CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03460756Updated Aug 18, 2023Results posted

A Clinical Trial of Oral Ganaxolone in Women With Postpartum Depression

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ganaxolone and Placebo in Depressive Disorder, Depression and Depression, Postpartum, sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 33 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 48 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-18.

Sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 48 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

A clinical study to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of oral administration of ganaxolone in women with postpartum depression

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder
  • Depression
  • Depression, Postpartum
  • Behavioral Symptoms
  • Mood Disorders
  • Mental Disorder
  • Pregnancy Complications
  • Postpartum Blues
  • PPD
  • Postpartum Disorder

Keywords

  • Postpartum Care
  • Postpartum Depression
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 48 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Experiencing a major depressive episode, which started between the start of the third trimester and 4 weeks following delivery. The major depressive episode must be diagnosed according to Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) 7.0 interview
  • Given birth in the last 6 months
  • HAMD17 score of ≥ 20 at screening but \< 26
  • Must agree to stop breastfeeding from start of study treatment or must agree to temporarily cease giving breast milk to her infant(s)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current history of any psychotic illness, including major depressive episode with psychotic features
  • History of suicide attempt within the past 3 years
  • History of bipolar I disorder
  • History of seizure discorder
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ganaxolone

    Oral

    Drug: Ganaxolone

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Oral

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugGanaxolone

    Oral

  • DrugPlacebo

    Oral

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment

    The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and through Day 10 for 2 week treatment group and Day 29 for 4 week treatment groups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment

    The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Through Day 38 for 2 week treatment group and Day 71 and 119 for 4 week treatment groups

  2. Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17)

    HAMD17 Response was defined as ≥50% reduction from Baseline in total score. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with response to HAMD-17 has been presented.

    Time frame: Day 2 (all treatment groups), Day 7 (TID & QHS), Day 8/10 (all treatment groups), Day 15/17 (all treatment groups), Day 22 and 29 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment groups), Day 57/59 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 (QHS), Day 119 (QHS)

  3. Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission

    Remission was defined as an observed total score of 0 to 7. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with HAMD-17 remission has been presented.

    Time frame: Day 8/10 (all treatment arms), Day 15/17 (all treatment arms), Day 22 and 29 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment arms), Day 57/59 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 & 119 (QHS)

  4. Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score

    The EPDS is a validated 10-question depression assessment for postpartum women, which includes anxiety symptoms and excludes constitutional symptoms associated with depression common in the postpartum period, such as changes in sleeping patterns. It consists of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Questions 1, 2, \& 4 are scored 0, 1, 2 or 3 with top box scored as 0 and the bottom box scored as 3. Questions 3 and 5 to 10 are reverse scored, with the top box scored as a 3 and the bottom box scored as 0. Scores are then summed for a total score, which ranges from 0: no depression to 30: severe depression. Higher score indicates severe depression. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119

  5. Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version

    The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was a 6-item questionnaire designed and validated. It is a reliable and sensitive measure of anxiety. The 6-item version has been shown to have acceptable reliability, producing similar scores as the full 20-item inventory for those with normal and raised levels of anxiety. Participants are prompted to respond to indicate "how \[the participant\] feel right now, at this moment", followed by a list of common experiences like "I feel calm, I am tense, I feel upset, I am relaxed I feel content and I am worried." Responses range from Not at all (1) to Very much (4), with overall scores ranging from 20-80, where higher scores reflected higher states of anxiety. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119

  6. Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement

    The CGI-I scale is a clinician-rated 7-point scale used to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. It was rated as: 1. "very much improved" 2. "much improved" 3. "minimally improved" 4. "no change" 5. "minimally worse" 6. "much worse" 7. "very much worse". Higher scores indicated worse condition. Only those participants with CGI- improvement have been presented.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 119

06

Results

Posted Jan 30, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Started2142543
Completed291634
Not completed0599
Withdrew: Adverse event0001
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0002
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0121
Withdrew: Pregnancy0001
Withdrew: Protocol violation0001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0473

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment

The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and through Day 10 for 2 week treatment group and Day 29 for 4 week treatment groups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version (HAMD17) Through Treatment
score on a scaleTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 2/4-8.0 ± 9.90-5.7 ± 4.87-0.8 ± 3.19-2.6 ± 5.46
Day 7-15.0 ± 12.73-6.7 ± 7.93——
Day 8/10-3.0 ± 0-10.5 ± 7.21-6.8 ± 7.25-10.2 ± 7.44
Day 15/17-9.5 ± 9.19-8.8 ± 7.12-9.7 ± 7.36-9.4 ± 7.94
Day 22——-10.3 ± 5.94-12.0 ± 7.98
Day 29——-12.2 ± 8.40-14.0 ± 7.64
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment

The HAMD17 was a 17-item clinician-rated instrument used to assess the range of symptoms that were most frequently observed in participants with major depression. All items were scored on an ordinal scale between 0 and 4 (8 items) or 0 and 2 (9 items) of increasing severity. Each of 17 items was rated by clinician with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items, where 0 indicated no depression and 52 indicated severe depression. Higher score represented more severe condition. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) and Through Day 38 for 2 week treatment group and Day 71 and 119 for 4 week treatment groups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Version Post Treatment
score on a scaleTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 36/38-19.0 ± 7.07-7.1 ± 8.44-14.6 ± 9.63-12.4 ± 8.82
Day 57/59——-13.2 ± 8.20-12.3 ± 9.11
Day 71———-12.2 ± 8.45
Day 89——-14.2 ± 9.98—
Day 119——-20.5 ± 6.59—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17)

HAMD17 Response was defined as ≥50% reduction from Baseline in total score. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with response to HAMD-17 has been presented.

Time frame:
Day 2 (all treatment groups), Day 7 (TID & QHS), Day 8/10 (all treatment groups), Day 15/17 (all treatment groups), Day 22 and 29 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment groups), Day 57/59 (QHS, 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 (QHS), Day 119 (QHS)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Response to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 Item (HAMD17)
ParticipantsTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 2/4 - Response0203
Day 7 - Response14——
Day 8/10 - Response04712
Day 15/17 - Response14716
Day 22 - Response——820
Day 29 - Response——1022
Day 36/38 - Response231217
Day 57/59 - Response——818
Day 71 - Response———13
Day 89 - Response——9—
Day 119 - Response——10—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission

Remission was defined as an observed total score of 0 to 7. The HAMD-17 is a 17-item assessment used to assess the severity of depression and its improvement during the course of therapy. Each item was evaluated and scored using either a 5-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 4 (very severe) or a 3-point scale of 0 (not present/absent) to 2 (marked). Items rated on the 3-point scale include: insomnia early, middle, late; somatic symptoms gastrointestinal and general; genital symptoms; loss of weight; insight. Items rated on 5-point scale include: depressed mood; feelings of guilt; suicide; work and activities; retardation; agitation; anxiety psychic and somatic; hypochondriasis. The total score was the sum of the scores from HAMD-17 Items 1 through 17 and ranged from 0 (not at all depressed) to 52 (severely depressed). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. Number of participants with HAMD-17 remission has been presented.

Time frame:
Day 8/10 (all treatment arms), Day 15/17 (all treatment arms), Day 22 and 29 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 36/38 (all treatment arms), Day 57/59 (QHS & 1125mg), Day 71 (1125mg), Day 89 & 119 (QHS)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item Remission
ParticipantsTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 8/10 - Remission0118
Day 15/17 - Remission0248
Day 22 - Remission——310
Day 29 - Remission——714
Day 36/38 - Remission11911
Day 57/59 - Remission——512
Day 71 - Remission———9
Day 89 - Remission——7—
Day 119 - Remission——8—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score

The EPDS is a validated 10-question depression assessment for postpartum women, which includes anxiety symptoms and excludes constitutional symptoms associated with depression common in the postpartum period, such as changes in sleeping patterns. It consists of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Questions 1, 2, \& 4 are scored 0, 1, 2 or 3 with top box scored as 0 and the bottom box scored as 3. Questions 3 and 5 to 10 are reverse scored, with the top box scored as a 3 and the bottom box scored as 0. Scores are then summed for a total score, which ranges from 0: no depression to 30: severe depression. Higher score indicates severe depression. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total Score
Score on a scaleTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 2/4-0.5 ± 2.12-1.4 ± 2.19-0.8 ± 1.18-0.6 ± 1.64
Day 7-2.0 ± 2.83-2.3 ± 2.06——
Day 8/10-3.0 ± NA-1.3 ± 1.57-1.5 ± 1.74-2.3 ± 2.01
Day 15/17-5.0 ± 0.00-2.6 ± 1.63-1.8 ± 2.17-2.2 ± 2.38
Day 22——-2.7 ± 2.18-3.0 ± 2.62
Day 29——-2.9 ± 2.79-3.1 ± 2.77
Day 36/38-2.0 ± 2.83-2.6 ± 1.85-3.1 ± 2.77-3.7 ± 2.64
Day 57/59——-2.5 ± 2.46-3.4 ± 2.68
Day 71———-3.3 ± 2.31
Day 89——-2.6 ± 2.41—
Day 119——-3.3 ± 3.20—
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version

The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was a 6-item questionnaire designed and validated. It is a reliable and sensitive measure of anxiety. The 6-item version has been shown to have acceptable reliability, producing similar scores as the full 20-item inventory for those with normal and raised levels of anxiety. Participants are prompted to respond to indicate "how \[the participant\] feel right now, at this moment", followed by a list of common experiences like "I feel calm, I am tense, I feel upset, I am relaxed I feel content and I am worried." Responses range from Not at all (1) to Very much (4), with overall scores ranging from 20-80, where higher scores reflected higher states of anxiety. Baseline was defined as the Day 1 assessment before study drug infusion. Change from Baseline is defined as post dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) through Day 119
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 6-item Version
Scores on a scaleTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 2/4-11.7 ± 11.81-6.4 ± 11.77-1.8 ± 11.45-9.9 ± 14.84
Day 7-11.7 ± 7.00-9.0 ± 11.86——
Day 8/10-20.0 ± NA-5.7 ± 11.00-11.8 ± 12.40-16.8 ± 17.53
Day 15/17-33.3 ± 9.48-14.8 ± 13.45-14.5 ± 17.58-15.2 ± 19.97
Day 22——-13.0 ± 17.48-21.8 ± 19.81
Day 29——-17.13 ± 17.94-21.4 ± 20.34
Day 36/38-31.7 ± 2.33-11.3 ± 5.31-20.5 ± 17.62-23.2 ± 18.96
Day 57/59——-16.3 ± 15.52-22.8 ± 19.72
Day 71———-19.2 ± 18.75
Day 89——-14.7 ± 18.52—
Day 119——-16.7 ± 17.45—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement

The CGI-I scale is a clinician-rated 7-point scale used to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a Baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. It was rated as: 1. "very much improved" 2. "much improved" 3. "minimally improved" 4. "no change" 5. "minimally worse" 6. "much worse" 7. "very much worse". Higher scores indicated worse condition. Only those participants with CGI- improvement have been presented.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 119
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement
ParticipantsTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Day 2/4 - Much Improved0114
Day 2/4 - Minimally Improved16415
Day 7 - Very much Improved01——
Day 7 - Much Improved15——
Day 7 - Minimally Improved12——
Day 8/10 - Very much Improved02—3
Day 8/10 - Much Improved15714
Day 8/10 - Minimally Improved02811
Day 15/17 - Very much Improved0216
Day 15/17 - Much Improved25915
Day 15/17 - Minimally Improved0359
Day 22 - Very much Improved——17
Day 22 - Much Improved——916
Day 22 - Minimally Improved——66
Day 29 - Very much Improved——411
Day 29 - Much Improved——716
Day 29 - Minimally Improved——85
Day 36/38 - Very much Improved01812
Day 36/38 - Much Improved23410
Day 36/38 - Minimally Improved01710
Day 57/59 - Very Much Improved——49
Day 57/59 - Much Improved——914
Day 57/59 - Minimally Improved——27
Day 71 - Very Much Improved———8
Day 71 - Much Improved———14
Day 71 - Minimally Improved———6
Day 89 - Very much Improved——6—
Day 89 - Much Improved——4—
Day 89 - Minimally Improved——6—
Day 119 - Very Much Improved——5—
Day 119 - Much Improved——3—
Day 119 - Minimally Improved——3—

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up through Day 119. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TID (2-week)0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)
QHS (2-week)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)5/14 (35.7%)
QHS (4-week)0/25 (0%)0/25 (0%)16/25 (64%)
1125 mg (4-week)0/43 (0%)1/43 (2.3%)32/43 (74.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/20/140/251/43
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventTID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)
SedationNervous system disorders2/22/143/257/43
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/20/142/255/43
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/21/142/257/43
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/21/144/2511/43
SomnolenceNervous system disorders0/20/144/259/43
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders0/21/141/252/43
Hot flushVascular disorders0/21/141/252/43
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/20/140/252/43
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/20/140/252/43
Balance disorderNervous system disorders0/20/140/252/43

Baseline characteristics

Safety Set

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)Total
Mean23.5 ± 7.7827.5 ± 7.2727.4 ± 5.2728.0 ± 5.7227.7 ± 5.84
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)Total
Female214254384
Male00000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)Total
Hispanic or Latino13111227
Not Hispanic or Latino111143157
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TID (2-week)QHS (2-week)QHS (4-week)1125 mg (4-week)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native01001
Asian02204
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00011
Black or African American14101631
White17132546
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00011
07

Study locations

33 sites
  • Marinus Research Site
    Glendale, California 91206, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Lemon Grove, California 91945, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Long Beach, California 90806, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Panorama City, California 91402, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    San Bernardino, California 92408, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    San Marcos, California 92078, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Ventura, California 93003, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Gainesville, Florida 32607, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Hollywood, Florida 33021, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    North Miami, Florida 33161, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30331, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Decatur, Georgia 30030, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Marietta, Georgia 30060, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60169, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Leawood, Kansas 66206, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Wichita, Kansas 67226, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Flowood, Mississippi 39232, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Englewood, Ohio 45322, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Downingtown, Pennsylvania 19335, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Media, Pennsylvania 19063, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Houston, Texas 77058, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Irving, Texas 75062, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    League City, Texas 77573, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Orem, Utah 84058-4939, United States
  • Marinus Research Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 22, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 15, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03460756
Lead sponsor
Marinus Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2018
Start date
Dec 28, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2019
Completion
Jul 5, 2019
Results posted
Jan 30, 2023
Last update
Aug 18, 2023

Study contacts

Joseph Hulihan, MD
study director · Marinus Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion