ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04847063Updated Nov 9, 2026

Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies

A Phase 1 interventional study of Sodium Thiosulfate and 5-Fluorouracil in Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Ovarian Cancer, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2021; still recruiting 5 years later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) removes tumors in the abdomen. HIPEC is hyperthermic (heated) chemotherapy that washes the inside of the abdomen. CRS with HIPEC may help people with peritoneal carcinomatosis. These are tumors that have spread to the lining of the abdomen from other cancers. Researchers think they can improve the results of CRS with HIPEC treatment on these tumors by choosing the chemotherapy drugs used in HIPEC.

Objective:

To see if HIPEC after CRS can be improved, using either a model called the SMART (Sustained Microenvironment for Analysis of Resected Tissue) System or using 3-D cell culture (organoid) models, in order to test different chemotherapy drugs on tumors that were surgically removed prior to HIPEC treatment (these models are not attached to the body) versus tumors that were treated with HIPEC while still inside the body before being immediately surgically removed.

Eligibility:

Adults ages 18 and older who have peritoneal carcinomatosis that cannot be fully removed safely with surgery.

Design:

Participants will be screened with:

Medical history

Physical exam

Blood and urine tests

Electrocardiogram (EKG)

Computed tomography (CT) scan

Other imaging scans, as needed

Tumor biopsy, if needed

Laparoscopy (small cuts are made in the abdomen, and a tube with a light and a camera is used to see the organs in the abdomen), if needed

Participants will enroll in NIH protocol #13C0176. This allows their tumor samples to be used in future research.

Some screening tests may be repeated in the study.

Participants will have CRS. As many of their visible tumors will be removed as possible during surgery except for a few specific tumors left to receive the HIPEC treatment. Then they will receive HIPEC and the remaining tumors will be immediately removed. Participants will be in the hospital for 7-21 days after this surgery (CRS with HIPEC).

Participants will give tumor, fluid samples (from the abdomen during surgery), blood, saliva, cheek swab, and stool for research. They will complete surveys about their health and quality of life.

Participants with peritoneal mesothelioma (mesothelioma primary only) will have genetic (DNA) testing to determine clinical (CLIA level) germline BAP1 status for research use.

Participants will have follow-up visits for up to 5 years from CRS with HIPEC.

If there is disease progression, participants may have CRS with HIPEC again. Participants will then have follow-up visits for up to 5 years from the date of last CRS with HIPEC.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is uniformly fatal if untreated; improved outcomes are seen with aggressive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

The selection of chemotherapeutic agent for HIPEC is largely based on primary tumor histology and provider preference as opposed to knowledge of the potential efficacy of a specific agent for an individual patient.

HIPEC is intended to target small or microscopic residual disease following complete cytoreduction; however, the actual efficacy and additional benefit of HIPEC is in question.

Tissue response to simulated ex vivo HIPEC treatment in the SMART System or 3-D cell culture (organoid) models could inform chemotherapeutic agent selection for subsequent cytoreduction and intra-operative in vivo HIPEC treatments.

Objective:

To determine the correlation between ex vivo simulated HIPEC in the SMART System or 3-D cell culture (organoid) models, and in vivo HIPEC with respect to two measures of response to treatment: percent necrosis and Ki-67

Eligibility:

Histologically confirmed peritoneal carcinomatosis from peritoneal mesothelioma or atypical mesothelial proliferation, or from appendiceal, colorectal, or ovarian, histologies

Absence of extra-abdominal metastatic disease

Participant deemed able to undergo optimal cytoreduction

Age >= 18 years of age

Design:

This is a Phase I study of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with randomization to one of two accepted HIPEC treatment regimens as determined by primary histology.

At the time of cytoreduction, representative peritoneal tumor biopsies will be obtained before and after intra-operative in vivo HIPEC treatment.

Tumor nodules harvested before intra-operative HIPEC will be placed in either the SMART System or 3-D cell culture (organoid) models, exposed to simulated ex vivo HIPEC treatment, and then perfused or maintained in culture, with subsequent assessment

of percent necrosis and Ki-67.

Tumor nodules harvested immediately after intra-operative HIPEC will be placed in the SMART System or 3-D cell culture (organoid) models and perfused or maintained in culture, with subsequent assessment of percent necrosis and Ki-67.

The correlation of percent necrosis and Ki-67 assessment following simulated ex vivo HIPEC and intra-operative in vivo HIPEC will be determined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peritoneal Mesothelioma
  • Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • Appendiceal Cancer
  • Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation
  • Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

  • cytoreduction
  • organoid model
  • cell culture model
  • SMART System
  • Peritoneal Metastasis
  • necrosis
  • Ki-67
  • cytoreductive surgery (CRS)
03

In context

Peritoneal Neoplasms

249 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritoneal Neoplasms; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 46 across 202 interventional studies indexed under Peritoneal Neoplasms.

Browse Peritoneal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,556 studies on the registry; 336 are open to participants now.

Of its 411 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 373 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmation of peritoneal carcinomatosis from peritoneal mesothelioma or atypical mesothelial proliferation, or from appendiceal, colorectal, or ovarian, histologies by the Laboratory of Pathology, NCI.
  • Measurable or evaluable disease as defined by v1.1. criteria and/or by peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score.
  • Participants must be assessed to be able to undergo optimal cytoreduction (i.e., completeness of cytoreduction score of 1 or 0) with laparoscopically assessed PCI score threshold as indicated below:

    • Primary Histology: Appendiceal/Colorectal/Ovarian / PCI Cutoff for Eligibility: Total Score \< 20 (out of 39 possible points)
    • Primary Histology: Mesothelioma or atypical mesothelial proliferation / PCI Cutoff for Eligibility: Total Score \<= 30 (out of 39 possible points)
  • Age >= 18 years.
  • performance status \<= 1 ( >= 80%).
  • Participants must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:

    • >= 1,000/mcL
    • >= 75,000/mcL
    • Total within \<=1.5x institutional (ULN)
    • (SGOT)/ ALT (SGPT) \<= 3x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN), or \<= 5.0x ULN in participants with liver (only)
    • Creatinine within normal institutional limits

OR

-- >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 for participants with creatinine levels above institutional normal calculated using .

  • Because therapeutic agents used in this trial are known to be teratogenic, individuals of (IOCBP) and individuals who are able to father a child must agree to use adequate (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for 180 days after last study treatment.
  • Ability of participant to understand and the willingness to sign a written document.
  • Ability and willingness of the participant to co-enroll on the tissue collection protocol 13C0176, Tumor, Normal Tissue and Specimens from Patients Undergoing Evaluation or Surgical Resection of Solid Tumors .

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Participants with known extra-abdominal disease from the participant s appendiceal, colorectal, ovarian, or peritoneal mesothelioma primary.
  • Participants who have received intraperitoneal chemotherapy or other anti-cancer therapy within the last 4 weeks prior to the start of study treatment.
  • Participants who have undergone major surgery within the last 12 weeks prior to the start of study treatment.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to platinum-containing compounds.
  • History of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (only participants with appendiceal or colorectal cancer).
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant individuals are excluded from this study because the protocol involves major abdominal surgery and chemotherapeutic agents with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Note: Due to an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the participant, nursing (including breastfeeding) should be discontinued if the participant is undergoing treatment (i.e., nursing participants must agree to discontinue nursing activities).
  • -positive participants with detectable viral load despite antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of participants increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive therapy. HIV-positive participants who have undetectable viral load on antiretroviral therapy may be considered for this study only after consultation with a NIAID physician.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1/ HIPEC: Oxaliplatin Randomized treatment assignment

    HIPEC with intraperitoneal oxaliplatin and IV 5-FU, randomly assigned

    Drug: 5-Fluorouracil · Drug: Oxaliplatin · Procedure: Hyperthermic Intraperitonial Chemotherapy

  • Experimental
    2/ HIPEC: Mitomycin C Randomized treatment assignment

    HIPEC with intraperitoneal mitomycin C, randomly assigned

    Procedure: Hyperthermic Intraperitonial Chemotherapy · Drug: Mitomycin C

  • Experimental
    3/ HIPEC: Cisplatin, Doxorubicin Randomized treatment assignment

    HIPEC with intraperitoneal cisplatin and doxorubicin, in addition to IV sodium thiosulfate, randomly assigned

    Drug: Sodium Thiosulfate · Drug: Doxorubicin · Procedure: Hyperthermic Intraperitonial Chemotherapy · Drug: Cisplatin

  • Experimental
    4/ HIPEC: Cisplatin, Mitomycin C Randomized treatment assignment

    HIPEC with intraperitoneal cisplatin and mitomycin C, in addition to IV sodium thiosulfate, randomly assigned

    Drug: Sodium Thiosulfate · Procedure: Hyperthermic Intraperitonial Chemotherapy · Drug: Cisplatin · Drug: Mitomycin C

Interventions

  • Part of Arms 3 and 4, for cisplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride

  • Part of Arm 1, for oxaliplatin-based HIPEC: intravenous 5-fluorouracil given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 in 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 10 minutes, co-administered with intravenous leucovorin at 20 mg/m2 in a separate bag of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride

  • Arm 1, intraperitoneal (IP) Oxaliplatin: 200 mg/m2 for 90 minutes, mixed in 250 mL of 5% dextrose solution. For oxaliplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous 5-fluorouracil given at a dose of 400 mg/m2 in 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 10 minutes, co-administered with intravenous leucovorin at 20 mg/m2 in a separate bag of 250 mL 0.9% sodium chloride

  • Part of Arm 3: intraperitoneal (IP) Doxorubicin co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin

  • ProcedureHyperthermic Intraperitonial Chemotherapy

    Hyperthermic Intraperitonial Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with with standardized doses of chemotherapeutic agents as indicated by the subject's Arm assignment

  • Part of Arms 3 and 4, intraperitoneal (IP)cisplatin co-therapy: 75 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, mixed in 1 L of 0.9% sodium chloride. For cisplatin-based HIPEC, intravenous sodium thiosulfate given as a loading dose of 7.5 g/m2 in 150 mL 0.9% sodium chloride at the time of introducing cisplatin into the perfusion circuit, followed by a 12-hour pump-based infusion of 25.56 g/m2 in 1 L 0.9% sodium chloride

  • Arm 2, intraperitoneal (IP) Mitomycin C monotherapy: dosing divided into two 60-mL syringes, 30 mg per syringe. 30 mg will be given at time = 0, and the remaining 10 mg of the dose will be given at time = 60 minutes. Part of Arm 4: Mitomycin C co-therapy 15 mg/m2 for 60 minutes, given at time = 0 with cisplatin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the correlation between ex vivo simulated HIPEC in the SMART System or 3-D cell culture (organoid) models, and in vivo HIPEC with respect to two measures of response to treatment: percent necrosis and Ki-67

    percent necrosis and Ki-67 scores will be obtained and used to determine the correlation between each measure by ex vivo simulated HIPEC in the SMART System or 3-D cell culture (organoid) models, and by in vivo intra-operative HIPEC

    Time frame: approx. 4 days post-HIPEC

Secondary outcomes

  1. To measure Quality of Life by FACT-C and EQ-5D-5L

    outcomes from QOL will be reported using descriptive statistics, as well as comparing the results from before to after treatment: physical and mental health-related quality of life, social and emotional wellbeing, and disease-related symptoms

    Time frame: baseline, every 3 months post-treatment for 2 years, than every 6 months for a total of 5 years

  2. To evaluate overall survival for up to 5 years after (last) CRS and HIPEC

    median amount of time participant survives from (last) CRS and HIPEC until death or for up to 5 years post-treatment

    Time frame: death or 5 years post-treatment

  3. To assess germline BAP1 status as a prognostic indicator for progression-free survival (PFS) in participants with peritoneal mesothelioma treated with CRS and HIPEC

    Kaplan Meier curves reported separately by BAP1 germline mutation status to describe PFS in participants with peritoneal mesothelioma (only) with and without BAP1 germline mutations

    Time frame: baseline

  4. To estimate the peritoneal progression-free survival probability

    median amount of time participant survives from time of cytoreduction until peritoneal progression, determined for the individual cohorts and treatment arms and compared between arms within cohorts

    Time frame: baseline, every 3 months post-treatment for 2 years, than every 6 months for a total of 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
    Recruiting
    • For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact National Cancer Institute Referral Office · Contact888-624-1937
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD recorded in the medical record will be shared with intramural investigators upon request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Clinical data available during the study and indefinitely.

Access criteria: Clinical data will be made available via subscription to BTRIS and with the permission of the study PI.

09

Timeline

7 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2033, 146 months after the start.

Of 27 phase 1 interventional studies under Peritoneal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 70 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 39 and three quarters within 105. This study's planned 146 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 14, 2021
First posted
Apr 15, 2021
StartActual
Oct 19, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2033
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2034
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: description and verification date
7 updates, last Nov 9, 2026
Show all 7 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  2. Nov 5, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  3. Nov 3, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  4. Oct 29, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  5. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date
  6. Oct 8, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description
  7. Oct 2, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04847063
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2021
Start date
Oct 19, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Stephanie N Canady, R.N.
Contact
stephanie.canady@nih.gov
(240) 858-7573
Andrew M Blakely, M.D.
Contact
andrew.blakely@nih.gov
(240) 760-7647
Andrew M Blakely, M.D.
principal investigator · National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Sodium thiosulfate · Fluorouracil · Oxaliplatin · Doxorubicin · Cisplatin · Mitomycin

Start the discussion