ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07803536Updated Nov 9, 2026

Effect of Late Ripcord Removal From Glaucoma Drainage Device

An interventional study of Ripcord removal in GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder) and Glaucoma, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a research study to find out if removing the ripcord from a glaucoma drainage device more than 3 months after it has been placed has any effect on intraocular pressure. Participation in research studies is voluntary.

The ripcord will be removed at a routine glaucoma care visit and intraocular pressure will be measured before removal, 30 minutes following, and at 1 week, 6 weeks and 3-month intervals during regular clinic visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder)
  • Glaucoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • glaucoma drainage device
  • ripcord
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 223 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 61 across 964 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 18 years
  • Placement of Ahmed Clear Path or Baervelt drainage device with ripcord > 3 months
  • Diagnosis of Glaucoma, under active management at Duke Eye Center Glaucoma Clinic
  • Ripcord suture still in place and accessible for removal
  • Able to provide written
  • IOP > 10 mm Hg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ocular infection or conjunctivitis in either eye
  • Inability to undergo ripcord removal procedure
  • Scheduled for further glaucoma surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ripcord removal

    Procedure: Ripcord removal

Interventions

  • ProcedureRipcord removal

    Patients who have had a ripcord in place for greater than 3 months postoperatively will undergo ripcord removal in the office.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in intraocular pressure (IOP)

    Change in intraocular pressure

    Time frame: Immediately after, 1 week, 6 weeks and 3-month intervals

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Drop Burden

    Measured by the number of participants who miss drop doses

    Time frame: 1 week, 6 week and 3 month interval

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Sep 2028, 21 months later.

Of 229 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Glaucoma, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 287 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 53.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Dec 2026, on Nov 9, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 31, 2026
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 2028
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 9, 2026
Sites
Duke University Eye Center is now Recruiting
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026→Dec 2026
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Duke University Eye Center is now Recruiting
    Start date Sep 2026→Dec 2026
    + 2 other changes: verification date and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07803536
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Jonathan Shepherd
Contact
j_shepherd0829@email.campbell.edu
(919) 681-3937
Leon W Herndon, MD
principal investigator · Duke University Eye Center

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion