ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00442104Updated May 28, 2024Results posted

Open-label Extension to Protocol 1042-0500

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ganaxolone in Infantile Spasms, sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals. Terminated at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 4 Months to 24 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-28.

Sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals (part of Immedica Pharma) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor's decision
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
4 Months to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To allow open-label extension to patients who have completed Protocol 1042-0500

Read the detailed description

Patient should have completed all scheduled clinical study visits in the double blind, controlled trial (Protocol 1042-0500) and have been deemed eligible (had a response to treatment) by the Investigator. Male or female, with a diagnosis of IS with a video EEG (vEEG) recording confirming the diagnosis.

There will be a total of 14 visits over 99(+or-1)week. A 24-hr vEEG is only required if the subject has been spasm-free for more than 24-hrs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infantile Spasms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • infantile spasms
  • anticonvulsant
  • pediatric epilepsy
  • West Syndrome
  • epileptic spasms
03

In context

Spasms, Infantile

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Spasms, Infantile; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is above the median of 40 across 33 interventional studies indexed under Spasms, Infantile.

Browse Spasms, Infantile studies →

Lead sponsor

Marinus Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (100%) have results posted.

First submitted before Marinus Pharmaceuticals became part of Immedica Pharma.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Months to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have completed all scheduled clinical study visits in the previous Protocol 1042 0500 and have been deemed eligible (no SAEs thought to be drug related and had a response to treatment) by the Investigator.
  • Be diagnosed with IS regardless of etiology. Diagnostic Criteria: Seizures consisting of single or repetitive short muscular contractions leading to flexion or extension. Spasms may be characterized as tonic or myoclonic contractions, may occur singly or in clusters, and typically occur bilaterally and symmetrically. The EEG pattern must be consistent with the diagnosis of IS (hypsarrhythmia, modified hypsarrhythmia, multifocal spike wave discharges, etc).
  • Have a 24 hour vEEG recording confirming the diagnosis of IS.
  • Have had a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed to determine any possible causes of IS.
  • Have been previously treated with 3 AEDs or fewer.
  • Have a parent/guardian who is properly informed of the nature and potential risks and benefits of the clinical study, is willing and capable of complying with all clinical study procedures, and has given in writing prior to entering the clinical study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current treatment with more than 2 concomitant AEDs.
  • Have an active CNS infection, demyelinating disease, degenerative neurological disease, or CNS disease deemed progressive (with the exception of tuberous sclerosis) as evaluated by brain MRI.
  • Have any disease or condition (medical or surgical) at Screening that might compromise the hematologic, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, GI, or hepatic systems; or other conditions that might interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the product, or would place the subject at increased risk.
  • (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), or total greater than 4 times the upper limit of laboratory normal or any clinical laboratory value deemed by the Investigator.
  • History of recurrent status epilepticus.
  • Have been exposed to any other investigational drug within 30 days prior to enrollment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ganaxolone

    Drug: Ganaxolone

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Were Free of Spasms

    Clinical spasms were determined by video-electroencephalography (VEEG). The number of participants with spasm-free duration have been presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 4 through Week 96

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Frequency of Spasm Clusters

    Infantile spasms that come one after another in a cluster and lasts several minutes are called Spasm Clusters. Spasm clusters were determined by a 24-hour video-electroencephalography (vEEG). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the Day 0 assessment prior to ganaxolone dosing in Protocol 1042-0500.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 through Week 32

  2. Change From Baseline in Frequency of Individual Spasm

    Individual Spasm are seizures that may last only a second or two and were determined by a 24-hour video-electroencephalography (vEEG). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the Day 0 assessment prior to ganaxolone dosing in Protocol 1042-0500.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 through Week 32

  3. Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Status on Caregiver's Global Assessment

    Caregiver global assessment of seizure severity and response to treatment rated the participants' based on 7 clinical factors: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (\[1\] marked improvement, \[2\] moderate improvement, \[3\] slight improvement, \[4\] no change from baseline, \[5\] slight worsening, \[6\] moderate worsening, or \[7\] marked worsening). Higher score indicated worse symptoms. The assessment compared the participants' current status to their condition prior to initiating study medication.

    Time frame: Week 4 through Week 32

  4. Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment

    The investigators rated the participants' overall clinical status based on 7 clinical factors: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (\[1\] marked improvement, \[2\] moderate improvement, \[3\] slight improvement, \[4\] no change from baseline, \[5\] slight worsening, \[6\] moderate worsening, or \[7\] marked worsening). Higher score indicated worse symptoms. The investigators assessed the participants' status compared to their condition prior to initiating study medication.

    Time frame: Week 4 through Week 32

  5. Number of Participants With Spasm-free Durations

    Spasm-free duration is defined as total number of spasm-free days recorded in the spasm/seizure diary. Parents/Guardians or nursing staff maintained a spasm/seizure diary to record the number and type of seizures each day, including spasms, throughout the entire study. The number of participants with spasm-free duration of at least 24 hours have been presented.

    Time frame: Week 4 through Week 32

  6. Number of Participants With Absence of Spasms

    Absence of spasms is defined as percentage of total spasm-free days during a visit period=100%. Parents/Guardians or nursing staff maintained a spasm/seizure diary to record the number and type of seizures each day, including spasms, throughout the entire study. The participants achieving absence of spasms have been presented.

    Time frame: Week 4 through Week 32

  7. Developmental Assessment Using Denver-II Developmental Test

    Denver-II Developmental Test measures a child's development in several areas:Personal-Social,Fine Motor-Adaptive,Language,and Gross Motor,from birth to 6 years old.It consists of 125 items that are organized into subscales and scored as pass,fail,or refused.To evaluate a child's progress,test compares their performance to a normative sample of children of same age.For each item,age at which 90% of children in normative sample pass it is determined.Derived score for each subscale is sum of item scores and represents difference between child's chronological age and age at which 90% of children in normative sample pass the items in that subscale.A higher derived score on a subscale indicates better performance on items in that subscale relative to other children of same age who have taken the test.Among subscales,Personal-Social subscale ranges from -16 months to 24 months;others range from - 12 months to 24 months.All subscales have a population mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 3.

    Time frame: Week 8 through Week 32

  8. Percentage of Total Spasm-free Days and Cumulative Spasm-free Days as Determined From the Seizure Diary.

    Percentage of total spasm-free days during a visit period is defined as total number of spasm free days as recorded in the Seizure Diary/ total number of days during that period, multiplied by 100. Percentage of cumulative total spasm-free days during a visit period is defined as sum of total number of spasm-free days during this period as recorded in the Seizure Diary/ total number of days in the treatment period, multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Weeks 4 through Week 32

07

Results

Posted Jun 2, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Seizure-free information is not available

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGanaxolone
Started54
Completed7
Not completed47
Withdrew: Adverse event5
Withdrew: Death2
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5
Withdrew: Insufficient clinical response10
Withdrew: Other21
Withdrew: Discretion of the investigator/sponsor1

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Free of Spasms

Clinical spasms were determined by video-electroencephalography (VEEG). The number of participants with spasm-free duration have been presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 4 through Week 96
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Free of Spasms
percentage of participantsGanaxolone
Percentage of Participants Who Were Free of Spasms100 (59.0 to 100.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Frequency of Spasm Clusters

Infantile spasms that come one after another in a cluster and lasts several minutes are called Spasm Clusters. Spasm clusters were determined by a 24-hour video-electroencephalography (vEEG). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the Day 0 assessment prior to ganaxolone dosing in Protocol 1042-0500.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Mean · Spasm clusters per day
Change From Baseline in Frequency of Spasm Clusters
Spasm clusters per dayGanaxolone
Spasm Clusters - Week 4-2.9 ± 7.94
Spasm Clusters - Week 8-4.1 ± 8.35
Spasm Clusters - Week 14-4.1 ± 9.12
Spasm Clusters - Week 20-5.8 ± 8.58
Spasm Clusters - Week 26-5.6 ± 7.98
Spasm Clusters - Week 32-5.3 ± 9.96
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Frequency of Individual Spasm

Individual Spasm are seizures that may last only a second or two and were determined by a 24-hour video-electroencephalography (vEEG). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the Day 0 assessment prior to ganaxolone dosing in Protocol 1042-0500.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Mean · Individual spasms per day
Change From Baseline in Frequency of Individual Spasm
Individual spasms per dayGanaxolone
Individual Spasms - Week 4-6.8 ± 40.70
Individual Spasms - Week 8-17.4 ± 31.28
Individual Spasms - Week 14-20.8 ± 31.21
Individual Spasms - Week 20-15.8 ± 52.46
Individual Spasms - Week 26-19.9 ± 39.27
Individual Spasms - Week 32-17.7 ± 36.35
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change in Clinical Status on Caregiver's Global Assessment

Caregiver global assessment of seizure severity and response to treatment rated the participants' based on 7 clinical factors: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (\[1\] marked improvement, \[2\] moderate improvement, \[3\] slight improvement, \[4\] no change from baseline, \[5\] slight worsening, \[6\] moderate worsening, or \[7\] marked worsening). Higher score indicated worse symptoms. The assessment compared the participants' current status to their condition prior to initiating study medication.

Time frame:
Week 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Status on Caregiver's Global Assessment
participantsGanaxolone
Caregiver's- Week 4 - Marked Improvement11
Caregiver's - Week 4 - Moderate Improvement11
Caregiver's -Week 4 - Slight Improvement16
Caregiver's- Week 4 - No change from Baseline6
Caregiver's - Week 4 - Moderate Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 4 - Slight Worsening1
Caregiver's - Week 4 - Marked Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 8 - Marked Improvement7
Caregiver's- Week 8 - Moderate Improvement12
Caregiver's -Week 8 - Slight Improvement18
Caregiver's- Week 8 - No change from Baseline1
Caregiver's - Week 8 - Slight Worsening2
Caregiver's - Week 8 - Moderate Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 8 - Marked Worsening0
Caregiver's- Week 14 - Marked Improvement8
Caregiver's - Week 14 - Moderate Improvement13
Caregiver's -Week 14 - Slight Improvement14
Caregiver's - Week 14 - No change from Baseline2
Caregiver's - Week 14 - Slight Worsening1
Caregiver's - Week 14 - Moderate Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 14 - Marked Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 20 - Marked Improvement9
Caregiver's - Week 20 - Moderate Improvement13
Caregiver's -Week 20 - Slight Improvement10
Caregiver's- Week 20 - No change from Baseline3
Caregiver's- Week 20 - Slight Worsening1
Caregiver's - Week 20 - Moderate Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 20 - Marked Worsening0
Caregiver's- Week 26 - Marked Improvement9
Caregiver's- Week 26 - Moderate Improvement12
Caregiver's -Week 26 - Slight Improvement7
Caregiver's - Week 26 - No change from Baseline3
Caregiver's - Week 26 - Slight Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 26 - Moderate Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 26 - Marked Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 32 - Marked Improvement8
Caregiver's - Week 32 - Moderate Improvement7
Caregiver's-Week 32 - Slight Improvement8
Caregiver's - Week 32 - No change from Baseline2
Caregiver's - Week 32 - Slight Worsening0
Caregiver's - Week 32 - Moderate Worsening1
Caregiver's - Week 32 - Marked Worsening0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change in Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment

The investigators rated the participants' overall clinical status based on 7 clinical factors: seizure frequency, duration, and intensity; adverse experiences; social, intellectual, and motor functioning. Using a 7-point scale (\[1\] marked improvement, \[2\] moderate improvement, \[3\] slight improvement, \[4\] no change from baseline, \[5\] slight worsening, \[6\] moderate worsening, or \[7\] marked worsening). Higher score indicated worse symptoms. The investigators assessed the participants' status compared to their condition prior to initiating study medication.

Time frame:
Week 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Change in Clinical Status on the Investigator's Global Assessment
participantsGanaxolone
Investigator's- Week 4 - Marked Improvement7
Investigator's - Week 4 - Moderate Improvement15
Investigator's -Week 4 - Slight Improvement18
Investigator's- Week 4 - No change from Baseline4
Investigator's - Week 4 - Moderate Worsening1
Investigator's - Week 4 - Slight Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 4 - Marked Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 8 - Marked Improvement6
Investigator's- Week 8 - Moderate Improvement12
Investigator's -Week 8 - Slight Improvement19
Investigator's- Week 8 - No change from Baseline3
Investigator's - Week 8 - Slight Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 8 - Moderate Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 8 - Marked Worsening0
Investigator's- Week 14 - Marked Improvement6
Investigator's - Week 14 - Moderate Improvement16
Investigator's -Week 14 - Slight Improvement15
Investigator's - Week 14 - No change from Baseline1
Investigator's - Week 14 - Slight Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 14 - Moderate Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 14 - Marked Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 20 - Marked Improvement7
Investigator's - Week 20 - Moderate Improvement14
Investigator's -Week 20 - Slight Improvement11
Investigator's- Week 20 - No change from Baseline1
Investigator's- Week 20 - Slight Worsening1
Investigator's - Week 20 - Moderate Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 20 - Marked Worsening0
Investigator's- Week 26 - Marked Improvement5
Investigator's- Week 26 - Moderate Improvement14
Investigator's -Week 26 - Slight Improvement9
Investigator's - Week 26 - No change from Baseline4
Investigator's - Week 26 - Slight Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 26 - Moderate Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 26 - Marked Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 32 - Marked Improvement6
Investigator's - Week 32 - Moderate Improvement9
Investigator's -Week 32 - Slight Improvement8
Investigator's - Week 32 - No change from Baseline3
Investigator's - Week 32 - Slight Worsening1
Investigator's - Week 32 - Moderate Worsening0
Investigator's - Week 32 - Marked Worsening0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Spasm-free Durations

Spasm-free duration is defined as total number of spasm-free days recorded in the spasm/seizure diary. Parents/Guardians or nursing staff maintained a spasm/seizure diary to record the number and type of seizures each day, including spasms, throughout the entire study. The number of participants with spasm-free duration of at least 24 hours have been presented.

Time frame:
Week 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Spasm-free Durations
ParticipantsGanaxolone
Spasm Free at Week 419
Spasm Free at Week 818
Spasm Free at Week 1418
Spasm Free at Week 2018
Spasm Free at Week 2617
Spasm Free at Week 3213
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Absence of Spasms

Absence of spasms is defined as percentage of total spasm-free days during a visit period=100%. Parents/Guardians or nursing staff maintained a spasm/seizure diary to record the number and type of seizures each day, including spasms, throughout the entire study. The participants achieving absence of spasms have been presented.

Time frame:
Week 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Absence of Spasms
ParticipantsGanaxolone
Achieved absence of spasms at Week 42
Achieved absence of spasms at Week 83
Achieved absence of spasms at Week 143
Achieved absence of spasms at Week 204
Achieved absence of spasms at Week 265
Achieved absence of spasms at Week 321
SecondaryDevelopmental Assessment Using Denver-II Developmental Test

Denver-II Developmental Test measures a child's development in several areas:Personal-Social,Fine Motor-Adaptive,Language,and Gross Motor,from birth to 6 years old.It consists of 125 items that are organized into subscales and scored as pass,fail,or refused.To evaluate a child's progress,test compares their performance to a normative sample of children of same age.For each item,age at which 90% of children in normative sample pass it is determined.Derived score for each subscale is sum of item scores and represents difference between child's chronological age and age at which 90% of children in normative sample pass the items in that subscale.A higher derived score on a subscale indicates better performance on items in that subscale relative to other children of same age who have taken the test.Among subscales,Personal-Social subscale ranges from -16 months to 24 months;others range from - 12 months to 24 months.All subscales have a population mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 3.

Time frame:
Week 8 through Week 32
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Developmental Assessment Using Denver-II Developmental Test
Scores on a scaleGanaxolone
Week 8 - Personal Social-0.72 ± 3.899
Week 8 - Fine Motor-Adaptive-1.56 ± 3.131
Week 8 - Language-1.45 ± 2.798
Week 8 - Gross Motor-1.05 ± 2.285
Week 20- Personal Social-2.82 ± 6.081
Week 20- Fine Motor-Adaptive-3.73 ± 5.123
Week 20- Language-2.39 ± 5.615
Week 20 - Gross Motor-2.69 ± 3.584
Week 32-Personal Social-4.86 ± 5.659
Week 32-Fine Motor-Adaptive-6.80 ± 4.952
Week 32-Language-6.58 ± 4.336
Week 32-Gross Motor-6.13 ± 4.509
SecondaryPercentage of Total Spasm-free Days and Cumulative Spasm-free Days as Determined From the Seizure Diary.

Percentage of total spasm-free days during a visit period is defined as total number of spasm free days as recorded in the Seizure Diary/ total number of days during that period, multiplied by 100. Percentage of cumulative total spasm-free days during a visit period is defined as sum of total number of spasm-free days during this period as recorded in the Seizure Diary/ total number of days in the treatment period, multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Weeks 4 through Week 32
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of Days
Percentage of Total Spasm-free Days and Cumulative Spasm-free Days as Determined From the Seizure Diary.
Percentage of DaysGanaxolone
Total Spasm-free days during Week 4 visit11.10 ± 23.657
Total Spasm-free days during Week 8 visit18.74 ± 32.654
Total Spasm-free days during Week 14 visit20.74 ± 34.817
Total Spasm-free days during Week 20 visit28.79 ± 40.163
Total Spasm-free days during Week 26 visit28.73 ± 39.711
Total Spasm-free days during week 32 visit27.99 ± 39.259
Cumulative Spasm-free days during Week 4 visit10.86 ± 20.374
Cumulative Spasm-free days during Week 8 visit13.82 ± 23.433
Cumulative Spasm-free days during Week 14 visit15.70 ± 25.769
Cumulative Spasm-free days during Week 20 visit19.97 ± 28.501
Cumulative Spasm-free days during Week 26 visit22.07 ± 31.105
Cumulative Spasm-free days during Week 32 visit22.99 ± 30.140

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 32. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ganaxolone2/54 (3.7%)24/54 (44.4%)47/54 (87%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventGanaxolone
Infantile spasmsNervous system disorders5/54
ConvulsionNervous system disorders4/54
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/54
Pneumonia aspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/54
Gastroesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders3/54
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/54
EpilepsyNervous system disorders2/54
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations2/54
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/54
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/54
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventGanaxolone
PyrexiaGeneral disorders26/54
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders19/54
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations18/54
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders15/54
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations13/54
Nasal congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/54
ConvulsionNervous system disorders9/54
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations8/54
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders8/54
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders7/54

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(months)Ganaxolone
Mean13.4 ± 6.38
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ganaxolone
Female32
Male22
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ganaxolone
Hispanic or Latino7
Not Hispanic or Latino47
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ganaxolone
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian6
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American8
White33
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported7
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Mattel Children's Hospital at UCLA
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Children's National Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20010, United States
  • Miami Children's Hospital, The Brain Institute
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Child Neurology Center of Nrothwest Florida, P.A.
    Pensacola, Florida 32504, United States
  • University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Minnesota Epilepsy Group, P.A.
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center- Albert Einstein College of Medicine
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
  • Dallas Pediatric Neurology Associates
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00442104
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 1, 2007
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Completion
Mar 2009
Results posted
Jun 2, 2023
Last update
May 28, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ganaxolone

Start the discussion