ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05814523Updated May 14, 2024

To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Ganaxolone Added to Standard of Care in Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ganaxolone and Placebo in Refractory Status Epilepticus, sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals. Withdrawn at 52 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-14.

Sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals (part of Immedica Pharma) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Business reasons
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (IV) ganaxolone versus placebo co-administered with IV antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard of care for the treatment of RSE. Approximately 70 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ganaxolone IV solution or placebo IV solution along with standard of care (SOC) IV AED.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractory Status Epilepticus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Refractory status epilepticus
  • Ganaxolone
  • Antiepileptic drug
  • Standard of care
03

In context

Status Epilepticus

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Status Epilepticus; 37 are open to participants now.

Browse Status Epilepticus studies →

Lead sponsor

Marinus Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (100%) have results posted.

First submitted before Marinus Pharmaceuticals became part of Immedica Pharma.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participant, participant's parent, guardian, or LAR must provide signed /assent, and once capable (per institution guidelines), there must be documentation of consent/assent by the participant demonstrating they are willing and aware of the nature of the study and related procedures. Where allowed by law, where the participant lacks the capacity to make informed decisions regarding his/her medical treatment options, the treating clinician may follow their deferred consenting practices. The clinician will make the final decision based on the best interests of the participant.
  2. Male or females 18 years of age and older at the time of the first dose of IP.
  3. SE warranting imminent progression of treatment meeting the following criteria:

    a) A diagnosis of SE, warranting imminent progression of treatment for seizure control, with or without prominent motor features based on clinical and EEG findings:

    i. Diagnosis is established by:

    • For SE with prominent motor features: Clinical and EEG seizure activity indicative of convulsive, myoclonic, or focal motor SE.
    • For SE without prominent motor features (nonconvulsive SE): Appropriate clinical features and an EEG indicative of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).

    ii. For any type of SE:

    • At least 6 minutes of cumulative seizure activity over a 30-minute period within the hour before IP initiation, AND Seizure activity during the 30 minutes immediately prior to IP initiation.
  4. Participants must have received a benzodiazepine and at least 1 of the following IV AEDs for treatment of the current episode of SE administered at an adequate dose and for a sufficient duration, in the judgement of the investigator, to demonstrate efficacy. The benzodiazepine and at least 1 of the IV AEDs must have been administered at a dose that would be expected to be effective for the termination of the current episode of SE.

    • IV Fosphenytoin/phenytoin,
    • IV Valproic acid,
    • IV Levetiracetam,
    • IV Lacosamide,
    • IV Brivaracetam, or
    • IV Phenobarbital.
  5. (BMI) \< 40 or, if BMI is not able to be calculated at screening, participant is assessed by investigator as not morbidly obese.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. of less than 24 hours.
  2. Anoxic brain injury or an uncorrected, rapidly reversable metabolic condition as the primary cause of SE (eg, hypoglycemia \< 50 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL] or hyperglycemia > 400 mg/dL).
  3. Participants who have received high-dose IV anesthetics (eg, midazolam, propofol, thiopental, or pentobarbital) during the current episode of SE for more than 18 hours, or who continue to have clinical or electrographic evidence of persistent seizures while receiving high-dose IV anesthetics.
  4. Clinical condition or advance directive that would NOT permit admission to the ICU or use of IV anesthesia.
  5. Participants known or suspected to be pregnant
  6. Participants with known allergy or sensitivity to progesterone or allopregnanolone medications/supplements
  7. Receiving a concomitant IV product containing Captisol.
  8. Known or suspected hepatic insufficiency or hepatic failure leading to impaired synthetic liver function.
  9. Known or suspected stage 3B (moderate to severe; estimated [eGFR] 44-30 milliliters per minute per 1.73-meter square [mL/min/1.73m\^2]), stage 4 (severe; eGFR 29-15 mL/min/1.73m\^2), or stage 5 (kidney failure; eGFR \< 15 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or dialysis) kidney disease.
  10. Use of an product for which less than 30 days or 5 half-lives have elapsed from the final product administration. Participation in a non-interventional clinical study does not exclude eligibility.
  11. Known or suspected history or evidence of a medical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would expose a participant to an undue risk of a significant adverse event or interfere with assessments of safety or efficacy during the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ganaxolone IV solution + SOC IV AED

    Drug: Ganaxolone · Drug: Standard of care

  • Experimental
    Placebo IV solution + SOC IV AED

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Standard of care

Interventions

  • Ganaxolone will be administered as IV solution.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered as IV solution.

  • DrugStandard of care

    A non-anesthetic medication not previously used for treatment of SE within the current episode and will be administered at a dose sufficient for the termination of SE according to investigator judgment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants who will report cessation of SE within 30 minutes of investigational product (IP) initiation of at least 30 minutes duration

    Status epilepticus cessation will be determined by the investigator based on clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) features

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

  2. Percentage of participants who will report no escalation of treatment for persistent or recurrent SE within 36 hours of IP initiation

    Time frame: Up to 36 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of participants who will report cessation of SE within 30 minutes of IP initiation of at least 30 minutes duration

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

  2. Percentage of participants who will report no escalation of treatment for persistent or recurrent SE within 72 hours of IP initiation

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours

  3. Time to SE cessation

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours

  4. Percentage of participants having cessation of SE within 30 minutes of IP initiation of at least 30 minutes duration without escalation of treatment

    Time frame: Up to 30 minutes

  5. Percentage of participants reporting no escalation of treatment for persistent or recurrent SE within 36 hours of IP initiation

    Time frame: Up to 36 hours

  6. Percentage of participants reporting no escalation of treatment for persistent or recurrent SE within 72 hours of IP initiation

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours

  7. Change from Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the time of hospital discharge

    The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death where 0 - No symptoms; 1=No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms; 2=Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities; 3=Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted; 4=Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted; 5=Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent; 6=Dead. Higher scores will indicate high degree of disability.

    Time frame: Baseline and Up to Day 31

  8. Change from Baseline in level of responsiveness as assessed by the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Score scale

    The FOUR Score is a 17-point scale (with potential scores ranging from 0 - 16). Decreasing FOUR Score is associated with worsening level of consciousness. The FOUR coma scale includes 4 parameters with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of "4" for each of them: eye reactions (eye opening and tracking), motor responses (pain response and simple commands), stem reflexes (pupillary, corneal and cough) and respiratory patterns (respiratory rhythm and respiratory attempts in patients on a ventilator). The points are summed up, their sum is estimated. The interpretation of results will be as 15 to 16 score: clear consciousness; Less than 15: Impairment of consciousness; from 4 to 8: Coma and 0-4: Death. Lower the score, the greater the coma gravity.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 24, 36 and 72 hours

  9. Change from Baseline in level of sedation/ agitation as assessed by Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS)

    The RASS is a medical scale used to measure the agitation or sedation level. It is a 10-point scale that ranges from -5 to +4 with -5=unarousable and +4=combative. Zero means the patient is alert and calm. higher scores indicate more agitation.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 24, 36 and 72 hours

  10. Percentage of participants with mRS > 3 at the time of hospital discharge

    The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. The scale runs from 0-6, running from perfect health without symptoms to death where 0 - No symptoms; 1=No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. 2=Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. 3=Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. 4=Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. 5=Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. 6=Dead. Higher scores will indicate high degree of disability.

    Time frame: Up to 122 hours

  11. Change from Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) following IP initiation and at hospital discharge

    The CGI-I is a 7-point Likert scale that the parent(s)/caregiver(s)/legally authorized representative (LAR)(s) and clinician uses to rate the change in overall seizure control, behavior, safety, and tolerability after initiation of the IP relative to Baseline (prior to treatment with the IP). It was rated as: 1- "very much improved", 2- "much improved', 3- "minimally improved", 4- "no change", 5- "minimally worse", 6- "much worse", and 7- "very much worse". Higher scores indicated worse condition.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 24, 36, and 72 hours

  12. Number of hours on positive pressure ventilation attributable to the episode of SE or its treatment

    Healthcare Utilization Questionnaires include the Hospitalization Questionnaire and the Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV) and Intubation Questionnaire. The Hospitalization Questionnaire should be collected at hospital discharge or at final study visit/contact. The need for non-invasive or invasive ventilatory support within 24 hours prior to IP initiation and following IP initiation and within 48 hours following IP discontinuation should be collected as close as possible to the event.

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

  13. Number of hours on positive pressure ventilation

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

  14. Length of stay (days) in intensive care unit (ICU)

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

  15. Length of stay (days) in hospital

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

  16. Percentage of participants requiring artificial ventilation after initiation of IP

    Time frame: Up to 122 hours

  17. Percentage of participants not requiring IV anesthesia for SE treatment within 36 hours of IP initiation

    Time frame: Up to 36 hours

  18. Percentage of participants not requiring IV anesthesia for SE treatment within 72 hours of IP initiation

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours

  19. Percentage of participants not requiring IV anesthesia for SE treatment through the final study follow-up visit/contact

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

  20. Percentage of participants who do not develop super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) through the final study follow-up visit/contact

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

  21. Change from Baseline in Euro Quality of Life (five-level EuroQoL five-dimensional [EQ-5D-5L]) score

    The EQ-5D-5L is the EuroQoL 5D-5L, a descriptive system that comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the participant's health state. A positive score means quality of life improvement, a negative score, a worsening of quality of life. Higher scores indicate more problems.

    Time frame: Baseline and Up to 4 Weeks

  22. Number of AEDs at discharge

    Time frame: Up to 122 hours

  23. Percentage of participants requiring supplemental oxygen after initiation of IP

    Time frame: Up to 4 Weeks

07

Study locations

52 sites
  • Medical University of Innsbruck
    Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria
  • Kepler University Hospital
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH
    Linz, 4021, Austria
  • Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Department of Neurology
    Salzburg, A-5020, Austria
  • Medical University Vienna
    Wien, A-1090, Austria
  • Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme
    Bruxelles, 1070, Belgium
  • UZA University Hospital Antwerpen
    Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • University Hospitals Leuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Dubrava University Hospital
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
  • Mazaryk University, Brno,The First Department of Neurology
    Brno, 60200, Czechia
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
  • Motol University Hospital
    Prague, 150 06, Czechia
  • Helsinki University Hospital
    Helsinki, 00290, Finland
  • Kuopio University Hospital
    Kuopio, 70210, Finland
  • Hopital R. Salengro
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, 69002, France
  • CHRU Nancy
    Nancy, 54000, France
  • Chu de Toulouse
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • University of Osnabruck, Dep of Neurology, Osnabrück
    Osnabrück, Osnabruck 49074, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
    Erlangen, 91054, Germany
  • Epilepsy Center Hessen
    Marburg, 35043, Germany
  • Universität- und Rehabilitationskliniken Ulm, RKU
    Ulm, 898081, Germany
  • National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences
    Budapest, 1145, Hungary
  • Soroka Medical Center
    Be'er Sheva, Beer-Sheva 8410100, Israel
  • Hadassah Medical Center
    Jerusalem, 12000, Israel
  • Sheba Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, 52621, Israel
  • Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel aviv, 64239, Israel
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Caregg
    Firenze, 50134, Italy
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
    Milan, 20123, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena
    Modena, 41100, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona
    Verona, 37126, Italy
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos
    Vilnius, 08661, Lithuania
  • Oddział Neurologii z Pododdziałem Udarowym Górnośląskie Centrum Medyczne im. prof. Leszka Gieca Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach
    Katowice, Katowice-Ochojec 40-635, Poland
  • Oddzial Kliniczny Neurologii, Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
    Kraków, Krakow 30-688, Poland
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne im. prof. K. Gibińskiego w Katowicach
    Katowice, 40-752, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1 im. Prof. Stanisława Szyszko Śląskiego Uniwersytetu
    Katowice, 41-800, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny
    Lublin, 20-954, Poland
  • WSS im Gromkowskiego
    Wrocław, 51-149, Poland
  • II. Neurologická klinika SZU Fakultná nemocnica s poliklinikou F. D. Roosevelta Banská Bystrica
    Banská Bystrica, 975 17, Slovakia
  • SlovakiaNeurologická klinika SZU a UNB Nemocnica Ružinov Univerzitná nemocnica Bratislava
    Bratislava, 826 06, Slovakia
  • Neurologické oddelenie Nemocnica Agel Levoča a.s.
    Levoča, 054 01, Slovakia
  • Neurologické oddelenie Fakultná nemocnica
    Trnava, 917 01, Slovakia
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08004, Spain
  • Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca Biomedica Sant Pau
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid.
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG)
    Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
    Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
  • Cardiff and Vale UHB
    Cardiff, CF14 4W, United Kingdom
  • King's College Hospital, Department of Neurology
    London, United Kingdom
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Mar 2024; primary completion for Aug 2024, 5 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2023
First posted
Apr 18, 2023
StartEst.
Mar 2024
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2024
CompletionEst.
Aug 2024
Last update
May 14, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05814523
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 18, 2023
Start date
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ganaxolone

Start the discussion