An interventional study of Deaf CBT-TS in Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety and PTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, sponsored by University of Rochester. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.
Sponsored by University of Rochester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a short, Zoom-based intervention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treatment-Seeking for Deaf Individuals (Deaf CBT-TS) can change beliefs about mental health treatment and increase treatment-seeking behaviors in Deaf adults with untreated mental health or alcohol use problems. It will also see if Deaf CBT-TS may reduce suicide risk and explore factors that may increase the effectiveness of Deaf CBT-TS. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
The proposed project is a two-arm randomized controlled trial of a zoom-based intervention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Treatment-Seeking for Deaf Individuals (Deaf CBT-TS) vs. a waitlist control, with follow-up at 2 and 4 months to assess the intervention's ability to modify beliefs about treatment (intervention principles) and increase treatment-seeking behaviors (target mechanism), as well as explore its potential to increase hope and reduce indicators of suicide risk. The investigators will also examine factors that may impact the efficacy of the intervention including levels of Deaf acculturative stress and subject residential location (Rochester, access to URMC resources vs. other locations across the U.S. with less Deaf resources). Subjects are 110 Deaf adults who report American Sign Language as their primary method of communication, have clinically significant symptoms of a mental health disorder (depression, anxiety, PTSD, insomnia, or alcohol use disorder), and are not engaged in professional mental health or alcohol specialty treatment (e.g., counseling, psychiatric services). The investigators will oversample subjects with recent suicide ideation (50%). Half of the subjects will be recruited from Rochester and the other half nationally. The Specific Aims include (1) to test whether Deaf CBT-TS engages the intervention principles and target mechanism (co-primary outcomes: changes in behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about treatment; and initiation of professional treatment); (2) to explore changes in hope and reductions in indicators of suicide risk (mental health symptoms, alcohol use, and severity of suicide ideation); and (3) to identify factors that could impact the efficacy of Deaf CBT-TS (Deaf acculturative stress and residential location).
Subjects will complete a baseline assessment including demographic information, measures of Deaf acculturative stress, hope, general mental health and functioning, alcohol use, suicide ideation, and beliefs about treatment. Subjects who complete the baseline assessment will be randomized to Deaf CBT-TS or a waitlist control, using stratified randomization based on sex assigned at birth, prior suicide attempt, and residential location (Rochester vs. other U.S. locations). During study assessments, all subjects will receive suicide risk assessments using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), with actions commensurate with risk level, and a list of Deaf crisis intervention resources. The study coordinator will review each resource on the list and explain how to use them. Study conditions are Deaf CBT-TS (2 sessions) and waitlist control. Deaf CBT-TS involves 2 intervention sessions lasting up to 90 minutes each. The follow-up assessments (2 and 4 months) include the baseline measures of hope, general mental health and functioning, alcohol use, suicide ideation, and beliefs about treatment, as well as a treatment utilization survey to assess the subjects' use of professional mental health and alcohol specialty treatment since their last study visit. Subjects in the waitlist control group who have not engaged in professional mental health or alcohol treatment will be offered the Deaf CBT-TS intervention after their 4-month follow-up assessment.
7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →University of Rochester is the lead sponsor of 729 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.
Of its 56 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (79%) have results posted.
Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion criteria:
During study assessments, subjects will receive a suicide risk assessment, with actions commensurate with risk level, and a list of Deaf crisis intervention resources with instructions provided on how to use them. The list of resources contains crisis hotlines that are accessible for Deaf individuals including text-based options (e.g., Crisis Text line, 988 text number) and options to talk with counselors in ASL (e.g., 988 ASL services, DeafLEAd Crisis Line). The study coordinator will review each resource and explain their use. Subjects will be emailed this list of resources after their assessment. Other brief interventions that could be provided based on subject presentation include encouraging subjects to seek social support and share their thoughts with others; elicitation of coping strategies; and lethal means safety planning.
Intervention Group
Behavioral: Deaf CBT-TS
Deaf CBT-TS is a two-session (90 minutes each) Zoom-based intervention designed to target a change in the beliefs that influence whether or not someone initiates mental health treatment. The intervention works by modifying problematic beliefs, providing accurate information about treatment, and problem-solving barriers. The first session is structured in four phases: (1) history of symptoms and current functioning, (2) coping strategies, (3) evaluation and modification of treatment beliefs using CBT strategies, and (4) action planning. Subjects are provided a list of resources for seeking treatment, as well as a personalized search of treatment options (conducted by the interventionist) in their area based on their insurance and language preference. The second session occurs within 3 weeks and is designed to check in with subjects regarding progress on their action plan, provide assistance in identifying treatment options, and problem-solve barriers
Beliefs About Treatment
The Perceptions About Services Scale for the Deaf (PASS-D) will be used to assess participants' behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about treatment. The Behavioral Belief subscale has 10 items assessing advantages vs. disadvantages of seeking treatment, the Normative Belief subscale has 7 items assessing community support vs. opposition to seeking treatment, and the Control Beliefs subscale has 26 items assessing facilitators vs. barriers to seeking treatment. Each item is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs. Items for each subscale will be totaled.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
Beliefs About Treatment (4 months)
The Perceptions About Services Scale for the Deaf (PASS-D) will be used to assess participants' behavioral, normative, and control beliefs about treatment. The Behavioral Belief subscale has 10 items assessing advantages vs. disadvantages of seeking treatment, the Normative Belief subscale has 7 items assessing community support vs. opposition to seeking treatment, and the Control Beliefs subscale has 26 items assessing facilitators vs. barriers to seeking treatment. Each item is rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree) with higher scores indicating more positive beliefs. Items for each subscale will be totaled.
Time frame: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
Treatment Initiation
A Treatment Utilization Survey will assess use of 12 treatment services, number of sessions attended, current treatment status (active vs. completed), reasons for seeking/not seeking treatment, and any barriers experienced. Treatment Initiation will be measured with a binary variable. Subjects who have attended, scheduled, or contacted professional treatment services will be coded as 1 (initiated treatment) and those who have not attended or scheduled professional treatment services will be coded as 0 (not initiated).
Time frame: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
Treatment Initiation (4 months)
A Treatment Utilization Survey will assess use of 12 treatment services, number of sessions attended, current treatment status (active vs. completed), reasons for seeking/not seeking treatment, and any barriers experienced. Treatment Initiation will be measured with a binary variable. Subjects who have attended, scheduled, or contacted professional treatment services will be coded as 1 (initiated treatment) and those who have not attended or scheduled professional treatment services will be coded as 0 (not initiated).
Time frame: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
Hope
Hope will be assessed via the Beck Hopelessness Scale. The scale has 20 items scored as True or False. Scores of 1 or 0 are assigned to each item depending on the subject's response and the directionality of the item. The scores are summed with for a total score ranging from 0 - 20 and higher scores indicating more hopelessness.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-months follow-up
Hope (4-months)
Hope will be assessed via the Beck Hopelessness Scale. The scale has 20 items scored as True or False. Scores of 1 or 0 are assigned to each item depending on the subject's response and the directionality of the item. The scores are summed with for a total score ranging from 0 - 20 and higher scores indicating more hopelessness.
Time frame: Baseline to 4-months follow-up
General Mental Health
General mental health will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Three of the subscales are focused on general mental health: Anxiety, Depression, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles. These subscales each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse mental health functioning. Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the three subscales will then be summed for a total score representing general mental health functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-months follow-up
General Mental Health (4 months)
General mental health will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Three of the subscales are focused on general mental health: Anxiety, Depression, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles. These subscales each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse mental health functioning. Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the three subscales will then be summed for a total score representing general mental health functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
Physical Functioning
Physical functioning will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Five of the subscales are focused on physical functioning: Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity. The subscales Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse physical functioning. The Pain Interference subscale is a single item rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the five subscales will then be summed for a total score representing physical functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
Physical Functioning (4 months)
Physical functioning will be assessed via the PROMIS-29 V2.0. The scale has 29 items divided across 8 subscales. Five of the subscales are focused on physical functioning: Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity. The subscales Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Pain Interference each have four items rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) with higher scores indicating worse physical functioning. The Pain Interference subscale is a single item rated on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Scores for each of the subscales will be summed and converted to T-scores. The T-scores for the five subscales will then be summed for a total score representing physical functioning.
Time frame: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
Alcohol Use
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 30-day alcohol consumption will be used to assess alcohol use including total number of drinking days, number of drinks per drinking day, and number of heavy episodes of drinking.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
Alcohol Use (4 months)
The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) 30-day alcohol consumption will be used to assess alcohol use including total number of drinking days, number of drinks per drinking day, and number of heavy episodes of drinking.
Time frame: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
Suicide Ideation
Suicide Ideation will be assessed via the Depressive Symptom Index Suicidality Scale. The scale has four items rated on a Likert scale from 0 - 3, with higher scores indicating a higher intensity of suicide ideation.
Time frame: Baseline to 2-month follow-up
Suicide Ideation (4 months)
Suicide Ideation will be assessed via the Depressive Symptom Index Suicidality Scale. The scale has four items rated on a Likert scale from 0 - 3, with higher scores indicating a higher intensity of suicide ideation.
Time frame: Baseline to 4-month follow-up
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.