ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03483870Updated Sep 9, 2021

Effect of Granisetron on Morphine Induced Pruritus in Cesarean Section

A Phase 2 interventional study of Morphine Sulfate and Placebo in Pruritus, sponsored by Assiut University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-09.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 17 studies in Pruritus with a site in Egypt — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Pruritus · Egypt.

Enrollment
7th of 16
80 · median 75
Started
2018
the only one that year
Phase 2
5 of 17
1 open now
Registered
2nd of 17
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 17
Assiut University

Among the 17 studies in Pruritus with a site in Egypt, this one is the 7th largest by enrollment of the 16 interventional ones that give a count, is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 5 in phase 2, and was the 2nd registered.

Pruritus

491 studies on the registry are indexed under Pruritus; 94 are open to participants now.

Browse Pruritus studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 17 studies in Pruritus with a site in Egypt are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Egypt have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Egypt →

Who these studies take

Of the 54 Pruritus studies recruiting now, 22 (41%) set no upper age limit and 24 (44%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 10 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 20 Years to 40 Years · female · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Pruritus with a site in Egypt, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Neuraxial anesthesia, which includes epidural anesthesia and intrathecal anesthesia, is a frequent anesthetic approach for caesarean delivery and other lower abdominal and lower limb anesthetic procedures. The addition of neuraxial morphine to local anesthetics provides an effective and prolonged postoperative analgesia. Neuraxial administration of morphine which is considered as a gold standard for analgesia has been associated with a frequent incidence of pruritus and postoperative nausea and vomiting.

The incidence of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus varies widely from 30% - 60% after orthopedic surgery with intrathecal morphine injection and from 60% - 100% in pregnant women after neuraxial opioid administration. Parturients appear to be the most susceptible to neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus which probably might be due to the interaction of estrogens with opioid receptors.

Although the exact mechanism of neuraxial opioid induced pruritus is unclear, the postulated mechanisms include the presence of an "itch center" in the central nervous system (CNS), medullary dorsal horn activation, antagonism of inhibitory transmitters, modulation of 5-hydroxytryptamine subtype 3 (5-HT3) or serotonergic pathways and the involvement of prostaglandins.

There is dense concentration of opioid receptors and 5-HT3 receptors in the dorsal part of the spinal cord and the nucleus of the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve in the medulla. Activation of these receptors by neuraxial opioid administration or by circulating estrogen in parturients results in neuraxial opioid induced pruritus which is usually localized to the face, neck, or upper thorax. Nalbuphine, propofol and ondansetron have been used effectively in the treatment of pruritus associated with neuraxial morphine in surgical patients.

Granisetron is a potent and highly selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that has little or no affinity for other 5-HT receptors, or dopaminergic, adrenergic, benzodiazepine, histaminic, or opioid receptors. Its onset of action is 1-3 min, peak plasma level 30 min, plasma half-life is 4-6 h and duration of action up to 24 h. Its longer duration of action than that of ondansetron may coincide with the peak incidence of pruritus after intrathecal morphine (6-9 h). In contrast, other 5-HT3-receptor antagonists have affinities for various receptor-binding sites. For example, ondansetron has detectable binding to 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C, α1-adrenergic, and μ-opioid receptor sites. Although not proven, the binding of these agents to additional receptor subtypes other than their target receptor may underlie the inferior adverse event profile seen with ondansetron compared with granisetron.

Read the detailed description

The study will be carried on 40 parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section (CS) under intrathecal anesthesia. They will be randomly allocated into two equal groups of 20 parturients each:

Group A: (placebo group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally \& 2 mL of normal saline 0.9%.

Group B: (treatment group) will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally \& 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection.

Preoperative assessment:

The day prior to surgery, all patients will undergo preanesthetic checkup including detailed history, thorough general, physical, systemic examination and weight of the patient. They will be kept NOP (nil per mouth) 6-8 hours for solids and 2 hours for water and clear fluids.

Preparation of the patients:

Written consent, coagulation profile, emergency resuscitation equipments including airway devices, advanced cardiac life support drugs. Parturients will be educated regarding the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Parturients in the holding area:

The patients will be positioned in the supine position, with uterine displacement to the left lateral side.

  • Baseline monitoring readings of the maternal vital signs including Heart rate (HR), noninvasive systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR).
  • Then IV cannula 18 G will be inserted into forearm vein and normal saline 0.9% solution 15 ml/kg will be infused for all women participating in the study over 20-30 minutes as a preload.
  • The study drugs will be given 30 min before administration of intrathecal anesthesia.
  • All patients will be premedicated with ranitidine 50 mg IV and then they will be transferred to the operating room.

Parturient in the operating room:

The previous monitoring data will be recorded again for the second time. Then subarachnoid block will be carried out under complete aseptic condition in the sitting position with the table in the horizontal level using 25 G pencil point spinal needle. Intrathecal block will be performed at the level of L 3-4 or L 4-5 vertebral interspaces; 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally at a rate of 1 ml/15 second after obtaining free flow of CSF. Immediately after end of injection of the drugs intrathecally, the parturient will be placed in the supine position with left lateral uterine displacement by putting a wedge under right hip (15ﹾ left-tilted supine position). All patients will receive supplemental oxygen 4 L/min via facemask until delivery of the baby. Sensory block will be assessed using loss of sensation in response to cold sensation (using ice cube). Surgery will start when the maximum height of sensory block reaches T6 or higher. Motor blockade will be assessed by modified Bromage scale (1 = unable to move feet or knees; 2 = able to move feet only; 3 = just able to move knees; 4 = full flexion of knees; 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; 6 = able to perform partial knee bend).

A third monitoring reading of the vital data will be taken immediately, 5 min and 10 min after spinal block and before the surgical operation (CS) starts.

Intraoperative assessment:

  • After subarachnoid block parturients will be monitored for HR, NIBP, SpO2 and RR every 5 min till the end of the surgery. All parturients will be continuously monitored intraoperatively for any episodes of hypotension or bradycardia. Hypotension: defined as more than 20% decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure from the baseline. It will be treated with IV crystalloid fluid bolus and/or 3 mg IV ephedrine boluses when needed. Bradycardia defined as maternal heart rate \< 60 beats/min. If occurred, it will be treated with IV atropine sulphate 0.5mg.
  • After delivery of the baby, IV oxytocin 5 U will be administered slowly followed by an oxytocin infusion 0.03 U/mL at a rate of 200 mL/hr.

Study outcomes:

Primary outcome:

Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.

Secondary outcomes:

  1. Onset time of pruritus
  2. Duration, location of pruritus and severity of pruritus according to the pruritus grading score The pruritus grading system (PGS) score for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep.

    Pruritus Grading System

    Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as:

    • Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3
    • Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5
    • Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5
    • Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6

    Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5.

    Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11.

    Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19.

    The onset of pruritus will be assessed and recorded every 15 min for 4 hours along with the complaint by the patient. Pruritus scores will then be evaluated at 4, 8 and 24 hours post-surgery. For patients with pruritus who request treatment, antihistamines such as pheniramine maleate and μ-opioid receptor antagonists such as naloxone will be used depending upon the severity assessed by the clinician, if required.

  3. Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale (Fig. 1) is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain.

    Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.

  4. Perioperative adverse events will be recorded, including nausea, vomiting (treated with 10 mg IV metoclopramide), intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR \< 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.
  5. Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery: 1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.

Serum serotonin measurment:

Two blood samples (2 mL each) will be withdrawn from each parturient. One sample will be withdrawn in the holding area before preload infusion and granisetron injection (basal reading for serum serotonin) and the other one will be withdrawn 6 hours after intrathecal morphine injection in both groups. Repeated freezing and thawing of the samples should be avoided. Hemolytic and especially lipemic serum samples should not be used with this assay. Storage: up to 6 hours at 2 - 8ºC; for longer periods (up to 6 months) at - 20 ºC.

Intended use and principle of the test: Enzyme Immunoassay for the quantitative determination of serotonin in serum. In the first step, serotonin is quantitatively acylated. The subsequent competitive ELISA kit uses the microtiter plate format. The antigen is bound to the solid phase of the microtiter plate. The acylated standards, controls and samples and the solid phase bound analyte compete for a fixed number of antiserum binding sites. After the system is in equilibrium, free antigen and free antigen-antiserum complexes are removed by washing. The antibody bound to the solid phase is detected by an anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase conjugate using TMB as a substrate. The reaction is monitored at 450 nm.

Quantification of unknown samples is achieved by comparing their absorbance with a reference curve prepared with known standard concentrations. Expected reference values in serum: Males: 80 - 450 ng/ml and females: 40 - 400 ng/ml

03

Conditions studied

  • Pruritus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Granisetron
  • Serum Serotonin
  • Morphine
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parturients of (ASA) class I or II physical status.
  • Age: 20-40 years.
  • At term gestation (≥ 37 weeks) with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy.
  • Elective cesarean delivery under intrathecal anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parturient refusal.
  • Significant organ dysfunctions (e.g., cardiac, respiratory, renal, or liver disorders).
  • Morbid obesity ( >35).
  • Parturients with known to granisetron, morphine or amide local anesthetics.
  • Parturients with pruritogenic systemic disease.
  • A coexisting skin disorder or preexisting pregnancy induced pruritus.
  • Parturients with any for intrathecal anesthesia, e.g. coagulopathy.
  • Emergency cesarean section.
  • Psychiatric disorders.
  • Fetal abnormalities.
  • Failed or unsatisfactory intrathecal block.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Morphine sulphate & Placebo

    20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of normal saline 0.9% (placebo) IV injection preoperative.

    Drug: Morphine Sulfate · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Morphine sulphate & Granisetron

    20 parturients under intrathecal anesthesia will receive 200 ug morphine sulphate intrathecally and 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection preoperative.

    Drug: Morphine Sulfate · Drug: Granisetron

Interventions

  • 200 ug morphine sulphate will be injected intrathecally

  • DrugPlacebo

    2 mL of normal saline 0.9% IV injection

    Also known as: Normal saline 0.9%

  • 2 mL of 2 mg granisetron IV injection

    Also known as: Kytril, Sancuso

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of pruritus during the first postoperative 24 hours.

    The effect of prophylactic intravenous (IV) administration of granisetron on incidence and severity of pruritus that occurs after intrathecal morphine in parturients undergoing cesarean section (CS).

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Onset time of pruritus

    Recording the time when itching began

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. The pruritus grading system (PGS)

    The pruritus grading system (PGS) score (Firas et al, 2012) for each patient is based on: distribution, frequency, severity of itch and quality of sleep. Each patient's itch grade is calculated as the sum of the individual scores as: Distribution:Solitary site 1, Multiple sites 2, Generalized 3 Frequency: Episodic 1, Frequent 3, Continuous 5 Severity: Rubbing 1, Scratching 1, Localized excoriations 3, Generalized excoriations 5 Sleep disturbance: Rare 0, Occasional 2, Frequent 4,Totally restless 6 Mild grade: if total score is between 0 and 5. Moderate grade: if total score is between 6 and 11. Severe grade: if total score is between 12 and 19.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Postoperative pain assessment

    Postoperative pain assessment, by a blinded Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) nurse using VAS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours after intrathecal morphine injection. Visual analog scale is a validated approach to pain measurement (Wood, 2004). The most common VAS consists of a 10-cm line with one end labeled "no pain" and the other end labeled "worst pain imaginable." The patient marks the line at the point that best describes the pain intensity. The length of the line to the patient's mark is measured and recorded in millimeters. The main theoretical advantage of the VAS is that it does not limit pain to 10 discrete levels of intensity, permitting a more detailed rating of pain. Rescue analgesia will be given in the form of perfalgan (paracetamol) 1 gm/ 6 h (max 4 gm per day) IV infusion and/or pethidine (meperidine) 1 mg/ kg IM when VAS is greater than 4.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Perioperative adverse events

    Nausea, vomiting, intraoperative shortness of breath and respiratory depression (RR \< 8 breaths/ min), and postoperative headache in the first 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. Participants' satisfaction after end of the delivery

    1) not satisfied or 2) satisfied and willing to take the same medication and procedure in the future when indicated.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Assiut University Hospital
    Assiut, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kumar K, Singh SI. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jul;29(3):303-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.117045. PubMed 24106351 ↗
  • Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS. Opioid-induced pruritus: repeated vs single dose ondansetron administration in preventing pruritus after intrathecal morphine. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Nov;83(5):822-3. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.5.822. No abstract available. PubMed 10690153 ↗
  • Koju RB, Gurung BS, Dongol Y. Prophylactic administration of ondansetron in prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus and post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing caesarean section. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Feb 17;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-15-18. PubMed 25971957 ↗
  • Szarvas S, Harmon D, Murphy D. Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2003 May;15(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00501-9. PubMed 12770663 ↗
  • Blower P. A pharmacologic profile of oral granisetron (Kytril tablets). Semin Oncol. 1995 Aug;22(4 Suppl 10):3-5. No abstract available. PubMed 7570052 ↗
  • Breen TW, Shapiro T, Glass B, Foster-Payne D, Oriol NE. Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient. Anesth Analg. 1993 Nov;77(5):919-24. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199311000-00008. PubMed 8214727 ↗
  • Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Opioid-induced pruritus: an update. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Jan;35(1):2-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03463.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29. PubMed 19663845 ↗
  • Charuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Narasethakamol A, Promlok P. Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jun;96(6):1789-1793. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000066015.21364.7D. PubMed 12761013 ↗
  • Wood S. Factors influencing the selection of appropriate pain assessment tools. Nurs Times. 2004 Aug 31-Sep 6;100(35):42-7. PubMed 15471273 ↗
  • van Wijngaarden I, Tulp MT, Soudijn W. The concept of selectivity in 5-HT receptor research. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990 Jun 12;188(6):301-12. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(90)90190-9. PubMed 2164935 ↗
  • Perez EA, Hesketh P, Sandbach J, Reeves J, Chawla S, Markman M, Hainsworth J, Bushnell W, Friedman C. Comparison of single-dose oral granisetron versus intravenous ondansetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized parallel study. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Feb;16(2):754-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.754. PubMed 9469367 ↗
  • Slappendel R, Weber EW, Benraad B, van Limbeek J, Dirksen R. Itching after intrathecal morphine. Incidence and treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Oct;17(10):616-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00727.x. PubMed 11050519 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Oct 2020, 28 months.

Of 52 phase 2 interventional studies under Pruritus, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 31. This study's 28 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 22, 2018
First posted
Mar 30, 2018
StartActual
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completionActual
Oct 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Oct 30, 2020
Last update
Sep 9, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03483870
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Rabab Ahmed Samy Anwer (Principal Investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 30, 2018
Start date
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2020
Completion
Oct 30, 2020
Last update
Sep 9, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Granisetron

Start the discussion