% and 98%, respectively. In case that the emergency department of a study site uses ventilators, which allow for only two options of FiO2 titration (namely, "air mix" and "FiO2 of 1.0"), then the "intermediate normal oxygen" group should receive "air mix".

    Other: Oxygen

  • Active comparator
    High normal oxygen

    For the "high normal oxygen" group, an oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of 99-100% will be recommended. The lower-limit monitor alarm for SpO2 will be set at 98%. No upper alarm limit for SpO2 will be set. In case that the emergency department of a study site uses ventilators, which allow for only two options of FiO2 titration (namely, "air mix" and "FiO2 of 1.0"), then the "high normal oxygen" group should receive "FiO2 of 1.0".

    Other: Oxygen

Interventions

  • OtherOxygen

    Oxygen to achieve assigned SpO2 (or FiO2) targets will be administered to study subjects. The treating clinician can alter oxygenation targets at any time if deemed necessary. The oxygenation goal will be based on SpO2 rather than arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) or arterial pressure oxygen (PaO2) from arterial blood gases. However, PaO2 can be used instead in situations where the treating clinician considers that peripheral perfusion is poor or SpO2 readings are unreliable. Assigned SpO2 targets will apply to the study subjects for a total duration of 6 hours from intubation or until death or until transfer to the operating theater (whatever comes first).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean area-under-curve (AUC) for SpO2

    SpO2 will be recorded each hour for a total duration of 6 hours from intubation. Subsequently, mean area-under-curve (AUC) will be calculated for each group. This will demonstrate the feasibility of the study.

    Time frame: Measurements will be obtained each hour for a total duration of 6 hours from intubation.

  2. Mean area-under-curve (AUC) for FiO2

    FiO2 will be recorded each hour for a total duration of 6 hours from intubation. Subsequently, mean area-under-curve (AUC) will be calculated for each group. This will demonstrate the feasibility of the study.

    Time frame: Measurements will be obtained each hour for a total duration of 6 hours from intubation.

  3. PaO2

    PaO2 will be recorded at least once during 6 hours from intubation. Subsequently, PaO2 values (mmHg) will be calculated for each group. This will demonstrate the feasibility of the study.

    Time frame: Measurements will be obtained at least once during 6 hours from intubation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nosocomial pneumonia

    Incidence of nosocomial pneumonia will be recorded for each arm

    Time frame: Within 7 days of subject enrollment

  2. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

    Incidence of ARDS will be recorded for each arm

    Time frame: Within 7 days of subject enrollment

  3. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality will be recorded during ICU stay

    Time frame: Within 28 days of subject enrollment

  4. Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS-E)

    A combined outcome of disability and mortality at 6 months using the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score will be assessed

    Time frame: At 6 months following subject enrollment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Evangelismos Hospital
    Athens, 10676, Greece
  • KAT General Hospital
    Athens, 14561, Greece
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Asehnoune K, Seguin P, Allary J, Feuillet F, Lasocki S, Cook F, Floch H, Chabanne R, Geeraerts T, Roger C, Perrigault PF, Hanouz JL, Lukaszewicz AC, Biais M, Boucheix P, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Capdevila X, Mahe PJ, Le Maguet P, Paugam-Burtz C, Gergaud S, Plaud B, Constantin JM, Malledant Y, Flet L, Sebille V, Roquilly A; Corti-TC Study Group. Hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone for prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Corti-TC): a double-blind, multicentre phase 3, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Sep;2(9):706-16. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70144-4. Epub 2014 Jul 24. Erratum In: Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Sep;2(9):e15. PubMed 25066331 ↗
  • Asehnoune K, Balogh Z, Citerio G, Cap A, Billiar T, Stocchetti N, Cohen MJ, Pelosi P, Curry N, Gaarder C, Gruen R, Holcomb J, Hunt BJ, Juffermans NP, Maegele M, Midwinter M, Moore FA, O'Dwyer M, Pittet JF, Schochl H, Schreiber M, Spinella PC, Stanworth S, Winfield R, Brohi K. The research agenda for trauma critical care. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1340-1351. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4895-9. Epub 2017 Jul 29. PubMed 28756471 ↗
  • Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, Agrawal A, Adeleye AO, Shrime MG, Rubiano AM, Rosenfeld JV, Park KB. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1. PubMed 29701556 ↗
  • Andrews PJ, Sinclair HL, Rodriguez A, Harris BA, Battison CG, Rhodes JK, Murray GD; Eurotherm3235 Trial Collaborators. Hypothermia for Intracranial Hypertension after Traumatic Brain Injury. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17;373(25):2403-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507581. Epub 2015 Oct 7. PubMed 26444221 ↗
  • The Lancet Neurology. A rally for traumatic brain injury research. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Dec;12(12):1127. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70266-7. No abstract available. PubMed 24229612 ↗
  • Xu F, Liu P, Pascual JM, Xiao G, Lu H. Effect of hypoxia and hyperoxia on cerebral blood flow, blood oxygenation, and oxidative metabolism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Oct;32(10):1909-18. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.93. Epub 2012 Jun 27. PubMed 22739621 ↗
  • Vilalta A, Sahuquillo J, Merino MA, Poca MA, Garnacho A, Martinez-Valverde T, Dronavalli M. Normobaric hyperoxia in traumatic brain injury: does brain metabolic state influence the response to hyperoxic challenge? J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jul;28(7):1139-48. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1720. Epub 2011 Jun 30. PubMed 21534719 ↗
  • Tolias CM, Reinert M, Seiler R, Gilman C, Scharf A, Bullock MR. Normobaric hyperoxia--induced improvement in cerebral metabolism and reduction in intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury: a prospective historical cohort-matched study. J Neurosurg. 2004 Sep;101(3):435-44. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.3.0435. PubMed 15352601 ↗
  • Hafner S, Beloncle F, Koch A, Radermacher P, Asfar P. Hyperoxia in intensive care, emergency, and peri-operative medicine: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? A 2015 update. Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0084-6. Epub 2015 Nov 19. PubMed 26585328 ↗
  • Vincent JL, Taccone FS, He X. Harmful Effects of Hyperoxia in Postcardiac Arrest, Sepsis, Traumatic Brain Injury, or Stroke: The Importance of Individualized Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Patients. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:2834956. doi: 10.1155/2017/2834956. Epub 2017 Jan 26. PubMed 28246487 ↗
  • Raj R, Bendel S, Reinikainen M, Kivisaari R, Siironen J, Lang M, Skrifvars M. Hyperoxemia and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2013 Aug 19;17(4):R177. doi: 10.1186/cc12856. PubMed 23958227 ↗
  • Brenner M, Stein D, Hu P, Kufera J, Wooford M, Scalea T. Association between early hyperoxia and worse outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Arch Surg. 2012 Nov;147(11):1042-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1560. PubMed 22801994 ↗
  • Chu DK, Kim LH, Young PJ, Zamiri N, Almenawer SA, Jaeschke R, Szczeklik W, Schunemann HJ, Neary JD, Alhazzani W. Mortality and morbidity in acutely ill adults treated with liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy (IOTA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1693-1705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30479-3. Epub 2018 Apr 26. PubMed 29726345 ↗
  • Panwar R, Hardie M, Bellomo R, Barrot L, Eastwood GM, Young PJ, Capellier G, Harrigan PW, Bailey M; CLOSE Study Investigators; ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Conservative versus Liberal Oxygenation Targets for Mechanically Ventilated Patients. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 1;193(1):43-51. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1019OC. PubMed 26334785 ↗
  • Robba C, Poole D, McNett M, Asehnoune K, Bosel J, Bruder N, Chieregato A, Cinotti R, Duranteau J, Einav S, Ercole A, Ferguson N, Guerin C, Siempos II, Kurtz P, Juffermans NP, Mancebo J, Mascia L, McCredie V, Nin N, Oddo M, Pelosi P, Rabinstein AA, Neto AS, Seder DB, Skrifvars MB, Suarez JI, Taccone FS, van der Jagt M, Citerio G, Stevens RD. Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury: recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine consensus. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2397-2410. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06283-0. Epub 2020 Nov 11. PubMed 33175276 ↗
  • Busl KM. Nosocomial Infections in the Neurointensive Care Unit. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018 Apr;29(2):299-314. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.11.008. PubMed 29502719 ↗
  • Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, Donati A, Rinaldi L, Marudi A, Morelli A, Antonelli M, Singer M. Effect of Conservative vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Mortality Among Patients in an Intensive Care Unit: The Oxygen-ICU Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1583-1589. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11993. PubMed 27706466 ↗
  • Siemieniuk RAC, Chu DK, Kim LH, Guell-Rous MR, Alhazzani W, Soccal PM, Karanicolas PJ, Farhoumand PD, Siemieniuk JLK, Satia I, Irusen EM, Refaat MM, Mikita JS, Smith M, Cohen DN, Vandvik PO, Agoritsas T, Lytvyn L, Guyatt GH. Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018 Oct 24;363:k4169. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4169. No abstract available. PubMed 30355567 ↗
  • Mackle DM, Bailey MJ, Beasley RW, Bellomo R, Bennett VL, Deane AM, Eastwood GM, Finfer S, Freebairn RC, Litton E, Linke NJ, McArthur CJ, McGuinness SP, Panwar R, Young PJ; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the intensive care unit randomised trial comparing two approaches to oxygen therapy (ICU-ROX). Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Mar;20(1):22-32. PubMed 29458318 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05464277
Lead sponsor
Evangelismos Hospital
Responsible party
Ilias Siempos (Academic Scholar, Evangelismos Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 19, 2022
Start date
Dec 2, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2024
Completion
Jul 14, 2024
Last update
Jul 16, 2024

Study contacts

Ilias I Siempos, MD, DSc
principal investigator · Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion