ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06839404PHOEBUSUpdated Feb 21, 2025

Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the HaemOdynamic Effects of a Standard Fluid BolUS

An observational study in Shock, sponsored by Bicetre Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-21.

Sponsored by Bicetre Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

When the flow of blood ejected by the heart drops significantly, that is to say when there is "shock", one of the first treatments undertaken is often volume expansion. This treatment consists of injecting a liquid intravenously, generally in the form of a bolus, that is to say a dose of solute administered all at once, of 250 to 500 mL of fluid over approximately 10 to 30 minutes. The injected fluid expands the blood volume and fills the heart pump, in order to increase the flow it ejects.

However, this treatment poses two problems. First, it is only inconsistently effective. It is possible that of the 250-500 mL of fluid administered in the standard way, only a part is effective, whereas, as the effectiveness decreases during the infusion, the rest does not increase cardiac output significantly.

However, the average part of the total volume that is ineffective on a large population of patients is not well known.

Second, the effects of volume expansion on cardiac output decrease rapidly after the end of administration. However, the average duration of effectiveness of a 250-500 mL fluid bolus, and the factors that influence this duration of effectiveness, are not well determined.

The main objective of this research is to measure, among the volume of a fluid bolus, which part does not significantly increase cardiac output. The secondary objective is to measure the average time of effectiveness after the end of the infusion and the factors that influence it.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shock

Browse trials for

03

In context

Shock

487 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock; 107 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 100 across 247 observational studies indexed under Shock.

Browse Shock studies →

Lead sponsor

Bicetre Hospital is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients hospitalized in intensive care unit and with shock for whom a fluid challenge is administered

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Hospitalisation in intensive care
  • Haemodynamic monitoring already in place with a pulse wave contour analysis-derived estimation of cardiac output (either calibrated or uncalibrated)
  • Decision taken by the clinicians in charge of the patient to perform volume expansion by intravenous infusion of a 6 mL/kg crystalloid bolus

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Refusal to participate by relatives of the patient or the patient himself
  • Other therapeutic modification during volume expansion
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Drugfluid challenge

    Fluid bolus of 500 mL of crystalloids given at a constant rate between 10 and 15 minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To measure, during the administration of a fluid bolus in order to perform volume expansion, the volume of fluid which causes an increase in cardiac output of less than 15%.

    We will measure, among the volume administered (500mL), the proportion of infused volume which allowed an increase in cardiac output ≥15% compared to the baseline value. This baseline value will be defined by the average measured over the minute preceding the start of the fluid infusion

    Time frame: During the fluid bolus administration (<15min)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The maximum amplitude of the change induced by volume expansion in cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure

    The maximum amplitude, expressed as an absolute value and as a percentage of the baseline value, as defined above, of the change induced by volume expansion in cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure

    Time frame: During the fluid bolus administration (<15min)

  2. The delay at which this maximum effect appears in terms of cardiac output, mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure

    Time frame: During the fluid bolus administration (<15min)

  3. The time following the end of the infusion from which the cardiac output becomes ≤5% of the baseline value

    Time frame: A period of 120 minutes following the fluid infusion

  4. The factors that influence these pharmacokinetic variables will be determined

    Time frame: During the study period (during fluid administration and the period of 120 minutes following the infusion)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 59 months after the start.

Of 120 non-industry observational studies under Shock, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 59 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 127 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 17, 2025
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
StartActual
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Feb 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06839404
Lead sponsor
Bicetre Hospital
Responsible party
Christopher Lai (Doctor, Bicetre Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 21, 2025

Study contacts

Xavier Monnet, MD, PhD
Contact
xavier.monnet@aphp.fr
+33660862669
Christopher Lai, MD, PhD
Contact
christopher.lai@aphp.fr
+33 (0)145212671 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion