CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05428423Updated Nov 23, 2022

Reliability of PVI Changes During Tidal Volume Challenge in ICU Patients

An observational study in Shock, Septic Shock and Sepsis, sponsored by Bicetre Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-23.

Sponsored by Bicetre Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
44
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to assess whether changes in the plethysmography variability index, during a tidal volume challenge, can reliably detect simultaneous changes in arterial blood pressure pulsatility, in patients hospitalized in intensive care unit. If results will be positive, this will allow the test to be performed even in the absence of an invasive arterial catheter.

Read the detailed description

Among patients in a state of shock one of the first treatments is volume expansion, consisting in a fast intravenous injection of crystalloid or colloid solutions in order to increase cardiac preload and consequently cardiac output. However, this augmentation of the cardiac output happens only in half of the patients.To avoid ineffective fluid administration several tests have been developed.

One of these tests is called the "tidal volume challenge" (TVC). It consists of transiently increasing for 1 minute the volume of air inhaled with each breath, in mechanically ventilated patients, and then evaluating whether this change impacts the pulsatility of the arterial blood pressure, detected by an arterial catheter. This test seems reliable, but it requires an arterial catheter to be in place.

It has been suggested in previous studies that pulsatility of blood pressure can be estimated by the pulsatility of the plethysmography signal ("plethysmography variability index"), obtained from the oxygen saturation signal that's measured in all intensive care patients. The advantage is that this measurement only requires a sensor placed at the end of a finger, on the earlobe or on the forehead.

The aim of the study is to assess whether changes in the plethysmography variability index (PVI) during a TVC can reliably detect simultaneous changes in blood pressure pulsatility. This study will include patients hospitalized in intensive care unit, mechanically ventilated, in whom physicians have decided to perform a TVC as common practice. Changes, occurred during this test, in arterial blood pressure pulsatility and in plethysmography pulsatility index will be measured and compared. If results will show that changes in PVI during TVC are reliable for measuring blood pressure pulsatility changes during this test, this will allow the test to be used even in the absence of an arterial catheter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shock
  • Septic Shock
  • Sepsis
  • Hemodynamic Instability

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tidal volume challenge
  • Pleth variability index
03

In context

Shock

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock; 176 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 91 across 346 observational studies indexed under Shock.

Browse Shock studies →

Lead sponsor

Bicetre Hospital is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients hospitalized in intensive care unit, mechanically ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg on ideal body weight, with oxygen saturation monitoring with Masimo SET and cardiac output monitoring with PICCO2 system in place.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients hospitalized in intensive care unit
  • physicians' decision to perform a tidal volume challenge
  • hemodynamic monitoring with a calibrated pulse contour analysis device (PICCO2) in place
  • monitoring of oxygen saturation with Masimo SET
  • mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 6 ml/kg on ideal body weight

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • thoracic drainage
  • patient under judicial protection
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reliability of PVI changes in diagnosing preload responsiveness during TVC

    The primary objective is to assess the reliability of PVI changes induced by a tidal volume challenge test in diagnosing a preload responsiveness state in adult ICU patients.

    Time frame: TVC is performed in 1 minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reliability of PVI absolute values to diagnose preload responsiveness

    Secondary objective is to test the reliability of absolute values of PVI to diagnose a preload responsiveness state in adult intensive care patients.

    Time frame: TVC is performed in 1 minute

  2. Evaluation of PVI changes during TVC according to sensor position

    Third objective is to compare the value of changes in PVI induced by a tidal volume challenge test to diagnose a preload responsiveness state according to the location of the plethysmographic measurement (finger, earlobe, forehead).

    Time frame: TVC is performed in 1 minute

  3. Comparison of PPV and PVI changes during PLR test or volume expansion

    Forth objective is to compare the changes in pulse pressure variation (PPV) and PVI during a passive leg raising test (PLR) and a volume expansion, if applicable.

    Time frame: PLR is performed in 1 minute

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011 Mar 21;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-1. PubMed 21906322 ↗
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 15;354(24):2564-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062200. Epub 2006 May 21. PubMed 16714767 ↗
  • Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):415-421. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002183. PubMed 27922879 ↗
  • Alvarado Sanchez JI, Caicedo Ruiz JD, Diaztagle Fernandez JJ, Amaya Zuniga WF, Ospina-Tascon GA, Cruz Martinez LE. Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00817-5. PubMed 33555488 ↗
  • Feissel M, Teboul JL, Merlani P, Badie J, Faller JP, Bendjelid K. Plethysmographic dynamic indices predict fluid responsiveness in septic ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jun;33(6):993-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0602-6. Epub 2007 Mar 29. PubMed 17393139 ↗
  • Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, Gerlach H, Moreno R, Carlet J, Le Gall JR, Payen D; Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients Investigators. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):344-53. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000194725.48928.3a. PubMed 16424713 ↗
  • Natalini G, Rosano A, Taranto M, Faggian B, Vittorielli E, Bernardini A. Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: a clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2006 Dec;103(6):1478-84. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246811.88524.75. PubMed 17122227 ↗
  • Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Desebbe O, Joseph P, Metton O, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1105-11. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267593.72744.20. PubMed 17525584 ↗
  • Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Hachemi M, Jacques D, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Respiratory variations in pulse oximeter waveform amplitude are influenced by venous return in mechanically ventilated patients under general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Mar;24(3):245-51. doi: 10.1017/S026502150600161X. Epub 2006 Oct 23. PubMed 17054816 ↗
  • Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, Delannoy B, Robin J, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):200-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen133. Epub 2008 Jun 2. PubMed 18522935 ↗
  • Landsverk SA, Hoiseth LO, Kvandal P, Hisdal J, Skare O, Kirkeboen KA. Poor agreement between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude and pulse pressure in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):849-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181895f9f. PubMed 18946297 ↗
  • Liu T, Xu C, Wang M, Niu Z, Qi D. Reliability of pleth variability index in predicting preload responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients under various conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 May 8;19(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0744-4. PubMed 31068139 ↗
  • Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M, Bataille A, Julien F, Richard C, Teboul JL. Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Feb;110(2):207-13. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes373. Epub 2012 Oct 26. PubMed 23103777 ↗
  • Coeckelenbergh S, Delaporte A, Ghoundiwal D, Bidgoli J, Fils JF, Schmartz D, Van der Linden P. Pleth variability index versus pulse pressure variation for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 9;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0707-9. PubMed 30851740 ↗
  • Taccheri T, Gavelli F, Teboul JL, Shi R, Monnet X. Do changes in pulse pressure variation and inferior vena cava distensibility during passive leg raising and tidal volume challenge detect preload responsiveness in case of low tidal volume ventilation? Crit Care. 2021 Mar 18;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03515-7. PubMed 33736672 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 23, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05428423
Lead sponsor
Bicetre Hospital
Responsible party
Xavier Monnet (Professor, Bicetre Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 23, 2022
Start date
Jun 6, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 23, 2022

Study contacts

Xavier Monnet, MD-PhD
Contact
xavier.monnet@aphp.fr
+33 06 60 86 26 69
Xavier Monnet, MD-PhD
principal investigator · Hopital de Bicetre

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion