ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05323734Updated Jul 11, 2025Results posted

Adjunctive GNX Treatment Compared With Placebo in Children and Adults With TSC-related Epilepsy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ganaxolone and Placebo in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 63 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-11.

Sponsored by Marinus Pharmaceuticals (part of Immedica Pharma) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
129
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Year to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive GNX treatment in children and adults with TSC-related epilepsy. The study consists of a 4-week prospective Baseline phase, defined as the first 28 days following screening, followed by a double-blind phase consisting of a 4-week titration period (Day 1 to Day 28) and a 12-week maintenance period (Day 29 to Week 16).

02

Conditions studied

  • Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Related Epilepsy
  • Ganaxolone
  • Adjunctive
03

In context

Tuberous Sclerosis

115 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberous Sclerosis; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 129 is above the median of 52 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Tuberous Sclerosis.

Browse Tuberous Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Marinus Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (100%) have results posted.

First submitted before Marinus Pharmaceuticals became part of Immedica Pharma.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical or mutational diagnosis of TSC consistent with:

    1. Molecular confirmation of a pathogenic mutation in TSC1 or TSC2. A pathogenic mutation is defined as a mutation that clearly prevents protein synthesis and/or inactivates the function of the TSC1 or TSC2 proteins (eg, nonsense mutation or frameshift mutations, large genomic deletions) or is a missense mutation whose effect on protein function has been established by functional assessment. The Principal investigator (PI) or designee must review the results of the genetic analysis and confirm that the causal relationship to the epilepsy syndrome is likely. OR
    2. Clinical diagnosis of definite TSC which includes 2 major features or 1 major feature with ≥ 2 minor features.
  2. Male or female participants aged 1 through 65 years, inclusive. For Europe (EU), Middle East and North Africa (MENA), and Oceania (OC) Male or Female participants aged 2 through 65 years, inclusive.
  3. Participant/parent(s) or LAR(s) willing to give written /assent, after being properly informed of the nature and risks of the study and prior to engaging in any study related procedures. If the participant is not qualified nor able to provide written informed consent based on age, developmental stage, intellectual capacity, or other factors, parent(s)/LAR(s) must provide consent for study participation, if appropriate.
  4. Failure to control seizures despite appropriate trial of 2 or more Anti-seizure medication (ASMs) at therapeutic doses and for adequate duration of treatment per PI judgment.
  5. Participants should be on a stable regimen of ASMs (including moderate or strong inducer or inhibitor ASM eg, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) at therapeutic doses for ≥ 28 days prior to the screening visit, and without a foreseeable change in dosing for the duration of the study. (Note: Minor dose adjustment to address tolerability and safety events may be allowed on case-by-case basis and it should be discussed with the study medical monitor.)
  6. A history of at least 8 countable seizures per month in the 2 months prior to screening with no more than 1 seizure free week in each month. This includes seizures of any kind.
  7. Have at least 8 primary endpoint seizures in the first 28 days following the screening visit.

    The primary endpoint seizure types are defined as the following:

    1. focal motor seizures without impairment of consciousness or awareness
    2. focal seizures with impairment of consciousness or awareness with motor features
    3. focal seizures evolving to bilateral, tonic-clonic seizures
    4. generalized motor seizures including tonic-clonic, bilateral tonic, bilateral clonic, or atonic/drop seizures.

    Seizures that do not count towards the primary endpoint include:

    1. Focal or generalized nonmotor seizures (eg, absence seizures or focal nonmotor seizures with or without impairment of awareness)
    2. Infantile or epileptic spasms
    3. Myoclonic seizures.
  8. Participants with surgically implanted vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) will be allowed to enter the study provided that all of the following conditions are met:

    1. The VNS has been in place for ≥ 6 months prior to the screening visit.
    2. The settings must have remained constant for 3 months prior to the screening visit and are expected to remain constant throughout the study.
    3. The battery is expected to last for the duration of the study.
  9. Parent(s)/caregiver(s)/LAR(s) or the participant, as appropriate, is (are) willing and able to maintain an accurate and complete daily seizure eDiary for the duration of the study.
  10. Willing and able to take IP (suspension) as directed with food (TID).
  11. Women of (WOCBP) must be using a medically acceptable method of and have a negative quantitative serum beta-human chorionic growth hormone (β-HCG) test collected at the initial screening and Baseline visits.Childbearing potential is defined as a female who is biologically capable of becoming pregnant. A medically acceptable method of birth control includes intrauterine devices (that have been in place for at least 1 month prior to the screening visit), hormonal contraceptives (eg, combined oral contraceptives, patch, vaginal ring, injectables, and implants), and surgical sterilization (such as oophorectomy or tubal ligation. When used consistently and correctly, "double-barrier" methods of contraception can be used as an effective alternative to highly effective contraception methods. Contraceptive measures such as Plan B™, sold for emergency use after unprotected sex, are not acceptable methods for routine use.
  12. Male participants must agree to use highly effective contraceptive methods during the study and for 30 days after the last dose of IP. Highly effective methods of contraception include surgical sterilization (such as a vasectomy) and adequate "double-barrier" methods.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous exposure to GNX.
  2. Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  3. Participants who have been taking felbamate for less than 1 year prior to screening.
  4. Participants taking cannabidiol (CBD) preparations other than Epidiolex.
  5. A positive result on plasma drug screen for CBD or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) at Visit 1 (screening), with the exception of results that are fully explained by Epidiolex, which can be adjusted by the investigator in the event of any Adverse events (AEs).
  6. Concurrent use of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), prednisone or other is not permitted, nor use of the strong inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 (), rifampin and St John's Wort. Participants on ACTH, prednisone, or other systemically (non-inhaled or topical) administered steroids should be off the product > 28 days prior to screening. Rifampin and St John's Wort must be discontinued at least 28 days before Visit 2, study drug initiation.

    Note:

    1. Use of concomitant intranasal or pro re nata (PRN) topical steroids for dermatologic reactions and allergic rhinitis are allowed during the study.
    2. This exclusion criterion does not prohibit the use of approved ASMs.
  7. Changes in any chronic medications within the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit. All chronic concomitant medications must be relatively stable in dose for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit unless otherwise noted. Small dose adjustment to manage tolerability and safety events is permitted and should be discussed with the study medical monitor.
  8. Participants who have epilepsy surgery planned during the study or who have undergone surgery for epilepsy within the 6 months prior to screening.
  9. An active central nervous system (CNS) infection, demyelinating disease, degenerative neurological disease, or CNS disease deemed progressive as evaluated by brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This includes tumor growth which in the opinion of the investigator could affect primary endpoint seizure control.
  10. Any disease or condition (medical or surgical; other than TSC) at the screening visit that might compromise the hematologic, cardiovascular (including any cardiac conduction defect), pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal, or hepatic systems; or other conditions that might interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the IP, or would place the participant at increased risk or interfere with the assessment of safety/efficacy. This may include any illness in the past 4 weeks which in the opinion of the investigator may affect seizure frequency.
  11. Hepatic impairment sufficient to affect participant safety, or an (AST)/ serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/ serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) > 3 × the (ULN) at screening or Baseline visits and confirmed by a repeat test.
  12. Biliary impairment sufficient to affect participant safety, or total levels > 1.5 × ULN at screening or Baseline visit and confirmed by a repeat test. In cases of Gilbert's Syndrome, resulting in stable levels of total bilirubin greater than ULN, the medical monitor can determine if a protocol exception can be made
  13. Renal impairment sufficient to affect participant safety, or estimated (eGFR) \< 30 milliliter per minute (mL/min) (calculated using the formula or Pediatric GFR calculator or Bedside Schwartz), will be excluded from study entry or will be discontinued if the criterion is met post Baseline. Cases of temporary renal insufficiency should be discussed with the medical monitor to determine the participant's study continuation.
  14. Exposed to any other drug or investigational device within 30 days or fewer than 5 half-lives prior to the screening visit. For therapies in which half-life cannot be readily established, the Sponsor's Medical Monitor should be consulted.
  15. Unwillingness to avoid excessive alcohol use throughout the study.
  16. Have active suicidal plan/intent, active suicidal thoughts or a suicide attempt in the past 6 months.
  17. Known sensitivity or allergy to any component in the IP(s), progesterone, or other related steroid compounds.
  18. Participants deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, or for psychiatric treatment, or participants admitted to a health or social services facility for purposes other than research.
  19. Participants receiving traditional Chinese medicine therapies within the prior 28 days of the screening.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
129 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ganaxolone (GNX)

    oral suspension, 3 times a day (TID)

    Drug: Ganaxolone

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo matching GNX

    oral suspension, TID

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • GNX will be administered

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be administered

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Primary Seizure Type During Double Blind Period

    Primary seizures include atonic/drop, bilateral clonic, bilateral tonic, focal motor with altered awareness, focal motor with intact awareness, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, focal with hypotonia impaired awareness, and generalized tonic-clonic. Seizure frequency was calculated as the total number of seizures divided by the number of days with seizure data in the period, multiplied by 28. Percent change from Baseline in 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as follows for each participant: post-baseline 28-day seizure frequency minus baseline 28-day seizure frequency whole divided by baseline 28-day seizure frequency and multiplied by 100.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Were Considered as Treatment Responders During Double Blind Period

    Treatment responders are defined as those participants with ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline in primary seizure type frequency during the given period.

    Time frame: Up to 16 weeks

  2. Number of Responders to Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver

    The CGI-I is a 7-point Likert scale that the parent(s)/caregiver(s)/ legally authorized representative (LAR) and clinician uses to rate the change in overall seizure control, behavior, safety, and tolerability after initiation of the IP relative to baseline (prior to treatment with the IP). The participant was rated as follows: 1 - very much improved, 2 - much improved, 3 - minimally improved, 4 - no change, 5 - minimally worse, 6 - much worse, and 7 - very much worse. Higher scores indicated worse condition. Number of responders to each score on the scale has been presented.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through 16 weeks

  3. Number of Responders to Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale as Assessed by Clinician

    The CGI-I is a 7-point Likert scale that the parent(s)/caregiver(s)/ LAR and clinician uses to rate the change in overall seizure control, behavior, safety, and tolerability after initiation of the IP relative to baseline (prior to treatment with the IP). The participant was rated as follows: 1 - very much improved, 2 - much improved, 3 - minimally improved, 4 - no change, 5 - minimally worse, 6 - much worse, and 7 - very much worse. Number of responders to each score on the scale has been presented.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) through 16 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 11, 2025

Participant flow

This was a Phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive Ganaxolone treatment in children and adults with TSC-related epilepsy.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGanaxolonePlacebo
Started6465
Completed5560
Not completed95
Withdrew: Adverse event52
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Participant withdrawn due01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Primary Seizure Type During Double Blind Period

Primary seizures include atonic/drop, bilateral clonic, bilateral tonic, focal motor with altered awareness, focal motor with intact awareness, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, focal with hypotonia impaired awareness, and generalized tonic-clonic. Seizure frequency was calculated as the total number of seizures divided by the number of days with seizure data in the period, multiplied by 28. Percent change from Baseline in 28-day seizure frequency was calculated as follows for each participant: post-baseline 28-day seizure frequency minus baseline 28-day seizure frequency whole divided by baseline 28-day seizure frequency and multiplied by 100.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1), Day 28
Reported as:
Mean · Percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Primary Seizure Type During Double Blind Period
Percent changeGanaxoloneMatching Placebo
Percent Change From Baseline in 28-day Seizure Frequency for Primary Seizure Type During Double Blind Period-7.50 ± 60.43013.57 ± 77.374
Statistical analysis
  • Ganaxolone vs Matching Placebo · Wilcoxon Rank-Sum · p = 0.0904 · Median difference (final values): -14.53 · 95% CI -32.04 to 2.48The Hodges-Lehmann approach is applied for estimating 95% confidence interval.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Were Considered as Treatment Responders During Double Blind Period

Treatment responders are defined as those participants with ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline in primary seizure type frequency during the given period.

Time frame:
Up to 16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Were Considered as Treatment Responders During Double Blind Period
ParticipantsGanaxoloneMatching Placebo
Number of Participants Who Were Considered as Treatment Responders During Double Blind Period128
Statistical analysis
  • Ganaxolone vs Matching Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.3407 · Difference in percentage: 6.4 · 95% CI -6.4 to 20.1
SecondaryNumber of Responders to Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver

The CGI-I is a 7-point Likert scale that the parent(s)/caregiver(s)/ legally authorized representative (LAR) and clinician uses to rate the change in overall seizure control, behavior, safety, and tolerability after initiation of the IP relative to baseline (prior to treatment with the IP). The participant was rated as follows: 1 - very much improved, 2 - much improved, 3 - minimally improved, 4 - no change, 5 - minimally worse, 6 - much worse, and 7 - very much worse. Higher scores indicated worse condition. Number of responders to each score on the scale has been presented.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) through 16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Responders to Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver
ParticipantsGanaxoloneMatching Placebo
Very Much Improved58
Much Improved1615
Minimally Improved1412
No Change1919
Minimally Worse24
Much Worse20
Very Much Worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Ganaxolone vs Matching Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.7069 · Odds ratio (or): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.46 to 1.70The estimated odds ratio of the ganaxolone group compared to the placebo group based on proportional odds logistic regression with treatment as a factor.
SecondaryNumber of Responders to Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale as Assessed by Clinician

The CGI-I is a 7-point Likert scale that the parent(s)/caregiver(s)/ LAR and clinician uses to rate the change in overall seizure control, behavior, safety, and tolerability after initiation of the IP relative to baseline (prior to treatment with the IP). The participant was rated as follows: 1 - very much improved, 2 - much improved, 3 - minimally improved, 4 - no change, 5 - minimally worse, 6 - much worse, and 7 - very much worse. Number of responders to each score on the scale has been presented.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1) through 16 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Responders to Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale as Assessed by Clinician
ParticipantsGanaxoloneMatching Placebo
Very Much Improved03
Much Improved1413
Minimally Improved1211
No Change2225
Minimally Worse21
Much Worse10
Very Much Worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Ganaxolone vs Matching Placebo · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.6434 · Odds ratio (or): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.42 to 1.72The estimated odds ratio of the ganaxolone group compared to the placebo group based on proportional odds logistic regression with treatment as a factor.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 16 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ganaxolone0/64 (0%)5/64 (7.8%)58/64 (90.6%)
Matching Placebo0/65 (0%)6/65 (9.2%)49/65 (75.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGanaxoloneMatching Placebo
ErysipelasInfections and infestations1/640/65
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/641/65
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/641/65
Pneumonia AspirationInfections and infestations1/641/65
SeizureNervous system disorders1/641/65
CellulitisInfections and infestations0/641/65
Craniocerebral InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/641/65
Respiratory FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/641/65
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 44
Most frequent other events
EventGanaxoloneMatching Placebo
SomnolenceNervous system disorders18/6411/65
PyrexiaGeneral disorders10/6411/65
SeizureNervous system disorders9/648/65
FatigueGeneral disorders9/646/65
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/642/65
Decreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/644/65
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/643/65
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations3/646/65
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/644/65
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/644/65

Baseline characteristics

Safety Analysis Set comprised of all randomized participants who receive at least 1 dose of the investigational product (IP).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)GanaxoloneMatching PlaceboTotal
Mean14.7 ± 11.016.1 ± 11.215.4 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GanaxoloneMatching PlaceboTotal
Female362965
Male283664
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GanaxoloneMatching PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino9918
Not Hispanic or Latino5255107
Unknown or Not Reported314
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GanaxoloneMatching PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian121123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American729
White414889
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported347
08

Study locations

63 sites
  • Arkansas Children's Research Institute
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, TSC Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Orange County
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • University of California, San Diego
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Childrens Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Nemours Children's Hospital - Delaware Valley
    Wilmington, Delaware 19803, United States
  • University of Florida Gainesville
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Nemours Children's Health
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20817, United States
  • Mayo Clinic - Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Children's Mercy Hosptial
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Atrium Health/Levine Children's Hospital
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28207, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27712, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Penn State Children's Hospital
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38103, United States
  • Child Neurology Consultants of Austin (CNCA)
    Austin, Texas 78757, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75207, United States
  • McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Utah Health Care-Pediatric Neurology
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, United States
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
    Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia
  • Austin Health
    Heidelberg, 3084, Australia
  • Alfred Health
    Melbourne, 3004, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Parkville, 3050, Australia
  • Hôtel Dieu de Montréal - CHUM
    Montreal, H2X 0C2, Canada
  • CHU Sainte-Justine
    Montreal, H3T 1C5, Canada
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada
  • Toronto Western Hospital
    Toronto, M5T 2S8, Canada
  • BC Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, V6H 3V4, Canada
  • First Hospital of Jilin University
    Changchun, Jilin 130028, China
  • Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital
    Jiangxi, Nanchang City 330000, China
  • Beijing Children Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Xicheng District 100045, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University
    Guiyang, Yunyan District 550004, China
  • Peking University First Hospital
    Beijing, 100034, China
  • Chinese PLA General Hospital
    Beijing, 100080, China
  • Chengdu's Women and Children's Central Hospital
    Chengdu, 610000, China
  • University Hospital of Lyon
    Bron, 69229, France
  • University Hospital of Rennes
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • University of Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67084, France
  • Epilepsie-Zentrum Bethel - Krankenhaus Mara
    Bielefeld, 33617, Germany
  • University Hospital Bonn
    Bonn, 53127, Germany
  • ZNN - Epilepsiezentrum Frankfurt am Main
    Frankfurt, 60528, Germany
  • Universitäts Krankenhaus Freiburg
    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Herdecke
    Herdecke, 58313, Germany
  • Epilepsiezentrum Kleinwachau gGmbH
    Radeberg, 01454, Germany
  • Schneider Children´s Medical Center
    Petah Tikva, 4920235, Israel
  • Sheba Medical Center
    Tel Litwinsky, 52621, Israel
  • Department of Neurology and Sense Organs, AOU Policlinico di Bari
    Bari, 1170124, Italy
  • Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit - University of Genoa
    Genova, 16147, Italy
  • Policlinico Umberto I
    Rome, 00185, Italy
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
    Barcelona, 08950, Spain
  • Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús
    Madrid, 28009, Spain
  • Hospital Ruber International
    Madrid, 28034, Spain
  • Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
  • Bristol Royal Hospital for Children
    Bristol, BS2 8AE, United Kingdom
  • NHS acute tertiary referral centre, John Radcliffe Hospital
    Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
  • Salford Royal Hospital
    Salford, M6 8HD, United Kingdom
  • Sheffield Children's Hospital
    Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05323734
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 12, 2022
Start date
Apr 1, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 9, 2024
Completion
Oct 14, 2024
Results posted
Jul 11, 2025
Last update
Jul 11, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ganaxolone

Start the discussion