ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT04271709Updated Oct 16, 2026

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)

An interventional study of Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators and Usual Care in Glaucoma, Vision Impairment and Blindness and Cataract, sponsored by Columbia University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2019, registered Feb 2020).
Updated Oct 16, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
749
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators are conducting a 5-year prospective, 2:1 cluster-randomized controlled trial, funded by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which provides vision screenings to underserved New York City residents living in affordable housing buildings in Harlem and Washington Heights.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to increase engagement, detection and management of glaucoma, vision impairment, cataracts, and other eye diseases in vulnerable populations living in New York City. This study considers disparities by race, ethnicity, gender, geography, and socioeconomic status using innovative approaches such as patient navigators. Individuals over the age of 40 living in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) Housing buildings are eligible.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma
  • Vision Impairment and Blindness
  • Cataract
  • Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Eye Diseases

Keywords

  • Vision Screening
  • Follow-up Eye Care
  • Vulnerable Populations
  • New York City
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 223 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 749 is above the median of 61 across 964 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,136 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 148 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals over age 40
  • Living independently in NYCHA housing building or attending DFTA Senior Center
  • Willing to answer COVID-19 symptom questions
  • Willing to consent for 2 vision screening visits at baseline and 12-month follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported terminal illness with less than 1 year
  • Inability to provide due to dementia or other reasons
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
749 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced Intervention

    Consented subjects living in buildings randomized to the Patient Navigator Intervention arm who failed the screening and needed vision correction received free eyeglasses, which were fitted by an optician at the housing building. If they were referred to an ophthalmologist for a follow-up eye exam, they received enhanced support with patient navigators to assist with follow-up eye exams at Columbia Ophthalmology or Harlem Hospital, specifically eye exam appointment scheduling and arranging transportation over a 1-year period.

    Behavioral: Enhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual Care

    Consented subjects living in buildings randomized to Usual Care arm who failed the screening and needed vision correction were given an eyeglasses prescription and a list of optical shops within 1 mile from their home. These subjects who are referred to an ophthalmologist for a follow-up eye exam were only scheduled for their initial appointment at either Columbia Ophthalmology or Harlem Hospital. They did not receive enhanced support. Scheduling this initial appointment allowed tracking of adherence.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralEnhanced Intervention Using Patient Navigators

    Enhanced support by patient navigators assisted with follow-up eye exam appointment scheduling and arranging transportation over a 1-year period.

  • OtherUsual Care

    Usual Care subjects who failed the screening and needed vision correction were given an eyeglasses prescription and a list of optical shops within 1 mile from their home. These subjects did not receive enhanced support. Scheduling this initial appointment will allow tracking of adherence.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects with Visual Acuity Worse than 20/40

    Visual acuity (VA) is a measure of the spatial resolution of the visual processing system. Visual acuity will be measured in each eye and measured as ≤20/40 or \>20/40. Since there are two best corrected distance visual acuity measurements per person (right eye and left eye), the visual acuity in the worse eye will be used in the analysis and reported at the patient level, rather than the eye level. Visual acuity analysis will be handled as a dichotomous variable and the proportion of subjects with visual acuity 20/40 or worse will be considered abnormal.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sapru S, Berktold J, Crews JE, Katz LJ, Hark L, Girkin CA, Owsley C, Francis B, Saaddine JB. Applying RE-AIM to evaluate two community-based programs designed to improve access to eye care for those at high-risk for glaucoma. Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 21. PubMed 28689028 ↗
  • Hark L, Acito M, Adeghate J, Henderer J, Okudolo J, Malik K, Molineaux J, Eburuoh R, Zhan T, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Ocular Findings at Two Health Centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(4):1400-1415. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0103. PubMed 30449754 ↗
  • Pizzi LT, Waisbourd M, Hark L, Sembhi H, Lee P, Crews JE, Saaddine JB, Steele D, Katz LJ. Costs of a community-based glaucoma detection programme: analysis of the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;102(2):225-232. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310078. Epub 2017 Jun 27. PubMed 28655730 ↗
  • Waisbourd M, Shafa A, Delvadia R, Sembhi H, Molineaux J, Henderer J, Pizzi LT, Myers JS, Hark LA, Katz LJ. Bilateral Same-day Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. J Glaucoma. 2016 Oct;25(10):e821-e825. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000409. PubMed 26950579 ↗
  • Hark LA, Radakrishnan A, Madhava M, Anderson-Quinones C, Fudemberg S, Robinson D, Myers JS, Zhan T, Adeghate J, Hegarty S, Leite S, Leiby BE, Stempel S, Katz LJ. Awareness of ocular diagnosis, transportation means, and barriers to ophthalmology follow-up in the Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study. Soc Work Health Care. 2019 Aug;58(7):651-664. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2019.1614711. Epub 2019 May 23. PubMed 31120381 ↗
  • Hark LA, Adeghate J, Katz LJ, Ulas M, Waisbourd M, Maity A, Zhan T, Hegarty S, Leiby BE, Pasquale LR, Leite S, Saaddine JB, Haller JA, Myers JS. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study: Cataract Classifications Following Eye Screening. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Aug;26(8):992-1000. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0170. Epub 2019 Nov 13. PubMed 31721654 ↗
  • Adeghate JO, Hark LA, Brown H, Henderer JD, Waisbourd M, Molineaux J, Malik K, Maity A, Chuang D, Donches K, Heres C, Eburuoh R, Schardt M, Yu D, Ramsey F, Myers JS, Katz LJ. Philadelphia glaucoma detection and treatment project: ocular outcomes and adherence to follow-up at a single health centre. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;54(6):717-722. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Sep 19. PubMed 31836105 ↗
  • Hark LA, Myers JS, Pasquale LR, Razeghinejad MR, Maity A, Zhan T, Hegarty SE, Leiby BE, Waisbourd M, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Henderer JD, Haller JA, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Intraocular Pressure Measurements Found in a Population at High Risk for Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2019 Apr;28(4):294-301. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001207. PubMed 30946709 ↗
  • Hark LA, Myers JS, Ines A, Jiang A, Rahmatnejad K, Zhan T, Leiby BE, Hegarty S, Fudemberg SJ, Mantravadi AV, Waisbourd M, Henderer JD, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Pizzi LT, Murchison AP, Saaddine J, Pasquale LR, Haller JA, Katz LJ. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: confirmation between eye screening and comprehensive eye examination diagnoses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;103(12):1820-1826. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313451. Epub 2019 Feb 15. PubMed 30770354 ↗
  • Hark LA, Katz LJ, Myers JS, Waisbourd M, Johnson D, Pizzi LT, Leiby BE, Fudemberg SJ, Mantravadi AV, Henderer JD, Zhan T, Molineaux J, Doyle V, Divers M, Burns C, Murchison AP, Reber S, Resende A, Bui TDV, Lee J, Crews JE, Saaddine JB, Lee PP, Pasquale LR, Haller JA. Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-up Study: Methods and Screening Results. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;181:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 30. PubMed 28673747 ↗
  • Leiby BE, Hegarty SE, Zhan T, Myers JS, Katz LJ, Haller JA, Waisbourd M, Burns C, Divers M, Molineaux J, Henderer J, Brodowski C, Hark LA. A Randomized Trial to Improve Adherence to Follow-up Eye Examinations Among People With Glaucoma. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 May 20;18:E52. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200567. PubMed 34014814 ↗
  • Newman-Casey PA, Hark LA, Rhodes LA. It Is Time to Rethink Adult Glaucoma Screening Recommendations. J Glaucoma. 2023 Feb 1;32(2):69-71. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002146. Epub 2022 Nov 25. No abstract available. PubMed 36696354 ↗
  • De Moraes CG, Hark LA, Saaddine J. Screening and Interventions for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine (SIGHT) Studies. J Glaucoma. 2021 May 1;30(5):369-370. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001782. No abstract available. PubMed 33428354 ↗
  • Hark LA, Kresch YS, De Moraes CG, Horowitz JD, Park L, Auran JD, Gorroochurn P, Stempel S, Maruri SC, Stidham EM, Banks AZ, Saaddine JB, Lambert BC, Pizzi LT, Sapru S, Price S, Williams OA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study in Vulnerable Populations (NYC-SIGHT): Design and Methodology. J Glaucoma. 2021 May 1;30(5):388-394. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001795. PubMed 33492894 ↗
  • Hark LA, Lin WV, Hirji S, Gorroochurn P, Horowitz JD, Diamond DF, Park L, Wang Q, Auran JD, Maruri SC, Henriquez DR, Sharma T, Valenzuela I, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Friedman DS, Harizman N. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Subanalysis of Referral to Ophthalmology. Curr Eye Res. 2024 Feb;49(2):197-206. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2023.2269614. Epub 2024 Jan 18. PubMed 37812506 ↗
  • Horowitz JD, Adeghate JO, Karani R, Henriquez DR, Gorroochurn P, Sharma T, Park L, Wang Q, Diamond DF, Harizman N, Auran JD, Maruri SC, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Hark LA. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study: (NYC-SIGHT)Tele-Retinal Image Findings and Importance of Photography. Telemed J E Health. 2024 Mar;30(3):664-676. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0134. Epub 2023 Sep 1. PubMed 37651209 ↗
  • Hark LA, Tan CS, Kresch YS, De Moraes CG, Horowitz JD, Park L, Auran JD, Gorroochurn P, Stempel S, Maruri SC, Besagar S, Saaddine JB, Lambert BC, Pizzi LT, Sapru S, Price S, Williams OA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study in Vulnerable Populations: 1-Month Feasibility Results. Curr Eye Res. 2021 Oct;46(10):1597-1604. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1905000. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PubMed 33726583 ↗
  • Hark LA, Horowitz JD, Gorroochurn P, Park L, Wang Q, Diamond DF, Harizman N, Auran JD, Maruri SC, Henriquez DR, Carrion J, Muhire RSM, Kresch YS, Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E, Sapru S, Sharma T, De Moraes CG, Friedman DS, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Baseline Results and Costs of a Cluster-Randomized Trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;251:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Jan 21. PubMed 36690289 ↗
  • Sapru S, Price SM, Hark LA, Rhodes LA, Newman-Casey PA. Recruiting Populations at Higher Risk for Glaucoma and Other Eye Diseases Experiencing Eye Health Disparities. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Jun;31(3):220-228. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2232038. Epub 2023 Jul 5. PubMed 37408319 ↗
  • Hark LA, Wang Y, Gorroochurn P, Simon PR, Maruri SC, Henriquez DR, Diamond DF, Horowitz JD, Park L, Wang Q, Auran JD, Carrion J, Friedman DS, Liebmann JL, Cioffi GA, Harizman N. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): a nested cross-sectional assessment of falls risk within a cluster randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 22;108(12):1761-1768. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-323052. PubMed 38609163 ↗
  • Hark LA, Gorroochurn P, Tang H, Torres DR, Blackburn B, Maruri SC, Diamond DF, Harizman N, Wang Q, Wang Y, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Horowitz JD, Park L. Improvement in vision-related quality-of-life using the NEI-VFQ-9 over 1-year in the Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;263(7):2069-2079. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06727-z. Epub 2025 Jan 15. PubMed 39812799 ↗
  • Wang Q, Valenzuela IA, Harizman N, Gorroochurn P, Torres DR, Maruri SC, Diamond DF, Horowitz JD, Friedman DS, De Moraes CG, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM, Hark LA. Glaucoma Screening and Referral Risk Factors in a High-Risk Population: Follow-Up Study of the Manhattan Vision Screening Study. J Glaucoma. 2025 Mar 1;34(3):164-174. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002521. Epub 2024 Nov 26. PubMed 39792808 ↗
  • Diamond DF, Kresch YS, Gorroochurn P, Park L, Horowitz JD, Wang Q, Maruri SC, Henriquez DR, Harizman N, Carrion J, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Hark LA. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Vision and refractive error results. Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Mar;108(2):183-190. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2322523. Epub 2024 Mar 7. PubMed 38452798 ↗
  • Hark LA, Gorroochurn P, Pizzi LT, Jutkowitz E, Goulak AM, Maruri SC, Harizman N, Horowitz JD, Park L, Wang Q, Diamond DF, Valenzuela IA, Torres DR, Wang Y, Sharma T, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA. Patient Navigators Improve In-Office Eye Exam Adherence After Community Eye Screenings in a Randomized Clinical Trial: NYC-SIGHT Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun;274:54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.02.030. Epub 2025 Feb 26. PubMed 40015588 ↗
  • Diamond DF, Hirji S, Xing SX, Gorroochurn P, Horowitz JD, Wang Q, Park L, Harizman N, Maruri SC, Henriquez DR, Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA, Hark LA. Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): optometric exam improves access and utilization of eye care services. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 May;262(5):1619-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06344-2. Epub 2024 Jan 8. PubMed 38189973 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2029, 119 months after the start.

Of 229 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Glaucoma, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 119 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 287 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 53.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 16, 2026: primary completion Sep 2025 → Sep 2029 and completion Sep 2026 → Sep 2029.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 13, 2020
First posted
Feb 17, 2020
StartActual
Sep 30, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Sep 29, 2029was Sep 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 29, 2029was Sep 2026
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Sep 29, 2025→Sep 29, 2029
Oct 16, 2026
Study completion
Sep 29, 2026→Sep 29, 2029
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 29, 2025→Sep 29, 2029
    Study completion Sep 29, 2026→Sep 29, 2029
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04271709
Responsible party
Lisa Hark, PhD, MBA (Professor of Ophthalmic Sciences, Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2020
Start date
Sep 30, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 29, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 29, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Lisa A. Hark, PhD, RD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion