ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07724262Updated Jul 24, 2026

Evaluation of the Argos System to Estimate Cardiac Output

An observational study in Shock, sponsored by Bicetre Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.

Sponsored by Bicetre Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the reliability of the Argos system to track changes in cardiac output in critically ill patients. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does cardiac output changes induced by fluid administration or changes in norepinephrine dosage can be tracked by the Argos system, compared to transpulmonary thermodilution device.

Read the detailed description

In patients with acute circulatory failure, hemodynamic monitoring including cardiac index (CI) assessment is recommended for most severe patients. Transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is one of the methods that are recommended for this purpose, in particular because it is considered as reliable in this type of patients. The PiCCO2 system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Getinge, Feldkirchen, Germany) relies on TPTD method and associate two methods to measure CI. On the one hand, TPTD is considered as one of the gold standards for CI evaluation (CITPTD). On the other hand, pulse contour analysis calculates stroke volume from the waveform of the systolic part of the arterial pressure curve (CIpwa). The way this estimation is performed and it is regularly re-evaluated differs among the devices that are available on the market. This estimation of CIpwa is calibrated when TPTD is performed. Thus, it allows a real-time pulse contour derived CI assessment, which is very precise. However, TPTD system are considered invasive, expensive and are not available in all settings.

The Argos monitor (Retia Medical, Valhalla, USA) uses the so-called multi-beat analysis (MBA) to estimate CI after analyzing the arterial pressure waveform over periods of multiple heartbeats (up to 20) and scaling CI estimations to biometric data. The algorithm estimates the theoretical central arterial blood pressure waveform using MBA, minimizing and avoiding the cofounding effect of the wave reflection phenomena. Based on this central arterial blood pressure waveform and biometric patient data, the system estimates cardiac output. The Argos monitor has a second advantage. It simply connects to the analogue output of the blood pressure signal from a compatible multi-parameter monitor and needs no additional specific pressure sensor. During cardiac surgery, the Argos monitor showed reasonable agreement and trending ability compared to the pulmonary artery catheter. However, in patients after cardiac surgery, including those with low cardiac output and arrhythmia, CI estimated by the device was not interchangeable with the continuous thermodilution method via a PAC.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the reliability of the Argos system to track changes of CI induced by changes in norepinephrine or fluid administration, compared to CITPTD in critically ill patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • hemodynamic monitoring
  • vasopressor
  • fluids
  • cardiac output
03

In context

Shock

487 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock; 107 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 100 across 247 observational studies indexed under Shock.

Browse Shock studies →

Lead sponsor

Bicetre Hospital is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with shock defined by one sign of hypoperfusion:

  • systolic arterial pressure \<90mmHg
  • mean arterial pressure \<65mmHg
  • prolonged capillary refill time >3 sec
  • mottling score > 2
  • urine output \< 0.1 mL/kg/h

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years old
  • Hospitalisation in intensive care
  • Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution already in place
  • Hemodynamic intervention deemed necessary by the clinician in charge of the patient

    • Administration of a fluid bolus
    • Change in norepinephrine dosage or performance of a vasopressor test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Other therapeutic modification during volume expansion or the vasopressor test
  • Refusal to participate by relatives of the patient or the patient himself or herself
  • Non availability of investigators
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • patients with shock

    Patients with shock defined by one sign of hypoperfusion: * systolic arterial pressure \<90mmHg * mean arterial pressure \<65mmHg * prolonged capillary refill time \>3 sec * mottling score \> 2 * urine output \< 0.1 mL/kg/h

    Drug: Fluid bolus · Drug: Norepinephrine

Interventions

  • Giving a fluid bolus of 500mL of normal saline (NaCl 0.9%)

  • brief, transient increase in norepinephrine to achieve a 15mmHg increase in mean arterial pressure and evaluates if tissue perfusion improves

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the changes in cardiac output provided by the Argos system induced by changes in norepinephrine or fluid bolus, compared to cardiac output provided by the transpulmonary thermodilution device in critically ill patients.

    Time frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the Argos system

    To evaluate the accuracy of the Argos system to measure absolute values of cardiac output compared to transpulmonary thermodilution

    Time frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)

  2. Precision of the Argos system

    To evaluate the precision and least significant change of cardiac output provided by the Argos system

    Time frame: 1 hour (before and after intervention)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 120 non-industry observational studies under Shock, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 127 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 20, 2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 31, 2027
Last update
Jul 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07724262
Lead sponsor
Bicetre Hospital
Responsible party
Christopher Lai (Doctor, Bicetre Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2026

Study contacts

Christopher Lai, MD, PhD
Contact
christopher.lai@aphp.fr
12633816521

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion