ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05265520HIS-CRTUpdated Feb 9, 2026

His-Bundle Corrective Pacing in Heart Failure

An interventional study of His-CRT implantation and BIV-CRT implantation in Right Bundle-Branch Block, Heart Failure and His-bundle Pacing, sponsored by University of Rochester. Recruiting at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-09.

Sponsored by University of Rochester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2022; still recruiting 3 years 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators aim to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of benefit of His-bundle pacing enhanced cardiac resynchronization therapy (His-CRT) vs. cardiac resynchronization therapy (BIV-CRT) in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block (RBBB).

Read the detailed description

In this prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial, the investigators aim to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of benefit of His-bundle pacing enhanced cardiac resynchronization therapy (His-CRT) vs. cardiac resynchronization therapy (BIV-CRT) in patients with Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB) Electrocardiogram (ECG) Pattern by assessing the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm at 6 months, and by evaluating changes in ECG biomarkers, NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and echocardiography biomarkers (left ventricular volumes, strain contractility, and dyssynchrony), as well as temporal changes in functional status and quality of life in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm at 6, 12, and 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Right Bundle-Branch Block
  • Heart Failure
  • His-bundle Pacing
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
03

In context

Bundle-Branch Block

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Bundle-Branch Block; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Bundle-Branch Block.

Browse Bundle-Branch Block studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 729 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older (no upper age limit)
  • Optimal medical therapy for heart failure by current guidelines
  • Class IIa or IIb guideline-based indication for CRT-D implant in RBBB patients, including one of the following:

    • (NYHA) class II HF symptoms, ≤ 30% and QRS≥ 150 ms (IIb); OR
    • NYHA class III-IV a HF, LVEF ≤ 35%, and QRS duration ≥ 150 ms (IIa); OR
    • NYHA class III-IV a HF, LVEF ≤ 35%, and QRS duration 120-149 ms (IIb)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to obtain most recent imaging data from echocardiogram within 1 year prior to date of randomization
  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) morphology
  • Unable or unwilling to follow study protocol
  • Less than 12 months at consent
  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy during duration of the study
  • On heart transplant list or likely to undergo heart transplant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    His-CRT implantation

    His-CRT implantation includes implantation of three leads, an endocardial right atrial lead, an endocardial right ventricular lead, and an endocardial His-bundle pacing leads directly pacing the intrinsic conduction system.

    Procedure: His-CRT implantation

  • Active comparator
    BIV-CRT implantation

    BIV-CRT implantation includes implantation of three leads, an endocardial right atrial lead, an endocardial right ventricular lead, and an epicardial left ventricular lead implanted in a branch of the coronary sinus.

    Procedure: BIV-CRT implantation

Interventions

  • ProcedureHis-CRT implantation

    The pathophysiological process is utilized in His-Bundle corrective pacing, resulting in a faster and more homogeneous activation of the heart pacing directly via the intrinsic conduction system of the heart accompanied by a right atrial endocardial lead and a right ventricular endocardial lead.

  • ProcedureBIV-CRT implantation

    Biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy has been shown to improve outcomes by delivering synchronized electrical stimuli to the right and left ventricles utilizing an an endocardial right atrial lead, an endocardial right ventricular lead, and an epicardial left ventricular lead implanted in a branch of the coronary sinus.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at 6 months with His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT, in heart failure patients with Right bundle branch block (RBBB)

    The effect of His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT on left ventricular ejection fraction (as a percentage) measured during an echocardiography imaging study will be analyzed using an analysis of covariance model for changes in LVEF from pre-implantation (baseline) to post-implantation (6 months follow-up), with randomized treatment group as the factor of interest, and baseline LVEF as a covariate. A t-test will be performed using this model to compare the adjusted group means, and a confidence interval will be constructed for their difference.

    Time frame: 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess the mechanism of benefit with His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT by evaluating changes in ECG biomarkers

    Secondary endpoint measured on a continuous scale of paced ventricular depolarization (QRS) duration in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Assess the mechanism of benefit with His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT by evaluating changes in echocardiographic left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)

    Secondary endpoint measured from echocardiography on left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Assess the mechanism of benefit with His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT by evaluating changes in echocardiographic left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)

    Secondary endpoint measured from echocardiography on left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Assess the mechanism of benefit with His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT by evaluating changes in NT-proBNP

    Secondary endpoint of NT-proBNP in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Ascertain the mechanism of benefit on ventricular depolarization (QRS duration) over time, at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months.

    Assessing changes in QRS duration at 6, 12, 24 months in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  2. Heart failure (HF) or death events

    Assess heart Failure (HF)/death rates in the His-CRT vs. BIV-CRT arm

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

07

Study locations

14 of 14 sites recruiting
  • University of Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
    Recruiting
    • Mathew Freeman · Contact
    • Roderick Tung · Principal investigator
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kelsey Duggin · Contact
    • Eric Braunstein · Principal investigator
  • University of South Florida
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
    Recruiting
    • Jacky He · Contact
    • Bengt Herweg · Principal investigator
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
    Recruiting
    • Madison Stat · Contact
    • Nishant Verma · Principal investigator
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
    Recruiting
    • Samreen Ahmed · Contact
    • Timothy Larsen · Principal investigator
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
    Recruiting
    • Shahram Sarrafi · Contact
    • Gaurav Upadhyay · Principal investigator
  • Valley Health System
    Ridgewood, New Jersey 07450, United States
    Recruiting
    • Sequoia Young · Contact
    • Suneet Mittal · Principal investigator
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10021, United States
    Recruiting
    • Penn Collins · Contact
    • Jim Cheung · Principal investigator
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
    New York, New York 10029, United States
    Recruiting
    • Shahryar Kamran · Contact
    • Jacob Koruth · Principal investigator
  • Mission Health
    Asheville, North Carolina 28803, United States
    Recruiting
    • Jordan Dalton · Contact
    • Michael Manogue · Principal investigator
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
    Recruiting
    • Mary Gnap · Contact
    • Robert Schaller · Principal investigator
  • Geisinger Wyoming Valley
    Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania 18711, United States
    Recruiting
    • Grace Hughes · Contact
    • Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman · Principal investigator
  • University of Vermont
    Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States
    Recruiting
    • Amy Henderson · Contact
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
    Recruiting
    • Anya Baranova · Contact
    • Kenneth Ellenbogen · Principal investigator
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05265520
Responsible party
Valentina Kutyifa (Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Rochester) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 3, 2022
Start date
Dec 2, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 9, 2026

Study contacts

Ann Colasurdo
Contact
ann.colasurdo@heart.rochester.edu
585-275-1054
Mary Brown
Contact
mary.brown@heart.rochester.edu
585-273-5283
Valentina Kutyifa, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Rochester
Roderick Tung, MD
principal investigator · University of Arizona

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion