CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03303612COME-TAVIUpdated May 8, 2025

Clinical Monitoring Strategy Versus Electrophysiology-guided Algorithmic Approach With a New LBBB After TAVI

An interventional study of Pacemaker implant and Transcutaneous cardiac monitor in Left Bundle-Branch Block and Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by Montreal Heart Institute. Recruiting at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-08.

Sponsored by Montreal Heart Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary hypothesis of the proposed study is that an electrophysiology-based algorithmic approach is superior to standard clinical follow-up with 30-day monitoring in reducing the combined endpoint of syncope, hospitalization, and death in patients in patients with new of left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Read the detailed description

The study population consists of pacemaker-free patients that are 18 years or older undergoing a TAVI with new onset left bundle branch block. Patient consent is required.

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following two groups:

Group 1: electrophysiology-based algorithmic approach

Group 2: standard clinical follow-up with transcutaneous cardiac monitoring.

02

Conditions studied

  • Left Bundle-Branch Block
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Informed consent to participate
  • Persistent new-onset LBBB after TAVI implantation (i.e. present at day 2)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) or LBBB (i.e., prior to TAVI)
  • Class I or IIA indication for PPM implantation according to management guidelines
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    EP-based approach/pacemaker implant

    Subjects will undergo an EP study prior to hospital discharge and will receive a pacemaker implantation if the HV interval is ≥65 msec. In the case where the electrical slowdown is not confirmed by the electrophysiological study, the participant will not have a pacemaker implantation.

    Device: Pacemaker implant

  • Other
    Compared transcutaneous cardiac monitor

    Subjects will undergo a minimum of 72 hour ECG monitoring in hospital and receive transcutaneous monitoring prior to hospital discharge for a duration of 30 days.

    Device: Transcutaneous cardiac monitor

Interventions

  • DevicePacemaker implant

    Patient will be in the electrophysiology laboratory. The doctor will freeze the groin area and a medication may be given to help the patient relax. A catheter will be inserted into the groin up to the heart and the heart's electrical system will be recorded.

  • DeviceTranscutaneous cardiac monitor

    Transcutaneous cardiac patches will allow continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for a 30-day period. For the first randomized patients at the Montreal Heart Institute, Icentia was used and then was changed to a m-Health® device which allows continuous cardiac monitoring. The PocketECG from m-Health® is attached to 3 electrodes on the chest and contains a SIM card that transmits to a server located in Burlington, Ontario .The COME-TAVI coordinating center and the associated site will be informed rapidly of any events that occur . These events include: Ventricular fibrillation; Sustained ventricular tachycardia Any RR interval \>5 sec; Third-degree AV block or Mobitz 2 AV block;

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with cardiovascular hospitalization, and/or syncope, and/or death after TAVI.

    This is the number of participants who experienced cardiovascular hospitalizations, and/or syncope, and/or death after TAVI.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with cardiovascular hospitalizations.

    This is the number of participants who were hospitalized for cardiovascular reasons within one-year post-TAVI.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of participants with hospitalisations (Total)

    This is the number of participants who were hospitalized one-year post-TAVI.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of participants with emergency visits.

    This is the number of participants who had emergency visits after TAVI.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of participants experiencing syncope

    This is the number of participants who experienced syncope after TAVI.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Cost-effectiveness of EP-guided procedure compared to cardiac monitoring [incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER)].

    This is the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for one strategy compared to the other.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Number of procedural complications in the group of EP-guided procedure compared to the group of cardiac monitoring.

    This is the number of procedural complications in the group of EP-guided approach compared to cardiac monitoring within 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Number of atrio-ventricular blocks in the group of EP-guided procedure compared to the group of transcutaneous cardiac monitoring.

    This is the number of atrio-ventricular blocks in the EP-guided procedure group compared to the transcutaneous cardiac monitoring group within 12 months of TAVI

    Time frame: 12 months

06

Study locations

8 of 10 sites recruiting
  • Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Kenneth Quadros, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • New Brunswick Heart Center
    Saint-John, New Brunswick, Canada
    • Satish Toal, MD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
  • QEII Health Sciences Center
    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
    • Ratika Parkash, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Madhu Natarajan, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • London Health Sciences Center (LHSC)
    London, Ontario, Canada
    • Jaimie Manlucu, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute (UOHI)
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    • Mehrdad Golian, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
    Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1J 3H5, Canada
    • Benoît Daneault, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Montreal Heart Institute
    Montreal, Quebec H1T1C8, Canada
    Recruiting
  • CIUSSS du Nord de l'Île de Mtl
    Montréal, Quebec, Canada
    • Rémi Kouz, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
    Nantes, Cedex 01, France
    • Jean-Baptiste Gourraud, MD · Principal investigator
    Not yet recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03303612
Lead sponsor
Montreal Heart Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2017
Start date
Oct 15, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 8, 2025

Study contacts

Léna Rivard, MD, MSc
Contact
lena.rivard@umontreal.ca
514-376-3330 ext. 2120
Caroline Girard, EP Prof.
Contact
caroline.girard@icm-mhi.org
514-376-3330 ext. 2905
Léna Rivard, MD, MSC
principal investigator · Montreal Heart Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion